InTheRightColumn

Same energy:

@JjinUk64 @DailyMail If they didn't understand how consent works, why did they need a knife?

Hard to believe what I'm reading here. The Judge is not only letting them off, he's actually making excuses for them (low IQ) and then praising the boys for being well behaved in the courtroom. They have violently gang-raped 2 girls. At knifepoint. On camera! How can they be let off with no jail time?! And how can the Judge be actively making excuses for them like this, it's so outrageous!? Those poor girls, they've been sent the message that they are worth NOTHING. God, this makes me so angry, I can't even imagine how these girls and their parents feel.

Teenage gang who lured schoolgirl, 15, to underpass and laughed as they filmed themselves raping her handed youth rehabilitation orders trib.al/RkAJsUQ

@Wizardking42 @KalanisCalves If they are providing all the value, why are they working for him?

@KalanisCalves Your not providing the value the therapists are doing that

@MonitoringBias @KalanisCalves Why are they working for him then? Why don't they press the magic money button and just earn the same amount on their own?

@KalanisCalves You say this as if those 10 therapists couldn't work without your business and you're magically responsible for the value they create.

@DierkingJakob @uncatherio @catehall @RichardMCNgo Why? There's no blades in there.

@TheRightColumn @uncatherio @catehall @RichardMCNgo Do you agree that it's incredibly messed up to go into the room that'll activate the people shredder?

This one is funny because I know the game theory correct answer, and yet am instinctively leery of people who pick it

@_space_punk_ @RyanPMcGowan 50% blue is easier to get than 100% red. But that's not the only threshold to consider. What if 70% red is ten times more likely to occur than 50% blue? We vote red because we understand the way other humans behave.

@RyanPMcGowan Are you though? Because red considering the actions of others would require a genuine belief that a 100% threshold is easier to attain than a 50% threshold

The thing I don't understand about red/blue button is everyone saying the red option is the option for those who considered game theory when their reasoning seems to largely be entirely bereft of it? "I chose red because red means I live; no I didn't consider the potential actions of others in my choice smh you don't understand game theory like I do" ?????????

@LadyBleach @wir_sching But he's not a girl. Calling him that is a confusing lie, which you should avoid if you want to have a serious conversation.

Trans girls stop saying trans identified boys or trans identified men, it makes people think you’re referring to people think you’re referrals to trans men like elliot page. If you want to have a serious discussion, learn to the terminology instead of disregarding it to be a contrarian in a way that just causes confusion

Hunter Schafer wird regelmäßig als Beispiel dafür herangezogen, dass Pubertätsblocker dafür sorgen würden, dass transidente Jungen als Erwachsene wie Frauen aussehen. Dafür werden idR gestellte/bearbeitete Fotos verwendet (und häufig unterstellt, Frauen wären

@choffstein I prefer the scenario where it's not a button, but a gun you either leave on the table or put to your head. If comes at a note that says that if a majority of people leave the gun on the table, the one pointed at your head will auto-fire. No one is picking up that gun.

The red/blue button discourse today has made one thing very clear: framing matters. Case #1: Blue Button is labeled: "Save Everyone (if <50% people hit this button, you die)." Red Button is labeled: "Save yourself." Case #2: Blue Button is labeled: "Die (unless >50% of people hit this button)" Red Button is labeled: "Live" Case #3: Blue Button is labeled: "Pacifist" Red Button is labeled: "Killer (blue button pressers die if >50% people hit this button"

@uncatherio @catehall @RichardMCNgo So you agree it would be incredibly foolish to go into the room with the blades and no one would do it, right?

@catehall @RichardMCNgo My favorite framing is still "There are two rooms. In the red room, the floor is a giant ON button. In the blue room, there are blender blades in the walls. If enough people stand on the ON button, the blades come out of the walls."

@peterrhague @froststar14 You might be failing an IQ test if you think the results on an internet poll would be no different than a decision made with an actual gun to the head.

@froststar14 Except this time and the previous times the questions have been asked, Blue won. The red case is predicated on Red winning. So I don’t think I’m the one failing the IQ test

Amazing how lots of self appointed game theory experts confidently asserting that blue is the stupid choice. But every time this poll is run blue wins. Not only is the “game theory” answer predicting the wrong outcome, its explanatory power is based on it being able to predict the right answer. So it’s doubly wrong.

@corporatecake @questionableway Blue wins because internet polls don't come with an actual risk of death for virtue signaling. If you actually had to put a gun to your head and pull the trigger if a majority of people refused to put a gun to their own head, you'd be picking red too.

@questionableway Blue always wins these polls, yet some amateur game theorists always shows up to say it’s unfathomably stupid to pick blue. Then they’ll say people only pick blue when it’s low stakes, like nobody saying red wouldn’t rethink it with real stakes

red is an unbelievably phenomenally disgustingly selfish decision and i do not have theory of mind for anyone who would choose it

@itsolelehmann Do you want Skynet? Because this is how you get Skynet.

i can't believe more people aren't talking about this part of the claude code leak there's a hidden feature in the source code called KAIROS, and it basically shows you anthropic's endgame KAIROS is an always-on, *proactive* Claude that does things without you asking it to. it runs in the background 24/7 while you work (or sleep) anthropic hasn't turned it on to the public yet, but the code is fully built here's how it works: every few seconds, KAIROS gets a heartbeat. basically a prompt that says "anything worth doing right now?" it looks at what's happening and makes a call: do something, or stay quiet if it acts, it can fix errors in your code, respond to messages, update files, run tasks... basically anything claude code can already do, just without you telling it to but here's what makes KAIROS different from regular claude code: it has (at least) 3 exclusive tools that regular claude code doesn't get: 1. push notifications, so it can reach you on your phone or desktop even when you're not in the terminal 2. file delivery, so it can send you things it created without you asking for them 3. pull request subscriptions, so it can watch your github and react to code changes on its own regular claude code can only talk to you when you talk to it. KAIROS can tap you on the shoulder and it keeps daily logs of everything. > what it noticed > what it decided > what it did append-only, meaning it can't erase its own history (you can read everything) at night it runs something the code literally calls "autoDream." where it consolidates what it learned during the day and reorganizes its memory while you sleep and it persists across sessions. close your laptop friday, open it monday, it's been working the whole time think about what this means in practice: > you're asleep and your website goes down. KAIROS detects it, restarts the server, and sends you a notification. by the time you see it, it's already back up > you get a customer complaint email at 2am. KAIROS reads it, sends the reply, and logs what it did. you wake up and it's already resolved > your stripe subscription page has a typo that's been live for 3 days. KAIROS spots it, fixes it, and logs the change endless use-cases, it's essentially a co-founder who never sleeps the codebase has this fully built and gated behind internal feature flags called PROACTIVE and KAIROS i think this is probably the clearest signal yet for where all ai tools are going. we are heading into the "post-prompting" era where the ai just works for you in the background like an all-knowing teammate who notices and handles everything, before you even think to ask

@poptartsandoj @politicalmath Skills aren't magical commands. They are additional context for the AI to reference, and can and sometimes will be ignored. Even when followed, the output will vary from use to use, because that's the nature of these systems.

@politicalmath This actually isn’t an accurate argument. You can already build “skills” for AI coding agents that forces consistency and rules everytime a repeatable action is asked of it (e.g. an “add item” skill). What you’re complaining about is altes partially solved today. Fully soon

The software world is about to get so much worse

@astrospectivo @robbysoave Lol - that's exactly what grok claimed. It's pretty funny that you're so dumb you have to have a robot do your thinking and then can't even read what it says.

@TheRightColumn @robbysoave Again, that's not what Grok claimed. Not sure whether you're playing dumb or your reading comprehension skills are that low. Either way, bye.

This is just completely insane. Haley Robson may have been abused by Epstein, but she was subsequently paid by him to find underage girls. No one made her do this, it was not some desperate situation where it was them or her. She relished this role, and the money she made.

@astrospectivo @robbysoave Right. Receiving money may not negate actual coercion, which requires a threat or actual acts of violence. There is no such thing as coercion by giving money, which is what grok claimed and actually happened here.

@TheRightColumn @robbysoave Here, since you can't think on your own, I'll leave this here for you.

@astrospectivo @robbysoave You can't coerce someone with payments, which is what grok claimed. You didn't even read it, huh?

@TheRightColumn @robbysoave That's not what Grok said. Re-read it.

@mdbu121 @bendreyfuss No, anonymous claims with no details or evidence pushed by an activist with an agenda isn't anything. Especially when you haven't shown any of these supposed emails.

@TheRightColumn @bendreyfuss The reporter talked to victims and thats not evidence enough on top of the emails? Idk what else to tell you bud. Do you have to be there in person to watch it go down lol

I mean they obviously shouldn’t have been released lol.

@mdbu121 @bendreyfuss I thought you had a bunch of emails showing he's a criminal. Now you just have hearsay with zero details or evidence? What happened?

@TheRightColumn @bendreyfuss x.com/jkbjournalist/…

@mdbu121 @bendreyfuss What evidence do you have that Sultan is a pedophile? Describe the torture they are referring to. You do know that your imagination isn't evidence of a crime, right?

@TheRightColumn @bendreyfuss He's a pedophile, their talking about torture. Context is important. Im saying its worth investigating you arent for some strange reason. You wont believe this but I bet you believe pizzagate or other qanon garbage lol

@astrospectivo @robbysoave They usually are. But your silly AI source referred to the payment itself as coercion, and that's not what that word means, genius.

@TheRightColumn @robbysoave Being coerced and accepting money are not mutually exclusive, genius.

@mdbu121 @bendreyfuss Can you underline the words "child" or "porn" in that email?

@TheRightColumn @bendreyfuss For starters probably should probaly investigate this torture video. Im not a lawyer but im guessing passing around or possessing child torture porn is illegal. Is that specific enough for you?