constantitus

I'd say "real ones knew how to do port forwarding", but back then, I had my whole ass windows xp machine directly exposed to the internet without a router.

@SuperluminalSft Does Superluminal support linux natively ?

Today is a beautiful day for updates! On the Stable channel: rolling up a large number of features, perf optimizations, and QoL changes made over the past months On the Insider channel: support for our instrumentation API has been implemented on PS4 & 5! Go check it out!

@vaxryy or rename something like noninitialfocus to no_initial_focus

@constantitus I mean I might drop some config values but thats it

and this ladies and gentlemen is why: - lua is a better config format - I dont need to break configs anymore

@JimGetzen @rfleury @Galaxia0xFF Definitely not. All of these indian engagement farming larpers should delete their accounts.

@rfleury @Galaxia0xFF "Delete your account." A little harsh, don't you think?

how three languages handle a missing value C will kill you silently C++ will kill you politely Rust won't let you write the code at all production bugs disagree on which is best

>oops sorry you're not running the absolute latest version of neovim you're running the slightly older version so our plugin doesn't support your shit. Holy shit bro shut the fuck up.

@rfleury @valigo dev does not work for me, it crashes as soon as I try to run anything.

dbg-test is a bit behind the newest stuff for Linux, since it’s running the old DWARF converter—sometimes that does work but it’ll crash with many kinds of input files (it’s also single threaded). That said, I don’t think the process control stuff has changed much on that branch—does dev not work?

If you don't understand what is this - this is working RAD debugger on Linux. We are SO UNBELIEVABLY CLOSE

@valigo I only tried dev

@constantitus Which branch? Master seems a bit behind, and all the hot work by Ryan and Nikita happens in either dbg-test or in dev

@valigo Yea, I saw him step through code in the vod and I immediately pulled the latest changes, recompiled and tried it myself, but it didn't work. Maybe he does something different in his setup..

@constantitus Ryan works on dwarf stuff right now, which is probably the bigger part you need to get down for it to be fully usable on Linux. And I saw him actually stepping through the code yesterday!

@DevuanOrg @gentoo @XLibreDev Sadly, neither were good. I couldn't have anything arch-based not break drivers after a system update and gentoo become impossible to update after 6 months without updates. Devuan seems to work fine for now, hope that lasts.

Rolling GNU/Linux distro done right: @Gentoo never imposed systemd and even built ways around it. Arch chose the opposite path: tighter coupling, less choice, and recent censorship of @XLibreDev that raises eyebrows.

@magnum_d1ngus Jai's error message for this makes a lot more sense, but the semantics are different anyway (Jai allows varargs anywhere, not only as the last argument).

@magnum_d1ngus Oh, now that makes sense. The error message made me think the procedure takes `.. []string` instead of `.. string`.

@valigo I thought the problem was that programs compiled with newer versions glibc don't run on systems with older versions, is it also the other way around ?

A lot of cope around Linux userspace ABI today. Cope and argue all you want, but a graphical program that was compiled and worked 10 years ago, just wouldn't run on Linux today, unless it is win32 application. Think about it.

@cmuratori 94ms is the time it should take visual studio to start

Just want to make sure I'm reading this right: Microsoft rewrote the run dialog with performance "top-of-mind", and the best they could manage to do when putting up a single text box was 10fps?

@valigo And the even cooler thing is that this is all implemented in userspace. The only thing that's a language feature is the syntax sugar of converting arguments to Any.

I know this is at least a half-joke, but here's bigger picture of how you can print an array in Jai:

@raysan5 You're asking for a zeroed buffer of 8 bytes, then you write 8 bytes of ascii to it to it and you expect the 9th byte to be zero ?

Why C compilers can't agree in how a standard C library function should works? ☹️ And better not to talk about strncpy()...

@zuhaitz_dev Here's an idea if you're willing to go further. Instead of emitting asm directly, you could emit bytecode and then either interpret it or convert it to assembly.

@zuhaitz_dev Yea, I tend to lump the parser and lexer together. Cool, so you do ast and then asm, just like chibicc.

For those who think that's bad, you should write a compiler ;p