Charlie Dolan

9.9K posts

Charlie Dolan banner
Charlie Dolan

Charlie Dolan

@cdolan92

I automate waste & recycling stuff Now: Scaling @dsqtech Prev: Built & sold @sequoiawaste to a public company $QRHC

Pittsburgh, PA USA Katılım Mayıs 2009
894 Takip Edilen1.8K Takipçiler
Charlie Dolan
Charlie Dolan@cdolan92·
Assume Starlink part is accurate here and incremental cost per additional home trends to $1 Why is PE still underwriting residential fiber value at ~$3,000/home?
The All-In Podcast@theallinpod

Chamath Lays Out the Case for SpaceX at $2 Trillion – Starlink: the most important internet infra project since the internet itself – Rockets: underlying platform that allows everything else to happen – AI: apps top layer, datacenter bottom layer – The Elon Flywheel: operating leverage ➡️ investment ➡️ competitive moat ➡️ capital moat ➡️ technology moat ➡️ execution/learning moat – Potential Tesla merger down the road – Elon’s premium for being “the guy” right now @chamath: “ If I'm asking myself, ‘Chamath, how do I underwrite SpaceX at $2T?’ Here's the basic math that I would do. Last year it did $18-19 billion. It'll probably do $25-30 billion this year. So I'm buying this thing at a fairly costly premium, right? So what am I buying? I'm buying probably the most important internet infrastructure project that's happened since the internet itself. That's going to scale to hundreds of millions of users, and the reason that's going to scale to hundreds of millions of users is it's just very useful, and it's just going to become cheaper and cheaper and cheaper. So that's number one. I'm buying a delivery infrastructure, I think over time, GDP plus 10, GDP plus 15, kind of a grower. So good business, valuable business, but it's the underlying platform that allows everything else to happen. And then I'm buying an AI business, which will be at the top level the apps, but at the bottom layer all the compute capability. So I suspect what happens is next year it's probably $40-45 billion. And then the year after that it probably doubles again, so then I'm buying it at 20x revenue. And you would say, ‘Well, why can you buy a company like this on revenue versus earnings and cash flow?’ And I think the reason is because what the revenue does is it gives him the operating leverage to go and invest in all of these other businesses that ultimately consolidate his differentiation and his competitive moat, because what he creates is a capital moat that then accelerates a technology moat, that then accelerates an execution and a learning moat. And that flywheel, when it starts to spin very quickly, and you would say, ‘Hey, hold on a second. It's probably spinning quickly now.’ I would say we're at the beginning of the beginning. He still has all these disparate assets. I still don't like the fact that Tesla's over here, and as I've told you, that will get merged in. And now you have this incredible corpus of physical capability, movement of all kinds, X, Y, and Z, right? That thing will look very cheap, I think, in a few years. And he has this one thing that nobody else, if you look at the big CEOs, who steps on stage where you're always curious, ‘Okay, what has he got up his sleeve?’ You know, the Steve Jobs, ‘Oh, and one more thing.’ He's the guy. Whether you like him or you hate him, he's the guy, and there's a premium that is well-deserved that comes with that.”

English
2
0
2
271
Charlie Dolan
Charlie Dolan@cdolan92·
@floinkus Maybe but even on the western half of the state in rural areas, market is paying $3,000/home valuation for deployed fiber to the premise Those seem like ideal starlink targets (even though it’s an inferior product relative to fiber in many ways)
English
0
0
1
22
cole benefield
cole benefield@floinkus·
@cdolan92 Cheap reliable fast connections are gonna be valuable regardless. Houses might become nodes of compute. I don’t think the main upside for Sterling is residential houses and areas that are already well connected.
English
1
0
0
20
Adam Smith Appreciator
Adam Smith Appreciator@WhoRfk36331·
@Molson_Hart Agree. Generational wealth also messes up the kids. Every biological creature derives their self-worth from their ability to acquire resources. Generational wealth deprives the next generation of this opportunity.
English
2
0
2
232
molson 🧠⚙️
molson 🧠⚙️@Molson_Hart·
We’d be better off if the rich, instead of giving their kids a trust fund to navigate a difficult and treacherous world, allocated that money towards making the world better for them. There’s a rich kid getting $100 mm in Los Angeles this year. Could that money be used to make the city less dysfunctional instead? Maybe I’m being naive about how entrenched the problems in our government are, but it seems to me that experienced business builders combined with large amounts of money and friends and perhaps a willingness to fail could make changes, at least, at the local level.
English
50
0
53
11.7K
Charlie Dolan
Charlie Dolan@cdolan92·
@Molson_Hart Government tends to be a poor steward of resources I’d much rather bet on a family‘s desire to improve itself over the hope that the organism of government we’ll have the same duty and care for my kids/grandkids
English
0
0
1
24
Charlie Dolan
Charlie Dolan@cdolan92·
Well-built MCPs & CLIs really are incredible for complicated systems/business processes
English
0
0
2
74
Charlie Dolan
Charlie Dolan@cdolan92·
@jamestmurphy_ One of my favorite parts of Wikipedia is finding someone with future political ambition and tracking their edits One guy I know has paid for authors, continually edited anonymously from his own house, and more Its like digital people watching
English
0
0
0
23
James Murphy
James Murphy@jamestmurphy_·
"Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information." - Michael Scott, The Office, 2007
Crémieux@cremieuxrecueil

I'm learning a lot from bickering with people on Wikipedia. For example, did you know fraudulent articles can be "reliable" and articles documenting said fraud can be "unreliable" for no other reason than 'some lifeless loser who edits Wikipedia 10 hours a day said so'? Wow!

English
1
0
2
745
Charlie Dolan
Charlie Dolan@cdolan92·
just me, or did Anthropic 'fix' the flicker by making it look like claude is having a stroke?
Charlie Dolan tweet media
English
1
0
0
59
Browser Use
Browser Use@browser_use·
@cdolan92 Sorry about this. Are you still running into the issue? If so, feel free to DM me the details and I’ll take a look.
English
1
0
0
47
Charlie Dolan
Charlie Dolan@cdolan92·
@browser_use was going to try some things this weekend. Signed up, 500 error on onboarding :(
Charlie Dolan tweet media
English
1
0
0
103
Charlie Dolan
Charlie Dolan@cdolan92·
@VanceE Making revenue off it for sure When they allocate (future) legal costs back to these reports, will not be for a profit haha
English
0
0
2
229
Charlie Dolan
Charlie Dolan@cdolan92·
@pitdesi Any chance the content will be recorded for later? On baby watch can’t make it but looks awesome!
English
0
0
0
160
Sheel Mohnot
Sheel Mohnot@pitdesi·
Excited to announce the speaker lineup for The Vertical AI Summit in New York on June 2nd. We’re bringing together founders and leaders from top vertical AI companies for a behind-the-scenes look at how they’re building with AI. We still have a few open spots. Apply below.
Sheel Mohnot tweet media
English
22
21
316
104.3K
Luckforest
Luckforest@lubinho_k·
I am on the $200 Claude, $100 Codex, $20 Cursor Plan. After using Composer 2.5 for 8 hours straight while only using 8% of my $20 plan, I should reconsider my entire subscription stack. Maybe $100 Codex for complex stuff, and $60 Cursor for UI & Copy?
Luckforest tweet media
English
206
33
1.6K
132.9K
Mike Ritchie
Mike Ritchie@thisritchie·
You can now run a complete AI-native analytics platform in your own cloud. Lakehouse, semantic layer, automations, data apps, and agents. Single-tenant. Nothing leaves your environment. @definiteapp now ships on-prem.
Mike Ritchie tweet media
English
2
1
4
932
Charlie Dolan
Charlie Dolan@cdolan92·
@pitdesi Have you noticed the former Mellon tower, which became the BNY Mellon tower, now only illuminates the BNY and leaves the mellon “off” at night in Pittsburgh? Can take years to get the sign changed, too (but they may not care the building is empty) Love a good rebrand!
English
0
0
3
488
Robb Wolf
Robb Wolf@robbwolf·
@amrevveejnas @jamestmurphy_ @Cernovich @oasishealthapp .That is almost certainly coming. James had to explain basic toxicology issues like what precisely parts per billion mean. But there as been a free lunch in the cottage industry of fear mongering. Those days are done.
English
2
0
17
801
James Murphy
James Murphy@jamestmurphy_·
@oasishealthapp has now deleted the posts and issued two redactions, saying “we’ll do better next time” I had conversations with them over a year ago, assuming best intent when they started with this BS. It’s only gotten worse since then. This protein post got 3.5MM views before deletion. The same day the founder and head of growth are pumping their fists posting record revenue and app download numbers. The next day the correction comes. The correction gets a few thousand views. Dozens of people saying “wft, I threw that brand in the trash” You don’t get an out, again. You don’t get to defame brands for years now, collect millions of dollars in revenue, and say “my bad” when no one hears it. Receipts. Photos in order: - Protein defamation post. 3.5MM views (twitter alone). - Founder posting “record day.” - Correction post. 7K views. These guys like dramatic statistics. Oasis has a 500x fold ratio in false allegations to honest reporting. (3.5M views vs 7K) Thats 10,000x higher than the safety level set by any reasonable person for honest and credible work. For every one person that sees the redaction, 500 people are throwing the product in the trash and telling their friends about it too. Oasis, you better start spending every dollar of that defamation-made money on promoting these redaction posts.
James Murphy tweet mediaJames Murphy tweet mediaJames Murphy tweet mediaJames Murphy tweet media
English
16
23
180
24.9K