Sabitlenmiş Tweet
@Not_the_Bee @TheInsiderPaper 1) weird
2) cannot comprehend (stupid)
3) nuts
The magnificent triad of true merit, strength, and superiority that is always used by the good guys.
Got it! Definitely lands! 👏
English
Riley Chauvin-Duchesne
1.9K posts
Yes, Seth.
Pretend to think about it from an American's perspective. Trump ran on America first principles. During his 2nd term he has operated by nearly completely reversing his own core campaign promises.
Normal human beings are outraged by this sort of behavior, as it is betrayal. For discussion's sake try to concedethe point that normal people despise betrayal and that it is evil of the highest order.
A politician is supposed to represent the people and carry out their objectives byfulfilling their commitments which were laid out in order for them to win election. To lie, cheat, and engage in bloodshed is very much in line with the spirit of the antichrist. By bloodshed, I mean engaging in war--people die in war, and yes people in Iran are actual people created in the image of God, and so are the soldiers on our side who fight.
When held to account a good leader shouldn't attack their constituents for accountability.
Your point is intellecutally dishonest and wicked. You act as if everyone out of thin air started making outlandish claims. The spiral of MAGA support has occured patiently and gradually. People have tolerated quite a bit of betrayal before deciding enough was enough and speculating as to what could cause Trump to act this way (slave, puppe, demon, madman etc).
“There is no curse in Elvish, Entish, or the tongues of Men for this treachery.”
What's weird is you voted for him, right? Based on who he was and his campaign promises? Why are you not outraged?
English
@Timcast Are you talking about the supporters who call him a slave, puppet, demon-possessed, antichrist, demented, bloodthirsty, etc.? Those supporters?
English
This is the WORST time for Trump to be attacking his supporters
In the last election cycle there was as huge fight between DeSantis supporters and Trump supporters but as the election drew nearer and DeSantis dropped out the right came together around Trump
In fact Libertarians, former Liberals, and Independents joined in voting for Trump.
The issue now is that Trump needs a coalition to help the GOP win the midterms and everyday his rhetoric, decisions, are pushing people away from the GOP.
I never thought Trump was perfect but the GOP is certainly preferable to the Democratic party, just look at Swalwell.
But I dont see how Trump recovers enough coalition votes to stop whats coming in November. Maybe he knows this.
Get ready for a blow out in the midterms if this continues. Democrats will subpoena, impeach, imprison, etc.
Maybe its mutual. Trump die-hards know they are on the chopping block when Democrats sweep and Trump's ego has him refusing to bother will growing his coalition
English
Matthew 4 meditation:
Matt. 4:19–20 “Follow me”… “Immediately they left their nets and followed him.”
Matt. 4:21–22 He called James and John, and “Immediately they left the boat and their father and followed him.”
Matt. 4:18 Simon and Andrew were “casting a net into the sea” when Jesus called them.
Matt. 4:21 James and John were “in the boat with Zebedee their father, mending their nets” when Jesus called them.
Matt. 4:20, 22 Matthew repeats the emphasis: “Immediately… Immediately.”
Matt. 4:20, 22 The pattern is simple: “he said”… “they followed him.”
The disciples’ response in Matthew 4 is like lightning.
Matthew is not chiefly magnifying their responsiveness, but the authority of Christ’s call.
If you make the passage mainly about the disciples, you are left with a response so abrupt it borders on reckless, because Matthew strips away nearly all contextual buildup and doubles down on “immediately.”
The point is not that these men were unusually impulsive.
The point is that Christ’s summons comes with a force that explains the response.
Even if you add context from the other Gospels, that is not how you exegete the inspired literary meaning of *this* text. Matthew is conveying something on purpose.
It is not whiplash decision-making in men, but the powerful call of Christ in whom all authority in heaven and earth rests.
Matthew excludes not only any emphasis on exceptional prudence or wisdom in the disciples, but also the plausible human backdrop by which such a response would ordinarily be explained.
He provides no prior interactions in this passage from which their immediate obedience would naturally arise.
Instead, we are left with Christ at the center, and it is His person that Matthew has been giving us context for up to the moment He calls these men.
English
You believe that? I can't prove you're lying. I can say that it's incredibly obvious to all of the world what the image meant, and so for you to believe that Trump didn't understand it is extremely difficult to comprehend. It would be easier to explain by dishonesty. Which is it Allie?
English
I do believe that he didn’t think of this as a depiction of Jesus when posting. Still, there has to be more care and discernment here.
English
@Not_the_Bee @TheInsiderPaper 1) weird
2) cannot comprehend (stupid)
3) nuts
The magnificent triad of true merit, strength, and superiority that is always used by the good guys.
Got it! Definitely lands! 👏
English
JUST IN - Iran was 'inches away' from deal with US in Islamabad, Iranian foreign minister says
English
@FrkJrBrdn @Happygilmore776 @Not_the_Bee @TheInsiderPaper Lol really? From what I have read they weren't even close to a nuke even before the US launched the war of aggression. No intent/development.
The Pentagon apparently just can't get their facts straight 🤷♂️.
English
@RileySDG7 @Happygilmore776 @Not_the_Bee @TheInsiderPaper Hes saying Iran was inches from a nuke dufus.... reading comprehension, you should check it out
English
Thank you!! Glad to be considered weird by you guys, its a clear delineation. I don't fit your "normal." I passed the test.
As to your claims, are you sure they are based in reality?
Yeah, dang. I did read your post from the current geopolitical context including Trumps threats to Iran and your total commitment to the war of aggression premised upon lies, and moving goal posts.
Totally missed that you were accusing Iran of pursuing/threatening with nuclear weapons as their nuclear program was destroyed last July and I hadn't seen that they had made threats like that.
But you're probably operating from the same, highly reliable, America first intelligence that was provided to Trump.
English
Dude you’re one of the weirdest reply guys. How is it sick to suggest that Iran trying to continue the pursuit of a nuclear weapon is what stalled talks? It’s been their priority for the past 30+ years. If you think my post is somehow threatening to Iran, you have serious comprehension issues.
English
Even if they were joking, its not funny. To even suggest that we are considering thermonuclear exchange as a negotiating tactic on a war of aggression is barbaric and apocalyptic.
Its perfectly in step with Trump's "truths" and as is typical with "joking" it gives words to the uncomfortable, usually unspoken, core of the matter.
Trump has repeatedly threatened war crimes. Babylon Bee is just further outlining the scope as they see it.
English
@RileySDG7 @Not_the_Bee @TheInsiderPaper Nazis will be Nazi's, oh wait, even the Nazi's didnt "intend" to do this much harm amd cause this amount of death.
English
@TheInsiderPaper Yea approximately 70 inches, which also happens to be the length of a typical nuclear warhead
English
Rev 1:5
Jesus Christ the faithful witness,
the firstborn of the dead,
and the ruler of kings on earth.
To Him who loves ➡️us⬅️
and has freed ➡️us⬅️
from our sins ➡️by his blood⬅️
1) His witness is perfect. It stands above all other testimony.
2) He is firstborn among many brothers, the proof of redemption
3) This particular "love" has a particular object, "us"
4) He "has freed" (aorist participle, completed in totality) us by His blood, referring to the cross a specific once for all time event; His eternal atonement
John starts out Revelation by referring to Jesus as
"Him who loves us"
That is why John is my favorite disciple and its not even close.
He knew God, loved God, but most critically was living in reverant awe and wonder that God loved him.
This love John is referring to is
Redeeming covenantal love
Not universal benevolent love
Its the sort of love from which He who has the keys to Death and Hades pardons your iniquities and remembers your sins no more, clothing you in His righteousness and sharing His inheritance with you.
Scripture won't allow us to state God has a flattened monchrome disposition toward all people.
Biblically, He relates to us all individually and uniquely, but within what can be split into the categories of His universal love or covenantal love.
English
"trope" is one of those words that is losing meaning and sounds like a robotic mantra.
You can only say it so many times in varied contexts before people catch on and say "wait a minute... Is this some sort of scripted word policing with a subversive agenda?"
I also see the LLM models use it a ton and, most awkwardly, when I haven't said anything remotely "antisemitic" - it gets thrown out there, obviously by programming.
English
@MegaChurchMouse Fun Fact: This mildly retarded person thinks if something gets classified a “trope” it’s less true.
He also thinks “antisemitism” is an actual thing.
English
Fun fact: JD's narrative is a compilation of classic antisemitic conspiracy tropes, not a factual evaluation. It recycles longstanding canards about Jewish secrecy, dual loyalties, coded hatred, and hidden control, while ignoring historical and textual context.
JD™@LostMyHats
Fun fact: Rabbinic Judaism is - hands down - the most secretive major world religion, with intense operational religious security built within it to keep the goyim from knowing their actual beliefs and values, prohibitive bans on teaching rabbinic beliefs to outsiders, scriptural prohibitions against allowing the goyim to sit in on dogmatic instructions (including under penalty of death), with much of their sacred texts written in code that require a special glossary to decipher. And surrounding this veiled community is the most intense censorship infrastructure known to man (ask Johann Eisenmenger). This is because Talmudic religion was forged in a post-Constantine Roman Empire as an anti-Christian oppo-religion, which required secrecy to avoid suppression thanks to its spiteful and often blasphemous teachings that would appall most Christians. To this day there’s an active coverup of medieval traditions, in particular. You can find polemical experts for almost every world faith, with easily obtained information from the religions themselves, eager to proselytize. Judaism is the opposite. Not so with Judaism. They’re not looking for coverts, and it’s more similar to the Free Masons or Church of Scientology where you have to prove your faithfulness before finding out their deeper beliefs. And then you’ll find out that what little is advertised, is almost entirely contrived. But if you want to know their value system, it’s simple. Look at the industries with disproportionate amounts of Jewish influence, at their many global cottage industries, how they spend their lobbying dollars, and who they vote for, and you’ll see their values soon enough.
English
A few friendly language tips for people:
Disassociate means to distance yourself from a group.
Dissociate means to zone out from your body and mind, aka turn off.
There is no such thing as irregardless. It’s just regardless.
You couldn’t care less. Not “I could care less.”
You are angry *with* a person. You are angry *at* a situation.
The past tense of an execution style hanging is “hanged” not “hung”.
These are a few common mistakes we see on X
English
I thought this was fairly charitable towards Arminius and his positions.
At the end of the day "elect" shouts monergism.
By lexical architecture alone.
The chosen because I chose Him completely disintegrates any meaning of divine election.
It sounds like something a kid would do while attempting to get the last word in and take credit for having done something or found something first.
English
If John Calvin and Jacob Arminius squared off in a rock battle... It might look something like this.
English
Hebrews 9:28
so Christ, having been
offered once
➡️to bear⬅️
➡️the sins⬅️
➡️of many,⬅️
will appear a second time, not to deal with sin but
➡️to save⬅️
➡️those⬅️
who are eagerly waiting for him.
Penal Substitutionary Atonement
Definite Atonement
Maxxed out in 1 verse
He bore the sins of many.
And is going to save those.
Full stop.
E.g. any reflex to insert Judas into the
-bear the sins
-of many
-to save
-those
Is categorically excluded
Its not possible
What you can insert as the object would be
The Church
The Saints
The Elect
English
Except, I am a person, I suffer.
The only thing I want to hear in suffering is that God is working all things for good in my suffering.
And yes I take a maximal position on "God working all things"
Something along the lines of
I form light and create darkness;
I make well-being and create calamity;
I am the Lord, who does all these things.
When I am in calamity, I am comforted knowing that even this is not outside the Lord’s hand.
English
One of the worst things you can say to a suffering person is that God planned it.
Provisionist Perspective 🩸🌍@ProvisionistP
Everything is not part of God’s plan. Some things happen that God didn’t want to happen.
English
Piers Morgan Drops the Hammer
This brilliant exchange from @PiersUncensored is quite funny to say the least.
Everyone is hip to the op at this point, but there's something delightful about the British accent and the zoomed-in gulp that will brighten your day.
W, Piers.
English
I don't 'mindlessly follow' Tucker. I watch him consistently but skip episodes when they're not compelling. He's not 'consistently lying.' Sweeping claims like that just come off as emotionally charged NPC tears. Calling someone a proven liar while demanding others ignore him... Where have I seen that pattern before? People can (and should) watch multiple sources and judge the good from the bad for themselves. If you have a substantive pattern of bad faith or lies from Tucker, not isolated clips, lay them out. Otherwise it looks like he just hits a nerve.
English
@RileySDG7 Proving that the demagogue you mindlessly follow has bad theology is not "childish nonsense".
And, yes, it is legitimately insane to call us to follow the words of a proven liar, who spouts nonsense about American history and defends Islam.
Your appeals to Tucker are insane.
English
Yes. This shouldn’t be controversial.
𝐎. 𝐀𝐥𝐚𝐧 𝐍𝐨𝐛𝐥𝐞@TheAlanNoble
Threatening to wipe out a civilization is genocidal and evil.
English
Iran and the US have earned each other’s respect on the battlefield. Time to break up with the crazy girlfriend who got us into the fight and share a bottle of Aragh Sagi with our new bros.
🇺🇸 🤝 🇮🇷
English
“Knowledge” indeed puffs up. Nothing I said warranted the childish nonsense you just posted.
I am not appealing to Tucker as a theologian, pastor, or ecclesial authority, nor am I defending every theological claim he has ever made.
My point is much simpler: it is a shame when a layman shows more willingness to speak clearly about manifest moral evil in the name of Christ than many of our public Christian leaders.
You can think Tucker has bad theology. Fine. That still would not excuse the cowardice or ambiguity of Christian leaders who should be speaking clearly.
So no, linking an article about Tucker’s theological deficiencies does not answer what I said.
Nor do embarrassing dismissive swipes at my sanity.
English
QME
@SpeckMartyn @gavinortlund Anon, did you listen to the podcast?
English
