Diane D 1959 #50sWomen

92.6K posts

Diane D 1959 #50sWomen banner
Diane D 1959 #50sWomen

Diane D 1959 #50sWomen

@deasy_diane

Born 1959 was expecting to retire in 2019 but now have to work an extra 6 years 😡 Retweets are not endorsements

Basildon, East Katılım Mart 2018
802 Takip Edilen1.9K Takipçiler
GET A GRIP
GET A GRIP@docrussjackson·
That Zia Yusuf thinks a thug in a truck screaming abuse at a woman is a gentleman is not remotely surprising.
GET A GRIP tweet media
English
281
304
1.1K
21.6K
Jim Cognito
Jim Cognito@JimCognito2016·
EXCLUSIVE: Reform insiders have told me Nigel Farage is unlikely to lead Reform into the general election & they're making plans for his replacement There's much more to come from his donations/house purchases & he's conceded to party insiders that he won't be able to continue
English
408
945
3.7K
632.5K
Diane D 1959 #50sWomen retweetledi
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
@NaomiSeibt Farage is lying
English
2K
3.9K
45.6K
1.5M
Diane D 1959 #50sWomen retweetledi
HelenK 💙
HelenK 💙@Inthecountry76·
Can someone explain to me why @Nigel_Farage made a huge song and dance and sat in the gallery for PMQs stating that he never gets to ask a question, yet when slotted to actually ask a question at the KS debate, he doesn’t bother turning up?
English
39
88
400
6K
Sky News
Sky News@SkyNews·
"We had a very terse exchange on this issue" Having spoken to Nigel Farage last week on the £5 Million donation from Billionaire Christopher Harborne, Sky's @BethRigby says it is now politically 'very difficult' for Farage and there could be 'big consequences'
English
432
483
2K
255.8K
Jeremy Vine & Daytime on 5
Jeremy Vine & Daytime on 5@JeremyVineOn5·
Nigel Farage's £5 million row - does it matter to you? The Reform UK leader is facing questions after it emerged he accepted £5 million from a wealthy businessman before standing as an MP. Should he have declared it?
Jeremy Vine & Daytime on 5 tweet media
English
1.3K
183
472
64.9K
Diane D 1959 #50sWomen retweetledi
Sir Doge of the Coin ⚔️
Sir Doge of the Coin ⚔️@dogeofficialceo·
I love how this hantavirus breaks out on an isolated ship full of people from all over the world, and the immediate solution is to send everyone who was exposed right back to their home countries around the globe. Brilliant containment strategy.
English
599
8.2K
60.2K
650.7K
Diane D 1959 #50sWomen retweetledi
Pistachio 🇮🇷 🇵🇸
Pistachio 🇮🇷 🇵🇸@HarleyShah·
There is no valid reason whatsoever that MPs on almost 100k a year should have their food and booze subsidised by tax paying citizens. Not a single one.
English
68
1.4K
8.1K
62.4K
Diane D 1959 #50sWomen retweetledi
James Melville 🚜
James Melville 🚜@JamesMelville·
Subsidising meals in the House of Commons for MPs and parliamentary pass holders is thought to cost the UK taxpayer up to £7 million a year. Despite an ongoing cost of living crisis, we are paying for our MPs to scoff on fine dining. standard.co.uk/news/politics/…
English
111
912
2K
35.6K
Diane D 1959 #50sWomen retweetledi
INorBY2020
INorBY2020@INorBY2020·
Working beyond age 60 puts a lot of extra pressure on body and mind. What did Gov expect when raising #StatePensionAge 6-7 years! #50swomen #waspi
INorBY2020 tweet media
English
2
25
29
625
Diane D 1959 #50sWomen retweetledi
Robbie
Robbie@Robbie_Reasons·
Exactly. Pensions are not a pot to be raided when incompetent governments can't balance their books.
Robbie tweet media
English
566
3.4K
10.6K
492.8K
Diane D 1959 #50sWomen retweetledi
Gabriel Pogrund
Gabriel Pogrund@Gabriel_Pogrund·
Tice, who said Angela Rayner would resign if she had "any moral decency", did not respond to our latest inquiries about his tax affairs or even acknowledge receipt. Nor did his lawyer or Nigel Farage's team. However, he has now posted a statement saying of his wider affairs: "Naturally I am always happy to put things right and if numbers need rechecking, of course I will pay what is owed - be that more or less." Where does that leave us? - Story #1: Tice avoided £600k in corporation tax by classifying his company as a real estate investment trust in unusual circumstances and benefitting from a loophole meaning he did not have to meet technical rules that otherwise applied. Tice accepts this, and said everyone should seek to avoid as much tax as legally possible. - Story #2: Tice broke the law by failing to pay at least £92k - or, per further analysis by @DanNeidle, £120k - in withholding tax before paying incorrectly large dividends to himself and his off-shore trust in Jersey. He says the dividends he personally received meant he ultimately paid more income tax, meaning HMRC received the money it was owed, or even more. He has not provided any evidence for this or addressed what tax the trust paid. He has dismissed the fact the law was broken - and the accompanying fact that the company still has an unsettled tax bill - as a "technicality". Farage, when asked to evidence Tice's claim that HMRC received equal/more tax, snapped at a reporter and demanded she provide a "lecture" on the nature of real estate investment trusts. - Story #3: Tice failed to pay ~£100k in corporation tax on dividends deposited in four shell companies he owned and which were part of a group which donated huge sums to Reform. Last month he gave us contradictory stories as to why dividends were not taxed. a) He said they were tax-exempt. (They were not in this case.) b) He said the parent group suffered losses allowing tax bills to be offset. (This is not the case.) He did not respond to further inquiries which we sent yesterday morning. Overall, the evidence indicates Tice used unusual measures to avoid £600k, and failed to pay up to £220k on tax owed. Per @DanNeidle the underpayments mean the firms are vulnerable to HMRC investigation which could lead to required repayment plus interest and fines.
Gabriel Pogrund@Gabriel_Pogrund

Exclusive: Richard Tice failed to pay £100k in tax, benefiting his investment firm — which then gave big sums to Reform Tice gave contradictory reasons for why four shell companies paid zero tax. @DanNeidle says they flouted "basic" rule, face HMRC probe thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…

English
132
1.7K
4.4K
244.9K
Diane D 1959 #50sWomen retweetledi
🦖ZonedOut KPSS Safeguarder Agent#42500
Only in 1990 did married women become independent tax entities in their own right. And they blame #50swomen for being embezzled by the state. 36 Years ago is a very short time period.
Jennifer Thetford-Kay@JenKteach

On This Day in 1990 Married women in Britain became independent entities for income tax purposes for the first time. From the start of the 1990–91 tax year, they were fully responsible for their own tax declarations and their income was no longer automatically assessed as part of their husband’s. The reform was introduced under Margaret Thatcher, who was Prime Minister at the time. Before the 6th April 1990, for generations, the tax system had treated a married woman’s earnings as an extension of her husband’s. He was legally responsible for declaring and paying tax on her income; she had no separate tax privacy or personal allowance in her own right. The change, introduced under the independent taxation reforms first announced in the 1988 Budget ended that legal fiction and gave every married woman the same status as any other adult taxpayer. It was part of a broader, long-term shift away from older legal assumptions about marriage, a process that had been unfolding for over a century. Merely 36 years ago, and in the sweep of British history that is astonishingly recent. Many women who are grandparents today were already working adults when this change took effect. Their own mothers had lived their entire married lives under the old rules. It is a vivid illustration that the legal recognition of women; adult human females, as fully independent, rights-bearing individuals is not some ancient, settled tradition. It is modern, hard-won, and still within living memory. The rights women secured in the 20th century, including this one, were fought for on the clear understanding that “woman” means adult human female. Those rights were not granted to a feeling, an identity, or a self-description; they were secured for biological women precisely because of the historical and legal incapacities that had been imposed on them as a sex. We must defend them as such. Most households paid about the same tax overall, but the way it was calculated changed. Couples where both partners earned often did a bit better (or at least fairer), while single-earner households could lose some tax advantages over time as old allowances were phased out. The biggest change wasn’t the amount paid; it was that each person became responsible for their own income and tax, rather than the husband handling everything. On this day in 1990 Britain took an important step forward. Let’s make sure we never take that step backward...

English
0
6
12
183
Diane D 1959 #50sWomen retweetledi
Rab
Rab@Rab_Dickson1·
I never remember my generation, or the one before, decrying people who received the state pension as some sort of scrounger class. What has happened to people?
English
187
149
1.5K
21.1K
Diane D 1959 #50sWomen retweetledi
Renée Hoenderkamp
Renée Hoenderkamp@DrHoenderkamp·
I'm tired of hearing ' you don't pay in to' the state pension because if that's true, why do they assess your NI contributing years and then decide how much you get depending on contributions? (PS, I know it isn't a pot - but you do pay in to get it)
Renée Hoenderkamp tweet media
English
183
348
1.6K
60K
Diane D 1959 #50sWomen retweetledi
Jamais Vu 🏉
Jamais Vu 🏉@boot15_vu·
🚨The state pension & triple lock is the hot topic of the day — but almost no one is discussing what actually happened and why we’re in this mess. Instead, governments are dividing older and younger generations with perverse gaslighting. Here’s the truth: National Insurance was explicitly sold for generations as a contributory scheme. You paid your “stamps” to build entitlement to your state pension — exactly like road tax was introduced and meant to fund the Road Fund for building and maintaining roads. Both started with a clear promise: pay in for a specific purpose. Then governments quietly broke the ring-fencing/promise. Road hypothecation ended in 1937. NI became mostly pay-as-you-go — today’s workers funding today’s pensioners, with surpluses spent on the priorities of the day (NHS, welfare, whatever suited the government). Why are we here now? • Collapsing birth rates since the 1960s + longer lifespans. • Mass immigration that failed to fix the worker-to-retiree ratio as promised. • Decades of political short-termism: treating the National Insurance Fund like a slush fund instead of properly ring-fencing or investing it for the future. See Singapore for the gold standard. Now the gaslighting ramps up: “No one paid into a pot.” “It’s just a transfer from poorer young to wealthier old.” “The triple lock is unaffordable.” This is classic deception by government. They collected contributions under one set of expectations, spent the money elsewhere, then rebranded the promise when demographics caught up. Pensioners who worked 40-50 years and upheld their side of the intergenerational contract are suddenly the villains. It’s perverse. Instead of admitting “we broke the funding model,” politicians pit generations against each other. The young aren’t subsidising the old out of nowhere — they’re paying into the same broken system their elders did. Honour the existing promises to those who already paid in. Cut the real waste first (illegal migration costs, foreign aid, Net Zero subsidies, welfare bloat). Then reform properly for the future: move towards individual accounts with actual investment and returns — like Singapore’s CPF. Stop the divisive nonsense. Fix the root causes instead of rewriting history and turning the country against itself. Feel free to engage👇🏽 #TripleLock #StatePension
English
299
1.2K
3.4K
96.4K