Prateek Alsi

262 posts

Prateek Alsi banner
Prateek Alsi

Prateek Alsi

@PrateekAlsi

Partner at @tribecap, Former Partner @GeneralCatalyst. Previously building at @Square

San Francisco, CA Katılım Kasım 2011
4.5K Takip Edilen820 Takipçiler
Gokul Rajaram
Gokul Rajaram@gokulr·
Net hiring at most 1000+ person companies (AI labs are exception) is already zero or negative. Most CEOs know their companies are bloated and don’t need as many people, especially with AI driving a step change in productivity. Leaders will start by keeping headcount flat, but as AI capabilities compound and small teams outperform larger ones, major cuts are inevitable.
TBPN@tbpn

"The reality is, nobody's hiring." Marathon Founding Partner @gokulr reacts to the Block layoffs and predicts that over the next 18 months, every public company is going to have a 30%+ cut because of AI: "If they don’t, I question their leadership."

English
21
10
146
59.7K
Keith Rabois
Keith Rabois@rabois·
This.
Ian Cassel@iancassel

So good by @GavinSBaker In Michael Jordan’s second to last year with the Chicago Bulls, Jerry Krause, GM of the Bulls said, “Listen players don’t win championships, organizations do. It isn’t just Jordan or Pippen. It’s how we scout, draft, train, it’s our system." Well… after Michael Jordan left they never won another championship. The thing allocators struggle with is it feels safe and good to say there is a process and its repeatable. Yes, it is important to have a process that is repeatable that works for you, but any process that is repeatable that generates significant alpha will be quickly arbed away in a competitive world. So where does repeatable outperformance come from? I would submit that any investment organization no matter how big, there are somewhere between 2-10 people where if you took those people out, and that organization would have the exact same process, the results would be dramatically different. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/cap…

English
7
2
199
87.9K
Jason Del Rey
Jason Del Rey@DelRey·
Man, I covered Square and Jack for a long time… Quick thoughts: Jack would be one of my first guesses as a ceo who would do this Same goes for severance packages of that size Like many tho, skeptical of how much is truly ai-related vs bloat emanating from creation of Block
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
9
2
75
25.6K
Prateek Alsi
Prateek Alsi@PrateekAlsi·
It begins!
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
0
0
0
87
Prateek Alsi retweetledi
jack
jack@jack·
we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack
English
8.8K
6.6K
50.9K
64.2M
Mamoon Hamid
Mamoon Hamid@mamoonha·
It's no secret that Qasar Younis is a generational founder building an N‑of‑1 company at Applied Intuition. Congrats on all your success, @qasar and Peter. forbes.com/sites/iainmart…
English
2
7
111
10.1K
Ankur Goyal
Ankur Goyal@ankrgyl·
This was a ton of fun and a window into the type of conversations @martin_casado have regularly.
a16z@a16z

.@braintrust is building the infrastructure for production AI. We're very excited to be backing their Series B. CEO Ankur Goyal joined a16z's Martin Casado to cover how systems engineering stacks up against the bitter lesson, why Chinese models are gaining ground faster than spending suggests, whether AI demand will eventually saturate, and more. 00:00 Introduction 03:10 What "evals" actually mean (hypotheses and the scientific method) 07:34 AI is continuous, systems are discrete 08:29 The bitter lesson: universal function approximators vs. engineering 11:58 Engineering the harness, not the model 17:47 Chinese models: high token usage, low dollar share 20:37 Why open source models aren't dominating yet 27:08 Frontier labs, infinite capital, and scaling limits 30:38 Demand-side saturation: enterprises can't absorb better models 38:47 Bash vs. SQL for agents: "the results are comical" @ankrgyl @martin_casado

English
2
0
31
7.8K
Avichal - Electric ϟ Capital
Monster business! Excited to see Kraken kick off IPO season when they go out. Well deserved success - congrats @arjunsethi, @DavidLRipley, @jespow and the entire @krakenfx team!
Kraken@krakenfx

Today, we’re announcing Payward’s FY 2025 financial results—and alongside them, a clearer articulation of Payward’s role as the unified infrastructure layer powering Kraken and a growing family of products, including @NinjaTrader, @breakoutprop , @xStocksFi, and future products yet to be launched. Payward enables each product to be purpose-built for a specific customer segment, regulatory regime, and use case, while operating on shared foundations: ∙ One global liquidity pool ∙ One risk & margin engine ∙ One collateral & settlement system ∙ One compliance & licensing framework Beginning in 2025, Payward has taken on a more explicit role as the infrastructure layer supporting multiple product surfaces and interfaces. Last was a year defined by execution: shipping across the entire product suite, launching, scaling, and integrating at a pace that reflected both operational maturity and long-term conviction. Growth was driven by strong core product momentum and meaningful contributions from recent acquisitions. 📈 FY 2025 highlights: ∙$2.2B adjusted revenue (+33% YoY) ∙$531M adjusted EBITDA (+26% YoY) ∙$2.0T platform transaction volume (+34% YoY) ∙$48.2B assets on platform (+11% YoY) ∙ 5.7M funded accounts (+50% YoY) ∙ Futures DARTs up 119%, driven by NinjaTrader and Breakout integration FY 2025 established a new baseline for Payward’s scale, earnings power, and long-term ambition. Learn more 👇 blog.kraken.com/news/kraken-20…

English
5
0
33
5.2K
Max Junestrand
Max Junestrand@MaxJunestrand·
I’m ecstatic to welcome David Eckstein to Legora as our Chief Financial Officer. David brings an incredible track record of helping technology companies scale at pivotal moments - just like the one we’re in right now. legora.com/newsroom/legor…
English
8
9
107
27.4K
Gokul Rajaram
Gokul Rajaram@gokulr·
Absolutely loved my conversation with @Patrickoshag - he has the unique ability to: (a) unearth a nugget of insight out of a specific comment and dig 10x deeper into it, and (b) make his guests feel extremely comfortable through his demeanor, as if with a long-time friend. One of my favorite conversations, with someone I've admired for a long time.
Patrick OShaughnessy@patrick_oshag

.@gokulr is one of the most prolific product builders and investors of the last 20 years. He helped build the core ads and product businesses at Google, Facebook, Square, and DoorDash, working directly with many of this generation's best founders and CEOs. He's also invested in more than 700 companies giving him an unusually broad view into how products are built and scaled. Gokul has an incredible ability to give precise and prescriptive advice on how to build products, particularly in AI, and he explains his thinking so clearly that you come away knowing exactly how to apply it. We talk about why judgment is the only thing he believes is truly AI-proof, why Zendesk and Slack are more exposed than Salesforce and NetSuite, and what AI-native startups must do to move customers and their data off legacy systems. We cover everything he's learned from building the most important ads businesses, including the only three ways an ad business can make money, and why ChatGPT may be even more powerful than Google or Facebook for highly targeted ads. He also shares inside stories from Larry and Sergey, Zuck, Jack Dorsey, and Tony Xu, about how each of them approaches product, design, and communication. Enjoy! Timestamps: 0:00 Intro 0:35 The Changing Nature of Product Development 4:09 The Merger of Product and Design 4:54 Managing Non-Deterministic Software 9:06 Judgment: The Future-Proof Human Skill 10:41 Building Durable AI Applications 16:43 The Risk to Legacy Software Companies 21:20 Sources of Stickiness in the Age of AI 23:43 Leadership Lessons from Google 27:41 Learning from Mark Zuckerberg 31:16 Jack Dorsey and the Philosophy of Great Design 35:48 The Product Manager as Editor 40:44 Three Pillars of a Successful Ads Business 49:03 Selecting North Star and Check Metrics 56:04 Hiring Functional Experts for the AI Era 1:00:06 Advice for Managing a Career 1:01:33 Evaluating Founder Authenticity 1:05:20 Best Practices for Board Management 1:11:15 The Kindest Thing

English
14
21
235
50.9K
JD Ross
JD Ross@justindross·
My last company, Opendoor ($7B), replaced real estate brokers. Today, my new company WithCoverage raised $42M to replace insurance brokers. It was led by Sequoia & Khosla, the first time @RoelofBotha and @Rabois partnered since PayPal.
English
753
534
4.4K
1.8M
Shishir
Shishir@shishirmehrotra·
I’m excited to share that I’m joining @Walmart’s Board of Directors! Walmart has a long history of innovation, and I’m thrilled to join them at a transformational period as we build for an agentic AI future. I have long admired how the company leads with people and uses technology to serve them, which is a rare approach at this scale. corporate.walmart.com/news/2026/01/0…
English
23
9
279
40.5K
Niko Bonatsos
Niko Bonatsos@bonatsos·
After 15 wonderful years @generalcatalyst I am moving on to new adventures. The best days for GC are ahead! Super grateful to every single one of my teammates that I had the fortune to work with over the years. I learned a lot. Very thankful to our limited partners too for their long-term support. Equally importantly, it's been the privilege of a lifetime to work with so many inspiring tech startup founders from the very early days.
English
271
23
1.6K
326.7K
Prateek Alsi
Prateek Alsi@PrateekAlsi·
@DannyCrichton I thought the original restaurant was in Taipei. Didn’t they start as a cooking oil shop?
English
1
0
1
22
David Ulevitch 🇺🇸
My short take is that people who want to get married, get married. My longer take is: Many of my single friends (mostly the women) have a hard time differentiating between filtering criteria and selection criteria. It's important to SELECT for values / goals / competency, etc. It's fine to FILTER for income / looks / etc. at the top of the funnel but SELECTING on those things is risky. If you aren't getting what you want, you can adjust and widen your filters but not compromise on selection. A lot of people don't understand the difference between filtering and selecting.
The Wall Street Journal@WSJ

American women have never been this resigned to staying single. The challenges of finding a romantic partner have been made more complicated by a growing divide in education and career prospects between men and women. 🔗 Read more: on.wsj.com/448WoC4

English
343
712
11.4K
2.9M
Ian Cinnamon
Ian Cinnamon@IanCinnamon·
This $200M Series C investment round is a massive vote of confidence from our backers— as demand for our bus platforms has exponentially increased, as are also seeing the underlying need for space based capabilities growing rapidly. With this capital, we are excited to double down on supporting the needs of the US and allied warfighter as well as critical commercial applications. Go Apex!
Apex 🛰@ApexSpacecraft

We have closed another round of funding to scale production and meet demand for satellite platforms for critical projects like Golden Dome. This $200M Series C funding is led by @p72vc and co-led by @8vc, alongside @a16z, @WashingHarbour, @stepstonegroup. spacenews.com/apex-raises-20…

English
22
10
158
31.1K