Fred Harris

205 posts

Fred Harris

Fred Harris

@TheFredman007

Early GTM @ https://t.co/Q6JqBBScw7 | CS + Commerce @ UNSW | Experimenting with agents, GTM systems & infrastructure

Sydney, Australia Katılım Ekim 2022
290 Takip Edilen29 Takipçiler
Fred Harris
Fred Harris@TheFredman007·
@geoffreywoo reminds me of naval ravikant saying our brains are like lions not machines. You sprint, recover, sprint again.
English
0
0
0
14
GEOFF WOO
GEOFF WOO@geoffreywoo·
personal data point: every serious founder i know is slightly allergic to lifestyle optimization. they optimize for cycles, not comfort. less performative balance, more shots on goal. most people want the identity of ambition without the invoice.
English
7
0
20
797
Kevin Xu
Kevin Xu@kevinxu·
trade first, research later. many such cases.
Michael Sikand 🦑@michaelsikand

I made a high conviction trade into $HLIT on Friday. Then I spent the long weekend doing the dive. When I first researched $HLIT back in March, I didn't see the story. There wasn't a laser or GPU to point at. But thanks to traders like @BryzonX, @citrini, @CKCapitalxx, and @kevinxu it finally clicked. The thing that flipped me wasn't the 43% quarter. It was realizing the moat isn't just 95% market share, it's time. $HLIT's cOS runs the broadband network for basically every major cable operator. To rip Harmonic out, an operator has to run an 18-24 month certification on a replacement before they can even start the switch. Harmonic owns this market into 2028 at the earliest, which happens to be the exact window the whole industry is forced to spend through its biggest upgrade cycle ever. This market isn't hard to win. It's closed. At first glance, two operators are a material risk at over half of revenue. But on a further look, the business outside those two is growing 78% and just became the majority of bookings for the first time. The single biggest reason to avoid this name is quietly dissolving. Overall, this cable upgrade isn't some manufactured narrative, it's a legitimate multi year supercycle, and it's undeniably AI adjacent. The same agentic AI and home compute pulling more and more bandwidth through these networks is exactly what forces the spend. $HLIT is the clearest pure play winner of it, and it's still trading in the low 20s forward on FY2027. For a critical infra software monopoly growing 43% yoy, it's still cheap. Kawz and I just published a short, digestible research report on $HLIT to share our conviction on Substack. It's all free aside from our model, PTs, and comps analysis. Average cost $15.76. Also holding some 10/16s $17.5C's. DYOR. NFA.

English
19
0
65
27.7K
Gaurav
Gaurav@gauravsbuilding·
We have nearly 20,000 users on the platform We respond to every piece of feedback individually, every single day Bugs, product suggestions, roadmap questions, etc But recently, we've been getting feedback submissions like this, which is so fucking awesome:
Gaurav tweet media
English
3
0
23
694
Fred Harris
Fred Harris@TheFredman007·
@thatguybg Pretty baller last name now that you mention it 😂
English
1
0
2
26
brett goldstein
brett goldstein@thatguybg·
dario's last name, "amodei" translates to "lover of God" or "loved by God" in latin the simulation is breaking and the pope is in on it
English
2
1
25
950
Fred Harris
Fred Harris@TheFredman007·
The dust has settled from Google I/O Quick one for me the SEO guys: How do you think agentic search powered by flash 3.5 & the move away from 10 blue links is going to change the SEO landscape?
Fred Harris tweet media
English
1
0
2
13
Fred Harris
Fred Harris@TheFredman007·
@levie For technocrats it’s hard to see the forest from the trees. In their mind coding is solved, therefore everything is going to get automated away, and before you know it no more jobs. They do not consider there is always surplus demand that can absorb the additional supply.
English
0
0
0
263
Aaron Levie
Aaron Levie@levie·
The CEO of Goldman Sachs is taking the other side on the pessimistic takes on AI and jobs. If you looked at what work looked like a few decades ago and saw how much faster everything is or easier it is to produce the same thing as before - even before AI - you’d certainly have been convinced there’d be no jobs left. What happens is we constantly just demand more from everything. Instead of automating a task and delivering the same value proposition, but cheaper, we just expect more from the overall product or service. Because some players in the market decides to do more with the automation, and it raises everyone’s expectations. So those that don’t respond can’t compete. We get more financial analysis from analysts. We get much more comprehensive legal advice. We get more tailored financial services offerings. We get better software in niches we never thought we could automate. Our healthcare providers offer more tests and deeper medical advice. This just goes on and on. When you move from believing the world is static and you’ll have a better view of how jobs evolve due to AI.
Aaron Levie tweet media
David Sacks@DavidSacks

Yes

English
52
48
461
69.2K
Fred Harris
Fred Harris@TheFredman007·
@jasonlk Chad Peets was on 20VC, and made a good point “If someone could get fired based on the decision, humans need to be involved in the sales process”
English
0
0
1
152
Jason ✨👾SaaStr.Ai✨ Lemkin
"Anthropic partnered with Fin to create a true self-serve process for enterprise customers. Since then? 54% of new enterprise logos have come through self-serve in 2026" -- Eleanor Dorfman, Anthropic’s Head of Industries
Jason ✨👾SaaStr.Ai✨ Lemkin@jasonlk

54% of Anthropic's new enterprise logos in 2026 came through self-serve. Self-serve enterprise. Real ACV. Real terms of service. No AE in the loop. Anthropic's Head of Industries Eleanor Dorfman walked through at SaaStr AI 2026 last week how they rebuilt the entire sales org in 30 days after Claude Opus 4.6 broke their demand curve in December. 👉The constraint: couldn't 3x or 4x the sales team fast enough without lowering the recruiting bar. The thesis: don't buy a new stack. Thread Claude through the one you already have. What they kept: 1⃣ Clay for enrichment 2⃣LeanData for routing 3⃣ @salesforce as system of record 4⃣@Gong_io for call coaching 5⃣Ironclad for contracts 6⃣@slackhq for everything else What they added: Claude as the connective tissue between all six. The four moves: 1/ Killed the PLG vs SLG orthodoxy. Launched enterprise self-serve in January. Intercom Fin guides the buyer through the journey. Now 54% of new enterprise logos. 2/ Threaded Claude through the existing stack. Every AE starts the day with a "morning brief" Skill that pulls context from Gmail, Gong, Slack, Salesforce, @intercom, Greenhouse. 3/ Made Slack the front door for every support function. Slack ticket in, Jira ticket out. Claude triages and resolves inline if it matches precedent. Escalates with full context if not. 4/ Codified what the best reps do as Skills. Every new rep gets a sales plug-in with 5 Skills: morning brief, call prep, customer follow-up, competitive intel, create-an-asset. Anthropic didn't replace anything. They invested in the stack they already had and let Claude be the seam between everything. Most companies will spend 2026 evaluating AI-native sales platforms. But Anthropic did it with its current stack + Claude. Almost none of it required new software.

English
5
0
64
21.8K
Fred Harris
Fred Harris@TheFredman007·
Founders, if you had to start a company tomorrow, what market would you pick? - B2B - B2C - Marketplace / C2P / B2P
English
0
0
2
13
Fred Harris
Fred Harris@TheFredman007·
@tobi not an ai b2b saas launch video? Get off my timeline
English
0
0
0
631
Fred Harris
Fred Harris@TheFredman007·
@danmartell If you are still manually doing over 50% of ur tasks, ur completely behind the 8ball. Most platforms/services now have agentic solutions bolted on, I couldn’t think of many circumstances where you are not powered by AI in a workflow.
English
0
0
0
45
Dan Martell
Dan Martell@danmartell·
Your competition is not another human. It's a human with 5 AI agents.
English
50
10
150
3.2K
Zach Yadegari
Zach Yadegari@zach_yadegari·
A wise mentor once taught me: To learn product, study Silicon Valley To learn marketing, study dropshippers
English
65
49
1.2K
55.5K
Fred Harris
Fred Harris@TheFredman007·
@paulg what about when it’s a network effect and has a centre of gravity. Ie marketplace platforms usually need huge network effects to be broadly valuable - I suppose one could make the case, to your point, that a niche marketplace could serve a specific need for a specific user.
English
0
0
4
378
Paul Graham
Paul Graham@paulg·
A startup idea that only works if there are already a significant number of people using it is not a valid startup idea. There has to be some subset of users who need what you're making so desperately that they'll use it even if no one else is.
English
162
129
2.6K
120.5K
Fred Harris
Fred Harris@TheFredman007·
Why does codex automations and usability not compare to claude cowork for non coding tasks?
English
0
0
1
19
Fred Harris
Fred Harris@TheFredman007·
@i_mika_el depends on business model. If u are running marketplace platform its growth loops + social visibility. If its b2b high acv, outbound + seo + big social bets
English
1
0
1
47
Mikhail Rogov
Mikhail Rogov@i_mika_el·
founders: what worked best to get your first users? was it repeatable, or just luck?
English
30
0
29
2.2K
Noah
Noah@NoahKingJr·
What’s the first job AI will completely replace?
English
169
3
97
21.9K
Fred Harris
Fred Harris@TheFredman007·
@mariannehere Disagree if it’s venture scale bets. Venture is to grow at all costs, if you are uber in the ride share wars, you wouldn’t give a F about whether lyfts profit margins are better, you are trying to absorb as much market share as possible.
English
0
0
0
22
Marianne
Marianne@mariannehere·
Profit > MRR There's this culture that has been going around for a while where founders flex revenue rather than profit A company making $100k a month can be profiting $20k A company making $30k a month can also be profiting $20k The second one is more impressive to me Revenue hides a lot of costs, to me the real flex is how much the company is actually keeping after everything is paid
English
41
0
70
1.5K
Fred Harris
Fred Harris@TheFredman007·
@CodeByNZ This is why ai leaders aren’t changing their messaging from “ai will eat all jobs”. They are selling to bloated enterprises, every ceo wants to hear that their salary expenses will decrease by 30%
English
0
0
2
24