Lanx

guy who has the trending page open all day and still misses the runner

@revenuerebate >Systems were not prepared for a practical instant migration. prob means someone sniped the supply

Working on fixing. Systems were not prepared for a practical instant migration. The current draw does not reflect the true rebate amount. Please standby.

@0xaporia the min_faves operator puts a minimum like threshold on your results eg bitcoin min_faves:5000

You can treat Twitter like a search engine, not a feed. Learn using search operators. Think of it as a searchable forum where you can find specific discussions on almost any topic. Go in with a question/keyword, find your answer or further resources and get out. That’s a fundamentally different behavior than opening the app and letting it decide what you think about for the next 45 minutes.

@BaggerWalmart @AvgJoesCrypto @Pumpfun

@AvgJoesCrypto @Pumpfun nft: 0.03e wow this shit looks horrible nft: 30e This is once in a generation artwork

Why are we complaining that we get to invest in the hackathon winners at cheap valuations when @Pumpfun invested at $10m valuation? You need to approach these projects with an investor, not trader, mindset. Buying a pumpfun-backed project at practically book value is as good investment as any in my view!

@notthreadguy @vibhu coinbase acquisition soon

@vibhu a lot

holy tbpn just got acquired by openai wow we are actually so right

Looking for the most iconic/funniest somewhat easy to recognize crypto memes of the last decade Both in writing and in images Something like the below fits but anything goes really Does anyone have a good resource for that or can you all just dump them under this tweet?

@swansonbenson0 kek

Listen man if you didn’t want her acting like a woman you shouldn’t have bankrolled this Quinceañera

@ebbecooks now imagine when sol is $50

how to get rekt in the trenches rn > chase losses > try to be like some other trader > attempt to squeeze every dollar sentiment just keeps getting worse and worse, coins arent running like theyre "supposed to" people whos supposed to have motion cant move shit the move is just patience for something good and not burn capital until shit comes just be patient, not being locked in is fine.

@WheelerrDealerr it was diddy bundled slop

two guys on fomo who held more than me even nuked it. crazy, idek what I'm missing with this trade being such a huge failure lmao

really feel quite convinced this should be a banger trade, but has instead turned into a disaster class. precisely why I'm walking away so that I don't make any more terrible picks - I guess I really did fall off lmao.

@BrianRoemmele what blockchain are they using?

XMoney is getting really real! The captain has received the funds! I repeat the captain has received the funds! We are going where no one has gone before! I am all in on XMoney and my first round will be sent to YOU! Ready?

@whodoneit21 go look at random fomo profiles and you’ll see they have a negative pnl most of the time. about 80% have a negative pnl if i had to guess

Have we considered that maybe everyone is not as profitable as they say they are on CT

@MagicalTux @Pumpfun x.com/lmao6900/statu…

On Feb 17, @pumpfun executed a ResetFeeSharingConfig on $ChiefPussy (chiefpussy.com), transferring my admin rights and 75% of creator fees to a third party wallet. Only PumpFun can execute this instruction — it requires their Squads V4 multisig (2-of-25 threshold). At least two PumpFun team members approved it. PumpFun's explanation: "the original dev wallet owner had applied for a CTO which resulted in them being given Coin Admin privileges." Here's why the on-chain evidence contradicts this: - The hacker is not the original dev. The hacker wallet (CFPUAf8nZ978WyRxXihH8sStdgNy7ULGC34QfhTGqQbn) and the original token creator (3H2pYPb9RbnyWgyVRAkNPtvqLc7XPGhzUVUvdSHygj2F) are completely different addresses with zero on-chain interaction. If PumpFun verified the requester was "the original dev," they gave admin to the wrong wallet. - The hacker wallet was brand new. Its very first SOL came from the stolen fee distribution. They used the stolen 1.58 SOL to trade memecoins, then drained the rest to an exit wallet. This is not a legitimate dev reclaiming their project. - The attacker knew the fee structure. The 25% shareholder was deliberately preserved in the reset — admin and the 75% recipient were changed, but the 25% share was left untouched. - The original dev denies involvement. He has publicly stated he never requested a CTO, and has zero on-chain connection to the hacker address. - The original dev is a great guy, well known in the community. I've known him for only a short time with this coin, and PumpFun's claim feels ridiculous. - All 5 historical ResetFeeSharingConfig calls on this token went through the same PumpFun multisig. This isn't something anyone outside PumpFun can do. The unauthorized reset was even executed by the same team member who ran a previous legitimate reset on my token. - PumpFun reversed the change ~9 hours later after I brought this on X, but the hacker had already collected fees. The real concern is the precedent: PumpFun can reassign any token's creator fees without the admin's knowledge or consent. I'm calling on @pumpfun to disclose: 1. Who requested the CTO/reset, and what identity verification was performed? 2. What wallet did the requester claim to own? 3. Why was a CTO approved on a token with an active, non-revoked admin? 4. What changes have been made to prevent this from happening again? Every token creator on PumpFun should be concerned. If it happened to one token, it can happen to any.

@tulipking they shoulda done this instead

Modi (not autistic) grabs sam's hand. Guy next to dario (not autistic) grabs his hand. Dario (Autistic) & Sam (Autistic) are unable to negotiate the hand hold, this should surprise nobody who's ever been to a San Francisco house party

@dwr yelp for agentic services

Related, figuring out how agents will choose services unsupervised seems like a lucrative opportunity. Plausible it's similar to humans based on "vibes" (e.g. you see people talk about it on Twitter, HN, reddit). But if it ends up being something else... x.com/garrytan/statu…

If agents start consuming developer infra at scale -- hosting, DBs, domains -- seems like winners will be services built for API-first signup, orchestration, and payments. No browser, no human in the loop.

@Ethanh141 @base @coinbase @zora ai slop

.@base is in trouble and @coinbase knows it. When @zora, one of your most publicly hyped projects, pivots to Solana without looking back, that's not just a narrative problem. Projects build where momentum lives, and right now Base feels like a ghost town with good infrastructure. The issues aren't technical. The chain works. The problem is cultural and strategic, and it starts at the top. Coinbase keeps hiring tradfi analysts and institutional voices to speak for an ecosystem that was built on degens, creators, and people trying to flip a $500 bag into something life changing. Nobody in CT wants to hear a former Goldman guy talk about Base's total value locked. They want to feel like there's a reason to show up every day with the potential for daily runners to give them a chance of being rich. Solana figured this out. They leaned all the way into the chaos, the memes, the 100x plays, the community lore. Love it or hate it, people are engaged. They have skin in the game. That's what drives ecosystems forward, not press releases about institutional adoption. If Base's real vision is to be a B2B settlement layer or a quiet infrastructure play for enterprise clients, fine. But then stop marketing a consumer app to a retail audience that has zero reason to care without incentive or culture behind it. Here's what a turnaround actually looks like. Drop the $BASE token. Make the people who built on the chain and used it early genuinely wealthy and watch them become your loudest evangelists overnight (see hyperliquid). Hire CT natives who live and breathe this space to run your community and content. Give the ecosystem a reason to believe there's a 0 to hero trade waiting for them on Base specifically. The foundation is there. The distribution is there. Coinbase has more potential reach than almost any team in crypto. But potential without culture is just infrastructure. Fix the incentives, fix the voices, and lean into what actually makes crypto worth participating in.

@Shill_Pill @lesabrefomo @tnsprotocol is working on this ENS but for token tickers

@lesabrefomo It’s simple - meme coin trading will eventually migrate to a blockchain that only allows one ticker to be created, like creating a domain. Until then trenches will just continue pvp’ing themselves

memes are basically dead in this current environment if you are unable to find the default main coin for a specific meme right away it basically kills it before it even starts just dilutes the capital and attention idk how to fix it but man, it is a terrible ux for traders maybe something like Fomo who owns the end user could put their stamp of approval on which coin should be the main one but that's a lot of responsibility + hard to do + comes with a ton of risks they prob dont want

@lesabrefomo oldcoin bad, newcoin good

like crypto has one of the most used AI apps in the world and we are chasing random ai scams everyday? I dont get it but like I said, what am i missing here?

so we have platform that allows you to build autonomous ai agents that has real traction (top 15 app on openrouter by usage and is seeing continued growth) + has a token + has been building for months + proper token integrations yet the token is sitting at $4m what am I missing here?

@lBattleRhino thps

I miss when there were a bunch of video game soundtracks that went hard as fuck

@0xPBIT @wirelyss @kirkinator_sol x.com/kirkinator_sol…

@wirelyss @kirkinator_sol no I made this seedance 2.0

i just got access to seedance 2.0 and it one-shot my first prompt. the game is changed forever.

@0xCryptoshi the stat sounds crazy but probably true. on fomo, i’m ranked 1410 with only a $360 pnl lmao. there’s gotta be at least 40,000 traders on the app, which puts me in the 3.5% granted idk what percentage of those traders are regularly active

I read some statistic recently where only .5- 1% of traders hit a 5 figure port And that was kinda crazy to me bcuz I’ve ran this up (from 0) at least 10 times Are ppl rlly that bad at trading? Or is it a holding issue?