WhiskeyTexasFoxtrot

@TheShandyKid @NicholasLissack @Keir_Starmer @ITV To be fair, you’ve probably never listened to him debate Here’s your chance “Race doesn’t mean anything … I look at you as a human being made in the image of God” … Charlie Kirk You’re welcome youtu.be/TGOMQdyyjmU?si…

THIS IS INSANE Two men, who both pleaded guilty to R*PING a 15yo boy and making child p*rn, received DIFFERENT sentences from two different judges. Eric Bergstrom was sentenced to 30-50 years by Judge Derek Vaughn. Judge Rich McGowan then took over the case and sentenced co-defendant Bradley Perry to ONLY 3 YEARS for the SAME CRIME. When Judge McGowan was questioned on his decision, he stated, "I am the law." How is this justice???

@ingelramdecoucy Happy Birthday 🎂🎁🎈

There are worse ways to spend my birthday

I've seen quite a few videos of ICE at airports this morning. You know what's missing from all of them? Deranged leftists blowing whistles, hurling expletives, and attacking law enforcement officers. You know why? Because the organizations that pay people to be domestic terrorists on the streets of Minneapolis and other blue cities can't create those astroturfed violent mobs inside an airport. Sorry, DICK Blumenthal. Your fever dream of violence in airports seems to be missing its funding.

🚨 BREAKING: Huge infighting inside IRGC after President Trump claimed there are people inside the regime who are secretly speaking to the U.S.

It’s time, finally, for our government to address the manning of FAA controllers nationwide. This is an accident that’s been waiting to happen for years. Years! Our government can’t kick the can any longer. There’s no way that one guy should ever be responsible for both the ground and tower functions. This controller did the best he could. He was overwhelmed. Hire qualified applicants and dump DEI. ASAP!

@z649278 @EricLDaugh 🎯🎯🎯🎯

@EricLDaugh @aleykhat_tx Democrats want an election season.

🚨 BREAKING: SCOTUS Justice Sam Alito just DROPPED THE MIC on liberals who want us to receive endless mail-in ballots after election *day* "We have LOTS of phrases that involve two words, the last of which, the second of which is DAY. Labor DAY, Memorial DAY, George Washington's birthDAY, Independence DAY, birth DAY, and election DAY!" "And they're all particular DAYS." "So if we start with that, if I have nothing more to look at than the phrase election day, I think this is the DAY in which everything is going to take place, or almost everything." 🔥🔥🔥

@AngelJawed @soirchick @bonchieredstate 🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯

@aleykhat_tx @soirchick @bonchieredstate They shouldn't be paid. They shouldn't be going on vacation. They shouldn't be re-elected. They shouldn't... ...a lot of things, but there is absolutely no way to change it because requiring ID for elections like the rest of the world does is racist & that is not who we are!

The total disregard and hate in these quotes for normal people. Wild.

For shits and giggles, I decided to see just how hard it would be to replace my birth certificate, Social Security card, AND my marriage license, since Democrats think women are too stupid to figure it out. Here's how it went: 1. Birth certificate: Contacted the health department of the county where I was born. They OVERNIGHTED a certified copy to me the next day - total cost, $14. 2. SS Card: Contacted Social Security on their site. They asked if I was sure I needed the card, since I 'won't likely be asked for it.' I went ahead and got it - took five business days to arrive - total cost, $0. 3. Marriage License: Went to the 'vital docs' site of the county where we were hitched. Filled everything out online, arrived in three days - total cost, $5. It cost less than $20 to obtain all three certified/legal documents, and it took less than five business days to receive them. Note: if I had lived where I was born or married, it would have been a day. Tops. Anyone telling you this is too hard or unfair is lying and hiding the real reason they want to stop Voter ID. I know you guys knew that already... lol

I am on my way to LaGuardia Airport now in response to last night’s horrific crash involving Air Canada Express 8646 and a fire truck that killed two pilots. @FAANews and @NTSB are working closely on this, and we will share updates as soon as possible. Please keep the victims, families and response teams in your prayers.

Shocking video showing Ecuadorian migrants openly cooking and selling guinea pigs on the streets of Queens, New York City, is now going viral, sparking numerous calls for their immediate deportation.

Hasan Piker and his crew threw food at Cuban kids like they were starving Seagulls. Sick fucking weirdos.

Hi there, Rep. Khanna. Retired Army JAG here & current prof of int'l law. And you are way out of your depth. You should consider sticking to legislating & leaving #LOAC commentary to actual specialists. Like me. Allow me to explain. First off, if a power plant is "dual use," then attacking it is, by definition, NOT an "indiscriminate bombing." Here's why. As DoD Law of War Manual notes, this term is often "used to describe objects that are used by both the armed forces and the civilian population, such as power stations" (pic 1). The Manual also correctly points out this term has no legal significance. Either something qualifies as a military objective such that directing an attack against it is permitted, or it's a civilian object such that it may not be made the object of attack. See the problem yet? That's right! If something is "dual-use," it qualifies as a military objective...and directing an attack against a military objective is, by definition, NOT "indiscriminate" (pic 2). Back to pic 1, the Manual also notes that when attacking "dual-use" objects, "it will be appropriate to consider in applying the principle of proportionality the harm to the civilian population expected to result from the attack on such a military objective." You might notice I emphasized "proportionality" & "expected" there, and I did so because it's a preview to your next massive error. Here's what you claim about proportionality in your 🧵: "Proportionality forbids attacks where expected incidental civilian harm including effects like loss of hospital power, water pumps failing, food spoilage or extreme heat or cold exposure. This is excessive compared to the concrete military gain per Article 51(5)(b)." We'll get to your selection of source (AP I) later. For now, let's focus on how badly you botched the proportionality rule. To describe what the actual rule is supposed to look like, let's go back to the Manual. As it observes, personnel engaged in hostilities "must refrain from attacks in which the expected loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, and damage to civilian objects incidental to the attack would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage expected to be gained" (pic 3). Now, I added bold text to the "expected" at the beginning & end because this highlights your next mistake. Yes you correctly note expected incidental harm is part of the equation, but you left out "expected" on the military advantage component. This is a massive error because you need to be able to tell what the expected incidental harm is & the expected (or anticipated) concrete & direct military advantage is for each attack in order to assess whether the former was "excessive in relation to" the latter. And, do you have any intel indicating what degree of incidental harm AND concrete & direct military advantage is for each attack you purport to be addressing? No, of course you don't. As such, you're not conducting a legitimate proportionality assessment. Which, is easy if you don't properly articulate law. Hell, you can make pretty much anything seem illegal if you can come up with any bullshit articulation of the legal standard you feel like fabricating. But we're not allowed to do that in actual practice. And so, you shouldn't either in public discourse, or else you're creating a false impression that potentially lawful conduct is illegal. And another thing - I noticed you left off the direct part of "concrete & direct military advantage" in your bullshit version of proportionality. That matters because remote harms need not be factored (pic 4). Some prospective harms you mentioned probably are direct enough, but others...not so much. Finally, I also noticed you claim AP I binds 🇺🇸 "as customary international law." But not all of AP I is customary, which is why I draw from the Manual instead. I'll finish off with a simple pro tip: stay in your lane. Leave LOAC analysis to @DeptofWar. And actual experts...like me.

@Collider Or could it be Disney’s new vision of Snow White sucked and was poorly executed? And Rachel Zegler was perfect for the role Cause no one loves Rachel more than Rachel

Rachel Zegler is finally speaking out about the racialized right wing backlash she faced for staring in Disney’s Snow White remake. collider.com/rachel-zegler-…

@physicsgeek @Collider

@Collider Finally speaking out? It would be newsworthy if she ever shut up. Her big, stupid mouth is her biggest problem.

Kimchi-derived probiotic found to promote binding and excretion of intestinal nanoplastics | National Research Council & Technology, Phys .org Under standard laboratory conditions, strain CBA3656 showed a high adsorption efficiency of 87%, comparable to that of the reference strain Latilactobacillus sakei CBA3608 (85%). However, a notable difference was observed under simulated human intestinal conditions. While the adsorption rate of strain CBA3608 decreased sharply to 3%, strain CBA3656 maintained a substantially higher adsorption level of 57%. These results indicate that the kimchi-derived strain can stably bind nanoplastics even in environments resembling the human intestinal tract. Significant findings were also observed in animal experiments using a germ-free mouse model. Compared with the control group that did not receive probiotics, both male and female mice administered strain CBA3656 showed more than a twofold increase in nanoplastics detected in feces. This result suggests that the probiotic may contribute to the excretion of nanoplastics by binding to them in the intestine. This study provides scientific evidence that kimchi-derived lactic acid bacteria may interact with environmental micropollutants beyond their traditional role in fermentation. The findings provide new insight into potential biological mechanisms that may help reduce nanoplastic accumulation in the gastrointestinal tract. "Plastic pollution is increasingly recognized not only as an environmental issue but also as a public health concern," said Dr. Sehee Lee, the lead researcher of the study. "Our findings suggest that microorganisms derived from traditional fermented foods could represent a new biological approach to address this emerging challenge. We will continue to expand the scientific value of kimchi microbial resources to contribute to public health and environmental solutions." Read more: phys.org/news/2026-03-k…

Want to cut health insurance? Put ICE Officers in the Emergency Room at every hospital in America. Simple.

@local_salty @BasedMikeLee 🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯

@BasedMikeLee @aleykhat_tx What have the members of this senate accomplished for us thus far? You guys are like 0 for 372 ..Why would recess for Easter even be in the cards…apparently none of you celebrate it anyway!

Which would you rather the Senate do for the two weeks following March 27th?