You
468 posts



@JayExci How much better is it than this one and why?






Respondents were ~85% male, but of those who were female, ~80% went blue! More interestingly, in total, 61-62% went blue, and, when asked to identify the choice that requires fewer people to save everyone, there was a huge button-partisan gap, equivalent to ~13-14 IQ points!

I'm so bored of people endlessly repeating "there is no biological component to competing in video games so there are no genetic advantages." It's the woke religious dogma of esports. Not only is it not even vaguely true, as experience and observation show, but it's based simply on people's feelings and what they wish was the case.





You see the red button as Murder. I see the blue button as Suicide. We are not the same.



China says it does not recognize US sanctions on Iranian oil purchases and will not comply with them.

The pattern played out like this: - Duh Red is the obvious choice. Nobody dies if everyone pushes red. There's not reason to push blue. - Blue button pusher think they have a bullet proof rebuttal... Some confused or irrational people will push blue. Therefore the knee-jerk red reaction is naive and the true enlightened position is that that you must push blue. Unfortunately, that turns out to be the naive position. Consider the following...












Let's say red is up by 1 vote. There's only two people left in the world to vote, you and someone else, and you both know red is up by 1 vote. Which one do you press? Let's say red is up by 2 votes. 3 people left to vote. Which one do you press? (cont)



















