Adarsh Singh

984 posts

Adarsh Singh banner
Adarsh Singh

Adarsh Singh

@adarshsingh110

Ph.D. student, Britolab @CornellBME | Alumni @IITKgp | Interested in engineering microbiome, (meta)genomics |||| Blue Sky ID: https://t.co/xDF3NLabCv

Ithaca, NY Katılım Mart 2012
1.3K Takip Edilen387 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Adarsh Singh
Adarsh Singh@adarshsingh110·
Thrilled to see this project come to fruition! It has been an outstanding collaboration, yielding numerous valuable findings. Congratulations to all involved!
Nicholas A. Christakis@NAChristakis

The bacteria in your gut depend on where you are in the social network. And the microbes within us treat our social networks as the extended environment in which they thrive. They can spread from person to person. New #HNL work out today in @Nature. 1/

English
0
1
6
413
Adarsh Singh retweetledi
Cornell Biomedical Engineering
Congrats to @CornellEng @CornellBME faculty @ilanabrito123 , named a 2024 @pewhealth Innovation Fund Investigator, working with Gabriel Victoria, Ph.D. of The Rockefeller University to unravel interactions between immune cells and the gut. bme.cornell.edu/news/brito-nam…
Pew Health@pewhealth

Dr. Ilana Brito from @Cornell & Dr. Gabriel Victora from @RockefellerUniv will explore the relationship between our gut microbiome and immune system.🦠💪 Their research could lead to insights into gastrointestinal disorders.

English
0
2
10
711
Adarsh Singh retweetledi
David Breslauer
David Breslauer@davidNbreslauer·
Ticks make their own bioglue in their saliva to help them attach to and seal skin! It's an IDP, like the freshwater mussel adhesive I previously posted. No data yet on how it compares in terms of performance, so I guess we'll have to make it! biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
David Breslauer tweet media
English
0
2
14
972
Adarsh Singh retweetledi
Nicholas A. Christakis
Nicholas A. Christakis@NAChristakis·
The bacteria in your gut depend on where you are in the social network. And the microbes within us treat our social networks as the extended environment in which they thrive. They can spread from person to person. New #HNL work out today in @Nature. 1/
English
34
279
1.2K
234.8K
Adarsh Singh retweetledi
Lammerding Lab
Lammerding Lab@LammerdingLab·
Looking for a postdoc position in nuclear #mechanobiology, with a strong interest in microfluidics, device design, fluorescence microscopy, and image analysis? Check out our opening: #lammerdinglabpostdoc" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">bme.cornell.edu/bme/job-openin… If you are attending #BMES2024, we can meet there. Please RT.
English
0
43
74
11.9K
Adarsh Singh retweetledi
Host-Microbe Interactions
Host-Microbe Interactions@HostMicrobeLit·
A core microbiome signature as an indicator of health | Cell Metagenomics on a high-fiber dietary intervention plus reanalysis of 26 case-control studies. Identified a set of stably correlated genome pairs perturbed by interventions and diseases cell.com/cell/fulltext/…
Host-Microbe Interactions tweet media
English
0
26
56
6.8K
Adarsh Singh retweetledi
Luis Pedro Coelho
Luis Pedro Coelho@luispedrocoelho·
It's Nobel week, so—after a break last year when this account became a Karikó stan account—I am reposting my annual plea to give Lipman and Myers a Nobel Prize for creating BLAST substack-proxy.glitch.me/articles/luisp…
English
4
51
301
59.8K
Adarsh Singh retweetledi
Luis Pedro Coelho
Luis Pedro Coelho@luispedrocoelho·
Why are bioinformatics results so full of false positives? I've been thinking about this for a few years: the incentives in the field are to produce false positives (link in next tweet)
Luis Pedro Coelho tweet media
English
7
35
200
27.4K
Adarsh Singh retweetledi
Zihao Ou
Zihao Ou@NoLongerMeow·
Our team's efforts in bio-imaging in live animals has been published on Science. If you are interested in our work, feel free to reach out to me and I am happy to chat and discuss future potentials! science.org/doi/10.1126/sc…
English
17
96
486
51.8K
Adarsh Singh retweetledi
Pranam Chatterjee
Pranam Chatterjee@pranamanam·
I'm going to keep saying this until someone proves me otherwise: AlphaFold(2, 3, 10000, whatever) or any structure prediction tool will not generalize to protein conformations if its training is optimized to "ground truth" structures in the PDB! Crystallized or cryo-EM structures are NOT ground truth: they are artificially-constrained, single conformations in a physiologically irrelevant environment. 👎 Perturbing these structures via MD or diffusion won't magically generate possible alternate conformations either. Those resulting poses are also artificial and likely wrong. This amazing paper, I believe, supports my point. This is also my gripe about training language models with structural tokens -- those are biased pieces of knowledge that inhibit design and modeling of conformationally and functionally diverse proteins operating in complex cellular environments. 🙄 However, I have to give credit to the ESM3 team for balancing loss on sequence, structure, and function during training. If you want to work on static proteins, go ahead, use these tools, use structure -- you'll probably get some working designs or semi-trustworthy models. 🤷‍♂️But we need a more first-principle, unbiased approach to modeling conformationally dynamic structures. I know a lot of people disagree with me on this. I like pLMs because at least we're not making assumptions (MLM is as basic as you get), and some signal should be trustworthy if evolution is indeed meaningful, but I agree that we need better training paradigms that correct evolutionary inconsistencies (can't be using ESM-2 forever). We'll keep pushing on this for out-of-distribution but important target classes. 😬 Alright, that's my rant for the week. We have some exciting works coming out soon though, so hope you'll stay tuned to our work. 🤗 Paper: nature.com/articles/s4146… (Beautiful) Benchmarking Code/Results: github.com/ncbi/AF2_bench…
Pranam Chatterjee tweet media
English
24
55
352
80K