The Titan of Doom

@AzulAether Someone need to create a fair movie rating site

@AzulAether They are now gonna completely remove "everyone else" and will only have pish votes.. Just see

Thought this was cool and thought Odyssey was bad So i whipped up a site documenting this gap in rating for every movie from 2019 - present. You can check it out out at popcorngap.com

@esjesjesj @WallStreetApes @MattWalshBlog @DustyRonin It's too late. You dumbasses and your politics made her a meme and a joke to laugh at. Good fucking job.

@WallStreetApes @MattWalshBlog @DustyRonin This is AI you fucking idiot

Just saw The Odyssey. Despite what you may have heard, literally all of the criticisms by conservatives were entirely correct. The movie is just as woke as you fear, if not more so. The DEI casting is atrocious. Completely takes you out of the story right from the beginning. But even worse than that is Nolan’s decision to turn Odysseus into an anachronistic whiney, solemn shell of a man plagued by “trauma” and guilt. It’s impossible to overlook these flaws because the film itself is not terribly entertaining or well constructed. For the most part it is disjointed, dull, self-serious, disenchanted, somehow feeling both verbose and overly rushed at the same time. The dialogue is some of the worst I’ve ever heard in a “critically acclaimed” film. “On the nose” and “clunky” are descriptions that can’t even begin to describe this script. At no point in the story does Nolan ever transport the audience to the ancient world. You never feel like you’re 3,000 years in the past. You feel like you’re watching modern Americans put on a pageant, because you are. Nobody would be calling this thing a masterpiece if it was made by a director not named Christopher Nolan.

@heavenlykore It's so disgusting. I am a 3rd worlder and even I wanted to know the Greek's story told by Greeks through this film. If I wanted to learn about blacks, I would watch a black film. Someone give me authentic experiences.

i dont know if you guys know about this but greece is like a real place and greek people exist

@dr_salt_neo @adam__isom It's not a big world. People should stop saying that. Realistically how far are you gonna travel and meet people? Unless you are the lucky 1%, your dating pool is people in your town and the city you work in. That's it. And it's not much.

@TitanofDoom1 @adam__isom It's a biiiiiiiig world and there's gotta be someone for everyone. The idea of a perfect match or soul mate might be unrealistic but at the very least someone that's close enough statistically has to exist. Whether you ever find them is a different matter however.

in this comic, the person on the left is just terminally online, that's all I don't think organic individuality makes people incompatible, just the morass of unlived and bizarre ideas they've memetically ingested

@alea_est_ @allie__voss I do feel some people are fundamentally incompatible with humanity tho. They just won't fit it. Their natural tendency is to isolate

@allie__voss most people think they’re deep and “complex” when in reality they’re just fragile and sensitive due to prolonged isolation and not knowing the real world they live in

Under-socialized people can quickly become convinced they’re more complex than they actually are Endlessly focusing on yourself and your interests makes you assume everyone else is “normie” and shallow simply because you don’t know them well enough

@Badass_Superdad yOU raCiSTTT!!!! (man I'm fucking tired where I can watch the REAL odessey? Suggestions??)

Deleted scene from Nolan’s The Odessey

@dorkerexe @vxunderground @telegram Huh? Fallback was to avoid the DNS problem, not to avoid the IP blocking. If the IP is blocked, then user should bypass it. You're talking about IP blocking which is not the discuasion

@TitanofDoom1 @vxunderground @telegram right and those existing solutions are vpns and domain fronting etc, which is exactly my point. that's not "code a fallback to direct IP" it's a whole separate infrastructure problem telegram already invests in. you made it sound like a quick patch when its the actual arms race

> be United States > sanction VPN > used for ransomware > ransomware VPN uses Telegram > Advertisement and customer support > US Treasury publishes sanction thingie > list VPNs Telegram channel > Domain people see it > See t.me/ransomwarethin… > "OMG BLOCK T.ME!!!" > Put global block on t.me > Breaks Telegram URLs > Telegram owner mad af > Complains, says they can't read > "hehe oops, me no think good" > Resolved like, 24 hours later

@ProtonVPN *Halo theme intensifies*

Do any gamers follow this account? Scroll to see the greatest gaming trilogies of all time 🐐

@dorkerexe @vxunderground @telegram Bypassing IP blocks are a different problem. There are already existing solutions for it.

@TitanofDoom1 @vxunderground @telegram fair on the DNS part but you are ignoring that they just block the IP ranges too. telegram already rotates IPs and does domain fronting to dodge this and countries still choke it out when they escalate. hardcoding IPs just moves the cat and mouse game up one layer doesn't end it

@dorkerexe @vxunderground @telegram Why? DNS is just a resolver after all. TCP connections are IP to IP

@TitanofDoom1 @vxunderground @telegram thats not possible?

@GrapheneOS @SchreinerKa I think it's big time GrapheneOS spends some big money on marketing, especially with new devices coming. Maybe help others too, for eg sponsoring YT videos Proton style.

> What is the biggest pain point besides new developers? External attacks on the project and dealing with the formalities of running a non-profit organization, hiring people, etc. > Is GrapheneOS financially stable? Yes, and we need to start spending much more money. That will also enable us to obtain far more money via donations due to a much faster pace of improvements. We can scale up much more once we get the organization set up more smoothly. The bottleneck hasn't been money but rather mostly the difficulty of finding trustworthy, productive people to handle major roles in the organization and then getting better systems set up. Relentless external attacks on GrapheneOS have also greatly slowed down a lot of this progress. > What proportion of your income comes from donations? 100%

Android's security policy for the past several years has been to backport patches for Critical and High severity Android vulnerabilities to the past 3 major yearly releases. Moderate and Low severity patches including most fixes for privacy weaknesses have required upgrading to the latest releases. Google recently informed OEMs of greatly reduced security support for older releases of Android. For the vast majority of discovered vulnerabilities, only Critical severity issues deemed to be an imminent risk will be backported at all and only to the most recent 2 major yearly releases (16 and 17). Externally reported vulnerabilities will currently still follow the same policy for backports as before. High and Critical severity vulnerabilities reported to Google by external parties will be backported to releases going back around 3 years (currently 14, 15, 16 and the current latest stable 17). Android Security Bulletins already omit Moderate and Low severity patches. They're already dated 2-4 months after the vulnerabilities were disclosed to OEMs and allowed to be shipped. Only Samsung flagships and Pixels ship any of it 'early' on practice. Only GrapheneOS ships the full set 'early'. The vast majority of vulnerabilities are now being discovered internally by Google for Android and Chrome. These are largely being discovered with AI. The subset deemed Critical severity and an imminent risk will be backported to 16 and 17. Bare minimum security support for older releases is over. Bare minimum Android security patches now require being on Android 16, 16 QPR2 or 17 and quickly moving to Android 18 when it's released. Once Android 18 is released, it will be the only release with current High and Critical severity patches. Serious support for older Android releases has ended. Android 17 is the only Android release with the current set of disclosed Moderate and Low severity patches. Android 16, 16 QPR2 and 17 will soon be the only releases with the current set of disclosed Critical and High severity patches too. Once Android 18 is released, it will be the only one. Vast majority of Linux kernel vulnerabilities aren't covered by Android Security Bulletins, externally disclosed patches are backported very slowly and Android Security Bulletins come 2-4 months later than when Android patches can be shipped. If you want bare minimum patches, use iOS or GrapheneOS. We're going to need to do a lot of work with Motorola and Qualcomm to provide serious patches for GrapheneOS devices. We're going to need more developers. After the launch of the new devices with GrapheneOS support, we want to repeatedly port to the latest Linux LTS branch among other major changes. Google is completely overwhelmed by the massive torrent of vulnerabilities discovered by AI models. They've done repeated cycles of layoffs and buyouts crippling their ability to handle it. The change to the schedule for Android Security Bulletins is also extremely at odds with this new reality. Google switched to a performative Android Security Bulletin system with vulnerabilities listed 2-4 months after they're shipped. They're pretending as if not open sourcing patches protects people from OEMs not patching them. Our community has people successfully reverse engineering binary patches. Google needs to start open sourcing QPR1 and QPR3 releases again along with open sourcing security preview patches shortly after disclosure to OEMs. Otherwise, we'll just hire people to start doing reverse engineering work in an official capacity to start publishing the changes as open source early.

@paper2comic @alisawuffles Yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaa I'm fucked

@alisawuffles congrats on joining OpenAI! 🎉 I really enjoyed reading your blog, so I made a comic based on it. It turned out to be a 17-page, haha! 👇 Hope you like it! (But please let me know if you want me to take this down!) 1/5

I'm joining OpenAI next week!🥹 The job search turned out to be really challenging but also super rewarding, so I wrote a small blog to share what I learned along the way and hopefully make the process a little less mysterious for the next person. alisawuffles.github.io/blog/job-search

@Azarea02 @SongOfSickness @GreenTextRepost Not really.... Human biology is a bit too complex to develop radiation resistance. Just like simple systems are resilient to damage and wear, only simple creatures are resilient to radiation

@SongOfSickness @GreenTextRepost Humans that evolved to adapt radiation will live. Those that don't will die. But many will die first, like trial and error, before that particular trait that is resistant to radiation will appear. Scientifically and statistically, it's a cool concept. Morally, it's devastating.

anon sub

@CryptoCyberia Imagine if a CVE 10.0 dropped on Jul 1 💀💀

>The bad guys won't rest >Probably not. But we will. lol lmao even

@luciascarlet It is fals x.com/i/grok/share/7…

grok is this true

@EricParker Use I2P. Forget about clearnet. There goes all your issues.

I never understand this meme. A vpn provider could only see you are using tor not which site. In the reverse setup a malicious vpn that knew who you are would know everything.

@seanthomas85 @VexedVortices Agree but sex belongs at level 4. Our body literally biologically reacts when starved sexually.

@VexedVortices Anyone who posts this version of Maslow's -- with sex on the bottom rung -- deserves to be ignored. It's silly. The bottom rung is "You, individually, will imminently die without these things." Sex belongs on Level 3.

This is obviously not true. It's only true if you think basic needs are just like... food and maybe shelter. If you want to minimize crime, we should aim to fulfill the bottom 2-3 rungs of this pyramid.