Cats On Mars

19K posts

Cats On Mars banner
Cats On Mars

Cats On Mars

@ZackBB

🖖

Katılım Mart 2009
727 Takip Edilen35 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Cats On Mars retweetledi
Genevieve Gluck
Genevieve Gluck@WomenReadWomen·
@reduxx Articles like these take time, and money. We pay for access to court records, and we also have site hosting fees. We are a small team, entirely independent, and we rely on our readers for support. Please consider making a donation. reduxx.info/support/
English
2
92
183
3.5K
Cats On Mars
Cats On Mars@ZackBB·
@PF_Jung I remember when it was simply LGB… as it still should be. There’s no other sexual orientations
English
0
0
0
555
Bridget Phetasy
Bridget Phetasy@BridgetPhetasy·
Ireland is the canary in the coalmine.
English
115
178
2.3K
101.2K
Cats On Mars retweetledi
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧@TRobinsonNewEra·
Someone just sent me the ISIS magazine that recently called for my death
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
1.1K
2.2K
7.8K
238.9K
Cats On Mars retweetledi
Chad Byrne
Chad Byrne@chadpbyrne·
Hero's will be made in Ireland in the next few days , Stand strong men 🇮🇪
English
48
414
4.5K
72.8K
James Dreyfus
James Dreyfus@DreyfusJames·
Good luck @StroudBrewery … you’ll need it. Cowards.
Women Won’t Wheesht@WWWheesht

We are saddened to hear that @StroudBrewery have chosen to cancel an event by authors of Porn, @jo_bartosch & @robjessel16. As Stroud Brewery will find out VERY SOON, it is unlawful to treat anyone less favourably on the basis of their gender critical views. We hope they will choose not to be exclusionary, unwelcome & bigoted because we're sure Jo & Rob would prefer not to have to spend their valuable time in a court.

English
21
66
633
11.8K
Strange History Cafe
Strange History Cafe@XStrangeHistory·
I asked @ScottBaioPod to invite @CherieCurrie3 on his weekly podcast. They both starred in FOXES in 1980. I hope that happens. It would be a great interview. Especially if they talk about 1970s music. If you don’t already do so, you may want to follow Scott and Cheri.
Strange History Cafe tweet mediaStrange History Cafe tweet media
English
1
0
5
79
Genspect
Genspect@genspect·
Detransitioner Jonni Skinner on his experience at the Californian bill debate yesterday. "I wouldn't have been able to stand up and share my lived experience like that if I didn't have such kind people supporting me that day. Wiener had tried to call all of us opposing his bill hateful, tried to claim we hate trans people to dismiss our testimonies. It was interesting, as a member of the committee did stick up for us, though I still felt as if my testimony fell on deaf ears. Many people seem to be under the impression that gender identity and sexual orientation are two sides of the same coin, instead of one being a pattern of behavior/experience that carries no harm and the other (gender identity that is) is a start towards a path of medicalization that will carry long lasting effects and far reaching consequences. I'm very grateful to have the support to cultivate the resilience to take an experience that ruined my life and try to do something good with it by educating the public, stopping the same harm from befalling another, and hopefully to help foster a conversation around how we might address these sorts of issues in a more holistic way, with non-medicalized approaches that foster confidence and self-acceptance rather than suggesting body modification as a solution to emotional distress." ____________ Across X we are witnessing powerful testimonies from Detransitioners giving evidence to California lawmakers. They were making representations on Bill 934 - a bill which could ban qualified therapists supporting people experiencing confusion around “gender.” Genspect ambassador @JonniSkinner talked about his inability to experience orgasms subsequent to taking puberty blockers and cross sex hormones. We asked him how he felt about the committee hearing. Above are his words. This photo was taken outside the courthouse yesterday. The vote is out on whether it was before or after he gave evidence!
Genspect tweet media
English
39
216
1.3K
31.4K
0HOUR1
0HOUR1@0hour1·
Megyn Carlson
0HOUR1 tweet media
English
1.4K
3.6K
20.6K
204.2K
Cats On Mars retweetledi
"Doc" Hypnosis 🧠 | BowTied Brain-Hacking
Scott Adams talks about the Placebo Effect and the power of Where You Set Focus. (Similar to Affirmations.) BTW, who remembers the "Asynchronous Sip" from this episode? I had completely forgotten!
English
23
107
869
31.3K
Cats On Mars retweetledi
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Accurate
Ricardo@Ric_RTP

In 19 days, a jury in Oakland is going to decide whether the entire legal foundation of the AI industry is built on fraud. Everyone thinks the Musk vs Altman lawsuit is a billionaire grudge match. Two egos, one grudge, a $150 billion damages number designed for headlines. Easy to dismiss. Easy to scroll past. That's exactly what Altman wants you to think. Because what's actually on trial on April 27 is something much BIGGER than Elon's hurt feelings... A jury is going to decide whether you can legally take billions of dollars in nonprofit donations, use them to build the most valuable technology in human history, and then quietly convert that nonprofit into a for-profit company worth $850 billion. If the answer is no, the entire AI industry has a problem. Because OpenAI is not the only company that did this: Anthropic was founded by OpenAI defectors using the same nonprofit-first mission language. xAI pitches itself as building AI "for humanity." Every frontier lab has used the moral cover of "we're doing this for the good of the world" to attract talent, capital, and regulatory goodwill they would have never gotten otherwise. An Elon win doesn't just touch OpenAI. It creates a legal precedent that every AI company built on a nonprofit or public benefit promise becomes vulnerable to shareholder and donor clawback suits. That's why this case matters. And that's why Altman is panicking. Just look at what he did this week: Elon filed a motion demanding the court remove Altman and Brockman from their roles and FORCE OpenAI to return to its nonprofit origins. Then he amended the suit to say if he wins the $150 billion, all of it goes to OpenAI's charity arm. Not him. Zero dollars to Elon personally. That amendment was surgical. It stripped Altman of his entire public defense. He can no longer claim this is about Elon's ego or Elon's bank account. Elon is now legally on record saying he just wants the mission back. OpenAI's response was to panic-write a letter to the California and Delaware attorneys general asking them to investigate Elon for "anti-competitive behavior." Their strategy chief publicly accused Elon of coordinating attacks with Mark Zuckerberg. They called the lawsuit "harassment driven by ego and jealousy." That's NOT the response of a company that thinks it's going to win. Real companies with real defenses don't ask the government to silence the person suing them 3 weeks before trial. They let the evidence speak. OpenAI is scrambling because they know what's in discovery. Elon's team has been building this case for two years. Emails, board minutes, internal conversations about the conversion. The kind of paper trail that juries understand and executives can't explain away. And the timing couldn't be worse... OpenAI is trying to IPO at $852 billion. They just raised $122 billion. Microsoft has $135 billion of exposure to them. A jury verdict that even partially sides with Elon in late April or May would crater the entire IPO runway and send shockwaves through every major AI investor on Earth. This is why Altman spent the last 2 weeks doing press tours and policy blueprints and "super intelligence agendas" aimed at Washington. He's trying to REFRAME himself as the responsible statesman of AI right before a jury decides if he's a con artist. Most people will watch this trial start and think it's celebrity drama. The smart money is watching it and realizing that the legal foundation of the AI boom is about to be tested in court for the first time EVER. And if that foundation cracks, everything built on top of it is at risk.

English
2.5K
9.9K
61.5K
12.8M
Cats On Mars retweetledi
NASA
NASA@NASA·
LIVE: Agency leaders answer media questions and provide updates on our Artemis II mission around the Moon. twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English
193
622
3K
326.1K
Cats On Mars retweetledi
Jen
Jen@oregonwoman·
We had a fantastic Space yesterday, thank you for cohosting @VirgisViews and thank you to everyone who joined us! I will share links below about some of the things we talked about:
Jen@oregonwoman

Please join @VirgisViews & I tomorrow afternoon at 2:30 PT to discuss porn's harms and what we can do to fight back! x.com/i/spaces/1RJjp…

English
2
3
11
386
Cats On Mars retweetledi
Not the Bee
Not the Bee@Not_the_Bee·
Indiana released this transgender baby killer 30 YEARS EARLY after the state was ordered to fund his sex-change surgery. No one knew he was free. notthebee.com/article/indian…
English
18
88
354
10.4K
Cats On Mars
Cats On Mars@ZackBB·
@SantaDecides Will everything be ok? Asking for the future 🚀🔴✨🤖🐈‍⬛🌱
English
2
0
0
25
Santa Decides
Santa Decides@SantaDecides·
On the road, Ask me anything!
English
23
0
44
1.5K