Sam

202 posts

Sam

Sam

@SamSpGl

Katılım Ocak 2022
34 Takip Edilen19 Takipçiler
Sam
Sam@SamSpGl·
@ClarkeMicah ...but if you must watch it, watch the first half for hilariously dumb commentary from police like, "We needed to ask Lucy Letby questions and the best way to do that... the only way to do that... was to arrest her."
English
1
0
8
589
Peter Hitchens
Peter Hitchens@ClarkeMicah·
My review, in today’sDaily Mail, of the new Netflix Letby programme.
Peter Hitchens tweet media
English
67
52
269
29.4K
Sam
Sam@SamSpGl·
@NadineDorries @netflix I disagree. The police look like a bunch of numpties in this doco. Hughes also tries to rewrite history with the claim they considered legitimate reasons for the baby deaths.
English
0
0
0
65
Rt Hon Nadine Dorries
Rt Hon Nadine Dorries@NadineDorries·
The #Letby@netflix⁩ documentary is nothing more than promotional exercise for Cheshire Police as the conviction they manipulated turns to dust before their eyes. The biggest justice scandal this country has ever witnessed. Read my column here ✍️ mol.im/a/15521465
English
77
150
678
133.8K
Kat
Kat@Kat918406316196·
As an ex paediatric nurse, my initial concerns about the ‘evidence’ in the Lucy Letby case began with the handover notes. I don’t know a single nurse who has never gone home without handover notes in their pockets. Why aren’t more nurses speaking up?
English
26
39
243
10.8K
Sam retweetledi
WilliamHallett
WilliamHallett@William26139338·
Lucy Letby & The Paediatric Mafia youtu.be/z62f2JR6rr4?si… via @YouTube Connections between the accusing doctors in the Letby case and the proponents of Munchausen by proxy syndrome
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
8
25
1.2K
Sam retweetledi
Stuart Gilham
Stuart Gilham@gilham_stuart·
Lucy Letby & The Paediatric Mafia. A brief look at the evidence & allegations that attention seeking by proxy allegations have historically been used as either a 'fixer' diagnosis or to procure subjects for research experiments. youtu.be/z62f2JR6rr4?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
3
8
25
2.1K
Richard Gill
Richard Gill@gill1109·
I do understand @lizhull & @JudithMoritz. They were court reporters. They are women. They sat in that show-trial for 10 months listening to stories of the horrific last days of poor babies (and listening to prosecution lies). They became equally convinced as the jurors. (1/2)
English
27
18
121
9.4K
Stuart Gilham
Stuart Gilham@gilham_stuart·
1/2. A reaction by me to the confusion sown by the recent BBC Panorama documentary. In one study of a NICU in Texas the diagnostic error rate was 'just' 6.2%. There are several differences comparing that to the Lucy Letby case. youtube.com/watch?v=hGce3v…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
3
10
31
4.2K
Sam
Sam@SamSpGl·
@paulsakkal @caromeldrum Please would you consider an article about the case of Lucy Letby?
Dr Svilena Dimitrova@NeoDoc11

I was genuinely shocked when LJ Thirlwall chose to ignore a group of highly respected professionals last year after a letter that @PeterElston1 and I wrote to her last year co-signed by many eminent statisticians, scientists and doctors. The letter we wrote was unprecedented in a case like this. We said clearly: “We are concerned that the current Terms of Reference may unintentionally deflect from multiple potential causes of neonatal deaths at the Countess of Chester Hospital and thus miss the opportunities to draw the correct wider lessons for the NHS.” We were calling attention to how a flawed premise could lead to flawed outcomes — and continued harm. But… We were called “noise” and as the inquiry unfolded examining how murders that never happened were allowed to happen, the elephant remained quietly unacknowledged, in the corner. I’ve since often asked myself: did LJ Thirlwall genuinely believe we would all risk our reputations without cause? Did she think at all about the weight of our concerns? Was she under some sort of pressure we couldn’t see? And now another possibility presents itself. Or rather… 585,000 of them. And suddenly, some things begin to make sense. What continues to baffle me is the public indifference. Why aren’t more people alarmed that a judiciary willing to protect itself at all costs is a threat to all of us? At this point, international exposure is the only way forward. If our government and judiciary insist on maintaining this charade, let’s at least give the rest of the world something to laugh at. Because the UK isn’t immune to corruption. It’s just more skilled at denying it. @ClarkeMicah @drphilhammond @LucyLetbyTrials @amandaknox @MartynPitman @DavidDavisMP @DavidRoseUK @Oversig58651516 @ContrarianJolly @Voice4theDead @Michelehal7344

English
0
0
3
211
Sam
Sam@SamSpGl·
@WhyFakeNews But, the Draw of Doom? Wasn't he hording paperwork pertaining to babies in his draw at work? He refused to show anyone who asked what was in the draw and blamed Letby. Keeping confidential stuff from his seniors at the hospital signals guilty!
English
1
0
4
104
Sam
Sam@SamSpGl·
@NeoDoc11 Thank you. Seriously. Thanks.
English
0
0
5
128
Dr Svilena Dimitrova
Dr Svilena Dimitrova@NeoDoc11·
Ten years ago, Bill Kirkup spoke with rare honesty about the damage caused by cover-ups and the lack of accountability in healthcare. A decade on, not only have things not improved — in many cases, they’ve gotten worse. The pattern is painfully familiar now: someone speaks up. They raise concerns in good faith. Instead of being supported, they’re ignored, gaslit, isolated. When their mental health begins to suffer from the pressure, the system uses that very distress to discredit them. Eventually, they’re pushed out — not for being wrong, but for being right in a way that made others uncomfortable. Meanwhile, those who harmed patients or enabled that harm are protected, promoted, or quietly moved along. This isn’t theory. It’s a pattern I’ve watched repeat itself countless times over the past decade of supporting colleagues who tried to do the right thing. I hope, however, that patients remember that there are doctors, nurses, midwives and other healthcare professionals who continue to speak up for them. They do it knowing the risks. Often, it costs them dearly. I hope patients never forget that these people exist — and that they’re often standing up for them when no one else will. I hope the public eventually also sees that not every whistleblower is acting in good faith. Sometimes the system is misused — by those trying to avoid accountability themselves, or to retaliate against others. That’s why, in every case, we have to go back to the evidence. Always. Patient safety and justice rely on it. If there’s one thing I’ve learned, it’s this: the truth doesn’t go away. It waits. And no matter how long it takes, we owe it to patients — and to those who speak up for them — to keep going until it’s fully exposed. @drphilhammond @DavidDavisMP @DavidRoseUK @Voice4theDead @wesstreeting @Keir_Starmer @JamesTitcombe @DOckendenLtd @MartynPitman @PeterElston1 @Michelehal7344 @LucyLetbyTrials
Dr Svilena Dimitrova tweet media
English
18
52
127
8.6K
Sam
Sam@SamSpGl·
@ClarkeMicah @MailOnline Dr Yoxall might have provided evidence prior to the Shoo Lee conference, but now he can rest easy knowing his concerns will be thoroughly examined. So thoroughly, he may attract criticism that his level 3 unit should be shut down. Corporate manslaughter charges all round.
English
0
0
2
236
Peter Hitchens
Peter Hitchens@ClarkeMicah·
'Those involved, having seen the very strong case for Ms Letby's defence, which some of the world’s most distinguished statisticians and doctors have made, might sometimes wake with a start wondering what they have done.' mol.im/a/14869405 via @MailOnline
English
13
61
272
16.9K
Sam
Sam@SamSpGl·
@LucyLetbyTrials @sarahknapton Questions: can I comment if I'm not in either country? Can I post comments sent to me, on behalf of people from either country?
English
0
0
0
63
The Trials of Lucy Letby
The Trials of Lucy Letby@LucyLetbyTrials·
A point raised in @sarahknapton's article yesterday (gift link in next tweet): if the CPS bring new charges against Lucy Letby, journalists & members of the public in England & Wales will no longer be allowed to report on & scrutinise the evidence that originally convicted her.
The Trials of Lucy Letby tweet media
English
20
51
148
7.4K
Sam
Sam@SamSpGl·
@johnsweeneyroar One full file is all they've got after how many years? 70 people plus volunteers were employed on Operation Hummingbird. Waste of time and money.
English
3
0
6
156
John Sweeney
John Sweeney@johnsweeneyroar·
Oooooh! CPS - I predict - will kill this nonsense. Good science says bad hospital, bad doctors not killer nurse. Stupid policeman ignores good science. But will the CPS buy bad science twice?
The Trials of Lucy Letby@LucyLetbyTrials

Cheshire police have released another statement to the press this morning, "confirming that they have submitted a full file of evidence to the Crown Prosecution Service, for charging advice, on the ongoing investigation into deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies at the neonatal unit at both the Countess of Chester Hospital, and the Liverpool Women's Hospital too," per @BBCBreakfast. The Crown Prosecution Service, in their own statement, confirm they've received the file from police, and will be reviewing it. The CPS stress that any future decision to charge, "will be made independently, based on evidence, and in light with our legal test," and that they won't be making any further comments until/unless further charges are brought.

English
30
40
172
31K
Sam
Sam@SamSpGl·
@Philbean12344 Here you go: images.app.goo.gl/YmV6s Watch on, watch off! Why? Because talking to the camera is fine but in clinical areas, wearing a watch is an infection risk.
English
0
0
0
24
Sam
Sam@SamSpGl·
@Philbean12344 For infection control purposes, he probably wasn't even wearing a watch. 'Bare below the elbows'.
English
0
0
0
16