
cky.onchain
165 posts

cky.onchain
@ckyzhu
📍NYC crypto investing @ambergroup_io | sharing research & trading thoughts (sometimes life) | views are my own #nfa #dyor https://t.co/j40E7mYeN2



We've signed a Memorandum of Understanding with @NYSE to support the development of tokenized securities markets. Securitize has been named as the first transfer agent eligible to mint blockchain-native securities on the upcoming NYSE-affiliated tokenized securities platform.


We all know that right now most of the world’s attention is captured by AI. We also believe AI will bring significant impact to both our industry and our individuals. We recently launched the amber.ac North America Tour. For our stop at Columbia, we’re co-hosting with @BlockchainatCU and inviting friends from Polychain @polychain, IOSG @IOSGVC, Amber Group @ambergroup_io, and Maelstrom @MaelstromFund to share insights on AI, crypto, and the future ahead. Topics 1. VC AMA 2. The Future of Crypto 3. How AI Improves Crypto Builders & Projects 4. The Rise of the AI-Powered Super Individual Ask anything here. Luma link: luma.com/aqfyyf50 Please note: No video recording. Everything shared here stays here. Speak freely and honestly. 2026/3/9 See you in New York.

We are hosting our first Prediction Market Conference in March 2026. Researchers, economists, policymakers, traders will discuss big questions around prediction markets and knowledge aggregation. Spots will be limited. Reply here with a topic if interested in joining.












Key Findings 如下: 大前提是 Polymarket 用的 CFT (Condition Token Framework) 出來的 YES token 和 NO token 可以剛性 peg 1 USDC(類似於 PT + YT 的概念如果熟悉 @pendle_fi),且 YES 和 NO token 底層是基於 ERC-1155 的不同的代幣。 基於 @cryptogator1121 @poliedge100 的超細節觀察,Polymarket 上 UI 的 Orderbook 會發現下單時雙邊會對稱(你下單 Buy YES 0.65 會發現 Sell NO 0.35 也有一張你的 order),這一開始讓我非常困惑,因為兩個 token 底層是分開的,我一直以為 orderbook 也該完全分開的兩套。

Here's what I would do if I was a young person trying to break into VC: Write. Short writeups, on Twitter. Not generic market philosophical thinkpieces, because those will be assumed to be AI slop or regurgitated research. No one will read it unless you're brilliant, which you're probably not. Original research, on a specific company or sub-sector. If you want to write about robotics, even that is too broad. Narrow it down. Humanoid robotics, or healthcare robotics, military robotics, etc. Get really granular. So granular most people won't care. If it's something you could get by Googling, it's not narrow enough. You will not be able to find to do "original research" easily. This is not something you can do from a university library. You will have to go talk to people who work at these companies. Journalists who cover these companies. Pay for private industry-specific research / newsletters. Follow all of the employees/anons who are tweeting gossip. Integrate a picture that someone reading TechCrunch doesn't see. Then write about this sector and leading + new startups and tag / DM every investor at every major firm who covers your space (you can find them because they've invested in one of the companies in the sector). If they express interest, offer coffee meetings with everyone you can. Some will take you up on it. Do this enough times, you'll develop a reputation and get offered a job in venture. Don't need to go to business school, don't need to have a great angel portfolio or any of the above. "Get good deal flow" is wonderful if you have access to it, but most people just can't do this. If you're already surrounded by Stanford undergrads, you probably don't need advice to break into VC. But the above strategy--in principle anyone can do. Just need to have abnormal levels of agency and a willingness to basically do the job of a junior VC without anyone telling you to. (While you're doing this, best thing to do in the meantime is to also work at a company in the sector you're chasing after. But not always possible depending on your background. Thankfully, VC does not require any particular background. Lots of weirdos in VC, myself included.) I guarantee you, everyone wants to hire someone who can do the above. But very few candidates have this degree of agency. VC is not a "tracked" career. Hiring is arbitrary, firms are generally small and do not scale, and there is no standard path. This is good for you if you're willing to be weird. The thing that VCs have in common is that they are passionate about startups and understanding new industries. If you show that you already have that, a path will open for you.









