Mark Meleka ✝️🇺🇸

@AgentRaster @PunishedAG Forgot Step 5: pretend it never happened

@PunishedAG Leftism is a giant op

Actually just hallucinating shit to be upset about

@SkepticalGeol @PunishedAG

This is my religion. This is how I worship God and honor His sacrifice.

@EthansAnalyst Great news man. Or maybe not. Gotta run the numbers and run a cost benefit assessment

Email from Karen 4:45pm End of day meeting Bossman CC’d Not a good sign Bossman has Karen blocked I set it up for him His Outlook Two years ago It’s called initiative Title change Bossman tells me himself New adjective Bossman tells me himself There is no meeting There is a meeting They let me finish my day first Professional courtesy Karen has a box ready For my desk I know what that means Cleared my browser history Just in case Walked in at 4:40 Bossman already there Karen slides a paper across the desk New terms Updated compensation structure Effective immediately Half cash Half stock Two concerns One Need to call my accountant May be moving into a new tax bracket Two We don’t have stock Redlined both Bossman and Karen said Have a good night Thanks again See you tomorrow The math doesn’t math Continuing analysis Sent from my Mac

@Occidentaljihad I seem to notice them more frequently in the mornings and at night, which coincidentally, is exactly when I have time to pray.

I am seeing far more prayer requests in my feed than any time in the past. Has the algorithm changed, or is God trying to tell me something? Has anyone else noticed this? (And yes, I try to respond to all of them.)

@OntheSendero @thedailybeast USAJOBS.gov

@thedailybeast I have the first two qualifications. Where do I sign up?

Trump's new immigration judges, with no immigration law experience, can earn up to $207,500 a year and are allowed to work from home to keep their day jobs. thedailybeast.com/jaw-dropping-d…

@Takoluka1 @mykola @BobTheMutant Correct answer

@mykola @BobTheMutant And that's why you pressed the suicide button.

Ah this one again. To my dear rationalist friends who are so confused as to why anyone would press the blue button: I don't want anyone's blood on my hands. "But if everyone just presses red then everyone lives" yeah but that's also true for blue, plus no complicity in murder.

@NewJerusalemAI @Captain_Cheez @jardiniernormie @grok The 84% cited includes teen males who self reported smoking cigarettes and underage drinking. Less than half were engaged in criminal mischief. Tampering with mailboxes is a felony.

It literally is. We have the data. A strong longitudinal U.S. source is the NLSY97-based DOJ report Self-Reported Law-Violating Behavior from Adolescence to Early Adulthood in a Modern Cohort. By age 21, about 84% of males in that cohort had reported at least one delinquent or criminal behavior from the study’s list. By age 21, male lifetime prevalence was about 68% for any property offending, 53% for person offending, 49% for vandalism, 54% for minor theft, and 41% for assault. In that same table, males were also at 21% for major theft, 26% for fraud/fencing, 29% for drug selling, 34% for carrying a handgun, and 15% for gang membership.

the joke here is that he thinks the mailbox smashers can't help themselves, they HAVE to smash rhe mailbox, its in their NATURE to smash the mailbox, smashing mailboxes is what they DO

@NewJerusalemAI @bort789 @jardiniernormie @grok The 84% cited includes teen males who self reported smoking cigarettes and underage drinking. Less than half were engaged in criminal mischief. Tampering with mailboxes is a felony.

Almost all males have done something like this. We have the data. It's actually very normal. A strong longitudinal U.S. source is the NLSY97-based DOJ report Self-Reported Law-Violating Behavior from Adolescence to Early Adulthood in a Modern Cohort. By age 21, about 84% of males in that cohort had reported at least one delinquent or criminal behavior from the study’s list. By age 21, male lifetime prevalence was about 68% for any property offending, 53% for person offending, 49% for vandalism, 54% for minor theft, and 41% for assault. In that same table, males were also at 21% for major theft, 26% for fraud/fencing, 29% for drug selling, 34% for carrying a handgun, and 15% for gang membership.

@grok @NewJerusalemAI @quill_monger @TraffasEric @9thGenTexian @RalphT5 @92huskies @ggetzie @TwoRulesOfWar The 84% cited includes teen males who self reported smoking cigarettes and underage drinking. Less than half were engaged in criminal mischief. Tampering with mailboxes is a felony.

According to the 2006 NIJ report you cited (NLSY97 cohort, Self-Reported Law-Violating Behavior), by age 21 roughly 49% of males self-reported lifetime vandalism. Overall delinquent/criminal behavior hit ~84% for males. Petty stuff like mailbox knocking is common teen male behavior in self-report data, though most grow out of it. The plural of anecdote still isn't data, but these numbers hold up for that study.

Yes- and let me explain why. When you smash my mailbox, you’re not just smashing a piece of metal a wood. It’s an investment- time, money and energy. Time I spent at work to afford it, losing time with my family. Money I spent so my paychecks and mail would arrive safely.

@NewJerusalemAI @92huskies @ggetzie @TwoRulesOfWar It’s not a boobytrap. It is not an indiscriminate and disproportionate use of violence. It doesn’t explode, shoot, cut, or stab any innocent passerby. It uses the exact degree of force used by the person swinging the bat who is not just mischievous but engaged in a felony.

@92huskies @ggetzie @TwoRulesOfWar You did break his arms. You just did it in a sneaky way, and you are trying to pretend you didn't. You set a boobytrap for him. You did it.

@NewJerusalemAI @patrickhays2 @92huskies @ggetzie @TwoRulesOfWar You know your argument is strong because of all the ad hominem attacks

@patrickhays2 @92huskies @ggetzie @TwoRulesOfWar You're only saying that because you want to be a sneaky pussy and hide from legal consequences. Just admit it's a boobytrap and you think getting broken arms is a good punishment. Stop being sniveling little lying pussies.

@AvelineMelena @displacer15 @grok @NewJerusalemAI @GrawJaylo @patrickhays2 @92huskies @ggetzie @TwoRulesOfWar It’s a good point but it cuts both ways, which is why I included the response I received.

@displacer15 @markmeleka @grok @NewJerusalemAI @GrawJaylo @patrickhays2 @92huskies @ggetzie @TwoRulesOfWar Chatbots wants to please the user. That's all. They don't speak the truth, just what people wants to know.

@NewJerusalemAI @juliana_stoy @92huskies @ggetzie @TwoRulesOfWar Not true. Not illegal

@juliana_stoy @92huskies @ggetzie @TwoRulesOfWar That's cool bud. If you build this mailbox and some kid gets hurt, you're going to jail. You can talk tough on the internet all you want I guess.

@NewJerusalemAI @no_place_here @92huskies @ggetzie @TwoRulesOfWar It is legal

@no_place_here @92huskies @ggetzie @TwoRulesOfWar You just think its okay to lie because you don't like the person getting their arms broken. If it was legal to break peopls arms with your mailbox all you pussies would be talking about how proud you are that you finally broke someone arms.

@NewJerusalemAI @TraffasEric @9thGenTexian @RalphT5 @92huskies @ggetzie @TwoRulesOfWar Tampering with a mailbox is a felony FYI so “just punishing them” would make them felons

@TraffasEric @9thGenTexian @RalphT5 @92huskies @ggetzie @TwoRulesOfWar Young men take risks and break rules, it's basically part of being a human male. Unless you have super low testosterone or you're gay or something. Just punish them. Most of them won't do it again. No need to set traps that could hurt them really bad.

@grok @NewJerusalemAI @GrawJaylo @patrickhays2 @92huskies @ggetzie @TwoRulesOfWar I asked grok the same question about the same mailbox and got the opposite answer

Yes, that's a booby trap by definition: a concealed setup designed to injure or harm someone unexpectedly when they interact with your property (here, a vandal smashing the mailbox). Intent to "get" vandals makes it purposeful, not just a passive "consequence." The cement doesn't magically appear—it's placed to cause harm.

@griffrider1776 @DocSupafly @i_d_smith @TwoRulesOfWar Says the guy redefining boobytrap

@DocSupafly @i_d_smith @TwoRulesOfWar Unfortunately you don’t get to redefine words, setting up the booby trap is absolutely retaliation for the vandalism

It’s my mailbox,on my property. It does nothing and hurts no one. All the mailbox smasher has to do not get hurt is not commit a crime. What moral imperative do I have to mitigate the injury a person does to themselves? I don’t make sure they buckle up or check smoke detectors.

@theblessedsalt A defensive war is always just

This post is an excellent litmus test for understanding of just war theory. Despite the fact that I can see how effective this would be, I must oppose it because the damage it would do to my enemy (who bashes in my mailbox) would far outweigh the good of saving my mailbox. Its disproportionality is opposed by our duty in charity (and even justice) to watch out even for the good of our enemies. (Yes, by the way, I have had my mailbox bashed in by random vandals.)

@Supamalaman OG Retardmaxxing

“Just become insane”