kosh_

43.1K posts

kosh_ banner
kosh_

kosh_

@kosh_1

there is no other.

beside myself. Katılım Kasım 2011
693 Takip Edilen866 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
kosh_
kosh_@kosh_1·
@brehonisbest Villiers' boast that it wasn't RUC that "pulled the triggers" at #Loughinisland upholds NIO tradition
kosh_ tweet mediakosh_ tweet mediakosh_ tweet mediakosh_ tweet media
English
3
1
4
0
kosh_
kosh_@kosh_1·
@HendrickD82 @Dhlfc8 As a captain, it looks like Virgil's been doing that since September/October. He could try holding a back-line, tracking attackers in the 6 yard box, and do his own job before pointing at others.
English
0
0
0
43
Minnesota Sports Fan
Minnesota Sports Fan@HendrickD82·
@Dhlfc8 They played a part in getting the manager sacked. And Rafa was rightly sacked in 2010 btw.
English
1
0
0
894
kosh_
kosh_@kosh_1·
@Gandalf_LFC "I still don’t think...” Carragher should have stopped there. He spouts whatever gets him attention, spit or bile. Now slobbering over Jordan Henderson, who had 'values' until he got a better offer.
English
0
0
0
98
Marta Havryshko
Marta Havryshko@HavryshkoMarta·
Estonia continues its new "tradition". What could be more effective in peace efforts than fake historical analogies and a bit of good old-fashioned history abuse?
Marta Havryshko tweet media
English
26
14
128
2.7K
kosh_
kosh_@kosh_1·
@JohnCleese "War reveals the essence of ourselves..." The essence of Douglas Murray appears to be conjuring up psychopathic rape-murder fantasies to thrill the bedwetters of Western Civ, over coffee. "Thank you, Douglas Murray." ☕️
kosh_ tweet mediakosh_ tweet mediakosh_ tweet media
English
0
0
4
62
kosh_
kosh_@kosh_1·
@pickwickpick 'we' don't listen; 'we' don't take responsibility; 'we' lament predictable outcomes as 'tragedy'. 'We' know this was anticipated as a benefit in 2014: To 'forge a nation' as an EU/NATO proxy; conscripting men and exporting women and children as livestock. x.com/kosh_1/status/…
kosh_@kosh_1

@rochowanski It was always the aim. "…look at the demographic projections for western Europe's ageing population. We'll need those young Ukrainians sooner than you think, if we are to pay our pensions, maintain economic growth and defend our way of life in a post-western world." —TGA, 2014

English
0
0
0
7
kosh_
kosh_@kosh_1·
@rochowanski 'befallen' obscures those who imposed this 'tragedy' as the cost of nation-building and securing a patron/proxy relationship with the EU and NATO. This is how Faustian pacts work. South Vietnam's a loose analogy, the proxy that decimated its people, then abandoned to collapse.
English
0
0
3
232
kosh_ retweetledi
kosh_
kosh_@kosh_1·
@IrishRedDevil76 Doomer loyalism high on expressive AI is, erm, iconic. Symbolic disorder writ-large. Unless the 3 lads are off to support Pakistan against England in a test match. 🏏
English
0
0
0
78
James Myles
James Myles@IrishRedDevil76·
What the hell is wrong with these people?🤷‍♂️
James Myles tweet media
English
25
7
80
7.9K
kosh_
kosh_@kosh_1·
@AlessandraAster it's licencing *equivocation* between sex and a more malleable and inclusive term, 'gender', something entailing 'recognition' in law and beyond. But that doesn't make things equal or equivalent, they're obviously not so it entails misrecognition, e.g. 'female-coded' pronouns.
English
0
0
1
94
Alessandra Asteriti 𒊩
Alessandra Asteriti 𒊩@AlessandraAster·
How can the GRA allow the recognition of gender in law without defining what gender is? What exactly is the law recognising?
English
16
23
102
1.5K
kosh_
kosh_@kosh_1·
Europe looked the other way as it slipped over the event horizon. Within a week new freikorps went to the eastern front, storming Mariupol to put down Russian separatists who'd rejected the February coup. Ukraine as a state was over, civil war and proxy war beckoned.
Marta Havryshko@HavryshkoMarta

2 May 2026. While neo-Nazis and all kinds of self-proclaimed "patriots" celebrate their so-called ‘Shashlik Day,’ mocking the victims of the Odesa tragedy, ordinary residents of Odesa quietly carry flowers to the site where people lost their lives—victims not only of fire and violence, but of the reckless games and cynical manipulations of irresponsible politicians. RIP.

English
0
0
0
27
kosh_
kosh_@kosh_1·
@NoSecretLessons @jamiezerofour @LoudBonnet Chairing a 'Sex and Gender Law Association' (SaGLA) seems a natural progression after stepping aside from Sex Matters. The dual identity of trustee and barrister became untenable. Even absurd when relying on Sex Matters as experts on GC 'belief' in court. x.com/kosh_1/status/…
kosh_ tweet mediakosh_ tweet mediakosh_ tweet media
kosh_@kosh_1

@HJoyceGender "3. I don't know who paid..." That's because it's 'dark money', “from an organisation that wishes to remain in the background”. Why pretend otherwise? Yes, NC identifies as a barrister in court. Even when handing Sex Matters literature to a witness and asking them to debate it.

English
0
0
2
45
Clare Page : No Secret Lessons
Clare Page : No Secret Lessons@NoSecretLessons·
Well it isn’t the ‘law as it is today’ - it’s the law before the Supreme Court ruling. SI they’re already out of date. And ‘disadvantage herself in the workplace…’? That really says it all. There are girls of barely twenty lined up to have their breasts sliced off in British hospitals as we speak… after being ideologically and sometimes even physically separated from their parents by gender ideologues in schools, social services and the NHS. And there are young lads risking getting breast cancer by shovelling cross sex hormones into themselves after being groomed online by middle-aged male addicts of sissy porn. All thanks to the EA2010. Our public services, the civil service, charities, corporate HR departments, universities and the arts have been awash with gender ideology, LGBT totalitarianism and outright bullying ever since gender laws arrived. Personally, I will never be likely to work again in the creative industries I once loved being part of, following taking a stand against indoctrination in my daughter’s schools, and I know umpteen people who have been sacked or pushed out of jobs or left because it is a toxic environment. The only people who are doing fantastically well out of this are gender lawyers - on either side. So are you seriously suggesting we should be worried about whether NC can stay at the forefront of her high earning career by joining a law society that in it’s very name anticipates that ‘gender’ will be part of our legal system long into the future and that ‘sex’ has no fixed meaning in law - and thus, by default, the whole English language? This thought frankly epitomises everything that is wrong with our society today. So to answer you very directly - yes! Yes I really do believe people should put the truth, justice and child safeguarding before their own careers. And they should demonstrate their upmost contempt for this association by refusing to take part in it. And they should use their high profile positions to say outright to politicians and the media that no more of these ridiculous legal gender games will be undertaken in their name. And if everyone of NC’s standing did that, we wouldn’t have these abusive laws at all. And this self-interested, indulgent talking-shop where lawyers get to ponder the next fascinating but tragic case they’ll happily dine out on, wouldn’t need to exist.
English
3
7
17
493
Clare Page : No Secret Lessons
Clare Page : No Secret Lessons@NoSecretLessons·
The feminist lawyers have caught up to at least 2018, how very well done. And all by instinct too… And there we were thinking the ‘pronoun police’ should ‘fuck off’… Why not catch up all the way and just call for repeal please ladies? Then we can get on with prohibiting cross sex impersonation and identity fraud in the workplace to keep children and the vulnerable safe.
Naomi Cunningham@LoudBonnet

@SVPhillimore @HJoyceGender My instinct is that there is nothing to gain and much to lose by acting as if there’s something disreputable about accurate language. Even swerving seems to me to lend unmerited credence to the false idea that referring to a man as a man is abusive.

English
4
11
53
3.6K
kosh_
kosh_@kosh_1·
@Lambikins67 @NoSecretLessons it's a theological approach to law, casuistry orbiting around an ineffable subject. Trying to divine "legal meanings & effects" of the paradox created by the GRA and the effects in the EqA, using non-binding tribunals to test cases and establish new meanings and norms.
English
1
0
6
104
Clare Page : No Secret Lessons
Clare Page : No Secret Lessons@NoSecretLessons·
‘Worth watching out for the next case…’ Is it? Really? We’re supposed to sit around with morbid fascination for the next instalment in this torrid, drawn out legal gender games are we… whilst kids get socially transitioned by groomers and confused young adults go under the surgeons knife and teachers get to cross dress in front of their pupils? The only thing worth doing in these circumstances is standing up and saying ‘No! I will not partake in this dangerous sophistry any more’ and campaign for repeal. These lawyers have lost all perspective on reality, they’re so far down the gender rabbit hole.
English
8
2
42
1.4K
kosh_
kosh_@kosh_1·
@ThatAussieWoman @Women___Exist @DJeschin @DavinaDay2 @trudylynch64 Modelling social transition reminds me of the stitch-up among charities and regulators that led to the tyranny of Stonewall and the EHRC. The same insider consensus laying down new 'norms', rolling them into 'rights', shouting down, shaming and excluding awkward 'nobodies'.
English
1
0
4
22
kosh_
kosh_@kosh_1·
@ThatAussieWoman @Women___Exist @DJeschin @DavinaDay2 @trudylynch64 it was in different circumstances but seeking equal rights and liberties for all doesn't seem to occur. Rights and norms regulated by those who'd exempt themselves from rules they litigate for others. Does a classroom assistant make the grade? How do 'norms' impinge on rights?
English
1
0
2
26
Janet Inglis
Janet Inglis@ThatAussieWoman·
We know why a growing number of men are openly wearing their wank wear in public, don't we? We know why they are so emboldened they can lounge at bus stops in daylight wearing the uniform of a school girl, don't we? Why men can so triumphantly sit in a court room wearing fake tits and all the accoutrements of their sexual perversions while claiming to be the victim of harassment? Healthy societies chase these men into the shadows. They don't tolerate their open flaunting of sexual safeguards and society dress codes. They don't champion their right to use their clothing as a ticket into spaces no man should ever enter. Men don't have breasts. Girls school uniforms are not meant to be worn by grown men. It's the sign of a very sick mind for a man to fantasise about having a vagina, menstrual cramps and to be victim of misogyny. But instead of protecting these men and everybody else against their worst excesses our sick society is tolerating, emboldening and championing them above all others. Our resistance to and protections from their sexual degeneracy has been ground down, policed and punished. The social rules restricting public perversions being flaunted have been destroyed with protests of 'But he's not hurting anybody', 'Just don't look at him', 'He's so brave to wear a dress', etc. It's not the dress that's the danger. It's the man inside the dress. The one leering at children. The one we know is getting his sexual thrills at our expense. The one bleating about his clothing choices being policed. A modest knee length dress on a man with fake tits and a wig is just one more red flag. The first women to wear trousers and pants were stunning and brave. They wore then for practical reasons. They risked liberty and physical safety. Men wearing dresses aren't doing so for practical reasons. A few men do it for fashion and vanity. They risk nothing but a few sniggers. But the overwhelming number of men who wear dresses today pair them with their fake tits, long wigs and garish makeup. And they are far less likely to risk social approbrium than ever before thanks to their apologists. These men belong back in the basement. Children and women deserve to be protected from them.
English
46
252
992
17.6K
Janet Inglis
Janet Inglis@ThatAussieWoman·
It's yet another example of 'standards' being imposed on us by the rich and privileged. The men who do this that JKR associates with can afford much better attire, and they move in circles they would be shunned from if they arrived looking like the man in that photo. I have no doubt that if this man turned up looking like that to the JKR yacht with an invitation in hand - he'd be turned away by security before JKR even got a glimpse of him. A man with tastefully coiffed hair, a more modest set of silicone fun bags dressed in a designer gown, and wearing a demure instead of leering expression is a much safer way to display your woke cred. But her security will still keep an eye on him until he leaves the yacht, for reasons that are obvious to all of us. It's only us, the great unwashed, who are expected to deal with the pervert in the photo. And the privileged are leading the way in destroying the only security we have against him. Social opprobrium.
English
3
1
29
747
kosh_
kosh_@kosh_1·
@DaleJohnsonBBC English refereeing is generally poor and quite arbitrary, like changing application of guidance after 3 weeks. Usually driven by media pressure, it's cowardly.
English
0
0
0
98
Dale Johnson
Dale Johnson@DaleJohnsonBBC·
After tonight's handball penalty... A reminder that Roberto Rosetti, Uefa's head of referees, wants there to be a universal application of handball across Europe next season. This isn't going to fly in England. We've tried it once and it lasted a whole three weeks.
English
41
10
183
63.3K
kosh_
kosh_@kosh_1·
@zei_squirrel such a cynical ploy to surface whatever narrative is required from pet sources. certainly not properly-sourced journalism, it's narration by stock characters like the plucky 'activist' or trusted 'medic' to seed narratives that bolster the preferred political position.
English
0
0
3
63
☀️👀
☀️👀@zei_squirrel·
one of the most pathetic deranged genres of propaganda on Iran that gets churned out daily in the NYT, Guardian, BBC, CNN, AP, Reuters are these idiotic vox pops: "hi, I spoke to 5 random Iranians on whatsapp, and here is how 90 million people actually feel based on my chats with these randos who are definitely "Iranians" and willingly searched out a scumfuck Zionist gusano Western media class hack to talk to, which is of course totally representative of the entire population". This isn't journalism. It doesn't even have the pretense of it. It is the most shallow, superficial, simplistic, utterly moronic propaganda slop that would get you fired if you dare suggest it for the US or UK or any other place they consider a real country with real people in it. "Hey I spoke to 5 rando Americans who are my contacts, here is my story on how every American thinks based on a 5 minute whatsapp convo".
English
32
391
1.9K
33.7K
kosh_
kosh_@kosh_1·
@asim_lfc tbf, PSG were getting shredded at the back too, on the counter and in transitions. After Galatasaray, Virgil complained about the risks, so the plan changed to protect the defence and cut the losses. But the defence still couldn't defend under the slightest pressure.
English
0
0
0
201
Asim
Asim@asim_lfc·
Every time I’ve watched PSG this season, I can’t help but think how badly Slot got it wrong in trying to mirror them. He was obsessed but obsession is supposed to get you closer. Giving Gravenberch more freedom was part of this fluidity but the collective drop off eventually ended up with us playing 5 at the back against them with Ekitike at RW. That’s how bad the experiment to become PSG went. #LFC
English
36
54
817
51.9K