Ben Pohl

312 posts

Ben Pohl banner
Ben Pohl

Ben Pohl

@bjpohl33

PA-C, Family Medicine, trained at University of Iowa.

Katılım Ekim 2012
229 Takip Edilen78 Takipçiler
Ben Pohl
Ben Pohl@bjpohl33·
@hubermanlab @MichaelAlbertMD Did you re-trial the med with recurrence? Just curious. Not an adverse effect I’ve seen in my practice. (Family Medicine, PA-C, Iowa)
English
1
0
5
12.4K
Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D.
Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D.@hubermanlab·
@MichaelAlbertMD Q re ezetimibe Tried it and in 24hrs felt like I was getting shanked in the gall bladder. Stopped and it resolved. I assume this is uncommon. Ideas? My numbers are good. Wondering if you see this seldom/often/ever?
English
39
1
266
216.1K
Michael Albert, MD
Michael Albert, MD@MichaelAlbertMD·
I'm 36. I'm a physician. I take a statin—and ezetimibe—every day. No symptoms. No cardiac history. Just an honest read of the evidence. Here's what I found—and why I stopped waiting for a reason to act.
English
506
212
2K
2.2M
Ben Pohl
Ben Pohl@bjpohl33·
@jk_rowling I wish you could break down results by nationality. I bet this goes 95/5 pro-hoodie here in the states.
English
0
0
0
13
J.K. Rowling
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling·
I fear this might be my most controversial take ever, but I agreed to put it to a vote so here we are. Hoodies should only be worn by men young enough not to look silly carrying a skateboard.
English
7.4K
623
8.8K
4.4M
Ben Pohl
Ben Pohl@bjpohl33·
@alt_w_v_g Family medicine provider here. Sheer curiosity, I assume you have insurance? Why didn’t the doc just code this as a wellness visit? You wouldn’t have seen a bill. Also, is $1800 accurate? Including labs, I assume?
English
0
0
1
51
Ethan Brooks
Ethan Brooks@alt_w_v_g·
Went to the doctor the other week My wife made the appointment She said I "look tired" I said I am tired She said "not normal tired. Weird tired." I don't know what that means but I went anyway Nice office Fish tank in the lobby Third one this year Signed in at 1:48pm My appointment was at 2:00pm 12 minutes early Because I was raised to believe that matters The receptionist said "the doctor is running a little behind" I said "how far behind" She said "about 45 minutes" I said "so my 2:00 appointment is actually a 2:45 appointment" She said "we appreciate your patience" I said "I haven't shown any yet" My wife grabbed my arm There was a sign behind the desk "Missed appointments without 24-hour notice will incur a $75 fee" The doctor was 45 minutes late Nobody offered me $75 We sat down CNN was playing on mute with subtitles Running a segment about New York City redesigning its trash cans Cost the city $4 million I looked at my wife She said "don't start" Seven magazines on the table All from 2019 I read an article about supply chain disruptions that have since been resolved Very informative My wife was on her phone She looked up and said "WebMD says you might be dehydrated" I said "so we're paying $1,800 for a second opinion on WebMD" She went back to her phone At 2:54pm they called my name A nurse walked me to a room Took my blood pressure Took my temperature Typed for three minutes Then said "the doctor will be right in" I sat on the paper The paper ripped immediately I looked at the wall There was a diagram of a colon Not how I planned to spend my Tuesday 3:19pm The doctor walked in 1 hour and 19 minutes after my scheduled appointment He was looking at his phone Shook my hand without making eye contact Sat down and read my chart for about 30 seconds While I sat there watching him learn who I was He said "so what brings you in today" I said "my wife thinks I look weird tired" He said "what does that mean" I said "I was hoping you'd tell me" He said "when's the last time you had bloodwork done" I said "2019 maybe" He said "we should run a full panel" I said "fine" He asked if I was sleeping well I said "I have three kids and a golden retriever who thinks 3am is a reasonable time to need outside" He said "are you drinking enough water" I said "probably not" He said "that might be it" I said "you think the reason I look weird tired is because I don't drink enough water" He said "dehydration is more common than people think" I said "I've been here over an hour and sat on a piece of paper that ripped to be told to drink water" He said "we'll know more when the bloodwork comes back" I said "when will that be" He said "3 to 5 business days" I said "business days" He said "yes" I said "my blood has business days" He didn't respond Then he said "any other concerns" I said "several. But none you can bill for." He shook my hand again Still no eye contact Total face time with the doctor: 6 minutes Total time in the building: 1 hour and 37 minutes I was examined for approximately 6% of the time I was present I've fired people for better numbers than that My wife was in the waiting room She asked how it went I said "I need to drink water" She said "I told you that last week" I said "yes but now it's a medical opinion so it costs $1,800" She didn't laugh In the car she said "at least now you know you're fine" I said "I was fine when I walked in. I just didn't have the receipt to prove it." She didn't disagree The bloodwork came back four business days later Everything was normal The doctor's office sent a message through their portal It said "results look great. Continue to stay hydrated and follow up in 12 months." Follow up in 12 months To be told to drink water again $1,800 1 hour and 37 minutes 6 minutes of face time One ripped piece of paper And the same advice my wife gave me for free Plz fix. Thx. Sent from my iPhone
English
616
1K
9.9K
336.4K
Ben Pohl
Ben Pohl@bjpohl33·
@sentdefender Gotta vet your stuff…. Been dicey lately. Lots of conflicting takes on this. Genuinely think you ought to review closely anything adjacent to The Times.
English
0
0
2
48
OSINTdefender
OSINTdefender@sentdefender·
Sailors onboard the USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78), which is entering its tenth month of deployment, battled flames onboard the aircraft carrier last week for over 30 hours, after a small fire that started in the ship’s main laundry area, spread through ventilation to several other areas of the ship, including multiple berthings, with more than 600 sailors and other crewmembers having lost their beds in the fire and since been bunking down on floors and tables throughout the ship, officials tell The New York Times.
OSINTdefender tweet media
English
564
1.3K
9.4K
1.4M
NIL 𝘯𝘰𝘵 NLI
NIL 𝘯𝘰𝘵 NLI@NILnotNLI·
20 years ago tomorrow, 14-seed Northwestern State took down 3-seed Iowa at the buzzer in Auburn Hills
English
69
113
1.7K
322.1K
Ben Pohl
Ben Pohl@bjpohl33·
@CoachDanGo I do. Patient follow through is sometimes pretty limited, but I’ve noticed significantly improved rates/consistency of lifestyle modification with GLP-1 than there was prior to initiation. (Family Medicine PA-C)
English
0
0
0
130
Dan Go
Dan Go@CoachDanGo·
Any doctor who prescribes a GLP-1 should pair it with a basic weight-training program and higher protein intake.
The HighWire@HighWireTalk

One in eight Americans is currently taking a GLP-1 drug, and the safety picture keeps getting worse. A new study analyzing five years of medical records from over 146,000 adults found GLP-1 users had a 30% higher chance of osteoporosis, a 100% higher chance of osteomalacia, and a 12% higher risk of gout compared to non-users. Researchers aren't yet sure why the drugs may be causing bone loss. It could be nutrient depletion from dramatically reduced appetite, or bones simply adapting to the lower body weight. What they do know is there is no long-term safety data for taking these drugs for 5, 10, or more years. And a separate review published this month found that 60% of lost weight returns within a year of stopping the drug, with projections pointing to a 75% plateau. Researchers are openly wondering whether the weight regained is disproportionately fat, leaving users worse off than when they started. The answer from some health professionals? Stay on the drug forever. Meanwhile, the FDA issued a formal warning letter to Novo Nordisk (the maker of Ozempic and Wegovy) for failing to report deaths to the agency as required. Two deaths were not reported at all. A third, involving a patient who died by suicide, was submitted late and only after an FDA inspection raised the issue. The suicide warning that was previously on semaglutide labels has since been quietly removed. Gastroparesis. Blindness. Bone loss. Gout. Unreported deaths. The chance there are serious mental health risks... This is the drug one in eight Americans is currently taking. Full story by @smiddendorp22 : bit.ly/GLP-1_Osteopor…

English
29
8
331
94.7K
Ben Pohl
Ben Pohl@bjpohl33·
@sentdefender Thoughts on the video analysis stating it was likely an Iranian KH-55 and not a Tomahawk? Genuine question - hard for a layman to really craft an opinion these days…
English
0
0
0
100
OSINTdefender
OSINTdefender@sentdefender·
Republican Sen. John Kennedy was asked Monday by NBC News about the bombing of the girls’ primary school in Iran on the first day of Operation Epic Fury, which resulted in the death of roughly 175 children and which evidence suggests was inadvertently carried out by the U.S. Air Force/Navy. “It was terrible. We made a mistake,” he said. “Other countries do that sort of thing intentionally, like Russia. We would never do that intentionally. I think the Department [of Defense] is investigating it now, and I'm sorry. I’m just so sorry it happened. It was a mistake.”
OSINTdefender tweet media
English
290
400
4.9K
586.3K
Ben Pohl retweetledi
Matthew Tkachuk
Matthew Tkachuk@TKACHUKycheese_·
🥇 Is that good? 🇺🇸
English
3.4K
7.3K
128.4K
2.4M
Ben Pohl retweetledi
Thomas Massie
Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassie·
@HasanKhxnx I am not suicidal. I eat healthy food. The brakes on my car and truck are in good shape. I practice good trigger discipline and never point a gun at anyone, including myself. There are no deep pools of water on my farm and I’m a pretty good swimmer.
English
7.1K
45.2K
290.7K
17.5M
Alex Kalogeropoulos
Alex Kalogeropoulos@AkalStation·
I don’t think you should scrap the Model S I do think the Model X should be completely redesigned to be a true 7 seater SUV that is way larger than the current X. I get the “autonomous” future - but not everyone lives in a city, and not everyone wants to robotaxi from their home in the suburbs to the grocery store. Some people like car ownership, and some people also like the product Tesla produces. Yes, the model Y and 3 exist - but for large families, which @elonmusk keeps telling everyone they should have larger ones, the 3 and Y don’t cut it.
English
33
24
1.1K
41.1K
Tesla
Tesla@Tesla·
As we shift to an autonomous future, Model S & X production will wind down next quarter. If you’d like to own one of them, now’s a good time to place your order. Tesla wouldn’t be what it is today without Model S & X and their (early) owners – thank you for your support over the last decade
Tesla tweet media
English
2.2K
2K
16.6K
14.7M
Ben Pohl retweetledi
david friedberg
david friedberg@friedberg·
why not just raise income tax rates? because your real intent is not to just “provide healthcare”. you’re masking that you are proposing the creation of, for the first time in the 250 years of this American republic, an organized government seizure of private property from citizens. you’re calling it a “wealth tax” or a “billionaires tax” or “millionaires tax” or whatever nom du jour polls well. but at the end of the day, it’s the seizure of private property from citizens by the government. citizens that earned money, paid their fair taxes on those earnings (53% if they live in California) and are now being told they need to hand over after-tax assets because the government has failed to provide promised services with the revenue it’s collected, and are now re-casting their own failure to be a socio-economic inequity that must be justly resolved... a slippery slope that has never gone anywhere good (see economic effects in USSR, Cuba, Venezuela, France and Norway wealth tax etc.) the American founders fled tyranny in Europe and this amazing nation was populated by immigrants (myself and your parents) from around the world not just looking for a “better life” but for a place where they could have freedom from tyrannical governments that can take what they want from private citizens. a great nation borne of property rights, the rule of law, and endowed freedoms to believe, speak, or act. these principles led to the greatest run of innovations, successes, and widespread increase in prosperity, for all citizens, ever seen. the citizens, the individuals, not the institutions, delivered this progress. those who invented, who toiled, who bled, who sacrificed, who took risk and persevered, who led, and who changed the world, are not charlatans, kleptocrats, or oligarchs. they’re what made us all better off. prosperity is a measure of america’s success, not its failure. it is your principle that is so offensive, as evidenced by the broad disdain for your flippant flirtation with the darkest of human fantasy - socialism. you and other neo-socialists have led so many of us to reflect on America’s history and what it is becoming. that now leads so many to consider, so unnecessarily, leaving their homes for a place where everyone stands up to shout down the principle you suggest. because if your ideas are now considered moderate, it’s clear this titanic is sinking. that a “simple tax” of taking assets that have been earned, through toil and tribulation, rightly taxed, and preserved, should now be unjustly seized, is your solution to a problem of obvious government mismanagement and outright fraud, tells us that your true motivation lies not in giving people healthcare but in cutting down success and deleting the system of prosperity and opportunity for all. i don’t care, and neither should anyone else, what the sum total market value of a private citizens private assets might be. it is none of my business and should be none of yours. because, again, once you open that pandora’s box, we might as well study Lord of the Flies … there is literally nothing stopping 51% of citizens demanding that their government go out and seize 100% of the private property of the 49%. want to give healthcare to people in need? do your job and fix healthcare. make it affordable. want to be lazy about it? then do your job lazily and raise income taxes. want to take private property from private citizens who have paid their fair share of taxes and legally earned their property, then honestly declare that it is envy, not inequity, that you strive to resolve…
English
1.7K
5.5K
38.9K
4.5M
Ben Pohl retweetledi
Chamath Palihapitiya
Chamath Palihapitiya@chamath·
@RoKhanna If, after audits and zero based budgets, there are revenue gaps, I’d support a wealth tax. Until then, you and your ilk are just getting more incentives for fraud, voter manipulation and larceny.
English
416
562
9.9K
543.1K
Polymarket
Polymarket@Polymarket·
JUST IN: The majority of people want to ban Arabic Numerals from the New York School System, according to new poll.
English
701
333
5.5K
4.2M
Chad Leistikow🆑
Chad Leistikow🆑@ChadLeistikow·
FINAL: Iowa 47, UMass 7. Iowa with 200+ passing, 200+ rushing as Kirk Ferentz gets #206. 3-word headlines?
English
144
11
618
48.7K
Ben Pohl retweetledi
Steve McGuire
Steve McGuire@sfmcguire79·
Ezra Klein on Charlie Kirk: “You can dislike much of what Kirk believed and the following statement is still true: Kirk was practicing politics in exactly the right way. He was showing up to campuses and talking with anyone who would talk to him. He was one of the era’s most effective practitioners of persuasion. When the left thought its hold on the hearts and minds of college students was nearly absolute, Kirk showed up again and again to break it. Slowly, then all at once, he did. College-age voters shifted sharply right in the 2024 election. “That was not all Kirk’s doing, but he was central in laying the groundwork for it. I did not know Kirk and I am not the right person to eulogize him. But I envied what he built. A taste for disagreement is a virtue in a democracy. Liberalism could use more of his moxie and fearlessness. In the inaugural episode of his podcast, Gov. Gavin Newsom of California hosted Kirk, admitting that his son was a huge fan. What a testament to Kirk’s project.” “Kirk and I were on different sides of most political arguments. We were on the same side on the continued possibility of American politics. It is supposed to be an argument, not a war; it is supposed to be won with words, not ended through bullets. I wanted Kirk to be safe for his sake, but I also wanted him to be safe for mine, and for the sake of our larger shared project. The same is true for Shapiro, for Hoffman, for Hortman, for Thompson, for Trump, for Pelosi, for Whitmer. We are all safe, or none of us are.”
Steve McGuire tweet media
English
484
3.6K
30.3K
3.8M
Ben Pohl
Ben Pohl@bjpohl33·
@charliekirk11 This a bad take. While I don’t mind reviewing a willingness to assimilate, language capacity doesn’t have to be a line on the sand (and shouldn’t be). I’ve got tons of patients working their butts off and assimilating fine with minimal English.
English
0
0
6
32
Charlie Kirk
Charlie Kirk@charliekirk11·
Did you know... Getting a green card — a permanent right to live in the U.S. and first step to citizenship — doesn't require any English knowledge at all? This has to change immediately. Along with reviewing our 55 million visa holders, which is an absurdly high number, we also need to review our process for granting green cards and full U.S. citizenship. If you don't speak English, you are not assimilating. We have a moral obligation to the citizens of America to remove from our country those who refuse to assimilate. No English? Afuera!
English
2.1K
7.5K
38.3K
1.3M
₿IRB
₿IRB@crypto_birb·
Here’s what I’m thinking: Bitcoin will hit $90-95k in next 50 days. Reversal after September 17 will kick off last leg of the bull but the month will close red. October & November bull peak ~$200k+. December short altseason (bags go 5-10X) 2026 is for bears. Who’s with me?
₿IRB tweet media
English
325
142
1.2K
366.5K
Ben Pohl retweetledi
Nate Anderson
Nate Anderson@NateHindenburg·
I am Nate Anderson, the founder of Hindenburg Research referenced repeatedly in this bizarre and fantastical interview. During my career, I helped expose numerous financial scams, including over a dozen Ponzi schemes and numerous instances of public companies lying to and stealing from investors: hindenburgresearch.com/about-us/ I am immensely proud of that career including our work on Nikola Motors referenced in the interview. Trevor Milton is a convicted fraudster held criminally responsible for the incineration of hundreds of millions of dollars in retail investors’ hard-earned money. As should be unsurprising, Milton in this interview seems to just fabricate key events and information out of thin air – unfortunately with zero critical questioning or pushback from Tucker. For starters, contrary to Trevor Milton’s implications that his prosecution was some sort of Biden administration conspiracy, conveniently neither Milton nor Tucker share that the investigation into Milton was started and disclosed in September 2020 – under the first TRUMP administration and well before the 2020 election. There were numerous inaccuracies throughout the interview. The claim that Hindenburg paid employees for inside information is patently absurd. The key whistleblower discussed in the interview was only briefly a contractor for Milton. He was so horrified by what he viewed as Milton’s repeated false claims that he did a tremendous amount of research on his own, unraveling numerous additional suspected lies that Milton peddled to the investing public. Further, Hindenburg didn’t “coordinate” anything with media or the DoJ. Such entities ran their own investigations for their own purposes unconnected to us. There was ample evidence that Milton misstated numerous aspects of his business, as the company itself later acknowledged. It would take hours to write about all the other absurdities, half-truths, innuendos and false statements in this interview but in the interest of correcting some of the record, here’s a handful: - Milton waxes on about his pardon, but no one mentioned that Milton’s lawyer was Brad Bondi—the brother of AG Pam Bondi. Nor did anyone mention that Milton donated $900 thousand to Trump in October 2024, less than a month before the recent election—strategically timed well after his criminal conviction and immediately prior to the presidential election. Trump acknowledged he had never heard of Milton before being asked to pardon him but relied on others for the recommendation. - Milton failed to mention that immediately prior to his resignation from his company, beyond the extensive allegations of fraud, he was also publicly accused of multiple instances of sexual assault, including by his own cousin, who went on-the-record with her allegations. - I can only wonder what kind of investigation Tucker undertook of the fraud allegations against Milton before having him on. Milton literally video-taped a truck rolling down a hill implying that it was driving under its own power. He also went up on stage and said a truck that didn’t work “fully functions and works.” - Waxing poetic about hydrogen in the interview echoes Nikola’s lies to retail investors that it successfully produced hydrogen at a cost ~81% lower than anyone on earth, a feat that would have upended the entire energy industry had it been remotely true. Nikola’s head of hydrogen production, presumably in charge of this world-changing scientific breakthrough, turned out to be Milton’s own brother, who had no scientific background and previously did odd construction jobs in Hawaii. - These weren’t one-off misstatements—there were dozens of examples like these. As the DoJ said – and proved in court – Milton “made false claims regarding nearly all aspects of Nikola’s business.” The company itself admitted to many of these false statements, agreed to a $125 million fine, and won an arbitration against Milton holding him personally liable for his conduct. - Milton claimed that Hindenburg made $30m-$100m on our Nikola investment—this isn’t even close (we made a fraction of that). Trevor seems to just be making these numbers up out of thin air. Hilariously, Tucker opened by suggesting that short selling was illegal until 2007, a claim that is completely false. After confirming that he knows nothing about the subject, he went on to suggest that short selling should be criminalized outright. Short selling has existed for hundreds of years, and for good reason. Short sellers play a critical role in the functioning of healthy markets, similar to the role of investigative journalists, (which I presume Tucker considers himself akin to). Most companies are a force for good and economic growth. However, some companies lie and engage in fraud. Short sellers have exposed nearly every major corporate fraud in the past several decades because just as there is an economic incentive for identifying the good companies, there is also an economic model for identifying the scams. This is how free markets and free speech works—helping weed out the bad companies and those stealing from investors so good companies have more room to thrive. Claiming to be a free speech advocate while casually advocating for the imprisonment of anyone who dares to speak critically about public companies is a contradiction of the highest order. In short, Tucker, I highly suggest you actually vet the people you welcome onto your platform. If you find yourself staring, mouth agape at your interviewee, repeatedly saying “Wow! This is unbelievable!” it may in fact be because it’s unbelievable. You reach a lot of people and this one was an avoidable miss. Good day.
English
738
1.6K
14.1K
1.8M