Name here

107 posts

Name here

Name here

@collin_mit93900

Katılım Mart 2026
22 Takip Edilen6 Takipçiler
Burke Holland
Burke Holland@burkeholland·
I ❤️ Opus, BUT 💰💰💰💰💰 I've been using Sonnet 4.6 (Medium) with Rubber Duck in Copilot because @Github reports ~75% of Opus perf w this strat. I'm loving it. Fast, has not let me down yet and was able to fix a bug that even Opus could not. github.blog/ai-and-ml/gith…
English
13
12
117
10.3K
spike
spike@spikednn·
@RnaudBertrand Not even remotely true. Compare against the subscription which is what everyone uses and it’s pretty much the same price. You can do about 2B tokens a day on the $200 subs. Just enjoy the subsidies while they last.
English
1
0
0
953
Arnaud Bertrand
Arnaud Bertrand@RnaudBertrand·
Hard to calculate exactly without an input/output split but I did the math and for 831,962,136 tokens, Anthropic Opus 4.7 would cost: - 100% input (floor, unrealistic): 831.96M × $5/M = $4,159.81 - 90/10 (typical for coding agents like opencode — most tokens are codebase context re-fed each turn): $3,743.83 + $2,079.91 = $5,823.74 - 80/20 (more conservative): $3,327.85 + $4,159.81 = $7,487.66 - 50/50 (worst plausible case): $2,079.90 + $10,399.53 = $12,479.43 So that $10.57 DeepSeek bill would probably become roughly $5,000–8,000 on Claude Opus 4.7. In other words, DeepSeek is 500–700× cheaper, for similar-ish capabilities. Now you start to understand why Anthropic is worried...
Khalid Warsame@KhalidWarsa

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro cheap? I consumed 831,962,136 tokens in under 2 days and paid $10 for it.

English
86
257
2.3K
243.7K
Dan Wahlin
Dan Wahlin@DanWahlin·
I've been using GPT 5.5 heavily for the last few days in GitHub Copilot CLI and have been really impressed so far. Opus has always been my go to, but I feel like 5.5 is generating better results overall. Anyone else using it a lot? Thoughts...good or bad?
English
22
2
63
9K
Merill Fernando
Merill Fernando@merill·
@DanWahlin Yup, I've been a Claude believer ever since I released the first Microsoft Graph MCP (lokka.dev) back in Feb last year. BUT for the last couple of weeks, I've 100% switched to Codex and it is so good. The Codex app is 😘
English
2
1
15
1.2K
Name here
Name here@collin_mit93900·
@wongmjane Ppl will do anything but take public transit
English
0
0
6
275
Jane Manchun Wong
Jane Manchun Wong@wongmjane·
SF self-driving trio during rush hour: Waymo: overpriced Zoox: too far away Robotaxi: “High service demand” Anyways, I ended up taking a yellow cab instead 🚕
Jane Manchun Wong tweet media
English
26
9
233
53.5K
Petri Kuittinen
Petri Kuittinen@KuittinenPetri·
@ai_for_success GitHub Copilot went from having the best value for money in AI assisted coding to having no value over just paying for API credits yourself (coming in 1st of June 2026). Absolutely mind-blowing! They should at least add cheap Chinese OSS models to their model list. 1/
Petri Kuittinen tweet mediaPetri Kuittinen tweet media
English
6
9
63
9.3K
AshutoshShrivastava
AshutoshShrivastava@ai_for_success·
I was going through GitHub Copilot pricing changes… this is wild. They quietly changed model multipliers and some of these jumps are insane. Opus 4.6 is 9x Opus 4.5 is 5x Opus 4.7 is 3.6x Sonnet 4.6 is 9x Sonnet 4.5 is 6x Gemini 3 Pro is 6x Gemini 3.1 Pro is 6x GPT 5.1 is 3x GPT 5.2 is 3x GPT 5.3 Codex is 6x GPT 5.4 is 6x
AshutoshShrivastava tweet media
English
73
33
327
200.1K
Name here
Name here@collin_mit93900·
@zeeg GitHub Copilot does this. No need to mess with api and all the other crap.
English
0
0
0
78
David Cramer
David Cramer@zeeg·
Alright Anthropic, OpenAI: I need APIs that give me usage data. Granular. Per user. I need this in the same way its provided by every other company for all of time. What I dont want: "heres a $100,000 line vague line item of token spend".
English
34
7
320
27.3K
Name here retweetledi
Wes Bos
Wes Bos@wesbos·
Claude Code vs OpenCode github comments hit different this way (im so sorry)
English
99
170
2.1K
324.6K
Name here
Name here@collin_mit93900·
@handotdev Hell yeah let us know in 2035 when you get it done 💪
English
0
0
0
71
Name here
Name here@collin_mit93900·
@mitchellh I’m saddened more that you’ve devoted so many days and years of your fleeting life to a stupid software on a lifeless computer. Good luck
English
0
0
1
1.4K
Mitchell Hashimoto
Mitchell Hashimoto@mitchellh·
Ghostty is leaving GitHub. I'm GitHub user 1299, joined Feb 2008. I've visited GitHub almost every single day for over 18 years. It's never been a question for me where I'd put my projects: always GitHub. I'm super sad to say this, but its time to go. mitchellh.com/writing/ghostt…
English
548
1.6K
16.8K
2.9M
Theo - t3.gg
Theo - t3.gg@theo·
@cassidoo @film_girl I really hope yall can bounce back here. GitHub is the center of so much of the software world. Rooting for you guys 🫡
English
6
0
335
12.9K
Name here
Name here@collin_mit93900·
@MetacriticCap If I were to guess they’ve already lost single digit billions on subsidization so far
English
0
0
0
319
MetaCritic Capital
MetaCritic Capital@MetacriticCap·
GitHub Copilot will continue to be subsidized, to the extent your company has a discount to the listing price, like many companies do. That said, extremely disappointing. Microsoft doesn't need to pay a dime to OpenAI to serve their models, Microsoft is extremely rich, they should at least losing some mid-single digit billions of dollars here before giving up.
GitHub@github

Starting June 1st, GitHub Copilot will move to a usage-based billing model as GitHub Copilot supports more agentic and advanced workflows. In early May, you'll see a preview bill experience, giving visibility into projected costs before the transition. 👉 Read more about the upcoming change: github.blog/news-insights/…

English
12
5
215
42.5K
josh
josh@JoshCaughtFire·
@collin_mit93900 @fjzeit @GitHubCopilot No, you would pick the best tool for your org… which likely isn’t copilot, especially coupled with GitHub’s poor uptime. The only thing really valuable about copilot was it’s pricing structure, which is now changing to be like everyone else, hence no value
English
1
0
7
370
fj
fj@fjzeit·
my one question for @GitHubCopilot is: if you are to now charge $39 a month for API credits does this mean that unused credit will accumulate?
English
21
6
279
48.1K
josh
josh@JoshCaughtFire·
@collin_mit93900 @fjzeit @GitHubCopilot Dozens of other agents let you do that using open router, cloudflare, etc. as central billing. Seemed the edge with Copilot was their request based billing, I don’t think their agent is that spectacular
English
1
0
4
525
josh
josh@JoshCaughtFire·
@fjzeit @GitHubCopilot That’s what I don’t get, wtf am I paying monthly for? And if I’m paying API prices, why would I use copilot
English
1
0
37
5.3K
Name here
Name here@collin_mit93900·
@olvrgln Damn a GitHub disrupter wouldn’t let this happen to them
English
0
0
1
9
Name here
Name here@collin_mit93900·
@RimaSukhadia Pre production? I thought they had it figured out? It’s 2026!
English
0
0
0
3
Name here
Name here@collin_mit93900·
@GergelyOrosz Look at the amount users on GH vs those other services? Are you dumb? Like actually an idiot?
English
0
0
0
40
Gergely Orosz
Gergely Orosz@GergelyOrosz·
I totally get that agentic workflows means that GitHub has a lot more load to deal with (10x or more) BUT so do a bunch of other infra startups seeing 10x or more load increase - may that be Vercel, Resend, Railway, Cloudflare, Linear etc. What makes it a lot more challenging for GH? Git? Because when I look to those other startups that likely see a similar % of load increase, reliability does not seem to suffer as much, as constantly as GitHub.
English
41
14
452
56.4K