Why Lie
7.7K posts

Why Lie
@TheNewBacklash
I don't have to pretend anyone is the opposite sex in order to tolerate their existence. Why do you?



Tom Steyer: “I’m totally in favor of trans athletes in high school. When you understand the vulnerability, the stress, the danger of being a trans kid and you understand almost half of them try to commit suicide. Then you think we’re gonna punish those kids, we’re gonna cut them off from team sport. It’s like, no we’re not”



















The risk of a trans woman being abused or assaulted in the men’s toilet per visit = extremely high. The risk of a woman being abused or assaulted in the women’s toilet per visit = extremely low.







You really just hate girls and women and view us as the lesser sex that exists to serve men's wants, inc as emotional support animals for cheating and abusive males. That's what we hear loud and clear. Jackasses like you and Tom are why I left the Dem party and will never vote for another one until you all pull your heads out of your misogynistic asses. If that's even possible given what patronizing narcissists you all are. Go tell these girls your brilliant solution.



Follow the logic. Women are deluded and naive for thinking predatory and violent men can be kept out of women-only spaces. ‘They can rape you anywhere.’ However, trans-identified men can only be safe in women-only spaces, because no abuser would ever follow them in there.



Imagine this: a group of working-class white men flood into Parliament Square on a Saturday afternoon, waving Union Jack flags. Among them are known criminals—some with violent records. They shout abuse, deface statues, urinate on memorials. They hold signs with slogans like “The only good immigrant is a dead one,” “Bring back witch-burning of brown people,” and “Piss on Muslims.” Can you imagine the reaction? The police would be out in full riot gear. Journalists would descend like vultures. Front pages would scream about a fascist uprising. Politicians across the spectrum would line up to condemn it. There would be emergency debates in Parliament. The working class would once again be blamed for dragging Britain into barbarism. It would be treated as a national crisis. Now imagine the same scene—but swap the Fred Perry shirts for dresses. Swap the football chants for chants of “trans rights are human rights.” Keep the abuse. Keep the criminal records. Keep the vandalism and the threats—only now, the targets are women. Lesbians. Feminist. Survivors of male violence. And instead of swastikas or white power slogans, the flags are Progress Pride and trans stripes. Now imagine the reaction. Actually, you don’t have to. Because that happened. And no one cared. There was no national outcry. No political reckoning. No police crackdown. No headlines about hate movements. No pundits drawing historical parallels to fascism or authoritarianism. Instead, there was silence—or worse, celebration. Because these weren’t angry working-class blokes the liberal elite loves to loathe. These were the approved kind of extremists: middle-class men in lipstick, cloaked in the language of rights and inclusion. They can say “die, TERF.” They can threaten rape and disfigurement. They can silence women, stalk them, spit at them, doxx them. They can scream “no debate” while waving signs glorifying violence. And institutions—media, government, academia—will protect them. Not just tolerate them, but fund them. Platform them. Cheer them on. Because identity, in this warped political moment, trumps behaviour. And gender identity, in particular, has become the ultimate shield. It turns men into victims, women into villains, and violence into virtue—so long as it's directed at the right targets. This isn’t just hypocrisy. It’s systemic gaslighting. It’s a two-tier society where some people can say and do anything under the banner of “progress,” while others are hounded for speaking plain truth. We’re told to imagine a dystopia of hate. But the real nightmare is already here—and it’s wearing a dress. #ThisIsTrans











