TBD

The illusion of the American dream is propped up by the relative wealth of a very small portion of white baby boomers who are subsidizing the lives of their children. Boomers hold over 50% of the wealth in the US, and it is heavily concentrated among the top percentile. These are not the real elite (1%), but low multiple millionaires that believe they are elite. These are the types that obsess over school rankings, and somehow still believe the work hard, good college, McMansion, country club path is possible despite their children being rejected from their Alma mater and buying a house with family money. In the next few decades, all of this wealth will be partially eroded by healthcare costs and then transferred to their children who have been too sheltered to understand the score. You should be befriending these people as they are actually the only chance of changing course, not electoral politics.

Exhibit 1003 of liberals not caring about the text x.com/i/status/20395…

@EditrixLane @aethelamerican @SeanTrende x.com/i/status/20394…

@btbd314 @aethelamerican @SeanTrende Oh dear. I get that you are super mad, but this just isn’t true. You need to go take a nap.

I still think it’s hilarious that with the birthright citizenship MAGA has become living constitutionalists (this is a problem they didn’t consider in 1868!) and lefties have become plain meaning/originalist types.

@EditrixLane @aethelamerican @SeanTrende ( dual citizens like American Indians you talked about. The 1924 citizenship act addressed the Indian question not the 14th amendment specifically because the 14th amendment doEsnt apply to them)

@EditrixLane @aethelamerican @SeanTrende The english law was covered in the 1898 case where they determined that jurisdiction meant allegiance and talked about foreign diplomats. Sure, get rid of dual citizens but ur logic is incoherent anyway since once can have alliegiance to more than one country.

This specific type of profile is responsible for destroying this country just as much as gay race communists in the Democratic Party are.

@EditrixLane @aethelamerican @SeanTrende a) liberals do not believe that text matters. ur a fool b) jurisdiction means allegiance, not who gets arrested. the us routinely invokes its jurisdiction outside its borders to arrest international criminals. are their children citizens now?

@aethelamerican @SeanTrende If you are born in the US to a person who is able to be arrested in the US, that's all that the amendment requires. And saying it's wrong for liberals is silly. Liberals believe that text matters.

@SeanTrende except nothing but a completely tortured "originalist" reading supports birth tourism as it exists today, either

Did we seriously believe this problem went away by itself in the last 10 years ?

This is the kind of software engineering job does not require any kind of high end, super talent to perform. Any experienced software engineer or data scientist is qualified. There are 10s of thousands of unemployed American IT workers with the experience to do this job. Why do we have H-1B tech workers at all given all the layoffs in tech over the past couple of years? Hundreds of thousands of Americans have been laid off but the onslaught of foreign tech workers continue to flood in and get jobs that are set aside for them. What the hell is going on?

We actually don’t need a match system at all. It exists purely for the financial benefit of hospitals at the expense of young doctors.

She’s a fucking retard and so are you. You’re both walking stereotypes.

"Subject to the Jurisdiction thereof" Illegals and any person not authorized by our government to be present have not subjected themselves to US jurisdiction. They remain subject (allegiant) to their home nation. This is not the same a criminal jurisdiction for prosecution - here is why: Anyone present inside our borders could be subject to jurisdiction for the purpose of criminal prosecution. That is not the type of allegiance based subjection used in the 14th Amendment. This was clarified in Wong Kim Ark where the child in question was born to lawful permanent residents and was granted citizenship for that reason. The children of illegals, like the children of an invading army or resident diplomats of other nations are not automatic citizens. Never were supposed to be. @POTUS is correcting decades of erroneous interpretation. This will be a legacy defining gift to Americans who are tired of seeing our country stolen right in front of us with the assistance of communist inspired democrats. America is worth saving.

@PathOfMen_ White men are not allowed to have jobs and white women will not marry men without jobs

THIS IS FRAUD! An entire industry has formed around selling the O-1A "extraordinary ability" visa as a backdoor. The top 30 H-1B visa sponsors in the U.S. laid off 85,000 workers and hired 34,000 visa workers in the same period. Not before. Not after. At the same time. 60% of all H-1B positions are certified at below-median wages. A Harvard economist found H-1B workers earn 16% less than comparable Americans, saving employers nearly $100,000 per worker over a six-year visa term. Oracle approved 2,690 H-1B workers in 2025, then cut 30,000 via a 6 AM email in March 2026. Amazon approved over 10,000 H-1B workers while cutting tens of thousands. Google laid off 951 Americans and hired 1,058 H-1B workers the same year. Now that the H-1B is getting harder to exploit with a new $100,000 fee and a weighted lottery, the playbook is shifting. The O-1A was designed for Nobel Prize winners and world-class researchers. It requires "sustained national or international acclaim." Instead, it has become a product. No annual cap. No lottery. 15-day premium processing. 94% approval rate. Companies like Jinee Green Card are running ads that say, direct quote: "If you're an Indian immigrant facing visa uncertainty, click here." They claim an 87% first-attempt approval rate and sell something called a "Three-Pillar Visa Acquisition" system. An extraordinary ability visa being sold like a SaaS product. This is labor arbitrage. This is fraud.

🚨 EXPOSED: ACLU Power Lawyer Cecillia Wang—The Globalist Enforcer Using ‘Civil Rights’ to Dismantle American Sovereignty ACLU Director Cecillia Wang, who is arguing for birthright citizenship, has a very cozy relationship with the Open Society Foundations (OSF) – founded by George Soros, a key financier of internationalist causes, including mass migration policy advocacy and identity politics. OSF funds ACLU programs and complementary NGOs such as Human Rights Watch, Brennan Center, and the National Immigration Law Center (NILC), with which Wang has collaborated. Ford Foundation – major historical ACLU backer that shifted significantly leftward after the 1960s. Supports “racial equity,” CRT‐aligned education, and “equity-based democracy initiatives.” Tides Foundation – dark-money clearinghouse for progressive and socialist advocacy. Tides has spun off or fiscal-sponsored intersectional projects Wang has publicly supported. Sandler Foundation / Justice Catalyst – known to funnel funds to lawfare networks advancing anti-deportation campaigns and ideological litigation against law enforcement. While these are not “foreign” powers in the narrow sense, they are ideologically globalist — promoting transnational governance models that correspond to CCP interests in weakening U.S. sovereignty, borders, and domestic cohesion. Understand, the ACLU is no longer a purely domestic civil rights organization — it functions as part of a transnational NGO ecosystem heavily financed by globalist actors. And while there is no direct evidence that Wang served as a CCP agent or received funding from Chinese state-affiliated entities, not unusual for an actual CCP asset. In fact, several ideological overlaps and institutional intersections exist: The ACLU’s partner networks include organizations that have engaged with CCP-linked front NGOs under the banner of “human rights dialogue,” for example, Human Rights in China (HRIC) and Amnesty International USA (which has historically accepted funding from the Chinese-linked United Front-penetrated intermediaries through global U.N. partnerships). The ACLU has on multiple occasions aligned with CCP diplomatic narratives, such as opposing U.S. scrutiny of Chinese surveillance technology under the rubric of “anti-Asian discrimination” or “xenophobia.” These are examples of latent influence ops—the CCP exploits Western guilt and “race discourse” to mute criticism of Beijing. Wang herself co-signed letters or participated in events with NGOs with apparent ties to CCP-sympathetic academic institutions, such as the Asia Society and Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, which are known to have received co-sponsorship from Chinese state-tied corporations. So, while not an admitted operative, she operates within an influence network highly penetrated by CCP narrative symmetry and funding channels. Wang has collaborated with or spoken at events organized by: ◦ Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) – explicitly Marxist-rooted organization that defended violent radicals (e.g., Weather Underground members). ◦ National Immigration Law Center (NILC) – receives OSF and Tides contributions. ◦ Demos and Brennan Center – both founded by figures who identify as progressive reformists but operate on redistributionist and socialized- control models (shared DNA with European social democracy and cultural Marxism). Wang’s litigation and policy advocacy have faced accusations of undermining U.S. sovereignty, including attempts to block deportations even for individuals with criminal histories, and campaigning against biometric border surveillance. Critics argue she and other ACLU leaders have inflamed anti-police sentiment, helping create the legal backdrop for increased violent crime in cities following the “Defund the Police” push. The ACLU, under Wang’s legal direction, shifted dramatically from “civil liberties for all” to progressive political activism, such as defending censorship when it aligned with “anti-hate” laws. Some have criticized Wang for promoting racial essentialism, prioritizing minority group narratives regardless of truth content, which contradicts Martin Luther King’s ideal of color-blind justice. Cecillia Wang doesn’t operate as an isolated actor but as part of a fusion network: ➡ Globalist capital (Soros / Ford / Tides) ➡ Marxist legal theory (critical studies) ➡ CCP-aligned narrative laundering via “anti- racism” ➡ Domestic lawfare to erode U.S. border and policing systems This symbiotic architecture is classic 21st-century hybrid infiltration — not espionage in the Cold War sense, but ideological convergence between corporate globalists, postmodern Marxists, and authoritarian global powers like China. There is no verifiable evidence that Wang personally collaborates with the CCP or is on any Chinese payroll. However: She works within a transnational NGO intelligence and ideological ecosystem that conveniently aligns with CCP strategic interests. Her career exemplifies how globalist funding and Marxist-derived ideology have merged inside U.S. “civil rights” institutions. The ACLU under her influence has transitioned from a defense-of-liberty institution into a legal warfare apparatus for elite, globalized interests pushing border dissolution, censorship wrapped in “equity,” and selective rights application. And for the record, where was Wang during Xi Jinping's visit to San Francisco in November 2023? The image is a satire, or is it? 😉

None of these Asians believe their allegiance is to the United States

Don't Overcomplicate this Case "Jurisdiction" and "allegiance" mean whatever the justices want them to mean. That's it. That's the whole case. They can choose any definitions they want, so the only real question is whether they want birthright citizenship. The men don't. The women do. We're about to find out if Justice Roberts is male or female. Most signs point to female.

“I don’t care about what the law says, it’s mean”

Counterpoint: If I were the Chinese government, I would simply offer every pregnant woman a first class flight and 5-star hotel accommodations in the US at 8.5 months pregnant, wait 20 years, and then conquer the country. Why would I not do this?