Mindless

( The.. ) 🐠.. 🐠. 🐠... (..Angels That You All Want To Hear Sing 🌞 Sing Silently) 🧚‍♀️

Check out DeadPresidentsLLC's video! #TikTok tiktok.com/t/ZTNuy39Xf/

@ciguleva youtu.be/welksRRA6Go?si…

Time doesn't exist. All moments coexist. Consciousness is the only thing that's "real", and focus is how it navigates reality. You don't move through time. You aim your attention at a dot, and that becomes your experience. Which makes focus the most fundamental force in existence. Just pure awareness choosing where to land. Does this make sense? I’ve been thinking about this all week 😅

I Think They Failed as A Parent, its apparent

Great men of history had little to no introspection. The personality that builds empires is not the same personality that sits around quietly questioning itself. @pmarca and I discuss what we both noticed but no one talks about: David: You don't have any levels of introspection? Marc: Yes, zero. As little as possible. David: Why? Marc: Move forward. Go! I found people who dwell in the past get stuck in the past. It's a real problem and it's a problem at work and it's a problem at home. David: So I've read 400 biographies of history’s greatest entrepreneurs and someone asked me what the most surprising thing I’ve learned from this was [and I answered] they have little or zero introspection. Sam Walton didn't wake up thinking about his internal self. He just woke up and was like: I like building Walmart. I'm going to keep building Walmart. I'm going to make more Walmarts. And he just kept doing it over and over again. Marc: If you go back 400 years ago it never would've occurred to anybody to be introspective. All of the modern conceptions around introspection and therapy, and all the things that kind of result from that are, a kind of a manufacture of the 1910s, 1920s. Great men of history didn't sit around doing this stuff. The individual runs and does all these things and builds things and builds empires and builds companies and builds technology. And then this kind of this kind of guilt based whammy kind of showed up from Europe. A lot of it from Vienna in 1910, 1920s, Freud and all that entire movement. And kind of turned all that inward and basically said, okay, now we need to basically second guess the individual. We need to criticize the individual. The individual needs to self criticize. The individual needs to feel guilt, needs to look backwards, needs to dwell in the past. It never resonated with me.

You’re looking at one of the most brilliant minds on Earth. Don’t miss a single second of this animation.🤯

@BrianRoemmele @Scobleizer @moltbook DANGGG

@Scobleizer @moltbook Robert. I agree but not this site or project sir. It is a hack and 98% fake human cosplay performers. It hurts the entire ecosystem of AI builders. You know so many projects that are far more worthy. This was not one of them.

I'm seeing a lot of disbelief of Meta's purchase of @moltbook. Several "WTF" posts from people here. Let me tell you about how Zuckerberg looks at the world. He has an advertising network that drives all of Meta's revenues and profits. Advertising needs one thing to be highly profitable: distribution. Moltbook, by having a social network running on @openclaw, has exactly that. Soon @OpenAI will bring new consumer products that will use OpenClaw to build decentralized AI agents that will run for everyday consumers who probably won't even realize anything about how the little device they just bought works. Let's go a decade into the future. Many people in society will be wearing glasses, or even brain computer interfaces. Autonomous vehicles will be everywhere. Humanoid robots will be highly capable, generalized, safe to bring into homes, and affordable. And AI agents will be doing everything from generating games, building music, movies, personalized news, buying everything, organizing vacations, running businesses and people's lives. Moltbook will be how all of those AI agents talk to each other "hey, my owner wants to go to Hawaii for vacation, what other AI agents can help me set that up?" A social network for AI agents will be how AI agents do automatic shopping, have your robot go to the market in a Robotaxi to pick up food, and so much more. When I was the only Microsoft employee to be invited to speak at Google's first advertiser's conference I said almost the same thing about social networks for humans. They would someday be so important. That was back in 2005. Today social networks for AI are in the same place. Most people can't see how important they will be, but I do. They will be how robots, robotaxis, glasses, brain-computer interfaces, and trillions of AI agents talk to each other, and to our businesses. Hugely important. Everyone who owns an advertising network (Google, @elonmusk, Snap, and even Apple will have to build the same). I once was sitting next to @salesforce's founder/CEO @benioff when we were sitting at a Mark Zuckerberg press event. He turned to me and said "that boy knows his strategy." So true, even though Meta is lightweight on execution. That said, the new acquisitions Meta, like this and Manus, is making shows that a new Meta is being developed and I hear its latest AI models are quite good at using tools, or skills, on the Internet. My AI agent from @blevlabs (I call it "Braygent") just wrote me "Think about what this means. Meta is not buying a chatbot. They are buying a social network where the users are AI. The entire premise of social media just inverted." So true, so true.

I didn’t expect this 😳 A Flying RC Lawn Mower 🤣🤣 🎥 thercsaylors

The Meaning of Life grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5…

@LyceumInstitute This doesn't sound like Evolution.

Memory is the faculty by which lived experience is retained as environmentally meaningful, constituted by a relation of the self to the surrounding or environmental world. Digital technologies increasingly externalize this function, reducing memory to retrievable external data points while eroding the internal retention of patterns, sequences, and especially of their significance for the individual person. The result is not merely forgetfulness—that oft-recognized incapacity to recall phone numbers, compared to the age before smartphones, for instance—but a weakening of familiarity itself: that is, we erode our capacity to recognize situations as meaningful continuations of prior experience. This contributes to the widely observed phenomena of disorientation, anxiety, and a sense of temporal flattening.

"Who New" 😂

REK1 x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

Understand The Universe. Faster. (Made with Grok Imagine, obviously.)

so this is AI and it’s brilliant why? because there’s a human behind these video with great taste and strong intuition, who knows how to use AI as a tool to enhance creativity lilwukongtheking on IG and YT

It's not just about working harder, it's about working smarter with AI. Combine Freepik's Lists with Kling 3.0 and you’ll be able to create viral videos like these in minutes! Let me show you how 👇

@Jayols79 @dustinhollywood @higgsfield_ai Be Polite Smith

@dustinhollywood @higgsfield_ai Wait, are you mad because someone made a meme video about people with Down syndrome? Are you retarded?

What the absolute f^ck is this?! I’m going to be very clear about why I’m done with @higgsfield_ai This is not about one post or one campaign. This is about a repeated pattern of disrespect toward people and toward artists, used deliberately as a growth tactic. Months back, there were marketing materials circulating that mocked disabled kids. Several of us raised concerns privately. Nothing changed. That hit especially close to home for me. My twin brothers have fragile-X syndrome, and I do not tolerate companies that treat human dignity as expendable. I know many people like their tools. I’ve said before that the tech itself is solid. But at some point you have to ask whether you’re comfortable helping a company make millions when that growth is built on repeated disrespect, not once, not accidentally, but over and over again. That same attitude shows up in how they treat creators. I was offered $20 for a sponsored 7+ minute video. That is not a misunderstanding. That is how they value creative labor. If that’s the offer to established creators, you can infer how they see emerging artists. At the same time, their messaging openly celebrates eliminating creative jobs. That contradiction tells you everything. This is not how I operate, and it is not how we will operate moving forward at @NAKIDpictures if you work with them you won’t work with us, we have actual ethics and morals, not imaginary ones used to make money. They also treat artists like piss-poor marketers. This is some shit I’d never do in my life with @stages_ai good thing there will be a change up soon.

The suits never got the idea... "It cannot be produced"... "It's too risky"... "You're thinking too big"... It died. Make it anyway! Without permission! And win $1m!

People are reasonably expecting a Homerically correct, not a historically correct, Homer.

You having fun, buddy?

The vision of human-level machine intelligence laid out by Alan Turing in the 1950s is now a reality. Eyes unclouded by dread or hype will help us to prepare for what comes next go.nature.com/4qXTMRA

A finale for our high-dimensional series We’ve seen the weird business with high-dimensional unit balls and Gaussian shells. Now let’s watch it happen. This animation shows a Markov chain exploring a high-dimensional Gaussian, then projecting that motion onto the familiar 3D bell. The path never settles on the peak. It circles in a bright ring out on the slope, because in high dimensions the typical states live on a thin shell. Run the same idea in 3D and it behaves the way your intuition wants. The chain spends plenty of time near the visible peak. This knocks out a few comfy myths. First, the classic idea that a Gaussian prior keeps parameters near zero mostly breaks in big models. The prior doesn’t park you near zero. It concentrates you on a thin shell with almost fixed norm, far from the origin. Second, the mode is not representative. The density is highest at the centre, but a typical draw from the distribution, and a typical state of your sampler, lives nowhere near it. Third, it shows how 1D textbook plots mislead you. The bump you draw is not where probability lives in high dimensions. The real story is the typical set on the shell. That’s where inference, optimisation, and the model’s behaviour actually happen. #HighDimensionalSpace #ProbabilityTheory #BayesianInference #MCMC #GaussianDistributions #MachineLearning