Heather

@RedMags60 @BettsCaro @EDIQuestions I understand this stance. To me it is more prescribed than observed, but anything to get gender identity and ideology discredited is a win in my book.

@heathbohm @BettsCaro @EDIQuestions I don’t accept gender norms exist.

Dear Idiots, This is a black, gender non-conforming lesbian boxer You have entirely avoided every point we have made because you know, as we do, that Nicola is female and Imane is male Journalists: do better

@MrsMelD82 @realRenegadeTV @JayTC53 God Bless You 💗

If everything you say is true, the defense can present it with the actual witnesses and evidence rather than hearsay, anonymous sources, and podcasters pretending to be forensic experts. You haven’t even heard the case be presented yet with the full load of evidence (600,000 pieces sent in discovery) but you’ve come up with every theory you can to create reasonable doubt anyway from things that will likely be answered at trial. For all you know they have video of him on the roof taking the shot, they have his GPS putting him on campus and where he stashed the rifle, his parents and his boyfriend/roommate statements to police, etc. We know for sure they have a palm print, forearm print, and shoe print from the roof that match Tyler. If it’s his family’s DNA on the rifle that would be expected since it’s been in the family for decades, his prints are on the spent cartridge and the unfired casings found with the rifle and at his apartment, with engraving, used targets from target practice at the apartment, etc. They have so much video evidence and literally everyone I’ve seen who witnessed it (dozens of interviews) tells the same story and believes it was a gunshot that came from the roof. I’ve heard audio from people who were recording from an elevated position on campus and it sounds exactly like a rifle and everyone recoiled, 4D models have been done showing the only possible trajectory was from that spot on the roof. There’s a lot of evidence the public doesn’t even know about. It’s frustrating to hear people say they have no evidence when there’s so much that the defense is asking for 6 more months to review it all, and they list the parents and roommates as people they will have testifying for the prosecution. I bet we’ve seen 2% of the evidence they will present in court. All they have to show in a charging document is probable cause to arrest and try him. They don’t lay out the entire case there, and they don’t reveal almost anything to the public or it will complicate Tyler’s due process and right to a fair trial and impartial jury. All of this extra investigating being done by podcasters who are not trained investigators and one who is way too close to the victim and a certain outcome, should all be done after the trial if there are unanswered questions. Otherwise people are just speculating and filling in blanks with unknowns. The number of anonymous sources is concerning because we don’t know who these people are, if they are who they say they are, let alone know what they say they know, and we the public do not get to vet them or hear their testimony for ourselves. Pretty much any source that is unnamed or anonymous is not trustworthy in my opinion. If they want to go on record and be vetted then great. Lastly on the bomb dogs- first, we don’t even know if that’s true because it came from an unnamed source, and if you do any research on them you’ll see that they are not trained to smell metal, only explosives. So they would only detect a gun that had just been fired (not many hours later) due to the scent of gun powder. They are not gun-sniffing dogs, which is something else entirely. So take that as you wish but there’s no proof that happened let alone meaning anything if it did.

No, Candace Owens was not "Right" Since, nobody cares to read the Daily Mail article. It's Robinson's defense team trying to get him off, it's not news worthy. It's extremely common to have inconclusive results about 50% of murder cases detectives cannot find a bullet match. All you people are doing is helping Charlie's murderer's defense by acting like this proves his innocence. It doesn't. It's disgusting.

@SaveUSAKitty @dbongino Even saying the word bullet is misinformation, because all they had are fragments. And once it fragments, you almost certainly cannot tie it to a certain gun. This is typical. So misleading.

Dan Bongino @dbongino on last night’s despicable Daily Mail Charlie Kirk clickbait piece: BONGINO: “I mean, again, one of the most disgusting things I've seen in a long time… Number one, the headline of the piece, which is clearly rage bait and clickbait, is completely inaccurate and is debunked by Melissa Koenig, this absolute imbecile, in her own piece… They're not even close. The Daily Mail must know this. This Melissa Koenig may not be intelligent. I don't know her, but she can't be that dumb. She got your clicks. That's all that matters, man. Young man murdered on camera. He's got kids and a wife, ah, whatever, you got your clicks. I hope you're happy, Daily Mail, Melissa Koenig… The people out there trying to contaminate this are doing it clearly with intent here.”

@drones4usa @Corey17761988 @misfitpatriot_ Nothingburger. All you’re proving is that you yourself will ignore scads of credible and overwhelming evidence so you can continue to distrust the government. There’s no amount of evidence on Tyler Robinson that could get you to believe it at this point. That’s just denial.

@heathbohm @Corey17761988 @misfitpatriot_ Psst, Heather. Do you still believe the 1”official government explanation of JFK’s murder? The same one that they keep records hidden on until this day. That is who you are defending. They don’t have a great track record.

I guess we’re still doing this… Is it October of last year, again? Because I’m debunking the same retarded Charlie Kirk conspiracy theory, again… Someone get my spray bottle.

@Lisakcx0 @NJBeisner With all due respect, you may think you’re helping, but you’re not the investigation, and there are no credible leads with what Candace is doing. She’s great at leading people down conspiracy theories though. Do you forget that she’s implicating Erika?

@heathbohm @NJBeisner Hi Heather, I’m saying I don’t understand why Erika doesn’t want everyone’s help.

They don’t have evidence. They don’t have certainty. What they do have is the confidence to publicly mock a widow anyway. That’s not justice. That’s rot.

@Hokuto_Ide @TopTrendingBuzz Amen, brother 🙏

@TopTrendingBuzz Jesus Christ is the only way to salvation. No other name.

この投稿もアメリカまで届くのかな？ ハロー。アメリカの皆さん。私は日本で人口1％しかない宗教マイノリティーのキリスト教徒の1人です。 クリスチャントゥデイというメディアの編集長をしています。 よろしくお願いします。

@thelettuce @wokeandwoofing Oh yeah, I remember that

@wokeandwoofing Am upset at this because didn't Biden announce Easter Sunday was actually one of these trans days?

Tommorow is 'Trans Day of Visibility', which should not be confused with 'Trans Day of Remembrance', which is part of 'Transgender Awareness Week' nor with the 'Trans March of Visibility', which is part of 'Trans Pride' which is in June, if you are in the USA, or July if you are England, except if you are from Manchester, in which case there is a separate event in August. None of these should not be confused with Non-Binary People’s Day (July 14th) or 'International Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia & Biphobia' which is in May, or 'Trans Pride Walk', which is in August. All of which are separate from 'LGBT History Month' in October or February, depending where you live. So please do spend tommorow paying attention to Trans folx, because they get almost no publicity.

@Sandybeechbum @WomanWhoSaysNo @wokeandwoofing And people are trying to unexist them all the time, which is different than unaliving, because it is erasing them entirely.

@WomanWhoSaysNo @wokeandwoofing Why should trans identifying people allow women to have a whole month to themselves? Trans identifying people are so invisible all year that the whole year every year is dedicated to making them visible... That's how invisible they are.

@Fredayesthatone @wokeandwoofing What could be more important to occupy your mind than your self-identity?

@wokeandwoofing Sounds like you’re preoccupied by it and it’s taking up the whole of your mind which less space it isn’t very large to begin with. Try not to burn yourself out.

@RedMags60 @BettsCaro @EDIQuestions She is beautiful, but aren’t dykes by definition gender non-conforming? That’s not an insult. There are still gender norms, but they don’t define your sex.

@BettsCaro @EDIQuestions Tbh I don’t even see her as ‘ gender non-conforming’. She’s just a beautiful dyke in a nice suit.

@pr0truth @QuothByRaven @KanekoaTheGreat That is an interesting find. It does say at the beginning of the article that the rifle was already found and that this dog tracked the shooter’s path. Unless I’m misreading this.

@heathbohm @QuothByRaven @KanekoaTheGreat They did have dogs there looking for the suspect ca.news.yahoo.com/fbi-recovers-r…

What a misleading headline from The Daily Mail. The ATF ran a tool mark analysis on a bullet jacket fragment recovered from Charlie's autopsy. The result was "inconclusive" — not "no match." The jacket was too fragmented to compare, which also partially explains the lack of an exit wound. The bullet shattered on impact. "Inconclusive" means insufficient evidence to draw any conclusion. It doesn't mean the bullet "did NOT match" the rifle like the headline says. The defense wants to use "inconclusive" as exculpatory evidence — but the prosecution wants to run chemical or molecular analysis comparing the jacket alloy to ammunition recovered with the gun. Unlike tool mark analysis, it doesn't require an intact bullet. The defense is trying to block that testing from happening. That's the nuance of the real story.

@pr0truth @QuothByRaven @KanekoaTheGreat That’s great. If you’ll notice, I’m just asking questions and I didn’t make some definite claim here. I’m glad you’re verifying. I can get caught up too. But overconfident and unverified claims run rampant. And the trial and 4000 pieces of evidence have not all been revealed yet.

@heathbohm @QuothByRaven @KanekoaTheGreat You don’t want to show unreasonable bias, do you? Just trying to prod people back from their overconfident positions I don't and I will heed your advice...I'm currently in the process of confirming if there is written report of said 'bomb dogs' Thank you

@pr0truth @QuothByRaven @KanekoaTheGreat It’s confirmation bias and relying on unverified information in the first place. I try to rely on what’s being reported. You should read the summary if you didn’t. You don’t want to show unreasonable bias, do you? Just trying to prod people back from their overconfident positions

@heathbohm @QuothByRaven @KanekoaTheGreat Logic would tell me when they were looking for the murder weapon in a 'bushy' area, they would 'naturally' deploy the dogs that are built for this kinda work, but really what do I know.. But again, i'm using logic.

@pr0truth @QuothByRaven @KanekoaTheGreat I’m not saying I know what certainly happened (you are), but there is reasonable doubt to your explanation. And there’s no reported dogs used. You didn’t address that. x.com/i/grok/share/2…

@heathbohm @QuothByRaven @KanekoaTheGreat It wasn't dense or wooded and the dogs missed the gun...multiple times....They wouldn't have missed a freshly fired shot gun Heather. And the jury knows it

@pr0truth @QuothByRaven @KanekoaTheGreat There has been no public report of bomb dogs being employed. And if they were, it’s not guaranteed they’d be familiar with firearms and in particular this weapon. And dense and wooded areas makes that even more difficult. It’s no fireproof example of conspiracy, even if used.

@heathbohm @QuothByRaven @KanekoaTheGreat And the bomb dogs missed the 'smoking gun' hiding in the bush right???? Even the dogs knew

@QuothByRaven @KanekoaTheGreat Whoa, whoa, whoa. It doesn’t imply all that. Ask grok if a bullet that fragments can usually or ever be attributed to a certain gun.

@KanekoaTheGreat Legally, it means they cannot prove that gun shot that bullet. No match.. inconclusive... either way, there is no ballistic evidence to support the claim that Charlie was killed by a bullet from that gun.

@Corey17761988 @misfitpatriot_ “Woman” 🙃 your mind is not open past your own limited experience. You have shown that. You consider yourself the top of expertise and experience. It’s Dunning-Kruger. Pride cometh before the fall.

@heathbohm @misfitpatriot_ I have an open mind as well! And most importantly I have a very experienced mind when it comes to this issue! So woman please stop, you have no clue what you're talking about

@DontInfringeMe @Corey17761988 @misfitpatriot_ @grok Yes, not anymore.

@heathbohm @Corey17761988 @misfitpatriot_ Anybody can ask grok. @grok, please comment on this debate.

@Corey17761988 @misfitpatriot_ I have not. But I have an open mind, listening ears, discernment, and I’m not tainted by bias. I could be on a jury just like anyone could be. It doesn’t matter that I haven’t shot an animal. I’ve shot a rifle before, but it terrifies me. It’s a jury you have to convince.

@heathbohm @misfitpatriot_ Woman have you ever shot an animal with a high powered rifle? From 150 yards? Which is a very close shot by the way.

@Brii_8808 @Politicaloutle1 @misfitpatriot_ That’s exactly right. There is plenty of evidence already, and we await the trial, and hopefully justice is served.

@heathbohm @Politicaloutle1 @misfitpatriot_ Yea… just like y’all think y’all “know”…. We think we “know”… just gotta wait n see what evidence arise 😂