American Nuclear Society

🚀 Skyrocket your nuclear career with ANS. Tap into journals, exclusive webinars, mentoring, and leadership opportunities while saving on conference registrations & certifications. Become a nuke today — join ANS: ans.org/join

As part of our plans for a fleet of AP1000® power plants in the United States, Westinghouse has submitted a Design Control Document (DCD) to @NRCgov that establishes Plant Vogtle's Unit 4 reactor as the standard AP1000 reference plant for future reactors. A DCD defines the technical aspects of a standard reactor design to ensure it meets all regulatory and safety requirements. Learn more about this important step toward an AP1000 reactor fleet in the U.S.: info.westinghousenuclear.com/news/westingho… Pictured: Plant Vogtle Unit 4 in the foreground, with Unit 3 in the background. Both AP1000 reactors in the state of Georgia are setting performance records since entering commercial operation. (Photo courtesy of Georgia Power)

The power response of a reactor during an event is determined by the sum of all the reactivity feedback effects, not just one. Fast reactors like Natrium are designed so that the overall temperature and power coefficients are negative, meaning the reactor power tends to go down if the temperature increases. Moreover, liquid sodium is a very efficient heat transfer medium and the fluid is hundreds of degrees below the sodium boiling temperature at low pressure operating conditions, so a rapid boiling scenario like Chernobyl could not occur.

@ANS_org @Unplugnukes @lyndalovon @iaeaorg @NRCgov Actually, no. I'm very familiar with the design, as well as the functional containment review. The Natrium has a positive coolant void coefficient, just like Chernobyl. In certain accident sequences, there will be a rapid power excursion and a likely failure of confinement.

The American Nuclear Society supports the International Atomic Energy Agency's (@iaeaorg) calls for maximum military restraint around nuclear power plants and civilian research reactors, and for full adherence by all combatants to the IAEA's seven pillars for nuclear safety and security during armed conflict.

@NucSafetyUCS @Unplugnukes @lyndalovon @iaeaorg Regarding the NSC, the IAEA "found that there was no permanent damage to its load-bearing structures or monitoring systems." The agency is planning restoration after temporary repairs— not replacement. Received damage, yes. Ruined, no. iaea.org/newscenter/pre…

@ANS_org @Unplugnukes @lyndalovon @iaeaorg And the single drone strike on the New Safe Confinement depressurized the entire volume and hence ruined the structure, so I wouldn't downplay the destructive effect of the attack.

Ed, Natrium does have containment — NRC-accepted functional containment with multiple barriers. Not a traditional dome, but that's viable because the physics are fundamentally different: it runs at atmospheric pressure, and as temperature rises, reactivity falls automatically. Natrium design self-stabilizes. That's the opposite of Chernobyl's failure mode, where the 1986 RBMK became more reactive as it heated up at low power.

@ANS_org @Unplugnukes @lyndalovon @iaeaorg Well, now you're being misleading. You know that @NRCgov approved a construction permit for the Natrium, which will not have a physical containment, setting a precedent for future US reactors. If an applicant came to the NRC with an RBMK design today it likely would be approved.

So many errors in one tweet. Let's set the record straight: 1) Chernobyl Unit 4 had NO containment dome in 1986 — a deliberate Soviet cost-cutting shortcut. Western-style/modernized reactors do have concrete-and-steel containment domes. 2) The Feb. 2025 drone struck the New Safe Confinement (NSC) — a steel arch slid over Unit 4's sarcophagus. The NSC is NOT a reactor containment dome. And the drone only breached the outer cladding. The sarcophagus beneath was untouched. IAEA confirmed: no radiation increase as a result of the drone.

@ANS_org @lyndalovon @NucSafetyUCS @iaeaorg It only took a single Russian drone to blast a hole in Chernobyl’s “thick concrete containment!” Stop enabling nuclear disaster, call for cold shutdown, NOW!

I need to lock in @ANS_org 👀

Nuclear energy is among the safest and cleanest of energy technologies. Nuclear power plants are robust, hardened pieces of critical infrastructure built to withstand natural and man-made hazards. Thick, steel-reinforced concrete containment buildings protect reactor cores and are designed to keep radioactive materials isolated from the environment. Still, nuclear plants, like all other industrial civilian infrastructure, were not designed with war in mind. For the data, see Oxford University's and Global Change Data Lab's @OurWorldInData — the numbers speak for themselves: ourworldindata.org/safest-sources…

So much for nuclear power being safe.

Nuclear energy is among the safest and cleanest of energy technologies. Nuclear power plants are robust, hardened pieces of critical infrastructure built to withstand natural and man-made hazards. Thick, steel-reinforced concrete containment buildings protect reactor cores and are designed to keep radioactive materials isolated from the environment. Still, nuclear plants, like all other industrial civilian infrastructure, were not designed with war in mind. For the data, see Oxford University's and Global Change Data Lab's @OurWorldInData — the numbers speak for themselves: ourworldindata.org/safest-sources…

@ANS_org @NucSafetyUCS @iaeaorg Oh, I thought nuclear power was safe? Golly. You’re changing your tune now.

Imagine if a documentary crew had been embedded with Oppenheimer, Fermi, and other scientists in the 1940s, watching history unfold in real time. Capturing the awe, the hope, the breakthroughs, and the world-changing decisions as they happened. We can’t travel back to the first Atomic Age. But we can be there for the second one. Right now, a new nuclear renaissance is quietly coming into existence. The technology, the visionaries, the political will, and the existential stakes are all colliding at once… and almost no one is telling the full story. Until now. I’m beyond thrilled to announce that I’m co-creating a multi-year epic documentary series called The Last Renaissance, together with award-winning director @TysonCulver. We’re gaining unprecedented, real-time access to the brilliant founders, new reactor designs, daring entrepreneurs, and the key players inside government who are rewriting humanity’s energy future. This is a civilization-level turning point that could reshape climate, geopolitics, prosperity, and even space exploration for the next century. This is the kind of story that only comes around once in a generation. I feel profoundly lucky to be in the room where it’s happening. And if you feel the call, if you’re as electrified by this moment as we are, we want you with us. Whether you’re an investor, a scientist, an engineer, a policymaker, or simply someone who believes this renaissance deserves to be witnessed by the world… Join us. The Atomic Age 2.0 is already underway. Let’s make sure the world doesn’t miss it.

NASA is advancing nuclear power and propulsion in space to accomplish President Trump’s national space objectives. With SR-1 Freedom, launching in 2028, we will demonstrate nuclear electric propulsion and deliver SkyFall helicopters to Mars. In collaboration with @Energy, these capabilities are key to future missions to Mars and beyond. A new chapter of deep space exploration begins. 🚀

For full statement: ans.org/news/2026-04-0…

American Nuclear Society joins @iaeaorg in calling for protection of nuclear power plants in armed conflicts: “The American Nuclear Society (ANS) supports the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) calls for maximum military restraint around nuclear power plants and civilian research reactors, and for full adherence by all combatants to the IAEA's seven pillars for nuclear safety and security during armed conflict.”

American Nuclear Society joins @iaeaorg in calling for protection of nuclear power plants in armed conflicts: ans.org/news/2026-04-0…

.@GovernorLittle announced #Idaho responded to @ENERGY’s call for states to host Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses — a new federal effort to modernize the nation’s full #NuclearFuelCycle and strengthen its leadership in advanced #NuclearEnergy. ⚛️🤝 🔗gov.idaho.gov/pressrelease/i…

TN is the global epicenter of nuclear energy, & we're grateful for a new opportunity to lead the nation with a proposal to locate a @ENERGY Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campus in Oak Ridge. Link: tn.gov/governor/news/…

Utah is stepping forward on nuclear energy. Together with Tooele County, we’re evaluating a Department of @ENERGY Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campus, which would strengthen American energy security, protect the Great Salt Lake, and build an ecosystem that could rival the economic impact of Hill Air Force Base. We will build.

When we launched Mothers for Nuclear in 2016, we started at the ground level to build public support for nuclear with the most skeptical audiences: mothers and women. License renewal for Diablo Canyon reflects the power of community.

@ANS_org Finally some common sense! ⚛️ Diablo Canyon workers proved facts can beat political deadlines. You can't hit climate targets by closing your largest clean source.