philip holding

@GrahamTanner121 @Lorobawa @AnneSmi91430126 @LCasley31782 @JabesAllowed @ClarkeMicah @drphilhammond @sarahknapton ...and there lies the rub. 'Fear'.

@AnneSmi91430126 @LCasley31782 @JabesAllowed @ClarkeMicah @drphilhammond @sarahknapton And yet, here we are...Lucy Letby in jail after a trial with no evidence, a police force puffed with their own importance, a CPS unable to bring forth other charges for fear of ridicule and a NHS workforce in fear of having the next finger pointed at them..

With HUGE thanks to Jabe, who just publicly released the defence's closing speech in the Lucy Letby trial, inspiring "Lucy Letby, Lewis Carrol & The Trial of The Knave of Hearts . . . A Modern Day Lesson in Absurdity" lucyletbynotes.blogspot.com/2026/03/lucy-l…

@DailyMail @ClarkeMicah When one filters everything else out, there is only one thing that remains. 'Fear'!

PETER HITCHENS: I am sick of the US bossing us about. We're an ancient and proud nation. President Trump thinks a baseball cap is suitable attire for declaring the start of WWIII - we must stand up to him trib.al/SYDB1Dn

I think people should watch this! (Charlie Kirk). youtube.com/watch?v=3wUq3t…

@Positively4thS @GingerCharlie4 IMO, there were victims. But not by Lucy's hand!

@GingerCharlie4 The parents of the victims don't exist . . . because there WERE no victims, and non-existent victims cannot have parents. 😉

Two types of people are content that Lucy Letby is in prison: the irredeemably thick and the irredeemably evil. Some occupy a place in both groups. One thing's for sure: no matter whether you're in one group, the other group or both groups, it's not a good look. Free her NOW!

@UKPatriots2geva @drphilhammond ...and (if so), because she was on placement, what was her clinical supervisor doing.

@drphilhammond It still makes her look bad. 11 ventilated shifts, 4 unplanned extubations. 36%! It doesn't say about the circumstances behind them. As we who know now from the statisticians. It pisses you off. Sorry. But, it does.

I wouldn’t be at all surprised if this dodgy and discredited BBC chart is produced during further prosecutions of Letby as proof that she deliberately pulled tubes out. The CPS loves nothing more than butchering the statistics to get a result.

@drphilhammond After a letter from Mcdonald, the programme contents has been amended on I player. Including the addition of Letby being on placement and clinically supervised. Mcdonald has also written to Ofcome.

@apsamuelson @peternhayes So, does that exclusively point to Letby poisoning the infants with synthetic insulin? A quick peek at Google Scholar could explain glucose disturbances in neonates. One that Prof Lee adequately explained in the press conference! Here's a 'scholar' screen shot.

@peternhayes This is misleading. It wasn't just the immunoassay evidence, it was all the blood glucose tests showing severe hypoglycemia and the lack of response to hypoglycemia treatment in combination with the immunoassays and the lack of any other condition that proved poisoning

Experts have discredited the insulin assay test ‘evidence’ against Lucy Letby. But it was obvious from the start that the test was unsuitable (and hence unreliable) as it said so, in red, on its label. The police interviewing Ms Letby ought to have told her this. But did they?

@rich_coupe @CharlotteCGill It means he lives in a cul-de-sac. Very telling!🤔

@CharlotteCGill I wonder who originally wrote the 'lives in a cul-de-sac' line. What is it supposed to mean?

Great minds tweet alike

@made_by_chris @CharlotteCGill Honestly???

@DebRoberts22249 Yes, but Chase does 'dabble' in bio engineering! Including insulin/ glucose research. I counted 40 plus scientific papers he has collaborated in. scholar.google.co.nz/citations?user…

Dr Shoo Lee instructed a mechanical engineer, Geoff Chase, and a chemical engineer, Helen Shannon to write the reports on the insulin babies. That is correct - 2 engineers and no medical scientists. Dr Lee does not even claim that any of the neonatologists contributed to the report, not that they are in any way experts in bloods and hormones either, see screenshot below. The experts who testified regarding the insulin babies at the trial were; Consultant Pediatric Haematologist Professor Sally Kinsey Dr Gwen Wark, Director of Guildford RSCH Peptide Hormone Laboratory Dr Ana Milan, Consultant Clinical Scientist at Royal Liverpool University Hospital Professor Peter Hindmarsh, Paediatric Endocrinologist But Dr Lee and @legalmarkmc want the Great British public to believe that they have superior expertise to those who testified at the trial. You really couldn't make it up. @AnEmergentI @johnsweeneyroar @jontay44 @evenhanded909 @drphilhammond @thecarolemalone #LucyLetby

@rob_goudie @gill1109 In the trial, it all boiled down to six medical expert witnesses against plumber. In that scenario, what would be your verdict?

Ouch ... "For me the Lucy Letby trial goes much wider than Lucy herself; it represents to me a rot in society as a whole..." What confused me about this case – after Lord Justice Jackson raised questions about Dr Dewi Evans’ reliability in a prior judicial setting – was Mr Justice Goss' ruling that it was up to the jury to assess the reliability of Dr. Evans' expert testimony in light of all the evidence presented. Isn't it a duty of the court to ensure expert witnesses are fully qualified to guide the jury, not for a lay jury to assess the competence of an expert in, say, neonatal pathophysiology? youtube.com/watch?v=rSpW44…

@Cath0378 @ClarkeMicah @goodison2 Are the notes made out on official NHS stationary?

@goodison2 @ClarkeMicah You do realise that most nurses in the country have kept handover sheets? They are personal notes made by the nurse. In the days before shredders they either went in the bin or home in your pockets.

Free to view in the Guardian , totally destroying the ‘Letby is guilty’ certainty of Wes Streeting, Lady Justice Thirlwall and a host of Twitter nuisances . They won’t read it. Why has justice become a mere fringe concern?

@MyriamFrancoisC 1984?

@RichardHor54460 @UKPatriots2geva If I wrote an official NHS email, contradicting what I stated under oath in a murder trial, my feet wouldn't touch the ground!

Quite simply, Dr Ravi Jayarams' testimony under oath contradicts emails that he himself wrote at the time of baby Ks collapse at COCH. No wonder Lucy Letby said she had no recollection of events as described by Jayaram. They didn't happen. #LucyLetby thetimes.com/uk/crime/artic…

@JimFergusonUK @Victoria_Rixon Obviously. That is an assumption of yours!

Not the first time Macron has hidden something under the table. He realised he was wearing a very expensive watch. Decided to hide it.

@markwhiteTV @Mr_R_Alexander The man is completely lost .

BREAKING - On the day the Prime Minister unveiled his plans to reduce migration levels, his plans for smashing the gangs have taken another blow. More than 12,000 small boat migrants have now crossed this year, with another 400 arriving this morning.

@RichardHor54460 @Verity4Justice @NeoDoc11 I.e., 'clinically assessing'. If another nurse was seen doing this. But if Lucy was doing it, according to Jayaram, ' doing nothing'.

@NeoDoc11 Indeed. Lucy Letby was accused by some of 'hovering' over the babies while 'doing nothing'. In actual fact, a good, hardworking, and competent nurse will use their clinical skills of observation to look for signs of potentially serious issues before they become urgent #LucyLetby

David Davis, a rare example of an intelligent and engaged Member of Parliament, has stepped forward to address the growing concerns surrounding Dr Jayaram’s actions. His stance serves as a reminder that there are still MPs willing to defend the truth and challenge the erosion of professional integrity. Unfortunately, his example is far too rare in a political system that is increasingly concerned with self-preservation rather than the well-being of the people it serves. Until more leaders step forward to challenge the narrative, this country will continue to suffer from the growing impact of misinformation and misrepresentation. Further to the issues with discrepancies between his testimony and the truth as recorded by his own hands in an email, as flagged up by David Rose from UnHerd, Dr Jayaram, on national television, suggested that a nurse observing a premature baby during a desaturation event was somehow evidence of foul play or neglect. In reality, the observation of a desaturation event is a standard and essential procedure in neonatal care, especially since many desaturations in premature neonates are self-resolving. There are also well-established methods for determining whether the ET tube is in place properly without needing to handle the baby in the first instance as any handling event for a baby can actually further compromise them. Dr Jayaram’s claims, in a high profile interview during which he was called as “hero”, centred around a stark misrepresentation of neonatal nursing care and monitoring done by nurses when managing premature infants. Important details of medical care were distorted in that interview for the sake of sensationalism. Such reckless statements could not have come at a worse time for the neonatal nursing community. Many nurses, both in the UK and abroad, have raised concerns over the potential for misinterpretation and the broader damage caused by such public misconceptions. And despite these concerns being flagged to the General Medical Council (GMC), there has been no apparent action taken to address the issues. @drphilhammond @MartynPitman @wesstreeting @cheshirepolice @CPSUK @DavidRoseUK @DavidDavisMP

@RuthLessTWAM @UKPatriots2geva It's because she is rattling a few cages, and she has the clout and credentials to do it. They are shit scared of her.

#IStandWithSvilenaDimitrova youtu.be/3XEcjv2YWWo?si…

@theJeremyVine Nothing happens in isolation!

🎙️Mark McDonald, Letby’s barrister, said: “If this is true it’s very concerning. The Daily Mail podcast of Lucy Letby was seen as quite biased, selective and on occasion too focussed on her guilt. It had influence within the general public.” telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/05/1…

@osheaf01 @merchant47 @pope2023 @support_women @NASwinnerton There was a common denominator. Revealed now by the Thurlwall Inquirey. All the collapses happened in a substandard NICU.

@pope2023 @support_women @NASwinnerton For the "suspicious" incidents. With Letby's presence at all of them not coincidental. The "common denominator". The problem, of course, is "if Letby was on holiday in Ibiza", a death wasn't "suspicious." It was only suspicious if she was at work. Circular reasoning.

The key technical term in statistics is "selection bias". If you choose your analysis data wrongly (i.e. in a biased fashion), then you will get an answer that is unreliable, misleading, and maybe even completely wrong. Lucy Letby's trial was selection bias on a colossal scale.