Present Tense

28.2K posts

Present Tense banner
Present Tense

Present Tense

@PresentTense22

Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.

Cleveland Katılım Ekim 2022
4.8K Takip Edilen810 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Present Tense
Present Tense@PresentTense22·
Never gets old
English
7
3
12
2.6K
Present Tense retweetledi
Nick shirley
Nick shirley@nickshirleyy·
If you look into California's budget surplus and deficit, it enters a deficit after 2022. What happened? Medi-Cal budgets have increased exponentially year by year. California went from a $47 billion surplus in 2021 to a $55 billion deficit in 2024. This is one of the major factors why the fraud is in the billions and why the hospice and home health fraud schemes have run rampant and unchecked for so long. Imagine all the other fraud taking place inside Medi-Cal… Like and share this to show others the mismanagement of our tax dollars!
Nick shirley tweet media
English
40
279
1.1K
19.2K
Present Tense retweetledi
Nick shirley
Nick shirley@nickshirleyy·
This is why California’s fraud is so massive: Just look at their Medi-Cal budget vs Medi-Cal enrollment and population In 2022 the budget was $108 B and this year it will be $222 B, for what? Their population and enrollment hasn’t increased exponentially but their spending has more than doubled. Prime example of fraud, waste and abuse of taxpayer dollars.
Nick shirley tweet media
English
118
706
2.6K
46.9K
Present Tense retweetledi
Barstool Sports
Barstool Sports@barstoolsports·
When you grow up watching LeBron instead of Jordan
English
254
235
4.5K
854.2K
Present Tense retweetledi
Present Tense retweetledi
MAGA Voice
MAGA Voice@MAGAVoice·
BREAKING 🚨 President Trump just reposted me exposing Nancy FEDsurrection Pelosi. HUGE 🔥 Thank You Mr President, MAGA has your back
MAGA Voice tweet media
English
112
2.2K
5.5K
42.6K
Present Tense retweetledi
Gunther Eagleman™
Gunther Eagleman™@GuntherEagleman·
🚨 LOOMER ON THE PROWL AGAIN, Laura Loomer exposed Jeffrey Anderson months ago and DC pretended it didn’t exist. Now @SenateForeign, @SenatorRisch, and @JohnCornyn are pulling a fast one on the American people: A surprise hearing just 4 days away, nominees still NOT listed on the website because comms head @SuzWrasse is holding it until the absolute last second.
Laura Loomer@LauraLoomer

🚨 SHADY SENATE HEARING SCHEME EXPOSED 🚨 The @SenateForeign Relations Committee has scheduled a nomination hearing for Thursday, March 26 and they are REFUSING to release the nominee list in advance. Instead, their website says: “Nominees will be added.” That is DC code for 👉 Drop the names at the last minute 👉 Avoid scrutiny 👉 Hope nobody is paying attention And based on what I am hearing, that is exactly what is happening. Multiple sources indicate that Jeffrey Anderson, Trump’s nominee to the UN’s International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), is expected to be quietly added to that list. This is a MASSIVE problem. I previously exposed Anderson, and here’s a list of what I uncovered: 🚨 Donations to anti Trump candidates, including Nikki Haley 🚨 Contributions to multiple Democrats 🚨 Past support for abortion 🚨 Praise of Joe Biden 🚨 Attacks on the Second Amendment 🚨 Anti capitalism rhetoric Then I exposed something even more serious. Anderson was sitting on $426,000 in federal tax liens spanning years. Shortly after I exposed him, he suddenly paid off his tax liens, and the IRS released his liens. But by then, the damage was already done. He had already submitted his 278e financial disclosure to Congress and left that massive tax liability off of the liabilities section. Let that sink in. A nominee for an international post with six figure tax liens decided to not disclose them to Congress. And now he is about to get a hearing! Anderson has refused to respond to any of my reporting. Instead, he went on LinkedIn to complain that the nomination process was too slow. Now he may be getting fast tracked next week while the committee hides the nominee list until the last possible second. This is how bad nominees get pushed through. No transparency No accountability No real vetting And if this goes through, Anderson will represent the United States on global aviation policy. That is unacceptable. @SenateForeign Chairman @SenatorRisch needs to step in immediately. No last minute additions No backdoor scheduling No rubber stamping controversial nominees The American people deserve to know who is being considered ahead of this hearing IMMEDIATELY, and President Trump deserves a Senate that fights to protect him against bad actors. Read my previous report here: loomered.com/2025/09/02/vet…

English
26
459
726
21.1K
Present Tense retweetledi
Lara Logan
Lara Logan@laralogan·
Absolutely brilliant - great find. Here it is in their own words - one standard for others, no standard for us. “The SAVE America Act asks Americans to do less than what NDI demands of Nicaragua, less than what NDI praises in Morocco, and far less than the biometric fingerprint-and-facial-recognition system NDI supervised in Nigeria. Eighty-four percent of Americans support photo ID to vote. Two-thirds of Democrats support it. Jimmy Carter's own 2005 bipartisan commission recommended it. You voted no. Your party's international arm, funded with taxpayer money, chaired by your party's former Senate leader (Tom Daschle), staffed by your party's most prominent voting-rights advocate, says yes. For everyone else. NDI's guides are publicly available on their website. You might consider reading them before you spout mindless drivel to protect your own grift.”
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican

Hello Representative Levin, I'd like to introduce you to an organization called the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs. NDI is one of the four core institutes of the National Endowment for Democracy, established by Congress in 1983. It is the Democratic Party's official international arm. Its board members include Stacey Abrams, Donna Brazile, and Michael McFaul. Its previous chair was Madeleine Albright, who served until her death in 2022. Also on the board: Eric Kessler, founder of Arabella Advisors, the largest dark money network in Democratic politics. NDI reported $181.5 million in revenue in fiscal year 2023, nearly all in government grants. NDI's mission, for four decades, has been to tell countries around the world how to run democratic elections. And what NDI consistently tells them, across dozens of countries, is that voter identification is a fundamental pillar of election integrity, and that proving citizenship is a basic prerequisite for participation. Here is what NDI has demanded of other countries: NDI's foundational guide, Building Confidence in the Voter Registration Process (2001), describes voter ID systems as standard democratic infrastructure. It states that voter registries should contain "voters' photographs and even their fingerprints" and that registered voters should be issued "a voter or other ID card that serves as proof of their right to vote." NDI explains that "issuing ID cards, either national or voting, requires a second point of contact between election officials and voters, which introduces an additional safeguard into the system." (pp. 10–11, 15) NDI's 2015 study of voter registration across the Middle East and North Africa goes further, laying out that voters must "prove their identity, essentially demonstrating that they are who they say they are" and must "affirm their citizenship and age." (p. 11) That same 2001 guide identifies married name changes as a routine voter roll maintenance challenge: "Election officials must update information about people who have moved or who have married and changed their surname." NDI also notes that voter lists "may omit information about changes of address or name for those eligible people who have recently moved or married." NDI's recommendation is not to eliminate voter ID. It is to maintain clean, continuously updated voter rolls that accommodate name changes within the system. In its 2009 Bangladesh report, NDI praised the country's new photo-voter list and national ID card system, noting that the ID cards gave "a sense of empowerment and belonging to the disadvantaged and marginalized people of the country, particularly women." Read that again. NDI itself called voter identification empowering for WOMEN! In every case, NDI's position was identical: marriage-related name changes are a solvable administrative problem. The solution is better record-keeping and updated systems. Not fewer safeguards. Not the elimination of voter ID. Your party's own international arm has already solved the problem you bring up. The answer is: maintain the rolls. Update the records. Issue the IDs. Accommodate name changes within the system, don't use them as a reason to have no system at all. The exact opposite of what you push here - refusing to clean voter rolls. By NDI’s own standards, by the standards of your own international soft power branch, YOUR position is the anti-feminist position. The SAVE America Act asks Americans to do less than what NDI demands of Nicaragua, less than what NDI praises in Morocco, and far less than the biometric fingerprint-and-facial-recognition system NDI supervised in Nigeria. Eighty-four percent of Americans support photo ID to vote. Two-thirds of Democrats support it. Jimmy Carter's own 2005 bipartisan commission recommended it. You voted no. Your party's international arm, funded with taxpayer money, chaired by your party's former Senate leader (Tom Daschle), staffed by your party's most prominent voting-rights advocate, says yes. For everyone else. NDI's guides are publicly available on their website. You might consider reading them before you spout mindless drivel to protect your own grift.

English
16
757
1.5K
25.1K
Present Tense retweetledi
MOMof DataRepublican
MOMof DataRepublican@data_republican·
"just to cast a ballot" tells us exactly why you are not in favor of protecting the voting process. It's a trivial inconvience for people to get their records together, yet you consider it a hardship when people have to do a little bit of work to exercise the most important freedom that we have. And, if you're really worried about the cost, do your job and help them... grok it for them and find out where they can receive monetary assistance.
English
20
147
1.1K
7.8K
Present Tense retweetledi
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
Hello Representative Levin, I'd like to introduce you to an organization called the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs. NDI is one of the four core institutes of the National Endowment for Democracy, established by Congress in 1983. It is the Democratic Party's official international arm. Its board members include Stacey Abrams, Donna Brazile, and Michael McFaul. Its previous chair was Madeleine Albright, who served until her death in 2022. Also on the board: Eric Kessler, founder of Arabella Advisors, the largest dark money network in Democratic politics. NDI reported $181.5 million in revenue in fiscal year 2023, nearly all in government grants. NDI's mission, for four decades, has been to tell countries around the world how to run democratic elections. And what NDI consistently tells them, across dozens of countries, is that voter identification is a fundamental pillar of election integrity, and that proving citizenship is a basic prerequisite for participation. Here is what NDI has demanded of other countries: NDI's foundational guide, Building Confidence in the Voter Registration Process (2001), describes voter ID systems as standard democratic infrastructure. It states that voter registries should contain "voters' photographs and even their fingerprints" and that registered voters should be issued "a voter or other ID card that serves as proof of their right to vote." NDI explains that "issuing ID cards, either national or voting, requires a second point of contact between election officials and voters, which introduces an additional safeguard into the system." (pp. 10–11, 15) NDI's 2015 study of voter registration across the Middle East and North Africa goes further, laying out that voters must "prove their identity, essentially demonstrating that they are who they say they are" and must "affirm their citizenship and age." (p. 11) That same 2001 guide identifies married name changes as a routine voter roll maintenance challenge: "Election officials must update information about people who have moved or who have married and changed their surname." NDI also notes that voter lists "may omit information about changes of address or name for those eligible people who have recently moved or married." NDI's recommendation is not to eliminate voter ID. It is to maintain clean, continuously updated voter rolls that accommodate name changes within the system. In its 2009 Bangladesh report, NDI praised the country's new photo-voter list and national ID card system, noting that the ID cards gave "a sense of empowerment and belonging to the disadvantaged and marginalized people of the country, particularly women." Read that again. NDI itself called voter identification empowering for WOMEN! In every case, NDI's position was identical: marriage-related name changes are a solvable administrative problem. The solution is better record-keeping and updated systems. Not fewer safeguards. Not the elimination of voter ID. Your party's own international arm has already solved the problem you bring up. The answer is: maintain the rolls. Update the records. Issue the IDs. Accommodate name changes within the system, don't use them as a reason to have no system at all. The exact opposite of what you push here - refusing to clean voter rolls. By NDI’s own standards, by the standards of your own international soft power branch, YOUR position is the anti-feminist position. The SAVE America Act asks Americans to do less than what NDI demands of Nicaragua, less than what NDI praises in Morocco, and far less than the biometric fingerprint-and-facial-recognition system NDI supervised in Nigeria. Eighty-four percent of Americans support photo ID to vote. Two-thirds of Democrats support it. Jimmy Carter's own 2005 bipartisan commission recommended it. You voted no. Your party's international arm, funded with taxpayer money, chaired by your party's former Senate leader (Tom Daschle), staffed by your party's most prominent voting-rights advocate, says yes. For everyone else. NDI's guides are publicly available on their website. You might consider reading them before you spout mindless drivel to protect your own grift.
DataRepublican (small r) tweet mediaDataRepublican (small r) tweet mediaDataRepublican (small r) tweet media
English
312
3.6K
9.4K
200.9K
Kaitlan Collins
Kaitlan Collins@kaitlancollins·
“Over the course of three years, Mr. Mueller successfully prosecuted dozens of killers, helped bring down the homicide rate and showed grace in comforting survivors. He also answered his own telephone: ‘Mueller, homicide.’” nytimes.com/2026/03/21/us/…
English
187
203
1.4K
51.2K
Present Tense retweetledi
Buzz Patterson
Buzz Patterson@BuzzPatterson·
Do you think @SenSchumer has ever stood in a TSA line in his life?
Buzz Patterson tweet media
English
118
268
1.2K
14.4K
Present Tense retweetledi
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
The biggest irony: NDI vice chair Stacey Abrams co-led the Nigeria 2023 election observation mission. Its final report called biometric voter ID "the most important contribution to raising confidence in electoral integrity." She called Georgia's voter ID law "Jim Crow in a suit."
DataRepublican (small r) tweet mediaDataRepublican (small r) tweet mediaDataRepublican (small r) tweet media
English
26
654
2.2K
35.8K
Sherrod Brown
Sherrod Brown@SherrodBrown·
Whether you work a 9-5, deliver for Doordash, care for your family, or all of the above, I’m in this fight for you.
English
47
63
418
5.8K
Present Tense retweetledi
Gunther Eagleman™
Gunther Eagleman™@GuntherEagleman·
Nancy Pelosi staged J6 to cover up the stolen 2020 election.
English
546
3.4K
11.3K
141.5K