Emma Waldon

48 posts

Emma Waldon

Emma Waldon

@emma_waldon

Perth, Western Australia Katılım Ekim 2011
802 Takip Edilen57 Takipçiler
Emma Waldon
Emma Waldon@emma_waldon·
@GeoffWilsonWAM There would definitely be enough shareholders to require a general meeting to be called and put it to a vote
English
1
0
0
41
The Australian
The Australian@australian·
Opinion: Jim Chalmers has vanished from budget promotion duties while Kevin Rudd’s former team steps forward to salvage Labor’s struggling economic message. Read more: bit.ly/4dOURWt
The Australian tweet media
English
40
34
75
4.6K
Emma Waldon
Emma Waldon@emma_waldon·
@FinancialReview This budget needs so many carve outs and concessions the cost of applying it will be astronomical. If only they had consulted with people in the real world. Clueless.
English
1
0
6
166
Financial Review
Financial Review@FinancialReview·
The treasurer signals a boost to salary-earner tax concessions, as the prime minister confirms small business exemptions to capital gains changes. ebx.sh/XBqFSX
English
39
4
11
7K
Emma Waldon
Emma Waldon@emma_waldon·
@keithmarlowau People will be spending more than any potential tax cut getting a tax accountant to work it out. 🙄
English
1
0
0
19
Keith Marlow
Keith Marlow@keithmarlowau·
Its a sh#t sandwich. The old system was easy to understand, why not just tweak the specific problem area wrt property and leave the rest alone??? Otherwise this sandwich is just a tax grab.
Chris Richardson@ChrisEconomist

LUMPY IS BUMPY The government is looking to race its new tax changes through parliament. I think that's a mistake. Two reasons stand out: (1) As I noted on budget night, capital gains are typically earned over a number of years, yet they're taxed in a lump as if they've all been earned at once. So a one-off capital gain can be taxed at a rather higher rate than if its profits were correctly spread out over the time they were earned. The old Keating system handled that lumpiness by letting the gain be averaged over five years - a reasonable compromise. (2) The second problem is that it appears the intent is to tax winners (real gains) but not allow offsets for losers (real losses). I say 'appears' because we don't know full details yet, and because - if that is true - then the Treasury revenue forecasts look too low. But there have been plenty of opportunities to clarify this, and as yet I haven't seen the government say that isn't so. If that is indeed the intent then it unreasonably weighs against risk-taking. I see these two (lumpiness across time and lumpiness across investments) as bigger issues than the start up stuff. If we want to help start ups then the best moment to do that is early (when they are taking the biggest risks and they are the most cash poor) rather than late (through a CGT discount for the winning survivors). Yes, I remain a fan of fixing our CGT discount. And I'm wary of whinging too much - these two problems may yet be resolved, and a bunch of the critics of the government's proposals should try switching to decaf. But it'd be good to better understand what is and isn't being proposed before parliament has to vote on it.

English
4
3
22
664
Emma Waldon
Emma Waldon@emma_waldon·
@SatPaper It’s not just the media. Small business and investors can use a spreadsheet and calculator. I’ve never seen a budget discussed on the street in so much detail and negativity from such a broad range of people. They can think it’s a scare campaign if they want.
English
0
0
3
109
The Saturday Paper
The Saturday Paper@SatPaper·
Inside Labor, the Albanese government's fifth budget was initially met with rapturous applause. That quickly evaporated as the budget met with the biggest media attack seen since the anti-carbon tax campaign more than a decade ago. satpa.pe/Vyrcgiw
English
29
15
43
4.3K
Emma Waldon
Emma Waldon@emma_waldon·
@FinancialReview The preparation of this budget would make a great episode of a Utopia style tv show. They can’t articulate responses to valid issues such as those outlined here because they don’t get it. We are being let down by our political leadership on all sides.
English
1
0
3
217
Financial Review
Financial Review@FinancialReview·
Treasury’s shortsightedness will reduce the incentives for all businesses to invest, putting a dampener on growth, productivity and our global competitiveness. ebx.sh/MsJ3aJ
English
29
41
240
17K
Emma Waldon
Emma Waldon@emma_waldon·
@FinancialReview Really. The deduction that many people that work for themselves validly claim anyway is being held hostage, with the deduction in 2028 that will be eaten up by bracket creep.
English
1
0
3
335
Financial Review
Financial Review@FinancialReview·
Anthony Albanese has flagged broader carve-outs for business from the CGT increase, with a twist. ebx.sh/C1P3NF
English
32
7
19
10.3K
Emma Waldon
Emma Waldon@emma_waldon·
@cjoye The proposed CGT and R&D tax amendments will decimate the Australian life sciences sector. Will make it significantly harder to raise capital for clinical trials and biotech companies will need to consider if Australia is the best place to do business. Madness.
English
1
1
3
317
christopher joye
Why would the CGT concessions be for tech only? Why not for all Aussie businesses? Why is tech more important than any other sector? And given the polling suggests voters clearly would have rejected these proposals at the last election, and there is patently no mandate to introduce them given the election was won on the many promises not to ever touch CGT and negative gearing, why not do the only honest and honourable thing - and put these radical changes to the test of an election? Either call one now or put them to the next election. Trying to railroad them home on the basis of a majority government that was voted in on the premise it would not make these changes is demonstrably non-democratic. It is also very unAustralian… At least give everyone a chance to vote on whether they want to overhaul the economy in this way. Even @DHughesy is up in arms about being rorted by the professional pollies who have never started a business or hired another Aussie in their lives
The Australian@australian

Anthony Albanese is leaning ­towards offering only “narrow” concessions to his new capital gains tax regime for start-ups in the tech sector, as business groups and some Labor MPs push for broader compromises to protect entrepreneurs across the economy from being hit with punitive tax bills. Greg Brown and Brad Thompson have more: bit.ly/4utHkdU

English
90
105
760
56.7K
Emma Waldon
Emma Waldon@emma_waldon·
@clairlemon Fuelled by flawed Treasury modelling and bad stats that underestimate how many “younger” people this impacts
English
0
0
0
778
Claire Lehmann
Claire Lehmann@clairlemon·
What's interesting about this backlash is that Albo & Chalmers do appear to be genuinely surprised by it. Which tells you that very few people in their circles come from private industry-- a massive self-sealing bubble. x.com/SkyNewsAust/st…
Sky News Australia@SkyNewsAust

The Albanese government has been trolled by a business founder who bought 18 inescapable billboards at Canberra Airport protesting Labor’s capital gains tax grab. skynews.com.au/australia-news…

English
82
135
1.6K
76.5K
Emma Waldon
Emma Waldon@emma_waldon·
@EdSaint61 Exactly. Everytime I’m on a Qantas flight business class is full of politicians, their staff and Qantas staff… very few actual business people in business class.
English
0
0
1
30
Emma Waldon
Emma Waldon@emma_waldon·
@JulianHillMP Not sure how disincentivising business investment helps someone get a home.
English
0
0
0
16
Senator Tony Sheldon
Senator Tony Sheldon@TonySheldonNSW·
We've helped 250,000 Australians buy their own home with a 5% deposit, and we're building 100,000 homes set aside just for them.
English
351
30
127
16.4K
Emma Waldon
Emma Waldon@emma_waldon·
@Ryandally08 Aspiration for none. Apparently people that earn a salary from government or multinationals are the only ones that work hard.
English
0
1
4
59
Ryan Dally
Ryan Dally@Ryandally08·
#BREAKING Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has delivered a feeble defence of his Government’s tax policies, doubling down after days of criticism to declare the reforms are necessary to ensure “aspiration for all” Speaking at Victorian Labor’s annual conference on Saturday, Albanese doubled down about the need for controversial changes to negative gearing, capital gains tax and death taxes that were unveiled in this month’s federal budget. There had been speculation that Albanese was looking to backflip on some aspects of the budget, given how poorly it was received but last night, he signalled that Labor would plough ahead with the tax package overall and rubbished the broader backlash by saying that trusts were not an option for most Australians “working their guts out” So penalise the ones it is an option for? Albanese then spluttered “These Australians, millions of hardworking people, will never be able to access a trust. Never sat around a kitchen table and thought, have we thought of setting up a trust? I mean, seriously” “The biggest investment that the majority of Australians ever make and the biggest hope that they ever have is to work hard and buy a home of their own” Seemingly oblivious to the fact his new tax changes make that dream almost impossible. He then delivered this whopper to a few chuckles in the crowd: “Labor is the party of aspiration” Bizarrely, he then began to weep as he described how young people were going to auctions and competing with bidders who could afford to spend an extra $30,000 on a property because of the deductions they could claim on their tax. Again trying to justify himself. He continued “We will not allow Australia to become a country where aspiration is only for some” Well, Anthony I think you’re talking about yourself as the proud owner of 4 homes. The hypocrisy of this man is staggering.
Ryan Dally tweet media
English
300
129
646
18.6K
Emma Waldon
Emma Waldon@emma_waldon·
@DerekFranc90653 And the biotech sector which is also disadvantaged by the proposed R&D tax changes. New capital investment in micro caps has already stopped while this mess is sorted out.
English
0
0
0
24
Dekka
Dekka@DerekFranc90653·
So stock pickers, people holding diversified portfolios, and mining exploration companies are to be "eliminated", so young people can have the 'dream' of owning a home. That sems like a good reform? What do you think? Please forward far and wide. afr.com/policy/tax-and…
English
2
5
17
590
Emma Waldon retweetledi
AT
AT@ryu_tay·
If this goes ahead, ASX will shrink and a lot of these sectors will be game over: * Microcaps early startups * Mining explorers, developers without revenue * Early stage bio-techs * High PE growth stocks with huge runway Money will rotate into * High dividend stocks with no growth * Cyclical mining producers with dividend * Index ETFs and never sell How depressing...
Chris Brycki@chrisbrycki

The proposed CGT changes could unfortuantely kill direct share ownership in Australia. news.com.au/finance/money/…

English
14
20
233
17.5K
Emma Waldon
Emma Waldon@emma_waldon·
@BarbaraPocock Most people I know do whatever they can afford to assist their children and grandchildren. They know who they are 🙄
English
0
0
1
36
Emma Waldon
Emma Waldon@emma_waldon·
@ALeighMP The instant asset write off is a timing difference and the R&D changes will have negative impacts to the life sciences sector as clinical trials tend to be weighted to now excluded supporting activities and many have been operating for 10 years+ the arbitrary cutoff for inclusion
English
0
0
1
70
Andrew Leigh
Andrew Leigh@ALeighMP·
Our budget helps small business invest and innovate: a permanent $20,000 instant asset write-off, permanent loss carry-back, and R&D incentives to boost research by new start-ups. #ausecon #auspol
English
154
26
71
6.7K
Emma Waldon
Emma Waldon@emma_waldon·
@psyclaw Let’s structure tax and regulation to incentivise the lowest common denominator. Businesses that fail. Sounds like a winning approach adopted around the world.
English
0
0
0
86
ARTHUR FRIEND
ARTHUR FRIEND@psyclaw·
Young woman on 7.30 criticising budget. Says young people see starting a business best way to become home owner. But budget CGT changes means starting up a business is disadvantaged. Could some kind person tell her that less than 50% of new businesses survive 3 years. Taa.
English
98
34
185
24.4K
Emma Waldon
Emma Waldon@emma_waldon·
@AlboMP Living the dream. I’d caution any young Australians to not rush into home ownership at the moment as property values and the economy decline as a result of this budget.
English
0
0
0
14
Anthony Albanese
Anthony Albanese@AlboMP·
We're bringing the dream of home ownership back in reach for young Australians. And it's why we're changing property investor tax breaks to give first home buyers a fair go.
Anthony Albanese tweet media
English
2.5K
179
762
128.1K
Emma Waldon
Emma Waldon@emma_waldon·
@farmercate2 Exactly each will have many multiples of that as future beneficiaries. It effects more than 5%
English
0
0
1
63
farmercate
farmercate@farmercate2·
80% of Australian trusts are discretionary. (840,000) Labor are correct saying that only 5% are affected by the proposed legislation atm. Over the next 10 yrs as Gen X retire that number will increase dramatically. Millennials will be the losers !
English
8
5
19
1.2K