
Eric Nemeth
1.5K posts

Eric Nemeth
@eneme23
VP @opentrade_io | Euro dollars, stablecoins, grid services, batteries, interruptible compute, | prev @BlackRock , VC, & DEX in 2018


@mattparlmer This should lite a fire under Americas ass when it comes to industrialization. Thankfully we have some movement now in the right direction. Space, nuclear etc but the window is slim. All it takes is for China to finally perfect their first Falcon like reusability, game over

Ford’s top executive says allowing Chinese automakers to sell their cars in the US would be “devastating” to American manufacturing bloomberg.com/news/articles/…









Turtle integrates @SierraIsMoney Sierra aggregates yield across RWAs and blue-chip DeFi markets and streams it directly back into SIERRA. Hold the token, earn daily intrinsic yield. All details below

1/ @getmidas Kripto, Turkey’s fast-growing hub for seamless crypto investing, has partnered with OpenTrade to roll out a New $USDT staking experience built directly into the platform. Powered by OpenTrade institutional-grade yield infrastructure, the upgrade brings simple, stablecoin-based returns to everyday users without any complexities or lockups. With this new integration, Midas Kripto users can now put their $USDT to work and automatically earn steady, dollar-based yield, which they can unstake back into $USDT or trade at any moment. Rewards accrue immediately and balances plus any earned yield can be converted to TRY or USD instantly whenever users wants. “Midas Kripto is dedicated to making easy crypto investing accessible for Turkish users. Partnering with OpenTrade enables us to offer USDT Staking with stable rewards backed by high quality assets, seamlessly integrated into our app. This strengthens our mission to provide innovative, user-friendly financial solutions without FX or crypto market risks.” - Balam Bingül, Vice President and General Manager of Midas Kripto







I disagree here. BTC network is more or less fine but PoS chains are significantly vulnerable to this attack vector🧵 Bitcoin is a PoW chain, so BLK and asset managers having ownership does NOT influence the network beyond their market influence (which can and likely could become a problem). But ETF providers could have the ability to directly/indirectly influence the market! This is true of large asset managers with small market cap companies in passive indexes. This is the same reason why 'passive investing is distorting the market' as much of the investment industry has been decrying for the past 10 years. Consider how an asset manager goes to market to procure more BTC for an inflow of ETF purchases? They either A) go to exchanges for BTC in circulation OR B) engage with BTC miners for newly minted BTC. Miners hold far more leverage here than the asset managers and benefit greatly from these structures. Now to your point, the problem becomes if asset managers blacklist miners or preferentially select partner miners to source liquidity from. But it would disadvantage both the asset managers and miners to change the 'game' of BTC unless you want to destroy the asset.. If any regulatory agency does that, then markets reconfigure elsewhere. But from what I've been seeing in the BTC mining industry, there are levels of sovereign alignment with miners to stabilize renewable grid systems. They would shoot themselves in the foot and reduce resiliency and stability of their energy grid and national security just to put miners in a chokehold. Given that ENERGY is far more equitably distributed around the world than capital, BTC's sovereign attack vectors would require blocs of nations coordinating across agencies to manipulate the mining industry. We've seen this game of whack-a-mole before and how it turns out. If 'decentralized' capital markets on PoS chains integrate with tradfi financial markets, then CAPITAL becomes to leverage point to exert influence. That means that 'defi' is basically just an extension of the current financial system. The problem of decentralization REALLY arises when structured products are created for PoS chains like Ethereum — entirely why I don't understand 'defi' beyond speculation. Working at BLK I recall looking doing portfolio forensics for holdings and performance attribution of index equity funds to report to institutional clients and would see the gravity and efficiency created by scaled asset management and how it'd impact markets. ETF providers will become US public markets 'majority shareholder' equivalents in these networks if they aggregate ETH like they have been with BTC. But even worse as there are no regulatory thresholds of ownership limits for entities owning these tokens!! This is where the industry bends the knee and forfeits decentralization because every PoS chain with flows driven by asset managers will become indirectly regulated under the SEC and CFTC. BTC is secured by energy and compute, which is globally distributed and abundant. Centralizing forces can kick in with economies of scale of data center operations and ability to access debt. As the world shifts to renewables, particularly green hydrogen, we can truly envisage a future where BTC functions as a financial battery for excess energy in which anyone can participate as a miner. Since ETH and other PoS chains are an extension of current financial systems, where the amount of capital dictates the amount of influence you have in the system, you won't have nearly the same level of democratized influence over the network. In the long run, PoS chains are not censorship resistant and could become entirely regulated directly/indirectly by sovereign regulators. I could never conceptualize where 'decentralized' projects fit in this worldview because 1) lot of it is just token speculation and fancy research, and 2) even if you build that app/infra, the whole network will eventually corrode and fold into the current financial system's influence. @saylor is right in some regard, there is no second best because BTC is far more decentralized and resistant to these attack vectors from financial regulators as they cannot control globally distributed energy or compute, while they can control capital flows and security products. The crypto industry does not talk about this and collectively ignores this because the market is receiving the passive inflows from tradfi that they'd rather preposition down on the risk curve given the inevitability of 'adoption'... instead of building truly democratizing financial products which equitably levels the playing field for people around the world to gain access to 'developed market' financial infrastructure. I came into crypto believing that this will democratize access to the US financial system and lower the cost of capital globally to fund the marginal entrepreneur who can make the world a better place. I believe we can build the latter, (and that we are!!), but to your point the industry really needs to wake up and become pragmatic about how the market structure can centralize the network and become more rational about the types of business structures that should be built on chain.










