AZ👾

1.5K posts

AZ👾

AZ👾

@contrarycap5

There are no solutions. There are only trade-offs.

Katılım Nisan 2023
1.9K Takip Edilen1.6K Takipçiler
AZ👾
AZ👾@contrarycap5·
@lexfridman Dali, Yunnan You’ll meet some special people there
English
0
0
0
26
Lex Fridman
Lex Fridman@lexfridman·
I'm traveling the world for a bit, starting with China but then hopping around the globe, anywhere. Open to any adventure. No plans, only a backpack. Hoping to meet & get to know humans from all walks of life. The pic is from a long hike on the Great Wall. For me, as a fan of history, this was an epic experience. In China, first I'm visiting a few big cities & talking to engineers at the heart of China's AI revolution. After that, if feeling crazy enough, I'm hitchhiking (first time) across rural China for a few weeks. Hitchhiking because I think it's the best way to meet rural folks who I would otherwise never get the chance to meet. I hope to do the same in US and other places. I have a request, if you have a travel recommendation, fill out the form(s) below if you feel like it. Or share with folks who might have advice about such travel. Form 1 - travel recommendation: If you can, recommend to me an interesting place I should visit anywhere in the world. For this, fill out form 1. Not touristy stuff, but something off the beaten path, that tourists may not know about, but is legendary. It could be as remote as meeting a herder in the mountains who is a local legend. Asia, Middle East, Europe, India, South/North America, Africa, Australia, anywhere. In China, I'm hoping to visit maybe Heibei, Shanxi, Shaanxi, Gansu, Sichuan, Yunnan, etc, so recommendations for spots to visit are helpful. Form 2 - coffee: If you want to grab a coffee with me anywhere in the world, fill out form 2 (please don't use form 1 for that). Anyway, I hectically tossed stuff in backpack. Realizing I don't have a clear plan of any kind, which is probably the only way to do it. LFG. Love you all ❤️
Lex Fridman tweet media
English
1.4K
644
14.6K
1.3M
AZ👾
AZ👾@contrarycap5·
Agree w this
Grug 🪨@grugcapital

@Shaughnessy119 The SPV craze is unlikely to die anytime soon because the IPO as a wealth creation event has largely died and preference has shifted to private markets

English
0
0
1
235
AZ👾
AZ👾@contrarycap5·
The real winners, once again, will be the corporate lawyers retained to sift through SPV layer interests and litigating claims on asset
_gabrielShapir0@lex_node

I am surprised more people are not paying attention to this update from Anthropic on its stock policy. This seems like a potential bombshell. There is an active secondary market purportedly in Anthropic stock or derivatives including on fairly reputable (or at least well-known) platforms like Forge. Anthropic is calling them out *specifically*, by name, and essentially *saying* 100% of these are illegal. Some may be frauds (people selling Anthropic stock or interests in Anthropic stock that they don't truly own), but more likely many are legit attempts at transferring Anthropic equity (directly, as SPV shares, or as some type of 'beneficial interest' or future, etc.) Anthropic appears to be saying it will treat all these transfers as void. I don't have access to their terms, but it's very interesting to think what this could mean. Do the 'first purported sellers' in the chain potentially have an opportunity to do a double-dip? Does the first seller and all downstream buyers get the entire entitlement nuked? Anthropic is threatening that--are they just bluffing? If they're not bluffing, what litigation is likely to ensue? This can get into really esoteric areas of corporate law that depend on exactly how the transfer restrictions are drafted as well as the language around how violations of transfer restrictions are treated--for example, if they are merely voidABLE then downstream buyers can assert various equitable claims/defenses, but if they are VOID ab initio then in some jurisdictions that forecloses equitable defenses.

English
0
0
2
223
AZ👾 retweetledi
FleetingBits
FleetingBits@fleetingbits·
some thoughts on the shape of foundation labs 1) epoch ai estimated anthropic @ $9m in revenue per employee and openai @ 5.6m in revenue per employee 2) these rates would be the highest among public technology companies; but, i'm not sure how valuable it is to look at on its own 3) the closest equivalents are quant firms like jane street @ $12m and hudson river @ $9m and energy infrastructure companies like valero energy @ 13m 4) revenue per employee is a complicated measure because a lot of it depends on accounting and different firms consider different things revenue 5) but, quant shops have high revenue per employee because they have a lot of revenue on top of a small number of specialized, expensive researchers 6) and, oil refineries have high revenue per employee because they can process a lot of oil with small number of employees, using very expensive tooling 7) foundation labs feel like a combination of these two things 8) like quant shops, they have a small number of very highly paid researchers and, like energy infrastructure companies, each employee is very heavily capitalized 9) traditional technology companies don't capitalize their employees very heavily; claude estimates nvidia spends $100k in r&d opex per employee per year, apple $80k per employee per year 10) in contrast, openai will probably spend ~$35bn in r&d compute this year with ~5000 employees; this would imply openai will spend ~70x what traditional tech companies spend in r&d opex per employee 11) now, in practice, this r&d opex spend is concentrated on a small team of core researchers and this would make the comparison even more stark 12) in this respect, they really are a new kind of tech business; they are not quite like hyperscalers, saas, ad-tech, e-commerce or hardware companies, etc... 13) they have unrivaled tam, distribution like plg saas, lower gross margins, an employee base more like quant shops, unique r&d dynamics, and capital requirements that if you squint sometimes look like a hyperscaler
Epoch AI@EpochAIResearch

Anthropic and OpenAI earn more revenue per employee than the top public tech companies, both now and at their IPOs. Anthropic: ~$9M OpenAI: ~$5.6M Top public co. (Nvidia): ~$5.1M

English
3
2
93
17.3K
AZ👾
AZ👾@contrarycap5·
I guess what you are saying is bulk-data problems are solved but for longer-horizon physical tasks it will require solving the long-tail problem. However, the difference between robotics and FSD is not all robotics tasks need the same number of nines (for tasks that don't risk human fatality as an outcome) Also the breakthroughs in Fan's video are tackling some of the problems you state. The DreamDojo world model is video prediction conditioned on actions. It will inherently teach/learn physics bc in order to predict the next frame, the model has to know what actions to do the world
English
1
0
1
86
AnointedApe
AnointedApe@Anointed_Ape·
I’d push back a bit and say the world model itself isn’t free. You need real-world data to build a high-fidelity simulator in the first place, and sim-to-real is incredibly hard. Running more compute on a flawed world model just produces more flawed data faster. This is basically the march of 9’s problem. Getting from 90% → 99% → 99.9% reliability each takes roughly the same effort as the prior step, because the failure modes get progressively weirder and longer-tail.
English
1
0
1
70
arian ghashghai
arian ghashghai@arian_ghashghai·
Both founders and VCs are currently assuming that "getting rich off secondaries" will be a permanent state of the private market vs a temporary one (inherently a risky position imo), and thus private market exits are what need to be optimized for Since private market valuations have very little correlation with actual business performance i.e. companies that raise a lot and spend a lot to turn over a lot (most unprofitably) are almost always valued more highly than a lightly VC-funded business with positive FCF. Pair this with the often-repeated idea that only 10 or so private companies matter, you end up with: > primary focus of the business becomes how to be popular with private market investors (as they are your supposedly only source of liquidity) > startup founding devolves into a status game (and attracts many fitting participants i.e. grifters etc) > bad assets get dumped onto unknowing idiots downstream (or just the one that gets caught holding the bag) Feels like an unsustainable prevailing setup for the entire venture asset class
Preston@metapreston

Current meta: VC's and founders getting rich off of secondaries. No need to exit

English
17
19
156
30.4K
AZ👾 retweetledi
Just Another Pod Guy
Just Another Pod Guy@TMTLongShort·
We are quickly approaching a tipping point where geriatric non-tech billionaires will be tempted to yolo half of their immense fortunes at GPU clusters dedicated to solving whatever pet disease they happen to be worried about as a far more compelling gambit vs the giving pledge or another university building.
English
15
18
591
26K
AZ👾
AZ👾@contrarycap5·
@pitdesi Jevon’s paradox, lots of air travel still booked by agents as online bookings exploded
English
0
0
0
101
Sheel Mohnot
Sheel Mohnot@pitdesi·
My surprise is not that the number of travel agents has fallen, but that it's only down 50% in the last 25 years.
Sheel Mohnot tweet media
English
47
1
282
23.3K
AZ👾
AZ👾@contrarycap5·
On my flight asking passengers next to me if they’re scared of the hantavirus
English
0
0
2
207
Charlie
Charlie@ccbaker2023·
@poolnoodle93 The other day I stopped in a wine store off the Bedford L that had a big vinyl collection. I made a James Murphy joke to the cashier and she had never heard of him. This was literally around the corner from Four Horsemen
English
5
0
71
8.9K
saarim zaman
saarim zaman@poolnoodle93·
walking on bedford avenue on a saturday feels surreal in 2026. there is no history left and not even a hint of nostalgia. the people have completely turned over. you might as well live in richmond, va or any other tier two city and find yourself more connected to place.
saarim zaman tweet media
English
119
49
1.6K
663.6K
AZ👾
AZ👾@contrarycap5·
@tomhschmidt I like my coffee like I like my accounting fraud, brewed in china and served here in america
English
0
0
1
372
AZ👾
AZ👾@contrarycap5·
@chang_defi Crypto charts every month for the last 5 years be like
English
0
0
1
37
AZ👾
AZ👾@contrarycap5·
@johnarnold This also happened to me with a full shoulder/labrum tear. Grateful to the younger doctor
English
1
0
3
1.5K
John Arnold
John Arnold@johnarnold·
Many years ago I hurt my knee playing sports. I was referred to the orthopedist for one of the local pro teams. After keeping me waiting for 2.5 hours, he diagnosed a cartilage tear and recommended surgery. I was so mad at his manner and tardiness I left without scheduling. The next week I got a second opinion from a much younger doc who was likely more current on the recent medical literature. He looked at the same MRI. He said he could do surgery now but his advice was to wait 30 days and see if it healed on its own. It did. Medical reversal is when a practice that became widely used is later shown to be ineffective or even harmful. Examples like meniscus surgery show the need to keep gathering evidence. A not immaterial part of the practice of modern medicine doesn't improve health, and may be net harmful.
John Arnold tweet media
English
183
250
4K
891K
AZ👾
AZ👾@contrarycap5·
@0xMentalIllness or countries dumping UST to shore up domestic currency
English
1
0
0
155
Dumpelstiltskin
Dumpelstiltskin@0xMentalIllness·
How much of the treasury dumping is people chasing stocks for the Fourth Industrial Revolution? How could you keep clients in bonds as the most profitable companies in the history of the world have half a trillion in unserved demand?
English
1
0
20
2K
AZ👾 retweetledi
Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞)
yeah I'm really optimistic about DeepSeek now. they will scale *aggressively* on Chinese compute, they will leapfrog every competitor. Jensen wasn't speculating, he knew what is happening. This will be V5. V4 is mostly preparation for migration. Kimi can have H1 2026.
Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞) tweet media
English
6
15
236
33.6K
AZ👾
AZ👾@contrarycap5·
@rev_cap Doesn’t inflation outpacing nominal rates (ie negative real rates) lead to stimulative liquidity? As long as the tail end risk of a hike is absent, the market won’t care
English
0
0
0
55
AZ👾
AZ👾@contrarycap5·
World Cup final tickets this summer are going for $15k a seat
Timothy B. Lee@binarybits

This essay by @alexolegimas is the best thing I've ever read on why AGI won't lead to mass unemployment. A compelling argument backed up by substantial empirical data.

English
0
0
1
298
AZ👾 retweetledi
Derek Thompson
Derek Thompson@DKThomp·
New newsletter: HOW THE 2020s BROKE OUR BRAINS It's the Tragic Twenties, and Americans can't stop feeling like hot garbage. - The UMich consumer sentiment survey is now at its lowest rate on record - The Fed's job satisfaction survey is at its lowest rate on record - Both the General Social Survey and the World Happiness Survey have found that happiness in the US plunged in 2020 and has since been mired at levels significantly below previous decades You shouldn't assume that your favorite pet issue is the main culprit here. Conservatives might point to cultural changes, like the decline of marriage and religiosity, but those have been going on for decades. The left might reach for wage inequality, but that has actually narrowed in the last six years. This can't even primarily be about phones, since what's most clear in the data set is something that changed this decade, not last decade. I spent a long time reading, talking to people, and doing my own research, and I think the most parsimonious explanation I can provide is this: The Pandemic Never Ended. This thesis has three parts. TPNE 1: The biological antagonist of COVID gave way to the economic antagonist of inflation, and after decades of coming to rely on lowflation and meager wage growth for low-income workers, price levels have increased 3x faster this decade than in the previous 40 years, and economists simply have to accept that inflation makes people angrier than it used to. This isn't even a strictly American phenomenon. Around the world, incumbents have lost power faster than any post-WWII period, as affordability concerns bludgeon their electorate. The few countries where happiness levels have increased in the western world in the last 6 years have had some of the lowest levels of inflation. TPNE 2: Institutions down, individualism up: The 2020s have seen trust plummet for practically every institution, along with growing distrust in strangers, and rising alone time and at-home time. At best, community offers a buffer in times of crisis. But today, the absence of community—and the triumph of a tech-enabled, hyper-introverted atomism—makes every crisis feel more existential and unsolvable. And that's a problem bc... TPNE 3: The 2020s have been the permacrisis crisis decade. It's really been one fucking thing after another, hasn't it? Pandemic, inflation, interest rates, Ukraine, Gaza, Iran, AI. Meanwhile, phones give us constant contact with both the scary news cycle and the panic-inducing fears and anxieties of the commentariat. Inflation makes today's life feel harder to live. The news cycle makes tomorrow's world scarier to live through. And the post-pandemic decline of institutions and acceleration of toxic individualism weakens our socio-emotional immune system to deal with all of it. TLDR: The pandemic never ended, and it's left us with the Tragic Twenties.
Derek Thompson tweet mediaDerek Thompson tweet mediaDerek Thompson tweet mediaDerek Thompson tweet media
English
55
161
989
137.5K