Ankit Kumar

2.8K posts

Ankit Kumar banner
Ankit Kumar

Ankit Kumar

@a_kmrx

Building @uncubedai AI agents that replace co-founders IIT Bombay Alum

Katılım Temmuz 2021
381 Takip Edilen129 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Ankit Kumar
Ankit Kumar@a_kmrx·
Been building Uncubed.me for a month now, it helps founders go from idea → users in hours. Still figuring out marketing... Here’s a quick demo 👇 My Vision: AI taking founders from idea to users in hours not months. #buildinpublic #SaaS #ai
English
2
1
14
3.5K
Ankit Kumar
Ankit Kumar@a_kmrx·
@shivambhadani_ tech people are too busy fixing the stuff marketers are writing threads about
English
0
0
0
76
Shivam Bhadani
Shivam Bhadani@shivambhadani_·
When I scroll through X, I observe that very less people here are obsessed with tech and engineering. Most of are seems to be marketing accounts only posting about SaaS, Vibecoding, Agent etc.
English
67
24
729
22.5K
Ankit Kumar
Ankit Kumar@a_kmrx·
@signulll openai bout to get judgeGPT’d by 12 people who still think “chatgpt” means google with extra steps
English
0
0
1
72
signüll
signüll@signulll·
i would be HORRIFIED to have my fate decided by 12 randomly selected americans whose strongest shared skill is unsuccessfully ignoring jury summons lmao. good luck to openai.
English
59
119
8.9K
376.9K
Chubby♨️
Chubby♨️@kimmonismus·
The US moat is melting, Demis Hassabis, the CEO of Google DeepMind told CNBC. "China's artificial intelligence models may be just "a matter of months" behind U.S. and Western capabilities. Chinese AI models are closer to U.S. and Western capabilities "than maybe we thought one or two years ago." The only thing China still lacks is the ability to explore its own breakthroughs, such as Transformer architecture. For now.
Chubby♨️ tweet media
English
71
105
930
138.3K
Ankit Kumar
Ankit Kumar@a_kmrx·
@signulll fighting for a “good job” in an economy built on bad ones is the funniest dystopia ever
English
0
1
3
281
signüll
signüll@signulll·
isn’t it fascinating that people are fighting for “good jobs”?
English
29
4
225
32.1K
Ankit Kumar
Ankit Kumar@a_kmrx·
@Adriksh maybe the real hack was ignoring every buzzword and still ending up running the buzzword machines
English
0
0
0
220
Adriksh
Adriksh@Adriksh·
Be Linus Torvalds > writes an OS as a hobby accidentally changes computing forever > picks C because abstractions lie works close to hardware, trusts nothing blindly > builds Linux, lets the world fight over it > creates Git out of spite for bad tools > says exactly what he thinks, no PR filter > ignores trends, frameworks, hype cycles > lives quietly, codes when it matters > doesn’t sell courses, doesn’t sell motivation > still relevant decades later because fundamentals don’t age Did Linus solve tech by not playing the tech game at all?
Adriksh tweet media
English
126
614
10.2K
461.6K
Ankit Kumar
Ankit Kumar@a_kmrx·
@theJayAlto so just 2 weeks of hyperfixation and i can quit my job got it
English
1
0
2
1.9K
Jay Alto
Jay Alto@theJayAlto·
i have a theory that it takes two weeks of obsession to reach the top 10% of a field, two months to reach the top 1%, two years to reach the top 0.1%, and two decades to reach the top 0.01%.
English
216
915
12.1K
431.2K
Ankit Kumar
Ankit Kumar@a_kmrx·
@gokulr vertical ai founders about to learn the hard way that slope > moat
English
0
0
0
49
Gokul Rajaram
Gokul Rajaram@gokulr·
VERTICAL AI CHALLENGE Vertical AI Founders: You've spent 2+ years building your agents, training your model on your customers' data, embedding into workflows, creating a powerful GTM motion, all the best practices. You've beaten back challengers and are the #1 or #2 player in your vertical. I'm sorry, you cannot relax. In fact, you need to massively up your game. Turns out you are facing an existential challenge: long-horizon agents (eg: Claude Code). Agents that are not trained on a specific domain, but can reliably work for hours or days on end in pursuit of a goal, self-correct, and actually do stuff. I'm sure many Vertical AI founders will say: "Oh, we are not worried. We are the system of record for decision traces. We train on enterprise-specific context. That's why these horizontal agents can never catch up with this." You might well be right. But, but, but ... you cannot afford to bury your head in the sand. These long-horizon agents will get better very, very quickly. You need to understand precisely how good they are at the exact jobs you've built your agents on. You cannot wait for someone else to do this. For example, if you're a legal AI company with an agent that automates contract review, you must compare how good your specialized agent is versus a general-purpose long-horizon agent that's simply given the contract and asked to perform the same review. My challenge to you: Assign a strong engineer on your team to focus 100% on using long-horizon agents (with minimal context, other than just the contract in the example above) to compete with your custom-trained agents. Benchmark how the long-horizon agents perform vs your agent. Rinse and repeat it every few months. Like with most other things worth measuring, what matters is the rate of improvement (the "slope" vs the Y-intercept). If the long-horizon agent is 30% as good as your vertical agent on Day 1, but 50% as good on Day 60, and 70% as good on Day 120, you need to reassess your product strategy. AGI is coming for everyone. Long-horizon agents are the closest we have to AGI, and as a Vertical AI company, you need to figure out how you compete and survive. Game on.
English
60
47
542
98.6K
Ankit Kumar
Ankit Kumar@a_kmrx·
@0xDesigner people out here treating AI copilots like a calculator when it's literally a genie with version control
English
0
0
0
29
0xDesigner
0xDesigner@0xDesigner·
how tf are you not obsessed with vibe coding. like how could you just wake up and think “i have the ability to verbally ask for any piece of software today and it will just magically appear” and then just shrug and go on about your day. idgi.
English
144
65
1.1K
47K
Ankit Kumar
Ankit Kumar@a_kmrx·
@Codie_Sanchez same, it's like my weekly reality check and ego destruction session in one chart
English
0
0
0
45
Codie Sanchez
Codie Sanchez@Codie_Sanchez·
I look at this weekly.
Codie Sanchez tweet media
English
63
235
2.2K
53.1K
Ankit Kumar
Ankit Kumar@a_kmrx·
@almonk somehow every mac dev hits that point where they rebuild xcode’s tabs but sexier
English
0
0
0
57
almonk
almonk@almonk·
made something I wanted for a while: a high performance custom tab/splits library in swift for native Mac apps. with support for drag/drop, CoreAnimation accelerated transitions, and more. spent a lot of time on the polish of this thing to feel snappy, but fun.
English
19
5
317
25.1K
George Pu
George Pu@TheGeorgePu·
The most successful people I know aren't on Forbes. You've never heard of them. They don't want attention. They're just building. Meanwhile we study the ones doing CNBC interviews and Davos panels. Those are performances. Not blueprints.
English
36
4
63
2.3K
Ankit Kumar
Ankit Kumar@a_kmrx·
@0xgaut peak 2026 productivity is letting the ai code, design, argue with itself and hoping one of them ships something before monday
English
0
0
0
19
gaut
gaut@0xgaut·
Can I code? No Can I design? No But I have 15 agents running in the background with 10 different claude code instances on my screen and I have no clue what half of them are doing
gaut tweet media
English
126
205
3.8K
154.4K
Ankit Kumar
Ankit Kumar@a_kmrx·
@ChShersh waiting for the CTO to say “we’re Claude native now” like it’s a real architecture shift
English
0
0
1
71
Dmitrii Kovanikov
Dmitrii Kovanikov@ChShersh·
2016: Move everything to Cloud 2026: Move everything to Claude
English
135
180
3.3K
84.7K
Ankit Kumar
Ankit Kumar@a_kmrx·
@chatgpt21 devs bout to go from coding to prompt engineering full time once that thing hits max speed
English
0
0
0
227
Ankit Kumar
Ankit Kumar@a_kmrx·
@HSVSphere bluetooth was clearly designed by someone who never used a mouse mid-fight in apex
English
0
0
0
139
HSVSphere
HSVSphere@HSVSphere·
Man, I hate cables. However, I hate the main solution to wireless, which is Bluetooth, even more. Why can't I poll more than 144hz??? Why do I even need to poll, why can't the device poll me??? It's fine for wireless keyboards and such, but it stinks for mice. Don't even get me started on bidirectional audio profiles (HFP) on Bluetooth 🫠
English
30
5
289
18K
Ankit Kumar
Ankit Kumar@a_kmrx·
@SahilBloom fun is the cheat code they forgot to mention in business school
English
0
0
1
11
Sahil Bloom
Sahil Bloom@SahilBloom·
The ultimate long-term competitive advantage is having fun. You can never bet against the person who just seems to have fun doing the work.
English
166
274
2.6K
121.4K
George Ferman
George Ferman@Helios_Movement·
"Sitting makes you retarded". -Aristotle
George Ferman tweet media
English
80
1.5K
31.7K
1M
Ethan Mollick
Ethan Mollick@emollick·
When my students were creating initial demos with Claude Code & Antigravity, the AI would often spontaneously decide to do Wizard of Oz demos. The AI would build an interface, but not underlying logic. Code would (live!) run the interface behind the scenes to make it look working
English
21
9
213
23.6K
Ankit Kumar
Ankit Kumar@a_kmrx·
@aymanalabdul nothing humbles a team faster than realizing “better product” didnt mean “more people know you exist”
English
0
0
1
36
Ayman Al-Abdullah 🧱
Ayman Al-Abdullah 🧱@aymanalabdul·
Overlooked reason for why companies stall: Neglecting RPE (revenue per employee) One of my clients came to me with 2.8% year-over-year growth When I looked at their P&L for the previous 3 years, all I saw was their engineering and design hires continuing to increase Their hypothesis: Better product = more customers aka ”this is just how SaaS works” - it takes a long time and then eventually takes off But when I looked at their analytics: • Nothing out of three years of shipping had moved the needle • They spent almost nothing on top of funnel and almost everything on bottom funnel • They improved the product for existing customers, but forgot to go out and attract new ones In other words: their hypothesis flopped So we completely flipped the P&L. Shifted investment to acquisition Their results? In 2025, they grew 81% YoY That’s 2.8 → 81% with the exact same product We simply revisited and analyzed the RPE and where the investment was being allocated The lesson here is simple: Track your RPE weekly It’s the clearest litmus test to know whether you’re hiring to scale revenue or discover it
English
14
7
39
4.6K