l.31 🐎

@GoldenAgeTimes2 @DailyCaller The answer is 30. x.com/MassieforKY/st…

@GoldenAgeTimes2 @DailyCaller

🚨EXCLUSIVE: Republican Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie raised more than $2.5 million in the first quarter of 2026, according to figures shared with the Daily Caller. Of Massie’s 20,665 donors in the first quarter, approximately 76% were first-time contributors while 993 donors from Kentucky contributed a total of $190,399, including 401 from his 4th Congressional District, the figures showed. The first-quarter showing comes as Massie faces a competitive Republican primary on May 19 against former Navy SEAL Ed Gallrein, who has received backing from President Donald Trump. Massie has repeatedly clashed with Trump since the latter’s return to the White House in January 2025. Read more from @BrasfieldAshley below 👇

@bespokeja @SunnySynny77 @mandyarthur @grok Our current involvement is greatly increasing the number of children and babies that are being murdered. Let's first bring our involvement down to zero and then figure out what to do next from there.

@ldv3n @SunnySynny77 @mandyarthur @grok Hmmm. The only problem with that approach is that the children and babies being murdered could not properly be considered to be one side of the "druken" equation here

Hi @grok, if I wanted to boycott the 10 most pro-Israel companies, which companies would those be? Just the list. No explanations.

@glennbeck x.com/robrousseau/st…

Yesterday, I got community noted for saying that I don't remember Lebanon being part of the ceasefire deal. The note stated that “the ceasefire as announced by the Prime Minister of Pakistan does explicitly include Lebanon." So, my team looked into this. What we found was concerning. Yes, Pakistan did say the deal included Lebanon and Israel. But the U.S. and Iran never mentioned either country in their deal announcements, only that the ceasefire would be in Iran, between the U.S. and Iran. Trump also said "everyone knows that" Lebanon wasn't included. Only after that did Iran publicly side with Pakistan about Lebanon. Israel never said it agreed to the deal, only that it "supports President Trump's" version, WITH its own addition that Lebanon wasn't included. That's 3 different versions of the deal. Which version did the U.S. and Iran agree to? Only the negotiators know for sure. So, why is @CommunityNotes taking the word of Pakistan and Iran over America?

@rainer_shea No. Our beliefs are not compatible. x.com/rainer_shea/st…

Now is the moment for Marxists to bring in libertarians, disillusioned MAGA, & the other conservative Americans whose class-consciousness has been growing. We will combine this with an outreach into the Gen Z who’ve been getting radicalized by Gaza, and build a great coalition.

@GoldenAgeTimes2 Only 32 Kentuckians have donated to Ed. Thirty-two. That's roughly the seating capacity of a mid-sized Quiznos.

🚨 BOMBSHELL REPORT: Thomas Massie's in-state financial support is rapidly DECLINING, while out-of-state & leftist financial support is SURGING. This spells trouble for him in May's upcoming primary! It's often brought up that Thomas Massie has a suspiciously small percentage of in-state financial support this election cycle. So, I was curious if it was always this small of a percentage? The answer is NO, & minus his first re-election bid, his in-state financial support has been rapidly declining, especially during the Trump years. Not a good sign for Massie! Percentage of in-state support by cycle: ✔️ 2011-2012: 52% ✔️ 2013-2014: 58% ✔️ 2015-2016: 44% ✔️ 2017-2018: 44% ✔️ 2019-2020: 29% ✔️ 2021-2022: 22% ✔️ 2023-2024: 12% ✔️ 2025-2026 (so far): 5% All of these figures were calculated by Grok, which used sites like OpenSecrets & FEC, where all donor locations are visible. 5% is a really low number, especially for a 6-time incumbent, but I wanted to confirm this is normal, so I asked Grok what the standard average percentage of in-state financial support for incumbent members of Congress. For the 2023-2024 cycle, the House Incumbent average of in-state financial support was 57.72%, while the Senate was 31.72%. You'll also notice the major drop in in-state financial support from the 2017-2018 to the 2019-2020 cycle. In 2019, Thomas Massie voted YES on H. J. Res 46 to overturn President Trump's usage of emergency funds to build the wall at the border. He voted along with a dozen other republicans & the Democrats. Another huge dip occurred during the 2023-2024 cycle, where he endorsed Governor Ron DeSantis over President Trump for President in 2024, then at the last minute, gave Trump a tepid Twitter endorsement, which rubbed people the wrong way, especially since he gave such a loud, glowing endorsement to Ron DeSantis, & all Trump got from him was a Twitter post. Finally, in this current cycle, that 12% dipped to 5%, because he started bucking Trump at every turn when it mattered most, voting against him on important bills like One Big Beautiful Bill, Take it Down Act & other huge bills that involved funding DHS, ICE, & strengthening our border's security. He also aligned with the Squad on a lot of issues, did a lot of leftist media tours, tormenting Trump on X, running around with Ro Khanna, all of which lead to him going from over a decade of receiving ZERO from leftists, to that 0% sharply rising to 79% of his financial donors also backing Democrats or Democrat PACS. I broke the story of the 79% figure on March 1st (screenshot included) , & had to pull the original version of this post, because some loser noted it without reading it, then got Massie Nasties to vote it up. The Daily Caller article was published weeks later. That doesn't make this figure any less correct. This is why Democrats want Massie to stay in his seat, because he does their bidding & he is their top useful idiot. Grok calculated this figure searching through Thomas Massie's donors on OpenSecrets & FEC, where donors' donation histories are publicly available. It's safe to say Thomas Massie is not nearly as popular in his district as X would lead you to believe that he is. He went from over 50% down to 5% during his entire time in Congress. No moneybomb is going to get him out of this hole he dug himself into. Moneybombs are largely for out-of-state donors, who aren't eligible to vote for Thomas Massie in May's upcoming primary.

For the 2025-26 cycle... By share of all individual donations: Thomas Massie: 192 of 2,946 = 6.52% from Kentuckians Ed Gallrein: 32 of 766 = 4.18% from Kentuckians So on the basic count-based read, Massie’s KY share is higher: about 6.5% versus 4.2%. Exactly 6 times as many Kentuckians have donated to Massie as Gallrein. By share of total individual dollars: Massie: $90,691 of $1,742,817 = 5.20% from Kentuckians Gallrein: $32,096.77 of $1,215,512.17 = 2.64% So by dollars, the gap is even wider: Massie 5.2% KY, Gallrein 2.64% KY. So, you were saying?

@hodgetwins Oof. I feel your pain.

Not unless you want to be labeled a Democrat

The Hyatt Hotels chairman resigned over Epstein ties. The MIT Media Lab director resigned over Epstein ties. The JPMorgan CEO of private banking was fired over Epstein ties. But nobody in government has faced a single consequence. Why?

@Ugo1537217 @WhiteHouse @SecWar @DOWResponse Every? That's just stupid.

@WhiteHouse @SecWar @DOWResponse The world is watching

Under the Trump Administration, you will face the consequences of your actions.

@goddek Here's the tell: You can criticize any Jew that is critical of Israel all you want. It isn't about Jewishness. It's about a country.

Whenever I criticize Zelenskyy, I’m called an antisemite, because he’s Jewish. Whenever I criticize Epstein, I’m called an antisemite, because he’s Jewish. Whenever I criticize Netanyahu, I’m called an antisemite, because he’s Jewish. Whenever I criticize Howard Lutnick, I’m called an antisemite, because he’s Jewish. Whenever I criticize Mark Levin, I’m called an antisemite, because he’s Jewish. Whenever I criticize Ben Shapiro, I’m called an antisemite, because he’s Jewish. Whenever I criticize Gad Saad, I’m called an antisemite, because he’s Jewish. So, is there any truly evil scumbag left I can rip into without being accused of antisemitism? Asking for a friend who’s sick of this crap.

@ChrisRossini Israel dictated when it started. And Israel will dictate when it will stop.

Trump was the "15 days to slow the spread" guy. Keep that in mind as he blurts out timelines. Nothing he says should be taken seriously.

@TomasDiziznitch @patthew @KulakMAGAMan @JohnWSCarpente1 @MattWalshBlog "It’d been easier to just answer the question instead of..." making a wild assumption without any evidence whatsoever.

@ldv3n @patthew @KulakMAGAMan @JohnWSCarpente1 @MattWalshBlog So, you don’t want Iran to have nuclear weapons? It’d been easier to just answer the question instead of that weird diatribe.

I can't take the gaslighting, guys. I really can't. Conservatives are now running around saying "Iran has been waging war on us for 47 years." Okay then why didn't any of you call for an attack on Iran at any point until now? Why didn't you make a case for Trump "ending the war, not starting it" until precisely the moment when Trump did it? You and I both know that you are latching onto a talking point you never used until 45 seconds ago. You and I both know that almost every conservative influencer in the business was opposed to war with Iran until just now. And now you're trying to use justifications that stretch back decades. It doesn't make any sense. If you changed your mind, fine. Say so. Explain why. You're allowed to change your mind. I've changed my mind about things. But don't try to rewrite history. Be honest about it. There's too much at stake to play these games.

Then it isn't "peace through strength." It's just war. "If Iran would’ve agreed to the terms..." We, the US government, was just using Israel's terms, which were that Iran essentially demilitarize. Zero missiles. Zero navy. Nothing. We were demanding they tie their hands behind their back. "Why do you want Iran to attain nuclear weapons?" Eh? You retarded? No. Really. Are you fucking retarded?

@ldv3n @patthew @KulakMAGAMan @JohnWSCarpente1 @MattWalshBlog Well, that’s kinda how it works. If Iran would’ve agreed to the terms, this wouldn’t have happened. We tried peace, they refused. Why do you want Iran to attain nuclear weapons?

@TomasDiziznitch @patthew @KulakMAGAMan @JohnWSCarpente1 @MattWalshBlog x.com/MeidasTouch/st…

@patthew @KulakMAGAMan @JohnWSCarpente1 @ldv3n @MattWalshBlog He was the peace through strength candidate. He said that many times.

@zamboni81 @TheFP In their defense, there are a whole lot of really stupid people around.

@TheFP You think we are stupid….

Operation Epic Fury serves American interests, even if the Trump administration is struggling to make the case, writes Haviv Rettig Gur. thefp.com/p/this-isnt-is…

@OunkaOnX When two kindergarteners in Wyoming stop bickering, Trump claims credit and adds it to his "stopped wars" tally. But when Trump drops hundreds of bombs on a country and kidnaps or kills their leader, that's just a "special operation." What's so hard to understand about that?

Mullin: Trump ended eight wars Hunt: He started this one Mullin: This isn’t a war Hunt: The Secretary of Defense, who calls himself the Secretary of War, said today, this is a war The gap between reality and Republican talking points has never been wider-or funnier

Iran has been at "combat operation" with America for 47 years!!!