@kdatdabat @JakeRabadi PHI - Matthews
LEAFS - 27 Leaf 1st
- 27 Flyers 1st
- 28 Flyers 1st
- Drysdale
English
GenX4ever
934 posts
@JakeRabadi Leafs Get-Zegras,Michkov, Luchanko & 2027 1st
Flyers Get- Auston Matthews, Matthew Knies
Martone-Matthews-TK
Knies-Dvorak-Tippett
Bump-Cates-Barkey
Forester-Coots-Grebenken
Or they can bring back Giroux and put him on the 4th line as a RW. He can win faceoffs & still play.
English
This feels like Daniel Briere’s big 1C shot. Flyers could send back the Leafs’ pick they own + more.
No brainer if he’s truly made available. 29 years old and we know the elite offensive upside he brings.
NHL Rumour Report@NHLRumourReport
Chris Johnston: Auston Matthews has two years remaining on his contract, but still isn’t sure if he’ll be back in Toronto in the fall, according to league sources - The Athletic (5/5)
English
@LoganE_94 @jackrichrdson 4 of the 7 were original 6 teams. Doesn’t exactly scream out for conspiracy theories
English
@jackrichrdson Aside from San Jose, it’s all original 6 teams who were struggling or had controversy around them
English
Last 7 draft lottery winners
New York
Buffalo
Montreal
Chicago
San Jose
New York
Toronto
What do you notice?
English
@martianwyrdlord So how many jobs did the president just piss away because he can’t find a way to treat his allies with the slightest bit of respect.
English
Wow 0.03% of US GDP, how will it survive this
United Canada 🇨🇦@UnitedCanucks26
Experts estimate the U.S. will lose $4.5B to $6B in 2026 just from the Canadian tourism boycott. 📉 Add in the food & goods boycott and we’re looking at nearly A DOZEN BILLION dollars lost. Canadians are staying home and keeping their wallets closed. 🇨🇦💪 Canada’s got game. #BuyCanadian #TravelCanada
English
@daEdge1960 @EddyM982 @IngrahamAngle It’s no annexation. It’s deeper economic ties and a more robust free trade agreement. Whatever happens in the US from now on doesn’t change the fact that Canada has realized that it can never allow itself to be so integrated again with the US. It’s all very sad
English
@EddyM982 @IngrahamAngle So, you choose annexation with the EU? That makes zero sense.
English
Apparently Canada intends to become a province of Europe.
Clash Report@clashreport
Canadian PM Mark Carney: It’s my strong personal view that the international order will be rebuilt — but it will be rebuilt out of Europe.
English
@KeeganMatheson Why didn’t he make the managers decision to pinch hit for him
English
More from Heineman on being lifted today by Schneider:
"That at-bat was pretty trash. I popped up on a pitch I should have drove. I've been pretty crappy the past 10 games or so. He probably saw something he shouldn't have saw or that I did wrong. He made a decision." #BlueJays
English
@richarddeitsch What is there method for making these valuations? I would like to see the business case to justify these numbers. All the power to them if these values are right but how a league that produced 200 mill in total rev last year can have team values that high doesn’t add up
English
If they were opening up shares for people, I would legit throw $250,000 into the Toronto Tempo and check back in 5-7 years. Because I’d bet it will be worth close to 1M or more.
Kurt Badenhausen@kbadenhausen
New @Sportico WNBA team values. ▪️@valkyries #1 for the 2nd straight year ▪️Avg value: $427 million, up 59% vs last year ▪️Avg up 345% from 2024 ▪️Total 2025 revenue: $410 million ▪️Atlanta Dream at $280 million are the cutoff. ATL value is up 409% in 2 years. Full list: wp.me/pc2RuA-1lz1S3
English
@MoeSquare @JeffVeillette If you think he has the bona fides then you might be right to expect growth and improvement. A perfect example is Alex Anthopolous who struck out badly in his first attempt to reshape the jays in ‘13 but learned, improved and became a top GM
English
@JeffVeillette I think the argument for Chayka is you're hoping his 2nd GM run is better cause of experience from being insanely young the 1st time (sort of similar to Dubas). It's not really convincing though
English
I get people are trying to put a positive spin on reports but it's wild how many things people are inventing to give credit to Chayka for right now
ARI had one of the weakest offensive d-corps in the league and even towards the end of his tenure they weren't a good in transition
James@SportsDataQuest
English
@rin1786768 @KellenDB @Sportsnet In this situation with the puck lying flat the only optical illusion from the net cam would be that the puck may look like it’s touching the line when it’s passed because the top of the puck is higher than the ice. Again it only reinforces a goal
English
@gen_x4ever @KellenDB @Sportsnet If the camera is further away from the crease, along the ice=>x-axis- the puck will appear less in the net than it really is. The opposite happens if the camera gets closer to the crease, wrt the ice.
English
Did some AI puck-tracking on that controversial Oilers/Ducks call. As an Oilers fan it pains me to say it, but the math doesn't lie — it's a goal. By 3 pixels. @Sportsnet
English
@RUseriouzzzz @JeremyBranham @ScootsyQ Sorry my bad. There is a parallax argument wrt the hockey game a couple of nights ago. Responded in the wrong thread
English
1. 100% foul
2. Definitely foul enough to where it’s a horrible call.
3. Approaches become drastically different with an out here so you can’t possibly determine that outcome.
AJ Cassavell@AJCassavell
1. Probably foul. 2. Not as definitively foul as everyone seems to think. If any part of the ball is hanging over fair territory, it’s fair. 3. If you play the inning out, with Miller getting an out here, he still allows a run. So, in theory, this call didn’t quash the streak.
English
@JeremyBranham @pablofdza The parallax effect makes you perceive the object is further from the camera. The issues in the past involved cameras pointing towards the net. In this case the camera was behind the net and any parallax effect would mean the puck travelled further in the net than perceived
English
@pablofdza Yep, that's what I'm saying.
The replay is from a bad angle, so the parallax effect disputes it's pertinence.
English
Jomboy consistently proving they don't know ball.
Jomboy Media@JomboyMedia
why was this called a fair ball
English
@JeremyBranham @ScootsyQ My god you can’t be this gullible. The camera is behind the puck not in front of it. The parallax effect makes you perceive the object is further away from the camera. Therefore any parallax effect would mean the puck actually travelled closer to the camera and more in the net
English
@ScootsyQ But the parallax effect discredits that angle.
x.com/MarkCamperell/…
Mark 🏕erell, CAS MPSE@MarkCamperell
@AJCassavell It’s so easy to demonstrate.
English
@iioxzy @CoreyClayton @DixonSeider557 @reporterchris Yes there is a minor effect but it causes you to perceive the puck is further away from the camera. Therefore any effect would mean the puck actually travelled further into the net than perceived by the eye
English
@CoreyClayton @DixonSeider557 @reporterchris No there’s a slight angle on the camera just by a couple degree and although it’s not a ball the red paint is inches below the ice which mean the puck doesn’t actually sit on the red so viewing it at a slight angle will also cause a parallax effect.
English
@FreedomEagleAB @V_kalia95 @SportsnetSpec 100% correct. People are comparing this to camera angles in front of the net. The parallax angle effect makes objects seem further away from the camera side. In this case if it seems in by the eye the parallax effect only brings it more into the net
English
@V_kalia95 @SportsnetSpec Oooh science. Except with the puck, not the red line as the foreground object in this case, the parallax angle is minimizing just how far the puck is over the line. Good goal. Cry more.
English
Folks, the puck was over the line.
If this happened for your team, and they said “no goal” you’d be apoplectic.
English
@goalfarabee86 The parallax angle effect means the object is closer to the camera side than perceived by the eye. In this case any effect would mean the puck was actually closer to the camera this FURTHER in the net
English
There is only one conclusive angle in these 4 pictures. It was the one that was called a goal
The parallax effect is real and causes problems for sport officials on a daily basis. No different here
Mike@mikethefanatic
Leafs ‘23 - No Goal Flames ‘04 - No Goal Oilers ‘17 - No Goal Ducks ‘26 - Goal Funny how the 3 Canadian team goals were called back/waived off yet the American team’s goal is deemed a good goal … (I think they got the call right tonight) Makes ya wonder …
English
@rin1786768 @KellenDB @Sportsnet The parallax angle effect only serves to make the puck closer to the camera than what is perceived by the eye. In this case any optical illusions from a puck on its edge would actually make the puck further in the net than perceived
English
@KellenDB @Sportsnet I disagree, in order for this to be accurate at these levels we need the exact angle of the camera to 3 decimals. The lack of precision of the parallax is the reason 12th century man could not detect the angle the earth moved 6 months later with the angle of the stars.
English
@Expos_2020 @BizNasty2point0 @spittinchiclets You can leave your feet in the follow through. It’s almost impossible in an open ice hit to keep your blades on the ice throughout the contact. What you can’t do is launch yourself like a missle to make a hit
English
@BizNasty2point0 @spittinchiclets He left his feet it’s not clean when you do that going fit head shot
English
Holy shit Slaf just got rocked by Mac Truck. Looked clean to me. Elbow tucked.
English
@stefanmaga2026 @GuntherEagleman Other countries leaders tend to follow their countries laws. That’s why Trump loves dictators who don’t have to give a damn about theirs or anyone else’s laws
English
@GuntherEagleman He’s right other countries would never let this happen to them.
English
🚨 TRUMP CALLS OUT THE $159 BILLION SCREW-UP
President Trump just unloaded on a ridiculous Supreme Court decision on tariffs:
“People and Companies that have taken advantage of our Country for decades… are now supposed to be given back 159 Billion Dollars.
All they had to do was one little half sentence… and our Country would be 159 Billion Dollars richer. That’s more than most Countries are worth!”
Trump is right, this is insane!
English
@ReaLPatriot2U @GuntherEagleman The justices are not activists they just followed the law. If you want to blame someone start with Trump, who cuts so many corners that he ends up going in circles
English
This all falls upon Supreme Court Justices who have chosen to be activists advancing their own agenda on the bench.
We need to start naming names and investigating our Supreme Court justices. They are compromised. They are committing criminal acts against We the People of the United States of America.
Damnit Do Something! 😡🇺🇲
English
@realspecialboy1 @GuntherEagleman American consumers eventually paid through higher prices but the American corporate importers paid the actual tariff bill to the treasury. The corporations get the money back and the average guy gets screwed. Classic Trump
English
@GuntherEagleman Where did the $159 billion originally come from? And where is it headed back to?
English
@LongAndOrder @GuntherEagleman You also had virtually no middle class before you passed income tax but who cares about details
English
@GuntherEagleman Okay hear me out.. America had no income tax for 137 years… then they passed income tax for “the rich” now 113 years later we are all paying it..
That should have been the real “STOP THE STEAL” movement.
English