Gary Wachtel

1.2K posts

Gary Wachtel banner
Gary Wachtel

Gary Wachtel

@gary_offchain

@OffchainLabs General Counsel // all views are my own.

Arbitrum Katılım Ağustos 2023
452 Takip Edilen402 Takipçiler
Gary Wachtel retweetledi
Arbitrum
Arbitrum@arbitrum·
Every generation of financial winners was built on the next infrastructure shift. 1800s - Physical exchange markets 1900s - Broker-led electronic markets 2000s - Internet brokerage platforms 2020s - Programmable markets (Today) Fintechs that build early in the programmable economy will define the next era of markets.
Arbitrum tweet media
English
36
29
213
14.6K
Gary Wachtel
Gary Wachtel@gary_offchain·
A LOT about the Senate Banking Cmttee scheduling a markup of CLARITY for 5/14. Exciting! ALSO - a lot of fud. Attached is the path to becoming law. 5/14 will be Step #4.
Gary Wachtel tweet media
English
1
0
7
2.8K
JAY HEFNER
JAY HEFNER@JOOKSPICASSO·
Big news: CLARITY Act just passed. Key details: - Approved by Congress in May 2026 - Stablecoin rewards now legit under federal regulations - Clear path for redemption to actual USD Pharos’ $CRCL: 1:1 redemption. Fully backed. Powered by Circle infrastructure. trade-crcl.com Redemption is straightforward: rewards convert directly to USD at face value. What you earn is what you get. Regulatory uncertainty is a thing of the past. Time to cash in! $GIGA $H
JAY HEFNER tweet media
English
1
3
10
39
Gary Wachtel
Gary Wachtel@gary_offchain·
not opining on timing or success, but various US agencies would be tasked with implementing rules based on the final law. Per the current Senate draft, the @CFTC & @SECGov would be the primary regulators involved; other agencies including @USTreasury, @FDICgov and others would also be involved with respect to specific provisions.
English
0
0
0
15
Gary Wachtel
Gary Wachtel@gary_offchain·
.@Offchain proudly signed on to this letter and is excited to keep the momentum going on this watershed piece of legislation.
Blockchain Association@BlockchainAssn

1/ Today, @BlockchainAssn and @crypto_council, joined by a broad coalition of more than 120 organizations from across the digital asset ecosystem, urged the Senate Banking Committee to move forward with a markup on market structure legislation. Years of bipartisan work have brought Congress to an important moment. The U.S. needs clear, durable rules that protect consumers, provide certainty, and reinforce American leadership in digital asset innovation.

English
4
6
34
833
Potuz
Potuz@potuz_eth·
GPT's new image gerator is a rug. Tried 10 times to get a modified photo of my son "Give me a photo of my son in the above image, flying on top of a dragon/riding a motorcycle/..." "We’re so sorry, but the image we created may violate our content policies."
English
5
0
7
772
WenMoon 闻月 💚
WenMoon 闻月 💚@0xWenMoon·
So many fucking retards on this app Arbitrum freezing hacked funds means its up to DAO vote what happens to them. That IS decentralisation. The folks here who try to keep up theatrics by letting DPRK continue to steal millions are complicit. In what world is it better to lose 300m just to feign decentralisation?
English
122
30
506
22.9K
Gary Wachtel retweetledi
Steven Goldfeder
Steven Goldfeder@sgoldfed·
Surely one of the most complex decisions ever made in Arbitrum governance history but a few things worth noting: 1. To all those screaming for the past few days “Arbitrum has a centralized sequencer so they can move funds”, take a few minutes to learn how Arbitrum works. The sequencer has absolutely no power to move funds and was not the one who acted here. 2. The decision to act was made entirely by the Arbitrum Security Council, a group of 12 individuals elected by the Arbitrum DAO (the annual election is currently underway — vote now!), which required 9/12 of them to agree. The council is independent from the Arbitrum Foundation and Offchain Labs (1/12 of the elected members is an OCL engineer), and came to this decision by themselves after much deliberation. You may not like the existence of security councils and you can form your own opinion on whether you agree with their actions, but this process was extremely distributed and coordinated by independent actors, and ina world where security councils exist, Arbitrum’s is a masterclass on how a truly independent security council should operate. 3. For many, the ultimate goal is to get rid of the security council entirely, but this is complicated. Technically it’s easy — the security council is elected by the DAO and operates at its pleasure, and the DAO can turn it off at any time. But the harder question is _should_ the DAO do that? L1s have the ability to hard fork. Security councils control the analogous power for the L2. If you get rid of it, you lose the ability to hard fork. You can still update the chain via DAO vote but that’s a slow process and you can no longer do fast emergency actions (which includes both actions like the security council took today as well as the ability to quickly upgrade the code in case an exploitable vulnerability in the software stack is discovered). As I’ve said many times, the best path that I see to getting rid of security councils is for the L1 itself to take on this burden for its most important L2s (as defined by objective criteria). In that case, in the case of a vulnerability or an exploit the conversation for L1 and L2 will be identical — does this warrant an L1 hard fork. I’m hopeful that we can reopen this conversation in the coming weeks.
Arbitrum@arbitrum

The Arbitrum Security Council has taken emergency action to freeze the 30,766 ETH being held in the address on Arbitrum One that is connected to the KelpDAO exploit. The Security Council acted with input from law enforcement as to the exploiter’s identity, and, at all times, weighed its commitment to the security and integrity of the Arbitrum community without impacting any Arbitrum users or applications. After significant technical diligence and deliberation, the Security Council identified and executed a technical approach to move funds to safety without affecting any other chain state or Arbitrum users. As of April 20 11:26pm ET the funds have been successfully transferred to an intermediary frozen wallet. They are no longer accessible to the address that originally held the funds, and can only be moved by further action by Arbitrum governance, which will be coordinated with relevant parties.

English
90
112
732
109.7K
Gary Wachtel retweetledi
Frank Chaparro
Frank Chaparro@fintechfrank·
WSJ front page: NYSE is going all in on crypto and tokenization.
Frank Chaparro tweet mediaFrank Chaparro tweet media
English
37
61
433
37.2K
CoinDesk
CoinDesk@CoinDesk·
JUST IN: $12T AUM @CharlesSchwab announces Schwab Crypto, a spot $BTC and $ETH trading platform set to roll out to retail clients in the coming weeks.
CoinDesk tweet mediaCoinDesk tweet media
English
27
69
334
18.9K
Gary Wachtel
Gary Wachtel@gary_offchain·
Was thinking a lot about the future of AI today. “Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could, they didn't stop to think if they should.” - Jurassic Park
English
1
0
2
72
Metatron
Metatron@d20_eth·
The man who has already lost everything and keeps the faith should scare you
English
1
0
0
227
Lumi
Lumi@zkLumi·
Few know that the original 2018 @Arbitrum paper was titled “Arbitrum: Scalable, PRIVATE Smart Contracts” Privacy was a core design goal from day one. The paper’s architecture kept VM code & state private by default, with only hashed state on-chain. Even proposed ZK one-step proofs to eliminate any leak during disputes. Privacy struggled to find PMF when crypto was retail-only but now that institutions are coming on-chain “Data Confidentiality” is a core legal and competitive requirement. @Offchain has been researching privacy solutions since before Arbitrum shipped. We’re now actively working on delivering multiple cutting edge solutions to bring protocol-level privacy with compliance to Arbitrum Platform. More to share soon.
Lumi tweet media
English
7
3
35
2.5K