Tonya

3.3K posts

Tonya banner
Tonya

Tonya

@Tyarchak

Katılım Nisan 2011
38 Takip Edilen60 Takipçiler
Tonya
Tonya@Tyarchak·
@trinick @VirgisViews @davepl1968 I heard about 1st plane in the way to work. Walked into work and watched the 2nd plane hit. I'm central time zone. I think central times zone probably mostly saw it live because we were on our way to work and heard about 1st plane and got to office before 2 nd
English
0
0
0
4
nickel³
nickel³@trinick·
people in PST hadn’t woken up yet, people in EST had meetings scheduled at 9 where they wouldn’t have people come barge in, people in other countries would have similar odd times.. it’s just statistically impossible that everyone saw it all at once. What about people in rural America that didn’t have great cell signal yet? This was 2001. It’s absurd to say everyone saw it live.
English
8
0
0
143
Dave W Plummer
Dave W Plummer@davepl1968·
99.9% of people who "experienced" the Challenger disaster saw it on replay and now remember it as live. Almost NO ONE was watching. Everyone thinks they were. It's a fascinating collective false memory.
Jeremy London@SirJeremyLondon

Anyone who experienced the Space Shuttle Challenger explosion, like I did, is probably a bit hesitant to get too excited about the Artemis II launch today. I truly hope our children don’t have to experience such tragedy. May the Universe welcome them and return them safely home 🙏

English
3.8K
51
1.6K
783.2K
nickel³
nickel³@trinick·
No. I’m saying not everyone saw it live. Not everyone happened to be watching tv at that time and cell phones were much less of a thing plus there was a lot of unsurity about if it was an accident or not before the second plane hit. If you just so happened to be watching TV or were alerted to turn on your TV within the dozens of minutes between strikes, then congrats to you.
English
11
0
4
354
Tonya
Tonya@Tyarchak·
@AzPetrich You know i bet there are a 1000 interesting facts about this man and you reduce him to the color of his skin.
English
0
0
0
52
Tonya
Tonya@Tyarchak·
@guyfelicella It was a joke. You people have to be the most humorless country on the planet.
English
0
0
0
6
Clark Lawson
Clark Lawson@clarksonlawson_·
The job of SCOTUS is not to subjectively determine whether a law is stupid. Their job is to interpret the Constitution and rule on whether a law violates it. If MAGA wants to end birthright citizenship, they should pursue a constitutional amendment. If you don’t like the separation of powers our Constitution outlines, then leave the country. Your ignorance is anti-American and incompatible with the principles this country was founded on.
Cryptid Politics@CryptidPolitics

Birthright citizenship is stupid. My son was born in a foreign country. Do you think they gave him citizenship? Of course not. That country isn't dumb like we are. Birthright citizenship has got to be put to an end by SCOTUS.

English
94
55
647
59.4K
Tonya
Tonya@Tyarchak·
@clarksonlawson_ Their job is to interpret the constitution. Thats what they've been asked to do.
English
0
0
0
15
Chat-T
Chat-T@Chatt_TT·
@AcrossAisle @tommysantos14 They took it up because the President doesn't get to override the Constitution by executive order, not for any other reason.
English
1
0
0
12
Tom Santos
Tom Santos@tommysantos14·
Here they go again. Folks, the 14th Amendment covers birthright citizenship. “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” That’s it. There isn’t any more. There’s no grey area. There’s no confusion. Whatever bullshit explanation a MAGA gives you that doesn’t end up proving that the above statement is actually fake, is just made up nonsense. If you are born in America, you are an American citizen. Period.
English
92
39
178
9.7K
Tonya
Tonya@Tyarchak·
@TBestig @baleygr728528 @VerumVulnero1 There are transcripts of their discussions when it passed. It was not for foreigner (there words, not mine). We had open borders but it was controlled by ship. We knew who was coming in and the naturalization process started at port of entry so everyone was legal.
English
1
0
0
11
tom
tom@TBestig·
@baleygr728528 @VerumVulnero1 No, that’s actually exactly how they intended it. It was the 1800s, we had open borders at the time. People crossing over without explicit permission and having babies was not only foreseeable, it was expected. Our modern restrictionist regime would be unrecognizable to them
English
1
0
1
9
Alexandra F. Baldwin
Alexandra F. Baldwin@VerumVulnero1·
If you really hate birthright citizenship, propose a new amendment to clarify that the 14th amendment applies only to the children of mothers here legally with the intention of long-term residence. I don’t know if that passes, but it absolutely has very real support.
English
96
5
110
7.8K
Tonya
Tonya@Tyarchak·
@madlizzy17 @TheSWPrincess The county in which she was adopted would have them archived, mostly likely in their probate court. If they have deeds from thd 1800s on record, they should have her adoption certificate.
English
0
0
1
7
MadLizzy
MadLizzy@madlizzy17·
@Tyarchak @TheSWPrincess Scroll down and read the npr article from the OP. A social security number won't stop ICE. And how do you know her adoption papers from 1970 Korea are available? I wouldn't bet on that.
English
1
0
1
10
Attitude with a side of freckles
Attitude with a side of freckles@HazeyDaisey17·
The issue isn't who is a citizen. The issue is whether the President can override the Constitution. And, no he cannot. If you want to change the Constitution, there's a way to do that. And, these assholes know they don't have the support to do it.
English
14
50
362
3.5K
Tonya
Tonya@Tyarchak·
@HazeyDaisey17 Of course they can't. Thats why it's in the Supreme Court so we can get a final ruling on 14th amendment. That's how our government works out disputes.
English
0
0
0
28
Tonya
Tonya@Tyarchak·
@madlizzy17 @TheSWPrincess I mean legally through citizenship office. Not that she was stolen and sold on the black market. If she has a social security number she should be fine. Adoption papers would be available in the county she was adopted in.
English
1
0
0
7
MadLizzy
MadLizzy@madlizzy17·
@Tyarchak @TheSWPrincess Of course it was done legally. It's not that cut and dried. Your assuming that my friend, now in her 50s and both parents deceased, would have access to her file. I was adopted in AZ in 1965. My file is permanently sealed by AZ court. I have zero legal access to my own records.
English
1
0
0
11
Tonya
Tonya@Tyarchak·
@PountneyNeil @BeingJWood Not sure if you know how war works but the liberators are in control when it's over. Thus, USSR control over Eastern Europe and US influence over Western Europe.
English
1
0
0
7
Neil Pountney
Neil Pountney@PountneyNeil·
@Tyarchak @BeingJWood So you think you get to pick and choose. There was no conflict of interest you just did not answer the call for help and you know it. You have done nothing but interfere with Europe for decades after the 2 WW again irrelevant. Try again
English
1
0
0
7
Being J Wood
Being J Wood@BeingJWood·
Our nation is stronger with allies. Trump is actively destroying our alliances. Trump is making our nation weaker and more vulnerable. I don’t understand why any American president would do this. I don’t understand why any American citizens would support it.
English
27
21
100
1.3K
Tonya
Tonya@Tyarchak·
@BehindOffensive @greendragonhq Native American were not considered citizens under the 14th amendment. They did not become citizens until 1924 under a separate act.
English
1
0
0
9
BehindTheOffensive
BehindTheOffensive@BehindOffensive·
@greendragonhq The only TRUE CLASSIFICATION of a nativeAMERICAN is people born in America to 1 American Citizen. I'd assume were both in line with basic definitions before we dive into definitions of CITIZEN; which is a LEGALLY ACKNOWLEDGED status for EVERYONE who was born here + naturalised.
English
1
0
0
49
The Green Dragon Tavern
The Green Dragon Tavern@greendragonhq·
If you are born in America you are American. This is enshrined in the supreme law of our land. If you don’t like it, it’s because YOU are un-American.
English
100
103
483
7.3K
Tonya
Tonya@Tyarchak·
@TheSWPrincess @BobTAngryFlower If they strike down birthright. All they have to do is add a box on the birth certificate about citizenship. Nothing they can do about those already here and received citizenship.
English
1
0
0
12
Leia
Leia@TheSWPrincess·
@BobTAngryFlower YES! Almost everyone seems to be missing that point!
English
2
1
3
169
Tonya
Tonya@Tyarchak·
@grit16451 @TheSWPrincess @cwebbonline Skin tone has nothing to do with it. Plenty of white people (mostly Eastern European) fly in on travel VISAs just to give birth. Been a problem since before the southern border was a problem.
English
0
0
0
5
Tonya
Tonya@Tyarchak·
@thecorpmex @TheSWPrincess This isn't about race. We have rich white and Asian people who fly into US on travel visas specifically to give birth in the US. It all needs to stop.
English
0
0
0
5
AL X , the deboosted democrata
AL X , the deboosted democrata@thecorpmex·
@TheSWPrincess Check out with Nazis did with their 1935 race laws….pass laws that defined citizenship based on your antecedents citizenship going back several generations and intermarriage records… And those Nazi laws were modeled on American Jim Crow “one drop” laws.
English
2
2
4
188
MadLizzy
MadLizzy@madlizzy17·
@TheSWPrincess One of my BFFs was adopted from Korea as a toddler in the early 70s. I worry about her and people like her constantly. Would they be considered citizens? Or deported to their countries of birth? Insanity.
English
3
1
2
165
Tonya
Tonya@Tyarchak·
@TheSWPrincess I don't think it would be retro active. There is no way for them to go back and renounce those citizenships.
English
1
0
1
26

Keşfet

@trinick @VirgisViews @davepl1968 @Daltin2010 @AzPetrich @guyfelicella @eostamar @thetimothygavin