Sahil Punamia

5K posts

Sahil Punamia banner
Sahil Punamia

Sahil Punamia

@SahilPunamia

Marketing @ OpenAI | Yapping about AI, EVs, marketing, investing, sartorial wear & world travel | Cortado chaser & collector of jackets I don’t need | LA/SF

Palo Alto, CA Katılım Aralık 2022
589 Takip Edilen901 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Sahil Punamia
Sahil Punamia@SahilPunamia·
@SawyerMerritt @Tesla Tesla will be one of the first companies to demonstrate the jaw-dropping ROIC of AI compute investments at scale
English
10
2
81
16.9K
Gali
Gali@Gfilche·
only a few pages in and this is already more epic/powerful than i was expecting, HYPED @EricJorgenson
Gali tweet media
English
20
5
187
9.2K
Sahil Punamia
Sahil Punamia@SahilPunamia·
@chamath With Loro Piana cashmere knitwear comes responsibility 🙂
English
0
0
1
140
Chamath Palihapitiya
When your working life rewards you, it’s easy to ratchet up the complexity: homes, cars, travel, possessions etc. I have found that all that complexity comes at the sake of your most fleeting asset: your time. Instead of building things, all of a sudden you’re dealing with minutiae and logistics. Instead of talking mostly to engineers, you’re talking mostly to non-engineers. The building stops…the business of managing self inflicted complexity begins. It’s worth noting that the best players in the game (Buffett, Elon) have kept their life extremely basic, almost monastic/nomadic, as success ratcheted them ever higher. I think it’s the biggest secret hiding in plain sight: When the world upgrades your status, downgrade your complexity.
English
542
1K
12K
957K
Sahil Punamia
Sahil Punamia@SahilPunamia·
1) Buying a home is almost always great investment 2) Pursuing graduate studies to figure out your career 3) Skipping the daily coffee to stay on budget 4) Multi-tasking in general 5) Work hard and everything will take care of itself 6) Follow your passion 7) Rebalance your portfolio every year 8) Relationships shouldn’t need so much effort with the right person 9) Eliminate seed oils completely 10) Buy it nice or buy it twice
English
0
0
0
45
Sahil Bloom
Sahil Bloom@SahilBloom·
What’s something people think is good advice that’s actually bad advice?
English
479
11
389
313.5K
Sahil Punamia
Sahil Punamia@SahilPunamia·
@yunta_tsai Old school value investor types call this dynamic: “information asymmetry”
English
0
1
4
199
Yun-Ta Tsai
Yun-Ta Tsai@yunta_tsai·
We have reached an era where some people have not touched a steering wheel and have simply let their cars drive them around for a whole year, whereas others do not know this is possible at all.
English
431
970
7.7K
881.1K
Sahil Punamia
Sahil Punamia@SahilPunamia·
@wholemars Not a hard problem to solve - I suspect Tesla is intentionally doing this. My reco: 1) Kill the subscription model and just make supervised standard across the range 2) Raise vehicle ASPs by $5K 3) Spend $1K of that incremental margin per vehicle on mass consumer education
English
1
0
0
83
Whole Mars Catalog
Whole Mars Catalog@wholemars·
Tesla needs to continue to evolve their Self-Driving pricing model to increase adoption. With a product this good, sales should be going vertical. It's time to ask some hard questions about what's not working. What do you all think?
English
1.1K
136
2K
271.7K
Robert Scoble
Robert Scoble@Scobleizer·
I was on @wholemars space this afternoon while my Model 3 drove me for a couple of hours to drop off my taxes. And found myself quite emotional listening to others' stories about theirs. I'll never sell it. It is the best thing I've ever spent money on beyond marriage and bringing children into the world. During the show it passed 159,000 miles. It is the 7,409th one Tesla made. Stood in line overnight 10 years ago to put down $1,000 before it was even announced. (I have a video over on Facebook of the first 100 people in line that I treasure today. Behind us were more than 1,000 in the Danville store). I really feel sorry for anyone who buys something else. I've driven many others since and they simply aren't even close to as good. Even the Chinese ones. They don't automatically drive nearly as well. My eight year old car is still way better than any other that's out today. Except a new Tesla. I studied automotive innovation most of my career because of my perch in Silicon Valley. When I was a kid the auto industry had its R&D centers somewhere else. Detroit. Stuttgart. Tokyo. Today they all have their R&D centers here in Silicon Valley because this is where the talent is that can build the future. Had the first ride in the Fiat 500. First ride in the BMW i3. First ride in the first Mercedes AI car. First ride in the first Tesla. Because two of my high school friends were killed in wrecks. My last book written with @IrenaCronin has a whole chapter about Robotaxis (written seven years ago). Uber was invented right in front of me in a Paris snowstorm. Did one of the first interviews with Lyft's founder. A week ago had a ride in the NVIDIA Mercedes at GTC. I have the first video of a Waymo EVER driving around a Silicon Valley freeway (it's up on YouTube). I had a front row seat on how Tesla outclassed the whole industry and brought software driven automobiles to the market. No one had done so before. Today my eight year old car is WAY better than when I bought it (I picked it up April 4, 2018). If I'm alive in 10 years we'll see maybe 100 million Optimus robots walking around everywhere and many vehicles that Franz @woodhaus2 and team haven't even dreamed up yet. All driving autonomously. And finally the death rate will start going down because of plans made more than a decade ago. There is a reason why I'm an Elon fan and it goes way beyond him giving me a ride in the first one before he gave his best friend a ride. It builds products the others can't match. Even a decade later. Even after Elon showed them. Even after they tore apart his cars to analyze how they were built. Even after I drove mine to Detroit to give people in traditional auto industry their first look back in 2018. And next comes Optimus, a new Roadster, a new semi, a new car without a steering wheel, a new transportation system, new tunnels to go faster across cities like Las Vegas, and more that I can't even dream up yet and I've been a futurist for a long time. It is so awesome finally seeing many "normal" people get what I've been saying for years and seeing the numbers of Tesla's on Silicon Valley's streets go up and up. So many over the years have given me shit about owning a Tesla. Or supporting Elon. Or being one of the first to take my hands off of the steering wheel and sharing that here on X. They all were wrong. Tesla is the world leader in all of transportation, even if you include all the Chinese new brands, which are making cars with more screens and better seats. Soon everyone will understand that transportation isn't about having a leather dashboard or seats, but about having better AI. And Tesla's is the best. And I'm talking about the AI running in my eight year old car. The AI that runs in today's Teslas is even better than that. And, yes, I know that lots of engineers claim theirs is better. But they won't give me one of theirs to drive around for a few weeks. There is a reason for that. Theirs isn't as safe. Isn't as smooth. Isn't as capable. And by the end of the year everyone will recognize that.
Tesla@Tesla

10 years of Model 3 The car that started the EV revolution

English
234
312
1.9K
13.9M
Sahil Punamia
Sahil Punamia@SahilPunamia·
@ramit I’ve always found it interesting that most define being a good saver as someone who thinks spending money is bad This zero-sum mentality then creeps into other aspects of their life (work, personal relationships) and compounds the misery FIRE needs a rebrand to Rich Life 🙂
English
0
0
1
170
Ramit Sethi
Ramit Sethi@ramit·
You can change this but almost nobody does Once you've created an identity that "spending money = bad," it is nearly impossible to find joy in spending money -- even if you have millions This is why I show you how to live a Rich Life
Ramit Sethi tweet media
English
6
2
40
7.5K
Sahil Punamia
Sahil Punamia@SahilPunamia·
@_milankovac_ 100000% I wished Americans traveled more often so they could realize that the way we live in cities like LA and SF is a conscious choice We have the ability to solve issues like homelessness, crime, and potholes/cleanliness if we really wanted to And more taxes aren’t required.
English
0
0
2
1K
Milan Kovac
Milan Kovac@_milankovac_·
Just spent over a month in Seoul (~22M residents) & Tokyo (~37-40M residents). For reference, Tokyo is roughly 2x NYC (!). Two things struck me the most: 1. The beauty of the sakura (cherry blossoms) this time of year — highly recommended. 2. The unbelievable level of safety in both cities. In Seoul, you can leave your phone or wallet at a coffee shop, come back hours later, and it’ll still be there. Nothing happens. In Tokyo, you see little kids walking home alone from primary school or young women strolling at 11pm by the railroad, under bridges, or through dark alleys. Without a single problem. Those drink vending machines are everywhere on sidewalks around the city, still pristine despite their age. To me, they perfectly represent a high-trust society. Nobody breaks them. Nobody steals from them. The streets are incredibly clean. If I saw 3 pieces of trash per week, that was a lot. Maybe I got lucky, but that’d be insane luck. Having lived decades in Europe and the US, this is shocking. Makes you wonder: where does such a massive gap come from? Given their enormous size, the excuse “big cities = unsafe & dirty” doesn’t hold anymore. Something very different must be at work to maintain this order and respect at that scale, for so long. It has to be cultural at the very least. But it proves it is possible.
Milan Kovac tweet mediaMilan Kovac tweet media
English
104
116
1.7K
122.8K
Sahil Punamia
Sahil Punamia@SahilPunamia·
@FutureAZA I can’t think of many times someone said a company was the next “xyz” and it actually worked out The abstraction of Tesla’s unique competitive advantages - including culture/talent density, SpaceX adjacency, and most of all, market timing, are not to be replicated so easily
English
0
0
1
52
FutureAzA
FutureAzA@FutureAZA·
This is a sobering read on investing in an unknown and unknowable future. I'm hopeful for Rivian, but I'm not sure it's going to 10x any time soon.
Peter Girnus 🦅@gothburz

I bought Rivian stock on IPO day. November 10, 2021. $172 a share. I bought 58 shares. That was $9,976. I remember the exact number because my girlfriend asked what I spent ten thousand dollars on and I said "the future of transportation." She said "you drive a 2017 Civic." I said "exactly." $1,000 invested at IPO is now worth $149.06. I have that number memorized. I check it before coffee. I check it after coffee. I check it during meetings where I'm supposed to be listening. The number changes by pennies. The pennies matter to me now. The thesis was simple. Rivian was the next Tesla. They had the Amazon delivery vans. They had the adventure truck. They had the factory in Normal, Illinois. I told people the factory was in a town called Normal. I thought that was meaningful. A sign. The future of transportation, built in a place called Normal. The factory produced 24,337 vehicles in its first full year. Tesla produced 1.8 million. I called that "room to grow." I have been through six theses on Rivian. Thesis one: they're the next Tesla. (Stock dropped 40%.) Thesis two: the Amazon vans are the real play. (Amazon cut the order.) Thesis three: the R2 platform will be the mass-market breakthrough. (Delayed 18 months.) Thesis four: the Georgia factory changes everything. (Paused indefinitely.) Thesis five: Volkswagen's $5 billion investment validates the technology. (Stock kept falling.) Thesis six: Uber robotaxis. This is the pivot. Every time the stock drops, I find the new thesis. I don't look for it. It finds me. I open Reddit. I open the Rivian subreddit. Someone has written a post titled "Why this is actually bullish." It has 400 upvotes. I read it. I agree with it. I was going to agree with it before I read it. The agreement is the point. The DD is the prayer. My cost basis is $172. The stock is $14.06. I am down 91.8%. I could have bought a used Rivian R1T with the money I've lost on Rivian stock. I have not done the math on this. I'm doing it now. Yes. I could have bought one. A 2022 with 30,000 miles. I would have the truck AND the remaining money. I drive a 2017 Civic. My coworker Dave bought index funds. Dave is up 34% over the same period. Dave brings a sad lunch to work every day. Turkey sandwich. Same sandwich. Dave will retire at 65 with a comfortable nest egg and a lifetime of turkey sandwiches and he will never know what it felt like to be early. I am early. I have been early for four and a half years. At some point early and wrong have the same return on investment. But they feel different. Wrong feels like a mistake. Early feels like a strategy. I feel like a strategy. The Uber partnership was announced Tuesday. I texted three people. One was my brother. One was a guy from the Rivian subreddit whose real name I don't know. One was my girlfriend. My ex-girlfriend. She stopped asking about Rivian in 2023. She stopped asking about anything in 2024. The stock jumped 10%. It gave half back the same day. But for eleven minutes I was only down 81% instead of 85%. I called that momentum. I took a screenshot. I still have the screenshot. Rivian will build robotaxis for Uber. Rivian has not built a profitable vehicle for anyone. Rivian lost $38,784 on every vehicle it delivered last year. That's not my number. That's their 10-K. But I don't think about it that way. I think about it as investment in scale. Scale means you lose money faster until you don't. Uber needs thousands of autonomous vehicles. Rivian needs to not go bankrupt before 2027. These are complementary needs. That's a partnership. That's synergy. That's the pivot. Dave asked me yesterday how much I'm down. I said "I'm long-term." He said "it's been four years." I said "Tesla was down 80% once." He said "Tesla was also profitable once." Dave went back to his sandwich. Dave doesn't understand pivots. I bought more shares this morning. This is the pivot.

English
19
1
76
8.1K
phil beisel
phil beisel@pbeisel·
In 2002, Gwynne Shotwell was a 38-year-old single mom with a stable aerospace job when she walked into a dingy El Segundo office to drop off a colleague. Elon Musk cornered her for ten minutes, grilled her on the rocket business, and created a VP of Sales role on the spot. She agonized for weeks (private space was a graveyard of failed startups) but one day on the LA freeway she grabbed her phone and called him: “I’ve been a fucking idiot. I’m taking the job.” She became roughly employee #7. Three Falcon 1 launches exploded in 2006–2007. SpaceX was days from bankruptcy. While engineers scrambled, Gwynne kept selling anyway. She flew to Iridium, closed a make-or-break deal tilted heavily in the customer’s favor because she believed so fiercely it would work. Then, on September 28, 2008, the fourth Falcon 1 finally reached orbit. Hours later she and Elon walked into NASA and sealed a $1.6 billion contract to resupply the space station— pulling the company back from the brink. That single mom who bet everything became president and COO, the reason SpaceX didn’t die and the reason it now flies more rockets than the rest of the world combined. Legend. 🚀
phil beisel@pbeisel

A cover we can all get behind. @Gwynne_Shotwell awesome! Your stock is rising, number 2!

English
98
566
6.5K
370.3K
Steve Wiesner
Steve Wiesner@SteveWiesnerSMB·
Amazing how old flexes are dropping like flies. Top tier MBA. Who cares? Comp sci degree. Sorry. PE gig. No carry. 500 employees. Can do it with 20. Swanky office. 😂
English
28
14
600
51.3K
signüll
signüll@signulll·
no offense but never has there been a moment in my life where i’ve wanted to hear a bunch of “panelists” speak at a conference lmao. like i get actively repulsed by that entire concept.
English
47
27
769
40.5K
Sawyer Merritt
Sawyer Merritt@SawyerMerritt·
NEWS: Today, Lucid introduced Lunar, a purpose built two-seat robotaxi concept based on their new Midsize platform. • Target driving efficiency: 5.5 to 6.0 mi/kWh • Passenger legroom: 42+ inches • 40% lower operating costs $/mile • Charging speed: 200+ miles added per 15 min of charging
Sawyer Merritt tweet mediaSawyer Merritt tweet mediaSawyer Merritt tweet mediaSawyer Merritt tweet media
English
427
141
1.9K
304.7K
Sahil Punamia
Sahil Punamia@SahilPunamia·
@RichLightShed If they want to compete with Netflix, they need a plan for the majority of their revenues to come from ex-US in the next 10 years. We have yet to see such a plan.
English
0
0
1
446
Rich Greenfield, LightShed 🔦
Rich Greenfield, LightShed 🔦@RichLightShed·
Game of Streams: David Ellison's Plan to Compete with Netflix called Paramount+HBO Paramount wants to be more than a survivor in the streaming wars. It believes it can catapult itself into a daily use streaming platform that can compete head-on with Netflix... $PSKY $WBD lightshedtmt.com/2026/03/11/gam…
English
6
8
46
20.6K
Sahil Punamia
Sahil Punamia@SahilPunamia·
@PeterDiamandis Uber offers a valuable service for robotaxi operators but does not deserve to take a 30% rev share on every ride Elon won’t cede margin to strengthen a competitor platform
English
0
0
2
241
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
Peter H. Diamandis, MD@PeterDiamandis·
Uber has a fascinating response to Elon’s vertical approach to autonomy: “We’d welcome Tesla on the Uber platform.” Smart move. Tesla may own the cars, but Uber wants to OWN the network.
English
274
28
531
390.3K
Sahil Punamia
Sahil Punamia@SahilPunamia·
@SawyerMerritt Samsung fridges from 2016 had more responsive built-in touchscreens than this disaster 😂
Sahil Punamia tweet media
English
1
0
48
3.5K
Sawyer Merritt
Sawyer Merritt@SawyerMerritt·
It’s 2026 and there are legacy automakers that are still shipping crap infotainment systems like it’s 2010. It takes 15 seconds for this Subaru Forester Hybrid to boot up. It takes 4 seconds for the car to even recognize that you tapped “I agree” lol. Horrendous lag.
Edmunds@edmunds

Imagine seeing this every single time you got into your car The new Subaru Forester's interface is unacceptably laggy and slow for a modern car

English
784
614
23.1K
4.6M
Sahil Punamia
Sahil Punamia@SahilPunamia·
@wholemars @KTLA Take a free car rental shuttle to get a Waymo from outside the LAX perimeter
English
0
0
1
245
Whole Mars Catalog
Whole Mars Catalog@wholemars·
@KTLA fuck these people. as if it wasn’t bad enough that we have to pay for uber black to avoid too to their little rideshare bus
English
14
6
137
9.9K
Sahil Punamia
Sahil Punamia@SahilPunamia·
@dieworkwear Are we giving too much credit (or blame) to the end consumer when most of this behavior is driven by whats “affordable & widely available?” I don’t think most middle class folks 50 years ago had better taste than folks today. Rather, tailoring was more accessible & easier to buy
English
3
1
16
6.9K
derek guy
derek guy@dieworkwear·
I think middle-class male attire mostly sucks because the middle class abandoned the tailored jacket decades ago. The tailored jacket — by which I mean suit jackets and sport coats — is made with complex tailoring techniques that lend architectural shaping. This shaping, which I've called "shape and drape" in previous threads, is a critical element of why such outfits look pleasing. See slide 1. However, many middle-class people are obsessed with respectability. Thus, while they've ditched the tailored jacket to seem more casual and relatable, they will not let go of the other things that historically went with that jacket. Consequently, they wear button-up shirts and polos with flat front trousers, but no jacket or tie (the outfit says "I'm casual, but still a respectable member of society"). The sneakers — which they previously eschewed as "low class" and "not proper" — are now made with ugly dress-shoe uppers. Another example of them trying to dress down to see more casual and relatable, but desperately clinging to the idea of respectability. Nike Air Force 1s are somehow "not proper," but if you make the uppers look like wingtips, they are somehow "proper." Thus, we have the ugly outfit in slide 2. The idea of respectability in dress is noxious on moral grounds (which I've explained in many other threads and articles). But as a matter of aesthetics, I would much rather live in a world where people are not constrained by this notion so that they can explore the possibilities of casualwear. This can include anything from the vintage militaria and workwear you see in slide three (clothes from the Tokyo-based vintage shop 'bout; IG a.bout). Or stuff that some people deem "sloppy," but has all the shape, drape, and storytelling that I think make outfits great (slide four shows outfits from Engineered Garments). I'm confused about what other people are even suggesting. If we take the woman's claim to be true — that people wearing pajamas in public have given up because things in their lives are falling apart — then what are we even proposing here? Take photos of people who are having a hard time in life and socially shame them online so they dress up for our pleasure? The idea of imposing standards might sound good if it came from a class with any aesthetic sensibility. But this dynamic almost always revolves around moral judgment and respectability, which are often defined by bourgeois standards. The bourgeois today dress badly, so I don't see why we should use respectability (a terrible notion) to impose an ugly mode of dress. I would rather get rid of the notion entirely so people can dress however they want. This includes your right to wear pajamas in public, a three-piece chalk-stripe suit, or something weird and wacky, but cooler than limp polos and slim chinos.
derek guy tweet mediaderek guy tweet mediaderek guy tweet mediaderek guy tweet media
Richard Pritzel@richardpritzel

@dieworkwear Is this because working class dress is often about flex or status imitation? Middle class fashion tends much more toward conformity and maybe that's why it winds up in the boring middle ground. But there's a refined finesse to finding expressive twists in a mundane ruleset.

English
45
112
2.2K
384K
Sahil Punamia
Sahil Punamia@SahilPunamia·
@cailen Tesla w/FSD is poor man’s land jet 🙋‍♂️
English
1
0
1
44
Sahil Punamia
Sahil Punamia@SahilPunamia·
@RichLightShed @paramountplus @YouTube @netflix Paramount/WBD have incredible ability to create mass-appealing content. It’s the other “DTC” stuff - distribution, growth engines, pricing, partnerships, technology, UI/UX, etc they’re still missing. Legacy media has done little to build these capabilities over the last decade.
English
0
0
1
398
Rich Greenfield, LightShed 🔦
Rich Greenfield, LightShed 🔦@RichLightShed·
"Nobody wakes up in the morning and goes, 'Oh, let me go see what's on @paramountplus' the way they check out what's on @YouTube or what's on @netflix," Greenfield said. "I think he is, directionally, spot-on," said media analyst Rich Greenfield of Lightshed Partners. "They need a lot more content, and they need a much better underlying technology." Thanks for the shoutouts @JamesFaris_ $PSKY $WBD businessinsider.com/david-ellison-…
English
12
18
124
14.6K