bob avakian acid tabs

265 posts

bob avakian acid tabs banner
bob avakian acid tabs

bob avakian acid tabs

@deaniac1917

They/Them Katılım Eylül 2014
3K Takip Edilen220 Takipçiler
Jesse Newman
Jesse Newman@Filmantopia·
@Maxmyself96 @lukeisamazing Interesting how someone who “has horrible political instincts” in 8 years went from bartender to one of the country’s most influential politicians surrounded by presidential speculation. I wish my political instincts were that bad.
English
1
0
3
166
the thicc husband & father
the thicc husband & father@lukeisamazing·
I really do think AOC has a good shot of winning in 2028, the only issue is that America is going to self-balkanize about a week after that election so it’s not gonna matter all that much regardless of who gets in there
English
20
68
3K
39.5K
John
John@thesnck·
@PrinceofD3mons @Kiehle4Congress @skumWgmi Grow up. What is this Junior High. What is it with libturds being unable to communicate without the crutch of profanity. Actually I am a small business owner and have to pay for my own insurance. Don’t even get the luxury of having it paid for by my employer.
English
3
0
0
1K
skum
skum@skumWgmi·
I called to cancel my health insurance because I couldn't afford the premium. The rep asked why. I said $480 a month for a plan with a $6,500 deductible isn't insurance. It's a monthly fee I pay to still go bankrupt if anything actually happens. She didn't have an answer.
English
454
4.1K
51K
2.6M
Buscando Cuba
Buscando Cuba@buscandocuba·
@davidrkadler It isn't just President Trump who gave the "green light" to Sec. Rubio, it is also the cuban people who live in freedom and haven't fear to speak.
Buscando Cuba tweet media
English
2
0
0
148
David Adler
David Adler@davidrkadler·
Donald Trump has given Marco Rubio the green light to annihilate a peaceful nation and its people — and the ‘resistance’ is silent. What does “No Kings” mean when one man can snap his fingers and kill innocent Cubans on a whim?
Peter Harrell@petereharrell

Quick takes on the new Cuba sanctions EO out today: 1. The new Cuba sanctions are potentially very broad. Basically any non-U.S. person or company doing any business in/with Cuba could be sanctioned. Initial focuses are businesses involved in the energy, defense, mining, finance, and security sectors, but these can be expanded. 2. In many respects, the new EO resembles EO 14024 from 2021, which created a broad authority to sanction Russia. (As a partial drafter of that EO, it is interesting to see some of the provisions carried over here). 3. Most designations will be status-based, e.g., "operated in X sector," or "is a Cuban official," rather than requiring the government to prove specific conduct, though there are also conduct-related designations, for, eg, corruption. 4. The EO puts the State Department in the lead for making sanctions designations. Trump expanded State's role in sanctions designations during his first term, and this is consistent with that, as well as with Rubio's interest in Cuba. (State has long had a role in specific sanctions designations, and a critical policy and diplomatic role on all sanctions, but Trump expanded the designations authorities given to State). 5. The EO gives the Trump Administration a fair amount of easy-to-deploy firepower to drive remaining international businesses out of Cuba. The questions will be in implementation. For example, will Trump sanction a Chinese firm installing renewable energy in Cuba? (Cuban renewables have been growing given the oil crisis).

English
46
1.2K
3.7K
104.6K
Julie Chen
Julie Chen@0xJuliechen·
i find it so funny that ppl are trying hard af to tell us what is abg and what is not. this kind of gatekeeping makes me feel like there is breed separation abg is just an aesthetic. it is a self-made community tag, not a credential someone needs to issue you. "you're not abg so you can't use abg" doesn't really hold up. an aesthetic is something you opt into or out of - there's no admissions board. it's so ironic, cuz the whole abg thing was originally anti-establishment, anti-respectability-politics. and we're in SF. the home of punks, freaks, and people who don't ask for permission. gatekeeping here is just sooo embarrassing. i am a fob. and i am proud of it. and i would like to call myself an abg. so stfu and go get a job
forward deployed ccp gf@FangYi11101

know the difference

English
68
5
104
214.4K
biteecee
biteecee@biteecee·
@treyk__47 @NopeSignal He was a free speech activist. Which is a civil right, and makes him a civil rights leader. This is just an objectively fact.
English
8
0
3
5.7K
we aren't on first name basis
@PennyGongo @ArhamHu25393478 @dijanmustard "solely for Imperialism and genocide" that's a bold claim. And for those who made weapons for Nazis, you made a good point. But then what is the difference between German military engineers today and those in world war? What if they decide to do it all over again?
English
3
0
0
257
tv
tv@tv5834472·
@SpectralAurora_ year 5 of the war in ukraine and we still got people pretending a strong defense industry has no utility? it's a tool that can be used for good and evil
English
5
0
6
3.8K
a halfway crook
a halfway crook@Crook1Halfway·
@CarlZha How do you use it to find travel info? the site is all in chinese
English
4
0
10
4.7K
Groundwork
Groundwork@GroundworkDSA·
We discuss the recent NYC-DSA CLC vote on supporting 'No More 24', correct the record as to what happened, and voice our dissatisfaction at the hostile and misleading agitation campaign mounted in response. groundworkdsa.com/building-up/no…
English
22
8
57
72.7K
bob avakian acid tabs
bob avakian acid tabs@deaniac1917·
@lcddiscoball2 @ygzgzot @Qt55023351 But value is exactly what maintains ‘equilibrium’ of price! If I price an item too far above its value, I’ll be undercut by competitors, and if I price it below its value I’ll run out of cash. In both cases the law of value asserts itself, regardless of whether you believe in it.
English
1
0
0
42
麻傘Ⓥ🌱🏴🏳️
麻傘Ⓥ🌱🏴🏳️@lcddiscoball2·
@ygzgzot @Qt55023351 Again, if you take this position that price can be (in equilibrium) radically distinct from value, there is no reason to believe value exists. It certainly doesn't metaphysically, and if it's not recognised in any meaningful socially by humans...
English
1
0
1
68
(• ˕ •マ.ᐟ ★
(• ˕ •マ.ᐟ ★@Y40IFRQTTING·
So if you're in Boston University or UPenn you can just write papers about things that Karl Marx described in the 1800s but removing his scary terminology to make it digestible
AI Highlight@AIHighlight

🚨BREAKING: Two researchers from UPenn and Boston University just published a paper that should be uncomfortable reading for every CEO automating their workforce right now. The argument is straightforward. Every company replacing workers with AI is also eliminating its own future customers. Laid off workers stop spending. Enough of them stop spending and nobody can afford to buy anything. The companies that fired everyone end up selling into an economy with no purchasing power left. Every executive can see this. The math is not complicated. But here is why nobody stops. If you do not automate, your competitor does. They cut costs, lower prices, take your market share, and you collapse anyway. So every company automates knowing it is collectively destructive because the alternative is dying alone while everyone else survives. The researchers proved this is a Prisoner's Dilemma playing out in real time. The numbers are already moving. Block cut nearly half its 10,000 employees this year. Jack Dorsey said AI made those roles unnecessary and that within the next year the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion. Salesforce replaced 4,000 customer support agents with AI. Goldman Sachs deployed a coding tool that lets one engineer do the work of five. Over 100,000 tech workers were laid off in 2025 and AI was cited as the primary driver in more than half those cases. 80% of US workers hold jobs with tasks susceptible to AI automation. The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income does not change a single company's incentive to automate. Capital income taxes adjust profit levels but not the per-task decision to replace a human. Collective bargaining cannot hold because automating is always the dominant strategy. They also identified what they call a Red Queen effect. Better AI does not solve the problem, it accelerates it. Every company chases faster automation to gain market share over rivals but at the end everyone has automated equally, the gains cancel out, and the only thing left is more destroyed demand. The one thing the math says could work is a Pigouvian automation tax. A per-task charge that forces companies to account for the demand they destroy each time they replace a worker. The conclusion is that this is not a transfer of wealth from workers to owners. Both sides lose. Workers lose income. Companies lose customers. It is a deadweight loss with no market mechanism to stop it on its own.

English
51
1.4K
12.6K
364.4K
Yami 💢
Yami 💢@StarfireAgain·
@mil000 And this rule is to castrate all vagueposters
English
2
0
20
5.3K
BladeoftheSun
BladeoftheSun@BladeoftheS·
Mexico is suing Google for renaming the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America. Google has changed the name even though Donald Trump does not have the power to rename international or Mexican waters.
BladeoftheSun tweet media
English
897
14.2K
76.6K
1.2M
casual clairo enjoyer
casual clairo enjoyer@clairoelizabeth·
@AnasSaleh_NYC Take that FAT L and go cry on another tree buddy. TRUMPS BOMBING THE SHIT OUT OF GAZA and you here policing AOC?
English
3
0
3
148
Big Judith Energy
Big Judith Energy@beeschoolbonds·
@NerdeenKiswani Neither of you cared when over 50k Iranian civilians were being killed by the IRGC earlier this year
English
30
1
62
18.1K