
T Do
12.6K posts






This is one of the clearest explanations so far of why the proposed CGT changes are economically flawed and could damage long term investment in Australia, written by former Treasury official Geoff Francis. One of Geoff’s key criticisms is the return to inflation indexation on an asset by asset basis, something I’ve also been raising over the past week. Because inflation adjusted losses on one investment can’t offset gains on another, diversified investors can end up paying tax rates higher than their actual real returns. It also suggests the housing changes are based on flawed assumptions about property investors and will likely reduce housing supply, increase rents and hurt long term renters. More broadly, Geoff argues the reforms do little to improve productivity or economic growth. He also points out that the additional tax revenue isn’t being used to reduce inefficient taxes elsewhere, but instead to fund more spending and debt, while the modest WATO tax offset will likely be quickly eroded by bracket creep. afr.com/politics/feder…









My younger sister is a school teacher, and the best saver I know. She squirrelled away money for decades, takes extra work, works really hard, and invests all her money into equities. Now Albo has taken half of it. There are no words to describe how abhorrent this CGT policy is.

Economist Richard Holden called the change a “productivity tax” because businesses that grew the fastest, above the rate of inflation, would be taxed harder. COSBOA CEO Skye Cappuccio “The underlying concern is we will have businesses with turnover between the $2 million and $10 million mark that will face a tax disincentive to grow.” afr.com/politics/feder…














