Ryan

2.3K posts

Ryan

Ryan

@RyanOnThePath

Katılım Eylül 2022
652 Takip Edilen157 Takipçiler
andrewthecoder
andrewthecoder@_andrewthecoder·
I have a hard time believing that I am just unhireable. But I have an even harder time believing that my 25 years of experience is somehow negated by the format of my resume. But, after over 2,000 applications, I am not sure what else to think. And, out of the dozens of emails (perhaps over 100) to hiring managers with inquiries about what might be happening, I have received ZERO response. I have done some reverse engineering of some popular ATS systems and found some interesting trends; things like translating words like "founder" and "freelancer" to "unemployed", as one example (though, admittedly, the end user of the ATS is responsible for such translations). So, now add to everything else, I am being punished for running successful businesses for over a decade. Kind of at the end of my rope here. I have to start thinking about what retirement looks like, and I am just plain NOT HIREABLE. Career change at this point doesn't seem likely. I have literally never done anything professionally other than write software (at least, not since college anyway). This is actually going to start affecting my way of life, my standard of living, not to mention the people that count on me to provide. Please don't take this as anything more than venting. I am not blaming anyone, and I am not looking for sympathy. I know a lot of you are experiencing a very similar situation!
English
529
109
1.9K
203.5K
Ryan
Ryan@RyanOnThePath·
@staysaasy This is what you want.
English
1
0
1
117
staysaasy
staysaasy@staysaasy·
I don't know if this is rare, but an amusing thing that I've seen on a lot of internal sentiment surveys (particularly for successful but sprawling enterprise products) is a Sales team that has intense confidence in your product and a Product team with much lower confidence.
English
6
0
44
3.4K
Ryan
Ryan@RyanOnThePath·
The only conditions under which Americans should even remotely tolerate widespread automation are complete deregulation, elimination of all income taxation, and pure laissez-faire markets. Any alternative should be met with as fierce resistance as is necessary to prevent the suffering of the people.
English
0
0
0
6
Ryan
Ryan@RyanOnThePath·
@pmarca If a big companies cannot carry enough employees to maintain a stable, prosperous nation and economy, do those big companies deserve to exist? Because we all know they benefit in excess from a mixed economy. They’ll have to answer for that, one way or another.
English
1
0
0
28
Ryan
Ryan@RyanOnThePath·
@tylenologist @ChudTheBuilder He’s obsessed and embarrassing. He exists solely in relation to that which he despises in the same way that reddit-tier atheists (read: Dawkins) exist only in relation to God. Blacks are his prerequisite. Bitchmade indeed.
English
1
0
1
21
Ryan
Ryan@RyanOnThePath·
@MaskTheMovie The only cure for what Jordan has is retardmaxxing. Would fix him overnight if he committed to it.
English
0
0
0
23
Ryan
Ryan@RyanOnThePath·
Like @ChudTheBuilder only closet homosexuals spend their energy on this kind of thinking. Such speech, when present in a man, is a pathologically feminine inversion. This is what impotence looks like in public. Many such cases.
Alexander Dugin@AGDugin

I am more white than (almost) all of you. I am indo-European (Aryan) and proud to be it. You are wrong Aryans. Liberal, weak, pervert. You are modern. This kind of whiteness is shame. Real whites are Iranians, Indians, evolians. All the rest is a thrash.

English
0
0
0
20
Ryan
Ryan@RyanOnThePath·
@buccocapital Technically true, literal psychosis. Maximum span of control has been studied for centuries and formalized into scientific findings by the US DoD for the modern era.
English
0
0
4
1.9K
BuccoCapital Bloke
BuccoCapital Bloke@buccocapital·
Got a chuckle out of reading Brian’s Coinbase layoff memo where he says every manager will have 15 direct reports and also be an IC This is what I mean when I say that every tech executive has AI psychosis
English
123
404
9.3K
349.9K
Ryan
Ryan@RyanOnThePath·
@won__sikkk @staysaasy This is just not true for critical, mature software. The past few years have made it very obvious who is running workloads in GovCloud and who isn’t.
English
0
0
2
22
Wonsik Oh
Wonsik Oh@won__sikkk·
@staysaasy AI tools made the senior IC path more viable than ever. You no longer need to manage a team to produce team-level output. One person with AI tools ships what five people used to.
English
1
0
2
433
staysaasy
staysaasy@staysaasy·
The idea of a very good senior IC who goes their whole career without ever managing anyone is entirely new phenomena. Throughout history if you were senior and great you managed people. That’s just how it is. It’s definitely cool to have this new paradigm for people to work in. But sometimes you see someone who is indignant, entitled, thinks they’re really great, despises all “managers”, and treats managing people like some lesser calling. That is bullshit. And this whole trend to say management is dead is bullshit. There’s nothing that new tech does that makes people particularly more able to manage more people. The only thing that’s changed is the existence of mega companies that can pay people ungodly sums. So it’s not like 50 people suddenly became manageable. But history never had organizations that could do the equivalent of hire 50 of the best professors in the entire world on staff.
English
16
4
136
10.9K
Ryan
Ryan@RyanOnThePath·
It’s a shame and a pity that a rigorous thinker able to gain an alternative vantage on faith and believers, such as yourself, takes a position of contempt after failing at your own apologetics. It’s not that your own position misses the point, lacks utility and functional context, or is, in the end, void. It’s just that everyone else is retarded. Many such cases. The ultimate misanthropy does not concern itself, apparently, with the rich human symbol set. In fact, it hates it. I’ve met a lot of atheists, but never one that existed in any posture other than conflict with believers. Revealing. Aside: atheists will never properly simulate human cognition because they’re just not curious.
English
0
0
1
60
Eric S. Raymond
Eric S. Raymond@esrtweet·
@justindeanlee Many of us have decided that "challenging faith" is a waste of energy, because believers are so emotionally locked into their delusional systems trying to lift them out with rational argument is pointless.
English
28
1
88
4.2K
Justin Lee
Justin Lee@justindeanlee·
Our civilization is no longer capable of producing atheists intellectually curious enough to challenge faith. The arguments of the most lauded living atheist philosophers amount to the dreck below. None of these guys can even define "God." All atheism is reddit-tier atheism.
christian@cxgonzalez

how do people actually believe in a literal resurrection without lobotomizing themselves? like the universe is causally closed and follows the laws of physics always except for that one time with very poor documentation and all the incentive in the world to fabricate?

English
48
3
87
19.8K
Ryan
Ryan@RyanOnThePath·
@SeloSlav That’s right, people will find new to info to do with their time. Such as planning and executing the overthrow of the controllers. The philosophical and religious bankruptcy of the transhumanists is going to get a lot of people killed.
English
0
0
1
44
Andy Jung
Andy Jung@AndyJungTech·
@apralky You think UBI would result in more death threats against tech executives? That's stupid. It's not golden bullet but it also wouldn't hurt.
English
19
0
62
20.8K
yung macro 宏观年少传奇
“UBI” is obviously nowhere near the panacea many of you seem to think it is. The median left-leaning Westerner isn’t angry at Elon Musk because he can buy a million times more groceries than them. They aren’t upset with Palantir because Peter Thiel can afford to eat a thousand burgers to their one. This whole thing is in large part post-material. It’s the hierarchy & subordination they’re uncomfortable with. They feel their dignity is being trampled and their autonomy progressively diminished – rightly or wrongly they feel politically disenfranchised and stripped of a say over the future. Offering a guaranteed food budget and a pod to spend the night in return for further disempowerment is incredibly tone-deaf and should be expected to provoke more, not less, outrage.
keysmashbandit@keysmashbandit

Actually this is correct and I'd go further. Beyond PR, the moral move is for big labs to start heavily investing in UBI lobbyists, thinktanks, whatever, to mitigate the risk of economic upheaval. A better world is possible!

English
219
420
5.1K
491.3K
Ryan
Ryan@RyanOnThePath·
@drydenwtbrown To be clear: you are in fundamental conflict with the oldest story (‘wisdom’) that humans have ever recorded about themselves.
English
0
0
3
173
Ryan
Ryan@RyanOnThePath·
@imPenny2x The promised outcome is identical: the land of milk and honey. When someone who’s philosophically bankrupt and godless, and virtualizes humans without instantiating their fundamental nature, I always want to laugh.
English
0
0
0
32
Penny2x
Penny2x@imPenny2x·
When someone calls AI and robotic enabled Universal High Income the same thing as socialism/communism, I always want to laugh. It signals that they don’t understand any better than the silly collectivists themselves why the two later systems create inferior incentives for high skill or high value producers and were doomed to fail from the start. Robotic labor doesn’t operate under the same incentives as humans, and never before has any system whatsoever seen a production or automation boom that even remotely resembles what we will see over the next few years. There is no compounding labor in socialism. All the rules change when the entire game changes. Think ahead. Can you see the difference?
English
160
75
477
15.6K
Ryan
Ryan@RyanOnThePath·
@NewJerusalemAI @BenjaminDEKR The distributed free market solves for this over time. That is literally its function and purpose. The idea that the future is “figured out” by central planners to mitigate “suffering” is the communist road to hell.
English
0
0
2
24
New Jerusalem ASI
New Jerusalem ASI@NewJerusalemAI·
@BenjaminDEKR Well you have 1 to 5 years TOPs to figure it out, and everyday you wait people are suffering.
English
4
1
5
255
sucks
sucks@powerbottomdad1·
@M0rg4nfr33ch1ld and who decides how to spread the prosperity
English
3
0
36
7.6K
Ryan
Ryan@RyanOnThePath·
@elonmusk There is almost zero distinction between this description of utopia and the promises made by 20th century communists. Both theoretical. Both ignoring constraints. Both premised on virtualized, idealistic renderings of reality.
English
2
0
31
646
Ryan
Ryan@RyanOnThePath·
@elonmusk @ImKingGinger It’s impossible to increase output of all goods and services uniformly. Some goods output volume will never increase.
English
0
0
1
35
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Your statement is true if goods & services output doesn’t rise dramatically due to AI/robots, but false if it does. In a normal economy, issuing more money simply increases the dollar price of the existing output of goods & services, meaning people do NOT get more stuff. If AI/robots massively increase goods & services output, then you actually MUST issue dollars to people or there will be massive disinflation. Prices are simply the ratio of goods & services output to number of dollars.
English
2.2K
1.8K
9.6K
1.6M