DMpay.eth

Get paid for DMs. Create your DMpay profile and share your IPFS profile card. app.dmpay.me IPFS profile card 👇 ensgianteth.dmpay.eth.link

USDC just crossed 64% of stablecoin transaction volume. Visa settles in it. Stripe integrates it. The OCC regulates it. And we built a messaging protocol where USDC is the key to the door. No spam. No bots. No noise. Just wallets talking to wallets @dmpayeth is live. 🟢

@jakepaul @anduriltech @PalmerLuckey @mttgrmm @SchimpfBrian @Antifund @geoffreywoo How much do you think someone would pay to DM you @jakepaul ? You can now find out👀👇

Amazing visit at Anduril @anduriltech Great people and great purpose @PalmerLuckey @mttgrmm @SchimpfBrian Proud to be invested in the future of defense tech @Antifund @geoffreywoo

@MrBeast @CoreyTheX Do you think someone would 100K to DM you @MrBeast ? You can now find out👀👇

@CoreyTheX :)

Feastables x Super Mario Galaxy Movie The Yoshi eggs are 🔥

@Cobratate @BambuluMen Would folks pay 1 million to DM you @Cobratate ? You now have a way to find out👇👀

@BambuluMen I realised it long ago.

If she's tired, polygamy solves it If she's not in the mood, polygamy solves it If she has low libido, polygamy solves it If she's unavailable, polygamy solves it If she's on her period, polygamy solves it If she's in postpartum, polygamy solves it If she's acting funny & trying to deny you sex, polygamy solves it If she won't cook/wants to starve you, polygamy solves it If she's getting complacent, polygamy puts her on her toes If she's unsubmissive, polygamy puts her in her place Polygamy solves everything. You just haven't realised yet.

Spam DMs are a broken incentive system. If sending a message is free and frictionless, abuse is inevitable. With XMTP, developers can build paid inbox access with programmable consent that protects both humans and agents. Cool XMTP-powered example from @DMpayeth 👇

@levelsio @hellosupaflo @X Use DMpay brother and filter out the spam and scammers👀👇

@hellosupaflo @X Can DM me

💸 @X paid me a reasonable $12,000 to tweet this month $10,511 ad rev share $1,247 subs revenue (= $11,758 per 28 days) = $12,807/month Median X revenue now since X started paying me is @ $9,000/mo If my X account was a business and valued at just these payouts, it would be worth at 10x @ $1,080,000, or at 20x @ $2,160,000 Although I think a bit more if you value the reach

@simonsquibb @noahkagan Our solo founder needs a partner @simonsquibb

@noahkagan DreamBrew.com

You build it. I promote it. Building has never been easier. Getting customers has never been harder. So I’m picking 2 products to promote to our 1,000,000+ entrepreneurs for our 16-year anniversary next Tuesday. Drop your product below. Don’t have one? Build it this weekend and come back.

@bnbchen 444

@MrBeast Hey @MrBeast would you please try out DMpay 🙏 Our solo founder needs a partner🫡

SOMEONE FINALLY FOUND THE $1,000,000 WE HID IN OUR SALESFORCE SUPERBOWL COMMERCIAL LOL

@LoganPaul @BreidenFehoko Would you invest in DMpay @LoganPaul ? Try it out and give us your honest opinion🫡 or chat with our 🇩🇴 founder

@BreidenFehoko Wait so are you down or not bc it sounds like you don’t have the money. I’ll send you same contract as Le’Veon if you’re in for next weekend

You put up a challenge, now you moving the goalposts. I’ll whoop your ass in a church parking lot. I don’t even want your money no more stop ducking smoke. I’ll fly out on my own dime to fight you or your clown ass brother. Let’s see how strong that jaw is.

Tired of spam DM’s? 👀👇

@levelsio @SahilPanhotra @X Sign up for DMpay it’s free and give us some feedback and maybe some free promo 🤔

@SahilPanhotra Nope just curious to see what's happening I never get paid to tweet except by @X

So after my last tweet icon.com now became the founder's Tinder profile

@VitalikButerin Try out DMpay @VitalikButerin

One important technical item that I forgot to mention is the proposed switch from Casper FFG to Minimmit as the finality gadget. To summarize, Casper FFG provides two-round finality: it requires each attester to sign once to "justify" the block, and then again to "finalize" it. Minimmit only requires one round. In exchange, Minimmit's fault tolerance (in our parametrization) drops to 17%, compared to Casper FFG's 33%. Within Ethereum consensus discussions, I have always been the security assumptions hawk: I've insisted on getting to the theoretical bound of 49% fault tolerance under synchrony, kept pushing for 51% attack recovery gadgets, came up with DAS to make data availability checks dishonest-majority-resistant, etc. But I am fine with Minimmit's properties, in fact even enthusiastic in some respects. In this post, I will explain why. Let's lay out the exact security properties of both 3SF (not the current beacon chain, which is needlessly weak in many ways, but the ideal 3SF) and Minimmit. "Synchronous network" means "network latency less than 1/4 slot or so", "asynchronous network" means "potentially very high latency, even some nodes go offline for hours at a time". The percentages ("attacker has <33%") refer to percentages of active staked ETH. ## Properties of 3SF Synchronous network case: * Attacker has p < 33%: nothing bad happens * 33% < p < 50%: attacker can stop finality (at the cost of losing massive funds via inactivity leak), but the chain keeps progressing normally * 50% < p < 67%: attacker can censor or revert the chain, but cannot revert finality. If an attacker censors, good guys can self-organize, they can stop contributing to a censoring chain, and do a "minority soft fork" * p > 67%: attacker can finalize things at will, much harder for good guys to do minority soft fork Asynchronous network case: * Attacker has p < 33%: cannot revert finality * p > 33%: can revert finality, at the cost of losing massive funds via slashing ## Properties of Minimmit Synchronous network case: * Attacker has p < 17%: nothing bad happens * 17% < p < 50%: attacker can stop finality (at the cost of losing massive funds via inactivity leak), but the chain keeps progressing normally * 50% < p < 83%: attacker can censor or revert the chain, but cannot revert finality. If an attacker censors, good guys can self-organize, they can stop contributing to a censoring chain, and do a "minority soft fork" * p > 83%: attacker can finalize things at will, much harder for good guys to do minority soft fork Asynchronous network case: * Attacker has p < 17%: cannot revert finality * p > 17%: can revert finality, at the cost of losing massive funds via slashing I actually think that the latter is a better tradeoff. Here's my reasoning why: * The worst kind of attack is actually not finality reversion, it's censorship. The reason is that finality reversion creates massive publicly available evidence that can be used to immediately cost the attacker millions of ETH (ie. billions of dollars), whereas censorship requires social coordination to get around * In both of the above, a censorship attack requires 50% * A censorship attack becomes *much harder* to coordinate around when the censoring attacker can unilaterally finalize (ie. >67% in 3SF, >83% in Minimmit). If they can't, then if the good guys counter-coordinate, you get two non-finalizing chains dueling for a few days, and users can pick on. If they can, then there's no natural schelling point to coordinate soft-forking * In the case of a client bug, the worst thing that can happen is finalizing something bugged. In 3SF, you only need 67% of clients to share a bug for it to finalize, in Minimmit, you need 83%. Basicallly, Minimmit maximizes the set of situations that "default to two chains dueling each other", and that is actually a much healthier and much more recoverable outcome than "the wrong thing finalizing". We want finality to mean final. So in situations of uncertainty (whether attacks or software bugs), we should be more okay with having periods of hours or days where the chain does not finalize, and instead progresses based on the fork choice rule. This gives us time to think and make sure which chain is correct. Also, I think the "33% slashed to revert finality" of 3SF is overkill. If there is even eg. 15 million ETH staking, then that's 5M ($10B) slashed to revert the chain once. If you had $10B, and you are willing to commit mayhem of a type that violates many countries' computer hacking laws, there are FAR BETTER ways to spend it than to attack a chain. Even if your goal is breaking Ethereum, there are far better attack vectors. And so if we have the baseline guarantee of >= 17% slashed to revert finality (which Minimmit provides), we should judge the two systems from there based on their other properties - where, for the reasons I described above, I think Minimmit performs better.

@LoganPaul @MicahhParsons11 Hey @LoganPaul we need a partner that can help take us to the next level 🫡

@MicahhParsons11 Whenever you’re ready 👊🏼

I got million just let me get healthy first!! 🤝

@chooserich Hey @chooserich would for you to try DMpay 🫡 Message us if you have any questions

Check out Somnia Reactivity at somnia.network

CRYPTO SELLOFF CONTINUES DESPITE THE MOST BULLISH NEWS EVER!

@VitalikButerin @baseddesigner @dcposch Hey @VitalikButerin can I get a repost?👀👇

@baseddesigner @dcposch That's something kohaku is doing, turning railgun and other privacy protocols (and more) into an easy-to-use self-contained sdk (last year the target user was browser wallets, now we have to make it work for agents too😄)

I think it's healthy for us in the Ethereum world to have a more bold and open mindset to many things, particularly on the application layer and on how we see ourselves in the world. We should not compromise on core properties: censorship resistance, open source, privacy, security (CROPS). We should not have "open mindedness" of the type that leaves people with no confidence of what security properties the L1 will still have one year from now. We should not ask ourselves questions like "do we really need light clients to be able to trustlessly verify correctness of the chain?". But especially on the layer of applications and Ethereum's interface to the world, we should be more willing to radically rethink various concepts and step outside our comfort zone. This includes issues of technological direction, eg. "what if AI basically means that wallets as browser extensions and mobile extensions are dead within a year?" One example last year was the shift to thinking about privacy as a first-class consideration, something we value equally to the other types of security. This implies a radically different Ethereum application stack, because the entire stack so far has not been built around privacy. Great, let's build a radically different Ethereum application stack! An example this year is the growing work on the networking side of privacy, both inside the EF and outside. It includes application-layer issues, eg. "what if the rest of defi is basically just universal futures markets on top of a good decentralized oracle and letting users self-organize on top of that?", and "what if the ideal decentralized oracle is just a SNARK over M-of-N small LLMs over zk-TLSes of some major news sites?" (BTW this is interrelated with the AI issue: one consequence of AI is that it moves "applications" away from being discrete categories of behavior with discrete UIs, and more toward being a continuous space, so "build fewer apps and rely on users to self-organize around them" should inevitably expand as a pattern) One example this year is rethinking from zero the role of L2s, and what kind of L2s are actually most synergistic and additive to Ethereum. It also includes culture. This is a big part of "the whole milady thing" for myself, @AyaMiyagotchi and others. Yes, it's a silly meme. Yes, I find the political takes of some milady partisans cringe and sometimes outright bootlickerish (though other milady partisans are quite the opposite). But the core underlying subtext, the message behind the message, is: rip off the suit and tie. If you have your suit and tie on, be willing to grab the nearest wine glass and spill it all over your suit and tie, so you have no choice but to rip it off and reclaim your body's full flexibility and freedom. Actually imagine yourself doing this the next time you get invited to a richpeopleslop formal gala dinner. Take the preconception that you are "respectable", write it down on a piece of paper, crumble it up and burn it. The psychological baptism of doing this leads to the intellectual baptism of unlocking greater creativity and expanding overton windows. For too long, our algorithm in Ethereum has been: we have this existing ecosystem, what's the logical next step to make it one step better? Now, our algorithm should be: we have this L1 that is amazing and will become more amazing, we have a growing array of tools, both those built within our ecosystem and outside it, what are the most valuable things to build, knowing what we know now? If YOU had to write the section of the 2014 Ethereum whitepaper that talked about applications, and take a first-principles perspective of what makes sense in defi, decentralized social, identity, and elsewhere, what would you write? At least take the step of marking all path-dependence concerns down to zero, pretend for a brief moment that the Ethereum chain today has exactly zero usage and you're the one suggesting or building the first apps, and see what comes out. Do this even if you're the one building today's existing apps. This is how Ethereum can grow back stronger.

@MrBeast Would love for you to try out DMpay @MrBeast 🫡 How much do you think folks would pay to DM you?

@jakepaul Hey @jakepaul would love for you to try out DMpay🫡 How much do think folks would pay to DM you?

It’s insane how people haven’t learned that NBA, NFL, and other professional athletes aren’t fighters There’s no difference to what Logan would do to the NFL players and to what I did to Nate Robinson Why are we still talking about this😅😅 Sean Strickland worked Maxx Crosby barely trying and Maxx is one of the strongest, biggest, and most athletic in the NFL and SEAN ISNT A BOXER!

Get paid for DMs. Create your DMpay account for free! Set your price in USDC 💵 Connect your X account share your IPFS profile card. IPFS profile card 👇 ensgianteth.dmpay.eth.link app.dmpay.me

@saylor Get paid for DM’s = More Bitcoin

There isn’t enough Bitcoin for everyone.