Deborah Small

308 posts

Deborah Small

Deborah Small

@deborahasmall

I study/teach decision making, consumer behavior, philanthropy, and marketing for social good

Katılım Mayıs 2015
598 Takip Edilen2K Takipçiler
Deborah Small retweetledi
Matt Coleman
Matt Coleman@Matt__Coleman·
How can nonprofits effectively present cost-effectiveness information? 🎯 A brand-new research paper by @joshdalewis and @deborahasmall finds that people use impact cost information (for example: $1 to provide a meal) as a target for how much they should donate. Brief summary🧵
Matt Coleman tweet media
English
1
7
18
2.1K
Deborah Small retweetledi
Andres Montealegre
Andres Montealegre@AndrsMontealegr·
Previous research shows that people sometimes view moral questions as objectively true, while other times treating them as true only relative to different perspectives. In our new paper, we present evidence that social rewards may explain this apparent inconsistency...
Andres Montealegre tweet media
English
1
8
30
3K
Deborah Small retweetledi
Experimental Philosophy
Experimental Philosophy@xphilosopher·
Studies find that some people espouse moral relativism, others espouse moral objectivism. What explains this mix? New Cognition paper with evidence for a surprising answer: People espouse relativism to signal tolerance, objectivism to signal intolerance philpapers.org/rec/MOSSIS-2
English
10
49
135
34K
Deborah Small retweetledi
Stefan Schubert
Stefan Schubert@StefanFSchubert·
Thanks to @AaronBergman18 we now have free audiobook versions of our (@LuciusCaviola and me) book: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/eff… open.spotify.com/show/7kSJ4aCd2… anchor.fm/s/f9d34984/pod… Thanks, Aaron! 🥰 (See the quote-tweet of a quote-tweet for a 13-tweet summary of the book)
Stefan Schubert@StefanFSchubert

We just received the physical copies of our book, Effective Altruism and the Human Mind. If you buy it at global.oup.com/academic, use the code AUFLY30 to save 30%. The electronic version is available for free at: academic.oup.com/book/56384?log…

English
3
8
57
6.2K
Deborah Small retweetledi
Kosuke Uetake
Kosuke Uetake@Chanman_ECON·
Our Joowon Klusowski @JoowonKlusowski from Yale concludes our conference @YaleCCI presenting very interesting consumer even number preference. Look at the slide!
Kosuke Uetake tweet media
English
1
2
14
4.6K
Deborah Small
Deborah Small@deborahasmall·
New paper: using visuals of poverty in humanitarian aid campaigns is some times criticized as “poverty porn”. We examine what people think is bad about it.
Shannon Duncan@ShannonMDuncan

🚨New paper out at Cognition! Examining ethical judgments of poverty portrayals in charity ads, we find lay judgments hinge more on whether portrayals are genuine (sampled from reality) than whether they are representative (depict what is typical). More details below...

English
1
2
24
1.9K
Peter McGraw
Peter McGraw@PeterMcGraw·
@deborahasmall @dggoldst Right. I did it for years. We once had it in the Ronald Reagan Suite of a hotel somewhere in Texas, I think. It's all a blur.
English
1
0
2
174
Dan Goldstein
Dan Goldstein@dggoldst·
What stands out in your memory about the first conference you went to as a grad student?
English
78
3
59
675.5K
Peter McGraw
Peter McGraw@PeterMcGraw·
@deborahasmall @dggoldst Was that 1998? I also went back and told Elke and Barb that the conference wasn't welcoming to grad students. They put me in touch with the organizer and I was given a $200 budget to buy drinks for grad students. Best job ever.
English
1
0
4
284
Peter McGraw
Peter McGraw@PeterMcGraw·
Haha. I went to SJDM in 1997 and it was filled with math psych. Overwhelmed, I came back and told Barb Mellers and Elke Weber that I think I made a mistake going to grad school. They (Elke, I think) told me to wait a few years till my costs were sunk and it would be okay. 😆 SJDM ended up being my favorite conference in later years. I also got to meet @MarsZeelenberg . That was good.
English
1
0
6
2.2K
Deborah Small
Deborah Small@deborahasmall·
@andre_quentin I have always thought that the broader case for science reform would be easier to make if there was an indentied victim
English
0
0
3
161
Quentin André
Quentin André@andre_quentin·
@deborahasmall The only explanation I can think of is that the harm of research fraud is more abstract and diffuse than the harm of, say, sexual harassment or racism. So maybe a flavor of the identifiable victim effect?
English
1
0
1
240
Quentin André
Quentin André@andre_quentin·
"Call out bad behavior when you see it, and support those who do" is a very uncontroversial idea when applied to bullying, discrimination, harassment... So why such controversial reactions when people call out research malpractices? I'm genuinely trying to understand... 1/2
English
2
0
6
2.3K
Deborah Small
Deborah Small@deborahasmall·
@andre_quentin I know not your point but sounds like an interesting moral judgment research question
English
1
0
1
195
Quentin André
Quentin André@andre_quentin·
If we agree that turning a blind eye to discrimination is being complicit to it, shouldn't we apply the same standard to data issues? If we think that calling out people for their bad behavior is helpful in the workplace, why wouldn't it help in research? 2/2
English
2
0
2
739
Kristin Diehl
Kristin Diehl@real_k_diehl·
Getting ready to complete a review on time. Setting helps.
Kristin Diehl tweet media
Bologna, Emilia Romagna 🇮🇹 English
2
0
15
788

Keşfet

@joshdalewis @CarnegieMellon @AaronBergman18 @LuciusCaviola @JoowonKlusowski @YaleCCI @PsychScience @siminevazire