devops_daddy

2.7K posts

devops_daddy

devops_daddy

@devops_daddy

build businesses and talk shit | AI infrastructure

Kentucky, USA Katılım Mayıs 2022
200 Takip Edilen94 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
devops_daddy
devops_daddy@devops_daddy·
a computer consists of 4 components: Disk (storage), CPU (processing), RAM (short-term memory) and the Network. regarding troubleshooting, 85-90% of issues are Network-related. maybe higher (shout out selinux / aws security groups)
English
2
0
6
2.1K
devops_daddy
devops_daddy@devops_daddy·
@HomeLoanBill @idobadtakes that's fair cause it is probably 90+% of people making 500k but even if I was in NY/boston wherever, I would seriously try to hunt for even a condo or something under $750k because again your up shits creek if I lose my job and my wife isn't also doing real well...risky games
English
0
0
1
37
Home Loan Bill
Home Loan Bill@HomeLoanBill·
@devops_daddy @idobadtakes Ok…perhaps my statement made assumptions that shouldn’t have been made. Typically, someone making $500k per year lives in an area where a $500k home is not an ideal place to live.
English
1
0
1
31
devops_daddy
devops_daddy@devops_daddy·
@HomeLoanBill @idobadtakes because I can practically afford the entire mortgage now with that income. If the mortgage was for a million I'd probably have to move if I lost my job. it's like basic math
English
1
0
0
35
devops_daddy
devops_daddy@devops_daddy·
@leaving_tech no completely retarded. know a million 40-60yr old ICs make dough and will continue to until someone knows linux better
English
0
0
3
439
Leaving Tech
Leaving Tech@leaving_tech·
Software engineering is becoming an athlete's career. Short prime. Big paychecks. Sharp dropoff. → 20-35: peak performance → 35+: manage (disappearing), pivot (founder/consultant), or fade The 40-year IC career is dying. If you haven't built leverage by 35 (equity, audience, your own product), the second half gets brutal. Don't you agree?
English
31
11
255
33.6K
devops_daddy
devops_daddy@devops_daddy·
@RobSilver his father is a millionaire and he got 2 mili up front. shut the fuck up
English
0
0
0
75
Rob Silver
Rob Silver@RobSilver·
It is wildly predatory even if the contract is deemed to be enforceable The MLB Player’s Association should push hard to ban this - there are better answers. Or at the very least make Big League Advance pariahs amongst prospects
Joe Pompliano@JoePompliano

Fernando Tatis Jr. has lost his lawsuit against Big League Advance. Tatis was paid $2 million as a minor leaguer in exchange for 10% of his future earnings. This was not a loan. If Tatis didn't make it to the big leagues, he didn't have to repay the $2 million. But Tatis did make it to the big leagues and later signed a 14-year, $340 million contract. That meant Tatis owed Big League Advance $34 million. Tatis had publicly praised Big League Advance, saying the $2 million allowed him to hire a personal trainer, upgrade his apartment, and eat better food. But after realizing he owed $34 million in exchange for $2 million, Tatis sued the company, alleging that they used predatory tactics to lure him into an investment deal that was really an illegal loan. The judge disagreed. The agreement was upheld this week and Tatis was even ordered to pay Big League Advance’s legal fees. This is a big deal because Big League Advance has signed deals with 700+ athletes, including Elly De La Cruz (MLB) and Nolan Smith (NFL), across MLB, NFL, and college sports (think: NIL). And now that the courts have ordered Fernando Tatis Jr. to follow through on the agreement, other potential legal challenges will likely go the same way.

English
46
3
34
29K
Joe Cassandra
Joe Cassandra@JoeCassandra·
The most important thing a millennial family can do for their kids is: 1. Move to a neighborhood w/ enough young families 2. Get involved in school, church and sports 3. Let the kids 'off the leash' enough i.e. play outside w/o you having to be there the whole time 4. Invite people over to your house constantly... This has changed our social life dramatically in just 2 years where we have many friends + our kids do too *** #1. You must move to an area that is family centric and has young families. Do as much on-the-ground research you can of every neighborhood to figure this out. Be willing to overspend if needed #2. Be a part of the school as a parent whether PTA or volunteering . Do the same at church and your kids sports. People who 'lead' or 'coach' meet a lot of people very fast. Bleacher parents have a harder road. #3. Be willing to let your kids explore the neighborhood, go knock on doors, etc. Sure, schedule some playdates, but make sure they've also met all the similar-aged kids in the neighborhood. Go to the pool in the summer and talk to people #4. You must invite people. Those who connect people are the most magnetic. People want to be around those folks. Open your home even if it's a little messy. Doesn't need to be fancy. Order pizza for a group, people will love it. Invite different groups over. One group is from church, another is sports parents, etc. Combine the groups at the holidays so people can meet other new folks. This is how you build a community for your kids to thrive in. It took us 8 years from having a kid to figure it out. BONUS --- have more than 1 kid. Multiple kids expands your circle even more as it opens more doors to meeting new families.
Meta Trav@Meta_Trav

Technology isn't the problem. The kids' peer group is. Where I lived before, there was literally nowhere to go and no kids to play with. No "lots of time outdoors" existed. But when you have that, when kids can run outside and find friends every single day, they don't touch screens. They just don't. I see this now. But here's what I also see. This peer group is fragile. It's literally 2 families within 2 streets keeping my kids busy. That's it. Two. If those families aren't around, the whole thing collapses instantly. We're back to zero. And it's not like the old days where families went to church together, where the adults actually knew each other and were aligned. The parents barely talk. We have a "wave to each other" relationship. Even worse, these families are completely bought into the running around lifestyle. My kids come home constantly with "So and so had to go to gymnastics." Peak play hours? Gone. Everyone's driving to activities. The whole street operates like this. School, then scattered to different locations for extracurriculars. This "lots of time outdoors" thing could fall apart any day. It's a math problem. And the math is actually terrible. The boomers have no idea how lucky they had it. A massive demographic explosion of same-aged families all concentrated in the exact same suburban developments. Close-knit houses but still tons of open space for kids to play. Church still binding everyone together. One parent working, one at home. It's actually insane how perfectly aligned everything was for them.

English
61
111
2.5K
457.6K
devops_daddy
devops_daddy@devops_daddy·
@NeuterTheDebt so now we're addicted to debt - which happened pretty quickly and isn't going away anytime soon and is probably the biggest threat to our sovereignty but you're like no, that was too little debt and somehow fiscally irresponsible. Jesus Christ
English
0
0
0
8
Steve C.
Steve C.@NeuterTheDebt·
I respectfully disagree with the universal nostalgia for the Clinton-era surpluses. I wish Milton Friedman had explained in more detail his concern with government 'spending' because it turns out that 'borrowing' need NOT be a dirty word. Here's why: • 'spending' = consumption + investment. • successful investment creates incremental future income and benefits. • future income makes debt service more affordable. • sufficient future income can eliminate the incremental burden of incremental debt. • 'paying back' the debt principal is NOT necessary; rolling the debt over and over while keeping debt service affordable is indefinitely sustainable, even when the debt principal is increasing indefinitely. • debt rollover in those conditions is analogous to working capital in a successful corporation: not just harmless, but BENEFICIAL and DESIRABLE. Conclusion: Sufficiently beneficial investment neutralizes the burden of growing debt. There is NOTHING WRONG with increasing debt under those conditions -- which is why a balanced budget amendment is an unnecessary straight jacket on a thriving economy. Said another way: The universal nostalgia for the Clinton-era surpluses is mass delusion; those surpluses were shameful mismanagement of federal investing opportunities. Once again, finger-in-the-air politics trumped wise, long-range thinking. [All of these ideas are in my book.]
Today In History@historigins

In 1998, the United States achieved its first federal budget surplus in 29 years, effectively ending a streak of deficits that had lasted since 1969. ⁠ ⁠ This milestone was achieved under President Bill Clinton, following the passage of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, which resulted in a fiscal surplus of approximately $69 billion for that year.⁠ ⁠

English
6
0
4
671
devops_daddy
devops_daddy@devops_daddy·
@TheJSantiago guy is a grifter and he's calling it out. it's called public service.
English
1
0
5
449
Dean Steinbeck
Dean Steinbeck@Crypto_Counsel·
@Linahuaa Not one of those jewish billionaires or founders was born into money like the 10 families that control your country. Your comparison is shit
English
2
0
16
870
LinaHua
LinaHua@Linahuaa·
Yes, Jews do control America. It's simple logic. Ownership structures & alliances make it possible for 10 billionaire families in South Korea to control 80% of the economy, while their actual ownership share is far smaller. Jews are doing exactly the same in the West, but on a bigger scale. Do I blame the Jews tho? No. People decided to play the game of capitalism. Jews have been playing that game for thousands of years while Christians considered it a sin and refrained from it. Jews literally evolved to play this game. All of you vastly underestimate how big the skill+moral gap really is. I just KNOW how clumsy and naive White people are at the money game. Hell, Chinese would control them too if they could camouflage like the Jews. China, as a country, is playing the capitalist game so much better that they're winning, despite starting the game with massive handicap. Jews controlling America is not some crazy conspiracy- it's the most logical outcome. It would be illogical for Jews not being able to control America. Cuz Whites with their Christian roots are just THAT gullible. And it completely checks out with the fact that Israel- a tiny pedo country in the desert- is cucking out America so hard.
Martin Shkreli@MartinShkreli

you are objectively retarded.

English
169
235
1.7K
182.7K
devops_daddy
devops_daddy@devops_daddy·
@danprimack yeah it's called attracting capital dumbass. you have to show some sort of track record of cost cutting. and if you don't think PE will own a higher and higher share of the team over time you have zero foresight (shocker). you have almost no critical thinking skills.
English
0
1
1
45
Dan Primack
Dan Primack@danprimack·
@devops_daddy They traded Mookie Betts over a year before private equity arrived. Try again.
English
1
0
0
139
Dan Primack
Dan Primack@danprimack·
This is just so dumb. Does private equity have a very small piece of the Red Sox? Yes. Does it have control? No. Same majority owner for over two decades. Plenty of good faith critiques against PE. (and the Sox). This isn’t one of them.
Graham Platner for Senate@grahamformaine

Private equity is taking our homes. It's taking our hospitals. It's taking beloved local businesses and stripping them for parts. And now private equity is running the Red Sox into the ground. Our new ad ⬇️

English
9
2
53
16.8K