Syed Hussain

SHUT THE FUCK UP AND DO IT. DON'T OVERTHINK. DON'T OVERANALYZE. JUST FUCKING DO IT YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE! (This message is for myself)

Meet and talk to our Founder & CEO @SerialTechX at @TokenizeCon and learn more about what a post-agentic world looks like.

Hahaha! My team has been saying the same thing to me the last two weeks!😂

@MaxMusing I'm one of the "SaaS will be dead soon" guys and this is a very sensible perspective, which I'm fully onboard with. Clearly not all SaaS will be dead, but this is the good, hard, strong kick in the ass that SaaS companies needed.

@lesabrefomo @goatedbaklava @KellyClaudeAI @FelixCraftAI Don't forget @SHIZA_AI

@goatedbaklava I think @KellyClaudeAI is the gold standard here along with @FelixCraftAI

im actually mind blown how unaware CT is with what's going on with this agent meta like every account that has historically been early to trends and such are just talking tradfi stuff, gold, agi, etc I understand why, the sentiment is SO bad in crypto and I think a lot of people kinda gave up putting in the work day in and day out but man, we are in the early stages of a narrative that (in my opinion) will breathe life back into ALL of crypto again. I think this is THAT big. And people are asleep at the wheel Even I wasnt sure if we would get this sort of setup again in crypto, but here we are. Basically in inning 1 of the biggest thing to happen to crypto in years Im either way off here or we are all looking at a generational spot to deploy capital extremely early. I think it is the latter and acting accordingly let's get it. time to lock in if you havent already

@lesabrefomo 🎯

The Agentic Workforce is coming!

"Own Your AI Before AI Owns You"

@Ibrahimifg 100% brother. Seen this coming for the last 2 years and been building the Ark @SHIZA_AI

I've been using Claude Cowork for the last couple of weeks and we need to talk about what madness is coming for employees and business owners: The world has fundamentally changed - this time it is not hyperbole. A few observations from the trenches: 1. AI dramatically improves quality and increases speed. I'm talking about work that used to take a day now taking 15 minutes. And the output is genuinely better. 2. It enables things that were never possible before. Ingesting multiple data sources - product info, emails, investment portfolios, customer support tickets - parsing it all down and giving actionable recommendations. We couldn't have done that with 10 people a year ago. 3. It will mean a loss of jobs. Or more likely in the medium term, a relative freeze on new hires as the same size team does 5x the work. 4. Engineers, designers, product, and BI are all merging into one. If you can't think architecturally, don't have a good aesthetic, and are too much of a code monkey - I think your career is going to fall off a cliff in 2026. If your business is larger than 10 and less than 100 people, you're in the sweet spot right now. Too small and AI doesn't help that much - there isn't enough complexity. Too large and you're probably going to die because you have too much bureaucracy and won't make decisions about this stuff fast enough. You need to be using AI for everything as standard. If you're leaving it to "IT" or treating it like a side project, you're dead. It really is as simple as that. One caveat: security needs to be front-of-mind. Experimental tools leave major gaps for exploitation. This will become a bigger and bigger issue as people open up vastly more of their proprietary and personal data to AI systems. No one truly knows how this will all end up. But the world as we have known it is over. And if you're not on Noah's ark, one thing is certain - you will drown.

2020: "So you blockchain guys have built a solution and are now looking for a problem" 2026: "Agents are creating a multi-trillion dollar problem that will require a solution to enable a post-agentic economy" "Blockchain UX has always been shit for humans because blockchains weren't built for humans. Signing transactions, gas, bridging. Humans hate it. Agents don't care. Most onchain activity is already bots. We've been building machine infrastructure this whole time." 💯

ETH is agentic money. L2s are agent economies. Everyone's been asking what L2s are for if mainnet can scale. Wrong framing. L2s aren't about scaling for humans. They're about isolation for agents. You want a delivery swarm on its own L2. A compute swarm on another. A dispute resolution swarm somewhere else. Each one runs its own economy with its own rules. Bad actors in one swarm don't poison the others. They settle cross-swarm on mainnet when they need to. This is the only framing where L2s make sense long term. Blockchain UX has always been shit for humans because blockchains weren't built for humans. Signing transactions, gas, bridging. Humans hate it. Agents don't care. Most onchain activity is already bots. We've been building machine infrastructure this whole time. Here's where it goes. You have a personal agent on your phone. You tell it to get eggs and milk. It finds agents competing to fulfill that request. Some delivery L2 wins the bid, coordinates with a labor L2, settles the payment, eggs show up. You never touched a wallet. Permissionless means any agent can participate. Composable means agents chain services without business deals. Neutral means no platform can shut your agent out. ETH is agentic money. ETH is the reserve currency for machine economies. More on that tomorrow. 👀

Looking forward to GAIB 2.0 👀!!

@Voxyz_ai Gold!

@Motion_Viz SYSTEM

2 months ago: Abandoning projects by week 4. Today: Zero abandoned projects. The shift? Stopped re-planning. Stopped re-researching. Stopped re-debating decisions I already made. The system: - Claude thinks through problems - NotebookLM remembers every decision - Markdown tracks what ships When someone joins my project now: → Point them to the .md files → Point them to the NotebookLM notebook → They're up to speed in 1 hour, not 1 week. Reply "SYSTEM" and I'll DM you the exact workflow.

@stevesi's historical analysis is spot-on, but his conclusion needs more nuance. His conclusion: We'll have MORE software, not less. Domain expertise becomes MORE valuable. Every historical transition he cites had humans building the new systems. This time: AGENTS building software. Not humans. (We know this because this is exactly what we're doing.) Yes, domain experts will guide the building. But the NUMBER of domain experts needed will be exponentially smaller. "More people work in banking today than ever before." True. Because humans were still building and operating the systems. When agents build AND operate the systems, you don't need more people. You need fewer people with higher expertise. The math doesn't work the same way this time. Value shifts from builders (massively in demand today) to the few domain experts who can guide agents. This isn't about timeline. It's about WHO OWNS the infrastructure when this happens (very soon). When agents replace builders, who owns those agents? Big Tech? Or individuals? That determines whether this transition creates shared prosperity or concentrated wealth. He's completely right: This is exciting, not scary. He's partially right: Domain expertise alone won't save the middle class alone. OWNERSHIP of AI agents will. Not UBI. Not job retraining. OWNERSHIP. "Own your AI, before AI owns you."

Great analysis and 100% with you on newer software being built and domain expertise becoming more valuable. However your conclusion misses something critical: Every transition you cite had HUMANS building the new systems: PC era → Humans building GUI software, Internet → Humans building websites, Streaming → Humans building platforms. This time: AGENTS building software. Not humans. Yes, domain experts will guide agent-built systems. But the NUMBER of domain experts needed is exponentially smaller than the number of builders today. Different math. Different economic system. Very exciting times ahead indeed, but we need to begin thinking about post-labor economics in a post-agentic world, so we can position ourselves for thriving in this new frontier.

BTC hit $62K. ETH $1,850. SOL $78. Couldn't have chosen a worse time to launch $AWF. But our job isn't to time the market. Our job is to build. And building is what we're doing. No one tells you that most of the time, being a founder fucking sucks. Grinding in silence. Revenue's slow. Market's brutal. Team's exhausted. You question everything because it's all on you. Then randomly, out of the blue, one of your investors sends this: Totally random. Total bro moment. This shit hits different when you're in the trenches. It's lonely at the top. Find your bros. Nothing like it. They won't fix the market. They won't solve your problems. But they'll remind you why you need to keep going. Building through the bear. Bismillah. 🚀

@akshay_pachaar Behetreen bhai!

OpenClaw/Clawdbot masterclass! In this video, I give you the complete blueprint to get up and running with your own Clawdbot. And not just one, but multiple AI employees working 24x7 for you. Enjoy! Chapters: 00:00 - Intro 1:12 - See my 3 AI employees in action 5:49 - How the whole thing works under the hood 9:47 - Installation and setup 11:22 - Hooking Clawdbot to Telegram 15:35 - Understanding the project structure 20:03 - Adding custom skill (from a repo of 42k skills) 23:18 - Automating your bots with Cron jobs 25:07 - Going from 1 to 10 Clawdbots 28:53 - Cron jobs vs. Heartbeats: what's the difference? 30:36 - What's coming up next? 31:34 - Outro

@v_computer Keen to try it out! Let's go!

Claude Opus 4.6 was just released... And it's now the default model in the #1 full stack vibe coding platform. Vibecode uses the Claude Code harness, so expect to be blown away by the quality of the mobile apps and web apps that you create. In celebration of 1,000,000 total apps created on vibecode, we're giving away a free month of Opus 4.6 for those who reply to this post. Reply and we'll DM you credits 👇

Shots fired! This is actually hilarious!! 😂

@DCinvestor @_nonfungible @postedgo Building exactly this @SHIZA_AI: @SerialTechX/empowering-the-future-why-ai-ownership-is-the-next-frontier-379086e839b9" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@SerialTechX/e…. Let's chat!

@_nonfungible @postedgo yes, that is also happening having your own AI which understands you and actually serves you is an important step towards this as well

vibe coders should understand something: i love how easy AI is making it for people to build their own apps, push them into production, and start businesses but let's be clear: the future is not in humans building consumer-facing apps the future is everything becomes an API which your personal AI agent can interact with in ways which suit your specific needs and lifestyle (down to the very specific needs of you as an individual) the fact that you can use the machines to build your apps is just an intermediate step to the machines creating the apps for you, LIVE, as you need them so the value of you learning how to build apps now really lies in you learning how to create a business model behind that app- not in creating the piece of software that is the app itself sure, there will be templates for how you can interact with those apps/APIs, but your personal AI will pick one and tailor it even further for you. and a lot of the time, you won't even need to interact with a UI beyond speaking with your AI assistant let me give you an example: would you rather use an app like Uber or Uber Eats, or would you rather just ask your AI assistant to get you a ride somewhere or to show you menus for the type of food you might be interested in and you pick one? the value in apps like that is not in the app installed on your phone. it's in the backend business model which connects the customer with providers. and personal AI assistants actually open the door to you being able to seamlessly use multiple business APIs without worrying in the slightest about which app or intermediate provider they come from there is a decent chance apps as you know them will be mostly dead in ~5-10 years and yes, there are some apps which will still require deep optimization and that is where the hardcore coders may still be needed. but machines will get better at that, and if you take one look at the AAA gaming landscape, you should understand that hyper-optimized code isn't as valuable as it used to be but what will be valuable is owning the APIs with the most use and liquidity. and yes, a lot of those will use public blockchains things are going to accelerate and get very weird very quickly from here

One of the fundamental mistakes that people are making is associating jobs with purpose, which is completely wrong. A human's purpose is not associated with his job. A job serves as a mechanism for the human to help achieve his purpose. A job is fluid and changes based on a variety of factors so yes there will always be a job, but the economic value associated with the job is what will change quite drastically. Yes, there will be a mass disruption to the economic value associated with jobs and the overall labor markets, but I also think it's wrong to associate that with a dystopian society. If anything, this will lead to mass abundance because things will become incredibly affordable due to the most expensive line item on any P&L (human labor) being removed from it. Humans will have more to do, so we will create different jobs, but the jobs "market" as we've known it thus far will forever change. On the flip side, pretending that AI will not cause a mass disruption to the labor markets is equally as wrong. There is a mass disruption that's coming and humanity will adjust to it. There will be short term pain, but in the long term it will be for the better.

Palantir CTO @ssankar says AI doomers are lying to the American public: "You have dual narratives— one that's wildly dystopic, that this tech is going to destroy jobs and purpose." "The other is wildly utopic— where it's going to usher in a new era where we'll be reduced to the equivalent of a house cat." "Both of these miss a fundamental point of human agency. The future of AI hasn't been determined. It is being decided every day by the actions we take." "Humans are going to use AI to do things. Will we use it to build trinkets of marginal value, or to actually reindustrialize the country?" "Net— you have job creation." "We're too enamored with AI as a concept as opposed to AI as a tool for the American worker." "Every single one of these frontier labs is in America... it was born here in America." "It matches the American culture. Look no further than Europe to see how their approach to AI has been essentially to regulate it to irrelevance." Via @FoxNews