Yonzie

@AtomicCoyote61 @escapefrommelos The highway too.

@escapefrommelos "Yeah we put the Gaylord Center right next to the giant swastika, what of it?"

more bizarre happenings at Denver Airport (DIA) BTW: everything pictured here is a real, officially sanctioned decoration or artwork at DIA

@ReesePolitics @cryptooverforex @CNBC To be fair, their audience is boomer retail traders who are aged and experienced enough to rightfully scoff at naive younglings.

@cryptooverforex @CNBC It's ironic because that's their audience, but not who pays their bills.

So Paramount can do the exact same thing $GME is doing with EBAY, to an even bigger scale I'll add, and it gets a total pass? But when it's GameStop, it's simply unfathomable for the mainstream media to comprehend.

@Fryz2394 @the_tong_song @ericjackson You could securitize a house or car on the blockchain and write options on that.

@the_tong_song @ericjackson You cannot buy options that raise in value when you offer to buy the house or car. And if the offer to buy the car falls through you then sell the options to collect a profit.

Everyone calling out Ryan Cohen for “half cash half stock, check the web site.” How about the fact he said his 5% stake in eBay is mostly options? You know what that means…

@johnkonrad If the forehead tilts more, it's even more pronounced.

““I bet your fishhead, wife doesn’t have these cannons,” Can I ask one question without everyone getting mad? What's a “fishhead”? Obviously an insult. Never heard it once which is strange considering I’m a sailor. Google and Grok aren’t much help.

@poderem_emilie Alle der har oplevet forskellen mellem drengebørn og pigebørn, forstår årsagen. Både dig og artiklens forfatter mangler tydeligvis denne oplevelse. Når det er sagt, så er løsningen vel ligetil? Bare lidt stats-styret optimering af produktionen?

Jeg er enig i artiklens pointe. Når man ser på pigeafdelingen, bliver det tydeligt, at køn stadig spiller en stor rolle i, hvordan tøj er designet. Piger får ofte mere pyntet og mindre praktisk tøj, hvilket er med til at skabe klare forventninger til, hvordan de skal være. Jeg mener dog ikke, at piger skal stoppe med at gå i kjoler eller bruge lyserødt, og drenge må selvfølgelig også gå i det, de har lyst til. Problemet er ikke tøjet i sig selv, men de normer og forventninger, der følger med. Børn bør først og fremmest ses som individer med hver deres personlighed – ikke kun ud fra deres køn. Når vi hele tiden opdeler dem, er vi med til at begrænse deres muligheder. Set ud fra et KSM perspektiv bliver det tydeligt, at det handler om mere end bare tøj. Samfundet er med til at fastholde bestemte kønsroller gennem normer, som gentages igen og igen. Det handler også om magt, fordi det ikke er alle, der har samme mulighed for at bryde med disse normer. På den måde er køn ikke bare individuelt, men noget der er styret af strukturer i samfundet .#Echobox=1777468555" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">femina.dk/agenda/jeg-sku…

@eugyppius1 Getting your kid out of the couch, teaching him that working for the man is safe but gets you peanuts, teaching him that using your brain to carefully choose a smart thing to do can get you the thing you want, is fucking great parenting. Exploitation my ass.

Exploiting your son's desire for a car and setting him up to circulate trash consoomerist crap in the hopes of scraping a few dollars off the top while charging him 20% interest for this bullshit FB marketplace scheme makes you the biggest piece of shit on my TL this morning.

@ryanmauro The huge push on the "Multipolar World" talking point is quite thought provoking. Always framed as tomorrows certain reality when in reality it's just another "USA was never great" Obamaism. Useful to weed out the gullible and the shills.

Why is General Flynn promoting the idea of a "Multipolar World?" The world is moving towards a 21st American Century, not a Multipolar World. Using the term, largely popularized by Russian influence agent Alexander Dugin, usually coincides with embracing other Seditionist-Right narratives like Israel being behind Charlie Kirk's martyrdom. Flynn has dabbled in anti-Israel conspiracy theories since at least 2023.

@DrInsensitive Another standout story: The original iPad lasted for a month in a drawer. At some point it got reduced to four days, and now I have to charge it every time I want to use it. On the bright side, I guess it cuts down on the screen time.

The Critical Spec That is Not Reported Roughly half of electronic devices slowly drain their batteries while they are turned off. For now, the only way to learn "Standby battery life" is to check the reviews and hope you get lucky. The good news: Based on my own, limited observations, more and more devices now have standby battery life measured in years. Good job, manufacturers. One standout story: Early AGM Rattler thermal sights drained their batteries in a matter of weeks, while turned off. AGM fixed that problem with a firmware update. For one glorious moment, it felt like the old days, when a software update was good news.

@MVfpVFiTRFEXvO3 Almost sounds like a bike engine? Maybe headers going straight back in two separate exhaust pipes? (Instead of joining under the engine like a normal boxer engine.)

なんだ！！このGR86は！！ 専有走行で走ってる86の音が水平対抗じゃない音してる気がするぞ！？ ターボでも無さそうだし直4のNA？？ めっっちゃくっちゃいい音だー！！！ 恋しちゃいそうなくらい良い音！！ 後は、何かテストしてそうな雰囲気の80スープラも居る

@larryvc Nike ad feels like it's from 30 years ago. Rough around the edges, but honest. We lost something in the polish.

Which Boston Marathon ad do you prefer? The Nike ad (pulled due to backlash): “Runners welcome. Walkers tolerated.” The ASICS response: “Runners. Walkers. All welcome.”

@TimurNegru The biggest con is if you crash, you die. Maintenance cost may or may not be high, depending on the previous owner.

What are the main pros and cons (most importantly) of this beaut?

@GrazianoColian1 @B0st0nR0driguez Also the convertible bonds

@B0st0nR0driguez Yeah, didn’t think to take that into consideration in my post. It’s absolutely legit. Thank you for your feedback.

1/10 Everyone is sleeping on $GME. $8.83 billion in cash. 83% of the entire market cap. A CEO with $0 salary who only gets paid if the stock 10x's. A deal described as "very very very big" — and IMMINENT. The setup is complete. 🧵

@RosenvoldGeo 3.5% - Only when you include Ukraine as “defense”… And certainly not when Trump talked about it the first time in 2017, when everyone went “how dare he!” as if they hoped to out-Greta Greta. And this is the goldfish-level brains reporting and contextualizing the news… Sad!

For the record: In 2026, the Denmark will spend 3.5% of GDP on defense (US is at 3.3%). We understood Trump’s message on military spending and almost every European country has acted on it extremely rapidly. Btw - we can still afford free health care and a budget surplus even with 3.5% defense spending. So no - we don’t have those things because we were spending less on defense. We have them because we pay much higher taxes.

The real problem is when you’re bumping along on an imperfect road and have to hit small touch targets or do gestures with your arm at full extension. It’s just inherently way more difficult to use reliably than a non-touch-sensitive (“normal”) button or knob, and claiming otherwise is disingenuous. Some cars have a place to rest your palm, which makes operation easier, but I’m not convinced this is intentional.

Mercedes-Benz engineers told me the reason for this. When they do consumer research, most people like tactile things: buttons, knobs, sliders, and stuff like that. They like the tactile experience. The problem is, if you stop there, you make mistakes. The world is moving toward an autonomous vehicle future where everything is done automatically with screens. The consumer can't tell you about that world because they haven't thought about it or been presented with it yet. As a result, the auto industry continues serving the past and not the future. Ferrari is just an example of that. They are selling to old people who have a fuckload of money. That doesn't mean these people have any sense or any care for innovation; they over-index on the physical experience of being in the car because they can't imagine a world where a car would drive them around. That is certainly true of the rich class in America. I hung out with them last year. They love their old mechanical cars because they can afford them, and Ferrari has to compete with that old mechanical car mentality just to sell them another $500,000 vehicle. Tesla, on the other hand, is going for the everyday person. And the everyday person knows it's stupid to rely on buttons when you can have a touchscreen like the one on your iPhone.

A large touchscreen does work in a car if you have great software. The Model Y became literally the overall #1 bestselling car in the world just three years after launching partly because people loved the software experience (among many other reasons).

Og hvis ingen havde gjort noget, så ville en religiøst fanatisk terrorsponsorerende nation indenfor få år have tilstrækkelig mange langtrækkende atommissiler til at det kun er Amerikanerne der ville være i sikkerhed. Paradoksalt nok er det alligevel Amerikanerne der tager ansvar og tager hånd om problemet, mens vi i Europa roser hinanden for at lade som elefanten er usynlig, og i øvrigt rar og venlig og helt uinteresseret i porcelæn.

MAGA elected Trump to end pointless US wars with no positive end result in the Middle East. They said. But Trump started one nonetheless, and now MAGA supports that war, because MAGA is really about worship of Trump, regardless of which wars he starts.

@ValdemarClem @enoch_alida Så når man siger at man støtter nogen eller noget, så betyder det at man er fanatisk og unuanceret for positiver og negativer? Interessant perspektiv. Måske ikke så… nuanceret.

Nu kan man vel godt have en fornuftig tilgang til virkeligheden og dermed også kritisere Trump når det er berettiget, uden at være hjernevasket. Men bevares, Bosse, Jarlov og Thorborg lever i en anden virkelighed. Tror bare det handler om formuleringen, så man ikke fremstiller sig selv som komplet MAGA-kujon

Jeg er træt af, at blive kaldt landsforræder bare fordi, jeg støtter Donald Trump og frihed...

@Morten_Nico @rolfnilsen Maybe convert Gaza to the biggest cargo port in the ME?

@rolfnilsen Ett par rørledninger for olje og gass, og kanskje jernbane for andre produkter, fra Irak, via Kuwai og Saudi-Arabia til kysten til Oman ved Arabiahavet vil gjøre at Hormuz stredet blir mindre kristisk. Men, det vil ta tid å bygge. Rørledningen til Rødehavet var et lurt grep🙂

Jeg har ikke ment så mye om krigen i Iran og hormuz stredet. Åpenbart har Iran interesse av å bruke stredet som pressmiddel. Like åpenbart har resten av verden interesse av at det er åpent. Noe som er rimelig sikkert er at rørledninger over til rødehavet kommer til å bli big business. Regimeskifte, mullahene kommer styrket ut, okkupasjon, USA brekker nakken.. Alt er på bordet. Men så langt virker ingen å ha tenkt på muligheten for en demillitarisert sone. Det er mange løsninger. Men det påfallende er hvor mange vestlige land som aktivt støtter Iran. Det skjer ikke bare av økonomiske/realpolitiske grunner. Det skjer også av ideologiske grunner. Macron og Støre er begge støttespillere av det barbariske regimet i Teheran.

@LA_joiaa @SaysSimulation *was

@SaysSimulation You have to be joking. Saudi Arabia and UAE?? This war showed that Iran is the most powerful country in ME. No glass house built country can fight it and their pain tolerance is very low.

If the US does exit the war in the next few weeks, that doesn't mean the war is over. Both the UAE & Saudi Arabia have indicated they are ready for war with Iran, and they will not let Iran control the Strait of Hormuz. A de facto 3-way alliance of Israel, UAE & Saudi Arabia 1/

@hinatariadesu We must return the land to the indigenous people - The Danes.

強いデンマークを求めて

@CRUDEOIL231 And most importantly, all of that would also have happened if Iran was allowed to continue to build their strength - just at some point in the future.

I think way too many ppl are delusional about this idea of letting Iran control the SoH, having the US pull out, and just letting Iran set up a toll booth. Where does Saudi’s power actually come from? It’s not just because they’re rich. Their entire influence comes from being the world’s only swing Producer. We need oil, and Saudi controls that market. If Iran takes over the SoH, they become the most powerful, one of a kind Global Swing Producer in history. If they don’t like the oil price? They can just "adjust" the traffic in a strait that handles ~20mb/d to swing prices however they want. If the UAE gets on Iran’s bad side? "No passage for UAE tankers." If Kuwait tries to build a bypass? "Fine, the SoH is closed starting today. Let’s see if you can finish that bypass—which takes years—without making a single dime." By letting Iran control that flow, the US is effectively making Iran the ultimate energy gatekeeper. The entire regional hegemony shifts to Iran. Saudi and the UAE lose everything. Think about it—if you were MBS, would you let this happen? Let’s say the US pulls out this week. The US started this mess, and now the GCC has to just sit there and watch their power handed over to Iran? Let me give you a reality check for Americans: Imagine Mexico now controls the North American continent. "Want to fly to the UK? Get Mexico’s permission. Want to import jet fuel from Asia? Pay Mexico a toll and take the route they tell you to. Did you dare to criticize Mexico? Now, no container ships can enter your waters. You can’t say a word against the great President of Mexico." It sounds like a fantasy, but that’s the reality for the GCC. If the US tries to run away? If I were the GCC, I wouldn’t let them leave. I’d grab them by the hair and drag them back to clean up the mess they made. I’ve said before that this is an existential issue for Iran and Israel. Well, Iranian control of the SoH is an existential issue for every other GCC nation. And the GCC has leverage. They have massive wealth invested in the West, huge U.S. asset holdings, decades of lobbying networks, and they are the biggest donors for Trump’s terms. And of course they have oil. Do you really think Brent would stay below $100/bbl if the GCC teamed up and cut just 3mb/d for six months? Even the most optimistic guy knows the answer is zero chance. They don't even need a fancy excuse: "Oh, since the US gave up on us and Iran owns the SoH, it's not safe. We have to cut production. Sorry!" Within months, the US would be begging to come back. It’s just pushing the Middle East into an even bigger pit of fire. Thanks for listening to my TED Talk :) #oott #iran