FrenFromFrens
1.2K posts


@tsoding If anyone wants suggestions on how to improve in math, what are your suggestions? books/tutorials lists will be?
English

🇨🇳 To nie jest ludzie kolano i skóra.. chińska firma UBTech pokazała roboty UWORLD U1, które wyglądają jak prawdziwi ludzie.
Urządzenia posiadają syntetyczną, bioniczną skórę, linie papilarne, naczynia krwionośne, 88 stopni swobody (Degrees of Freedom – DoF). W robotyce oznacza to liczbę niezależnych osi ruchów i przegubów, którymi maszyna może samodzielnie sterować. Posiadają też zaawansowane modele językowe AI rozpoznające ponad 20 ludzkich emocji.
Roboty zostały stworzone wyłącznie jako inteligentni towarzysze i asystenci rozmów np. dla osób starszych. Nie potrafią one wykonywać ciężkich prac domowych, sprzątać, chodzić po schodach ani pełnić funkcji intymnych.
Choć zebrano już ponad 13 tysięcy zamówień przedpremierowych, urządzenia są na razie sprzedawane wyłącznie na rynku chińskim, a pierwsze dostawy zaplanowano na połowę września 2026 rok
W linii produktowej dostępne są wersje zarówno męskie, jak i żeńskie.
Zaawansowany, pełen model można kupić już teraz w cenie od 130 000 dolarów.
Polski

@The_1_Reborn_ @Pies_of_Lee why start that kind of war in the first place?
English

If I gave you a test in a language you've never been introduced to how well would you perform?
Probably not well.
Would that performance indicate that you lack general reasoning capabilities?
Now that AGI is here it seems that we're resorting to giving AIs tests far beyond what a human would be capable of and then calling them not AGI once they "fail".
Hilarious.
English

Perhaps AGI is not imminent after all.
Lossfunk@lossfunk
🚨 Shocking: Frontier LLMs score 85-95% on standard coding benchmarks. We gave them equivalent problems in languages they couldn't have memorized. They collapsed to 0-11%. Presenting EsoLang-Bench. Accepted to the Logical Reasoning and ICBINB workshops at ICLR 2026 🧵
English


@FanboyBob @RealPostFolder but you don't know shit or care about art whatsoever, why won't you just go back to your denoised slop anime waifu?
English

@RealPostFolder Dammit. I was beginning to think I'd finally gotten this retarded meme filtered out of my feed.
English

hi, im from poland and the answer to this question is no, we all hate americans
Sammy Pate@PatesamSammy
@TheLiberal_ie Does Poland welcome American tourists?
English

@Codie_Sanchez Don't they teach circuits and electronics in computer science programs? The transition should be quite easy.
English

@prasenx you helping your mom with garden is more meaningful than this guy's entire career.
English

co-founder of YouTube is saying this btw

Chad Hurley@Chad_Hurley
Hope everyone enjoys their last year of meaningful work!
English

@jrouldz @aivainvesting @gnoble79 Nobody? What about Sam Altman and alike? They won't shut up about AGI and all the sci-fi nonsense that is "just around the corner"
English

@aivainvesting @gnoble79 Not what I’m saying at all
More like. nobody knows what will happen in future, and anyone who claims they do is just farming your attention/engagement with sensationalism presented as alpha
English

In 45 years on Wall Street, I've never seen anything like this.
Sam Altman just convinced 3 of the world's smartest investors to fund his losses.
$110 billion. But ZERO profit in sight.
The largest private funding round in history.
Let me explain why this is borderline criminal & what you have to understand as an investor:
Amazon. Nvidia. SoftBank.
3 of the world's most sophisticated investors just handed OpenAI $110 billion at an $840 billion valuation.
That's more than double the $40 billion OpenAI raised last year.
For context: all US venture capital combined invested $170 billion into American startups in all of 2023.
Altman just raised 65% of that. Alone. In one round.
And the company STILL isn't profitable.
Let's look at the actual numbers:
OpenAI burned $8 billion in 2025. They project burning $17 billion in 2026. $35 billion in 2027. $47 billion in 2028.
Cumulative losses before any projected path to profitability: over $115 billion.
Meanwhile, Amazon's $50 billion comes with strings attached. $35 billion is contingent on OpenAI either achieving AGI or completing its IPO by year end.
Read that again.
$35 billion is conditioned on ACHIEVING AGI.
They're literally writing checks against a scientific breakthrough that may not happen on any predictable timeline.
This is what peak cycle financing looks like.
The circular logic every investor should understand:
Amazon invests $50 billion in OpenAI.
OpenAI commits to spending $100 billion on Amazon Web Services.
Nvidia invests $30 billion.
OpenAI commits to buying 3 gigawatts of Nvidia compute.
These aren't arms-length investments. They're vendor financing dressed up as venture capital.
Amazon and Nvidia are essentially paying OpenAI to buy their own products.
The $840 billion valuation prices in a future that doesn't exist yet.
At $13 billion in 2025 revenue, that's 65x revenue.
Even in 2021 - the most speculative bubble in recent tech history - Snowflake peaked at 50-80x revenue.
And Snowflake was actually profitable.
J.P. Morgan calculates that the AI industry needs $650 billion in annual revenue just to generate a 10% return on total infrastructure buildout.
The entire industry currently generates a fraction of that.
I've seen cycles my entire 45-year career.
The 1980s defense build-up. The dot-com bubble. The 2008 mortgage machine.
The pattern is always the same:
When the biggest players start financing each other's growth through circular investment structures, you're not witnessing a revolution...
You're watching the LAST PHASE of a credit cycle.
Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said OpenAI is going to be "one of the very big winners long term."
Maybe.
But $840 billion assumes they've already won.
Stock prices follow earnings. Always have. Always will.
And right now, OpenAI's earnings are deeply, structurally, massively negative.
The IPO is coming. The hype will peak. And the question every serious investor needs to answer is simple:
At what price does this actually make sense?
Sam Altman doesn’t know either - he just keeps raising money faster than he can burn it.
This can’t end well.
English

@Toadsanime Why is AI kinder than humans?
English

Watch this short documentary about how AI tech is making people more isolated and lonely, and prioritising fake AI relationships over real ones + their own health...
...kidding! It's actually an ad for that very product, somehow.
Avi@AviSchiffmann
User Interview #3
English

@SoonMrWick @PBanpoys @ZackMorrison18 @thedorbrothers who gives a fuck about algorithm? What are you, some kind of algorithm slave?
English

@PBanpoys @ZackMorrison18 @thedorbrothers It's bait to provoke engagement. He took the bait. It's not a hard concept.
Now you're here further commenting on it so it's still filling the role it was supposed to for the algorithm.
English

Here we go again...
I'm Professor Zack, welcome back to Directing 1 at Your State U's Art School. Today we're taking a look at @thedorbrothers' piece, "Logan Paul: The Good Guy."
First, what gives you the impression this costs $300M? This isn't Avatar, Star Wars, or Marvel.
The Dor Brothers@thedorbrothers
We made a $300,000,000 movie starring @LoganPaul with AI in less than 7 days. Yes, this is 100% AI.
English

@AztecEmpire1520 It’s like imagine some guy in the 90s walking into an Italian restaurant with his friends, holding a VHS camcorder, and just starts filming while proudly announcing he’s making a multimillion dollar next Godfather movie.
🤣
English

This is the most awful portrayal of Aztecs and Conquistadors that I have ever seen. And I’ve seen some absolutely ridiculous depictions of this subject over the decades.
Congratulations?🏆
Isaac Rodriguez@isaachorror
I Made a multi-million dollar Aztec film at home with Seedance 2. The hype is real! Historical filmmaking will never be the same. Thank you to @YouArtStudio for the early access!
English

@jawwwn_ @peterthiel @cowenconvos Closed self-referential systems with known axioms like math and chess are over.
Open systems with unknown axioms like physics and art are safe for now.
English

If you do not set up your OpenClaw correctly, it's going to SUCK
It will do tasks poorly, not remember anything, and not be proactive
Here are the 5 things you need to do right away to turn your OpenClaw into AGI (demos of each in the video below)
1. Brain dump: your OpenClaw won't know how to accomplish your goals for you, if it doesn't know your goals
If you haven't yet, you want to tell your OpenClaw:
• Your interests
• Your career
• Your goals
• Your ambitions
• Anything personal
Do this, and your Claw will have the context to be SUPER powerful for you
2. Connect your tools
Your OpenClaw can basically use almost every tool you use on your computer
You just need to ask it to
Ask your OpenClaw to connect to any tools you use daily, and it will just figure out how to do it. Then create a skill for it
I have it check my Things 3 todo list every morning and complete any tasks it can
3. Build a Mission Control
Your mission control is just a hub for your OpenClaw to build custom tooling
Ask your OpenClaw to build a Mission Control using NextJS
Then anytime your bot doesn't have the tool available to do a task, have it build it in your Mission Control
4. Mission Statement
Your OpenClaw needs a mission statement
This is the one sentence statement that will be the north star for every single thing it does
It should be based on your goals and ambitions.
My Claw's mission statement is "“An autonomous organization of AI agents that does work for me and produces value 24/7”
Make your own and have your Claw put it at the top of your Mission Control. Now every task your Claw does will take you closer to this statement
5. Make it proactive
Your OpenClaw won't be proactive unless you set those expectations with it
Tell your Claw you want it to do a task every night at 2am that brings you one step closer to your mission statement
Now every morning you'll wake up and it will do something that surprises you and helps bring you closer to your goals
Do these 5 things and your OpenClaw will be 10000x more powerful
English














