Docwho is in Seattle.

27K posts

Docwho is in Seattle. banner
Docwho is in Seattle.

Docwho is in Seattle.

@docwho76

I am a DevOps meat popsicle. Opinions are my own and not my employers. Also @[email protected] on Mastodon

Seattle WA, US Katılım Şubat 2008
1.3K Takip Edilen1.6K Takipçiler
Docwho is in Seattle. retweetledi
mrredpillz jokaqarmy
mrredpillz jokaqarmy@JOKAQARMY1·
👀 🤔
QME
1K
18.2K
117.1K
4.9M
Docwho is in Seattle. retweetledi
Danielle Derek
Danielle Derek@daniellederekxo·
Repost and get a suprise
Danielle Derek tweet media
English
22
133
570
17.4K
Docwho is in Seattle. retweetledi
MERICA MEMED
MERICA MEMED@Mericamemed·
Now I'm pregnant.
English
41
155
2.4K
240.4K
Hedgie
Hedgie@HedgieMarkets·
@trashpanda 🦔I can respect that. "Sophisticated" might be generous. But they have access to capital and platforms that amplify their decisions, which makes it worse when they're caught off guard by something this predictable.
English
3
0
10
2K
Hedgie
Hedgie@HedgieMarkets·
🦔 Jason Calacanis says his company hit $300/day per agent using Claude's API at only 10-20% capacity, which scales to around $100,000/year per agent. Chamath Palihapitiya added that he's now asking "what's the token budget for our best devs?" and said AI-assisted developers need to be at least 2x as productive just to justify the cost. He said this is actively happening inside his company or he'll run out of money. My Take This was always the obvious trajectory. AI providers subsidized usage to drive adoption, and now the subsidies are ending. The consumer plans are likely loss leaders subsidized by VC money, and the gap between what individuals pay and what it actually costs to run these models is closing fast. I'm struck by the surprise from people who should know better. These are sophisticated tech investors just now realizing that running agents 24/7 burns through tokens at rates that dwarf human salaries. A human engineer runs on coffee, remembers context from years ago, builds institutional knowledge, and doesn't rack up exponential costs the longer they think about a problem. Agents waste tokens constantly, researching and validating things that don't need validation, spinning up subagents for simple tasks when a straightforward approach would work fine. The companies that fired engineers to replace them with AI agents are learning that you can't negotiate with an API bill the way you can renegotiate a salary. And unlike employees who might stick around during a rough patch, the meter just keeps running. Hedgie🤗
English
211
200
1.5K
283K
Docwho is in Seattle. retweetledi
Todd Spence
Todd Spence@Todd_Spence·
An animator created a "ROBOCOP & THE TERMINATOR" cartoon and it absolutely needs to be a show 😂 (credit: Simon Doolan)
English
417
3.6K
18.8K
971.1K
Docwho is in Seattle. retweetledi
TracketPacer
TracketPacer@TracketPacer·
i love dns it always works great for me 👄✨ video was created by the luminary genius @citiesbydiana
English
110
1.3K
11.8K
493.3K
Docwho is in Seattle. retweetledi
Charles Curran
Charles Curran@charliebcurran·
I recut the Melania trailer shot for shot with AI to replace her with Miss Piggy. I don't know if this was a good idea, but I did it.
English
1.2K
4.1K
24.6K
829.8K
Docwho is in Seattle. retweetledi
Peter Girnus 🦅
Peter Girnus 🦅@gothburz·
I work at Slack. We tell employees their DMs are private. And they are. Mostly. Look, when we say "private" we mean private between you and the person you're messaging. And your admin. And HR. And legal. And whatever compliance tool your company bought. And the export logs. And the backup systems. And anyone with a court order. But other than that, totally private. We're very clear about this in our documentation. Page 47. Section 12. Subsection C. Paragraph 8. The part nobody reads before they trash-talk their manager at 11pm. Here's what employees don't understand. When you delete a message, you're just deleting it from your view. The message still exists. In exports. In backups. In the retention policy. It's like closing your eyes and thinking you're invisible. The data belongs to the company, not you. We say this right in our terms. Workspace owners control everything. They decide how long messages are stored. Sometimes it's 30 days. Sometimes it's forever. Hope you didn't say anything spicy in 2019. Enterprise customers get extra features. Full message exports. Metadata tracking. Who messaged whom. When. How often. Communication patterns. It's for "compliance." It's for "legal needs." It's for "regulatory requirements." It's definitely not for micromanagement. We're very careful to explain that admins can't see messages in real-time. They have to formally request an export. Fill out some forms. Click some buttons. Maybe wait an hour. Very high barrier. Almost impossible to abuse. The key takeaway is simple. Treat Slack like work email. Not like WhatsApp. Not like Signal. Just because it looks like a chat app doesn't mean it works like one. If a message could cause trouble when HR reads it, don't send it. This is empowering employees with knowledge. If you wouldn't say it in the break room with your manager behind you, don't type it in Slack. That's privacy. Informed privacy. Enterprise-grade informed privacy.
Peter Girnus 🦅 tweet media
English
122
514
3.9K
615.4K
vx-underground
vx-underground@vxunderground·
> be me > use chrome > removing stuff to block ads > leave > be me > switch to firefox > block ads > firefox wants to add ai > omg leave me alone > gonna leave Okay where do I go next?
English
1.7K
1.5K
38.1K
1.1M
Docwho is in Seattle. retweetledi
Boring_Business
Boring_Business@BoringBiz_·
POV you made the mistake of asking a consultant what they do for work
English
135
720
8.6K
422.9K
Ali lionheart
Ali lionheart@Alilionheart6·
Boobmorning my Bountifuls~! Soooo I have been working on getting a discord set up. I think I have all the rooms I want just have to make sure it is secure. once I get that set up I will be inviting you all to the Cabin~
English
3
1
7
272
Docwho is in Seattle. retweetledi
SemiAnalysis
SemiAnalysis@SemiAnalysis_·
PFAS-free is a big deal in semiconductors. Getting rid of “forever chemicals” seems like a clear win, right? Turns out it’s probably greenwashing: 🧵1/10
English
10
40
417
3.3M