Potter

1.01 BEATEN 🤢 Princess Keri hit 1/100 in-running then this happened…

El mercado de fichajes más infravalorado de la historia. 🤯💰

DOVES | Pounding Some songs are simply enduring. Pounding is a perfect example. Absolutely sublime.

how insane was this marriage..... Billie Piper was 18 when she married the 35 year-old Chris Evans.

N heres what a sent back Dear Manchester United, Thank you for the reply — but with respect, it completely misses the point. You talk about frustration around the difficulty in securing away tickets. Let’s be honest: fans aren’t frustrated — they are furious. And with good reason. We’re not talking about one ticket here. Three tickets ended up in ineligible hands, circulated publicly on social media, and somehow we’re expected to believe this fits under “exceptional circumstances” and a “handful”? Meanwhile, ordinary supporters — the same people who travel up and down the country, take days off work, pay for trains, petrol, hotels, and get home at 3am from ridiculous kickoff times — are being suspended and banned for far less. You mention “investment” from partners like Adidas. What do you think ordinary fans do? We invest every single week. Not in boardroom numbers — but in time, money, and lifelong support. And unlike partners, that investment doesn’t come with corporate perks, hospitality, or immunity from the rules. It comes with loyalty, sacrifice, and actual presence in the stands. It is insulting to read the club proudly state that “no rules were broken” when supporters are punished on the spot for breaches that are far more minor than this. The club enforces strict collection rules, bans fans for missed pickups, and demands total adherence — yet here, where three tickets go to ineligible recipients and the whole thing becomes a PR circus online, the defence is simply: “it’s our prerogative.” That is exactly the problem. One rule for commercial partners. Another rule for the fans who have shown up for years without fail. And it’s not just the allocation. It’s the optics. The club was happy to put the images online for “likes” — while match-going fans are held to standards that partners can freely bypass without consequence. That is the very definition of double standards, no matter how it’s dressed up. If the club is comfortable saying partners can use their allocation “as they so wish,” then the club needs to be equally comfortable explaining why loyal fans are punished for anything that doesn’t align perfectly with policy. Because right now, what this incident really highlights is not policy — but hierarchy. And supporters have clearly been reminded where they sit in it. I urge you to reconsider how this incident is framed, because the message being sent to the fanbase is loud and clear: Corporate relationships matter more than the people who actually fill the away ends. For a club of Manchester United’s stature, that is nothing short of embarrassing. Regards, Melvyn