Techgnostik 🫶

55.8K posts

Techgnostik 🫶 banner
Techgnostik 🫶

Techgnostik 🫶

@Techgnostik

Αν πεθάνης πριν πεθάνης δεν θα πεθάνης όταν θα πεθάνης 🍄

Gaia Katılım Ocak 2011
598 Takip Edilen2.6K Takipçiler
Techgnostik 🫶 retweetledi
Ryan McCaffrey
Ryan McCaffrey@DMC_Ryan·
Tesla friends: my new interview with @larsmoravy & @woodhaus2 is here! It's all about the history & legacy of the Model S & X. The guys tell some really awesome stories from over the years (& give us a nugget of new Roadster news too). Timecodes and MP3 link below. Enjoy! 00:12:18 Interview Start 00:13:30 How the Decision to Discontinue S and X Happened 00:18:02 S and X Would Need a Complete Redesign to Continue 00:21:55 Next-Gen Roadster News 00:25:03 Signature Numbers 00:29:03 Final S and X Production Numbers 00:29:43 The Beginning of Model S 00:36:20 More Lightning 00:36:48 Old S and X Stories 00:39:26 First Drive of the Model S...Ever 00:45:14 The EV Market and EV Adoption Rate 00:49:36 Adding Dual Motors to Model S 00:51:36 A 3rd Motor in a Model 3? 00:54:37 About the Never-Made Model S Plaid+ 00:56:58 Are 18650s done at Tesla? 00:58:10 Favorite Wheels 01:02:10 Pencils Down on S and X 01:03:22 Parting Message 01:05:07 Drive or Preserve their Signature S's pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.…
English
62
135
838
854.5K
Techgnostik 🫶 retweetledi
Kyle Becker
Kyle Becker@kylenabecker·
Western Civilization didn't flourish because "white males" stopped other groups from succeeding. The West thrived because of rational thought, individual rights, and free enterprise. "White males" that invented the steam engine, electric generation, the combustion engine, flight, and space exploration did not do so because they "stole" the ideas of minorities. These inventions helped lift mankind out of ignorance and hardship, improving the quality of life for all of humanity. "White males" didn't oppress the entire world, they helped make it a better place. "White males" didn't oppress everyone's rights, they invented the idea of rights and paid in blood to liberate tens of millions of people. "White males" didn't invent slavery, they ended it. "White males" didn't invent tyranny, they devised a form of government to end it. Destroying Western Civilization isn't about empowering groups that were "oppressed." It is about tearing down civilization itself so that globalist parasites can rule over all of us.
Nancy C@NC7983

@robertsepehr @Greene_Thoughts @BreitbartNews Why isn’t dismantling white male focused societal conventions not a good deal? Why isn’t giving groups, such as women and no -whites more opportunities to maximize their potential. Why is aiming for diversity in groups making decisions bad, as they clearly come up with better2)

English
1.8K
11.6K
51.1K
42.9M
Techgnostik 🫶 retweetledi
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Breathtakingly Beautiful
Elon Musk tweet media
English
17.8K
37.5K
405K
10.1M
Techgnostik 🫶
Techgnostik 🫶@Techgnostik·
@Tesla Respect to Zack, but there's zero chance there were no human intervention of any kind (pedal press, blinker to force it out of the passing lane, speed profile changes, etc). Either that or they just let it annoy everyone on the roads for thousands of miles?
English
0
3
4
324
Techgnostik 🫶 retweetledi
SpaceX
SpaceX@SpaceX·
First full stack of Starship V3
SpaceX tweet mediaSpaceX tweet mediaSpaceX tweet media
English
1.3K
4.3K
28.5K
33.9M
Techgnostik 🫶 retweetledi
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
The human-perceived RGB is image 1 and the Tesla AI photon count reconstruction is image 2. This is why Tesla FSD can see so well at night or through extreme glare.
Elon Musk tweet mediaElon Musk tweet media
English
6.3K
18.7K
211.7K
40.6M
Techgnostik 🫶
Techgnostik 🫶@Techgnostik·
@anthonyisonline I'm of two minds, like Cern x.com/CernBasher/sta…
Cern Basher@CernBasher

Tesla SHOULD NOT merge with SpaceXAI! The main reason given for Tesla not merging with SpaceXAI is goes something like: "Robotaxi hasn't ramped yet. Tesla stock could 5X. I'm here for the ramp. Optimus hasn't ramped either. Tesla could 10x. Let's give it a few years. I don't want to give my upside to SpaceXAI shareholders who just enjoyed a 4.4X since last summer." On its surface, this is a sound argument. I share these sentiments. Who could argue with that? I will. (I'm capable of holding two opposing thoughts in my mind at the same time). AI waits for no one First, have you seen how fast AI is moving? How durable is Tesla's Robotaxi moat? Honest answer: I believe it's strong, but we just don't know. How durable is Tesla's Optimus moat? Honest answer: I believe Tesla is extremely well positioned, but again, we just don't know. So no one has the luxury of waiting a few years to see how things play out in this space. The good news is that Elon has always been good at seeing the next steps ahead and positioning his companies well before most. Robotaxi Ramp Issues What happens to the Robotaxi ramp if Federal autonomous legislation doesn't come? What happens if Federal autonomous legislation is terrible? Or, perhaps the legislation is favorable, but think about what could happen to the Robotaxi ramp if Elon can't get enough chips to build millions Cybercabs or build tens/hundreds of millions of Optimi. Being chip constrained would materially harm the present value of Tesla if Robotaxi and Optimus can't scale beyond a certain point. Sure the cash flow pours in on the first 10 million Robotaxis, but investors would say: "We're going to give this company a low P/E because their growth is capped. They should have thought ahead and invested in semiconductor capacity. This business can't scale." What does Tesla need SpaceXAI for? 1) Capital - fresh off an IPO SpaceXAI will be flush with cash. 2) Starlink for low-cost global connectivity to cars, Semi and Optimus. 3) Grok is the interface for Robotaxi (so you can speak to the car). 4) Grok is the brain/voice of Optimus. 5) Orbital AI data centers are needed for training & inference for Robotaxi, Optimus and Digital Optimus. 6) Semiconductors from Terafab - a joint project between Tesla and SpaceX (Tesla can't self-fund this). 7) SpaceX's material science expertise. Sharing the Wealth with SpaceXAI Okay, so if Tesla isn't merged with SpaceXAI, how much will Tesla have to pay SpaceXAI for all of the above? - What portion of Robotaxi revenue goes to SpaceXAI? - What portion of Optimus revenue goes to SpaceXAI? Tesla may have to pay SpaceXAI a slice of the economics from Robotaxi and Optimus. That could mean SpaceXAI collects money every time: - a Robotaxi mile is driven, - an Optimus unit uses Grok, - a vehicle connects through Starlink, - Tesla uses orbital data centers, - or Tesla runs fleet-level inference. So Tesla shareholders may think they are avoiding dilution by rejecting a merger. But they may simply be choosing a different kind of dilution: permanent economic leakage. Instead of giving SpaceXAI shareholders ownership upfront, Tesla may end up paying SpaceXAI forever. Pick your poison carefully!

English
0
0
2
53
Anthony Smith
Anthony Smith@anthonyisonline·
Agree with Bradford’s take here. The conflict comes with Elon’s personal goal of control of a combined Tesla/ SpaceX entity. Surely he would want the valuation of SpaceX to be high relative to $TSLA to increase his % ownership? This is not in the interests of $TSLA shareholders
Rebellionaire@Rebellionaire

Tesla shareholders funded the robotaxi vision through the hard part. The missed timelines, ridicule, drawdowns, and the “FSD is impossible” years. So if Tesla ever gets folded into SpaceX, the question isn’t “would that be cool?” It’s: who gets paid for the robotaxi value? Bradford breaks it down here.👇

English
23
15
96
4.7K
Techgnostik 🫶 retweetledi
Sawyer Merritt
Sawyer Merritt@SawyerMerritt·
The NHTSA has just officially announced that the 2026 @Tesla Model Y is ​the first ​vehicle model to pass ⁠the agency’s new ​advanced driver assistance ​system tests. 2026 Tesla Model Y vehicles, manufactured on or after Nov. 12, 2025, successfully met the new criteria for four newly integrated advanced safety tests: • Pedestrian automatic emergency braking • Lane keeping assistance • Blind spot warning • Blind spot intervention “Today’s announcement marks a significant step forward in our efforts to provide consumers with the most comprehensive safety ratings ever,” said NHTSA Administrator Jonathan Morrison. “By successfully passing these new tests, the 2026 Tesla Model Y demonstrates the lifesaving potential of driver assistance technologies and sets a high bar for the industry. We hope to see many more manufacturers develop vehicles that can meet these requirements.”
Sawyer Merritt tweet mediaSawyer Merritt tweet media
English
142
810
5.2K
399.4K
Techgnostik 🫶
Techgnostik 🫶@Techgnostik·
@teslavangelist @Tesla Yep. Still a long ways to go. Model Y L will help. I'm not saying they shouldn't make a larger one. I'm just saying the masses are already buying Teslas.
English
1
0
0
88
Teslavangelist
Teslavangelist@teslavangelist·
@Techgnostik @Tesla it's popular, but not enough. another way to look at it is that far more people choose something other than the Model Y than choose the Model Y.
English
1
0
0
10
Teslavangelist
Teslavangelist@teslavangelist·
Very good summary of a-mom's-view. Many such cases: "I’m not there yet, and not because I hate them, but because @Tesla does not make an SUV big enough for a family of 6. And I’m just talking about seat count." And no, autonomy will not replace this. Essentially, either Tesla makes one or the masses stick to gas.
Merianne Jensen@MerianneJensen

Several years ago, @congressdj decided he needed a Tesla. I was against it because I thought they were pretentious. Plus, I didn’t think electric cars would work because that’s what the media always said. But as is his way, he went ahead and got one anyway. He showed me how to drive it, and I have to admit it was pretty nice. But I still preferred my Honda. Over time, though, I started to see how much money we were saving on gas (he drives a lot!). So, I stopped rolling my eyes and just let him enjoy it. 😝 A few years later, he came to me with this crazy idea that we should get a used one for our 16-year-old son. I was completely opposed to it. I thought it was a bit much. We looked at the budget and he agreed to check out some used Honda Civics. What we found was that they were ridiculously overpriced and would still require gas, oil changes, brake changes, and all the rest. Then he found a used Tesla lease for $200 a month. We had to admit that was a steal. Teslas are one of the safest cars you can buy. I never doubted that. But when my husband showed me all the features we could enable to limit aggressive driving, track habits, and save money, it just made too much sense. So we got it for him (he’s working it off in various ways). With all these Teslas, my husband is naturally trying to push me into one. I’m not there yet, and not because I hate them, but because @Tesla does not make an SUV big enough for a family of 6. And I’m just talking about seat count. We rented a Model X for the family while in Hawaii over Christmas. Yes, it fit the whole family, but it did not fit our bags. Six carry-ons and a big suitcase meant I had to take a minivan cab to the hotel while my husband picked up the car. It was great for driving around the island but not for the logistics of traveling as a family. So until @elonmusk announces a car that can transport everything my Honda Pilot can, I’ll have to drive what my husband calls my tractor a little longer. Finally, I want to say something about Tesla’s Full Self-Driving. I watched it when my husband used it a few years ago, and it sucked. He liked it, but I would never dare use it. I didn’t trust it. What I see now on his 2026 Tesla is nothing short of incredible. He literally doesn’t touch the wheel anymore. He leans his seat back like some kind of gangsta and just lets it drive itself. The biggest and final thing I’ll say: With the self-driving (which has made me fear for my husband less since he no longer drives aggressively) and the other safety features Tesla is renowned for, I completely trust it to carry my kids around. And as a protective mama bear, that means a lot! PS - No we don’t have a Cybertruck. My husband insisted on taking that picture with a loaner he had, once. 🤦‍♀️ 😂

English
9
0
11
2K
Techgnostik 🫶
Techgnostik 🫶@Techgnostik·
@DanielLurie Great work. Can they legally be destroyed? That would be a great consequence for this kind of nonsense
English
0
0
0
79
Daniel Lurie 丹尼爾·羅偉
This past Sunday, nearly 80 illegal ATVs and dirt bikes were seized on the Bay Bridge as part of a two-month investigation by the Oakland Police Department. OPD, with CHP's assistance, tracked the illegal sideshow activity. They alerted SFPD to a potential takeover heading into San Francisco. More than 100 OPD officers were deployed to make arrests and recover the vehicles. This coordinated response highlights the strength of our regional partnerships and the progress being made to address illegal sideshows. Thank you to OPD personnel for their continued dedication to public safety and our law enforcement partners at CHP for their collaboration in keeping our communities safe.
Oakland Police Dept.@oaklandpoliceca

OPD drones captured illegal ATV/dirt bike activity on the Bay Bridge. This 2-month investigation led to 77 bikes seized 9 arrests 2 firearms If you were involved, we are actively pursuing leads. We will not tolerate reckless activity. Thank you @SFPD & @CHP_GoldenGate

English
48
20
435
50.4K
Techgnostik 🫶
Techgnostik 🫶@Techgnostik·
We don't live in a direct democracy. Nor should we. We have representatives, laws, zoning ordinances, and private property rights. So just because some angry people disagreed, that doesn't mean our system isn't a constitutional republic with democratically elected representatives.
English
1
0
0
53
Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯
Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯@BasedSamParker·
Imagine a building a half-mile wide. Now imagine that building stretches from Seattle to Portland. That's what they're gonna build in Utah. Utahns showed up in droves to oppose it. The 3-man county commission passed it anyway. This is "democracy." Lol I don't normally advocate violence, but they're making it VERY difficult here.
Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯 tweet media
Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯@BasedSamParker

Why does Utah need a 63 square mile data center that will require more than twice Utah's current total electrical consumption? Why does the country, for that matter?

English
1.2K
8.9K
35.3K
2M