Moonesu./

Pinned!

@hodmudau @QualityQuadry @WTroostEkong He is right. FT score (and AET) of a game cant be overturned

@QualityQuadry @WTroostEkong It is not surprising at all. He is Nigerian after all.

🚨 Ex-Super Eagles 🇳🇬🦅 @WTroostEkong on CAF verdict on Senegal 🇸🇳 🗣 "I watched the final and saw the moment when Senegal 🇸🇳 walked off the pitch. "It was unsportsmanlike behaviour but the referee, Jean-Jacques Ndala, had the power to stop the game and award Morocco a 3-0 victory at the time. "The moment both sides agreed to carry on playing, the match must surely be decided by what happens on the pitch."

@Bellickcrypt @DaraProtocol @dee_cypha @fattylincorn_01 You're stvpid to say this.

@moonesu @DaraProtocol @dee_cypha @fattylincorn_01 It’s not just Muslims, there are Christians boko haram but they’re disguise as Muslim.

Nobody is attributing this to any religion thank God! Just imagine this is ILORIN OR MINNA?😭

@DaraProtocol @dee_cypha @Bellickcrypt @fattylincorn_01 Why are southern Christians not sponsored to carry weapons to kill and bomb religious centers and barracks in the name of Jesus Christ? Why is it always Muslims all over the world?

@dee_cypha @Bellickcrypt @fattylincorn_01 Look at you calling their name but you didn't acknowledge they are being sponsored by the government. See how your eyes is blinded from western propaganda

Math trick Ask someone to name a two-digit number. Let’s say the person calls out 13. You then write down 13 and keep writing consecutive numbers until you have 10 numbers in total: 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 What’s the sum of these numbers? All you need to do is find the 5th number from the left, which is 17. Then simply put a 5 to that number to get 175—and that’s the sum! Let’s try another example. Suppose for 69. You write: 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78 The 5th number from the left is 73. Put a 5 to get 735—and that’s the sum! This trick works for any positive whole number. You can even try it with three-digit numbers, like 420: 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429 The 5th number from the left is 424, and appending a 5 gives 4245, which is the sum.

“The Sahel (Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger) and climate change are responsible for terrorism in Nigeria” Tinubu What an IDIOT!

@didrogba99 @AnthonyAji7492 He said they get killed. Christians don't kill fellow Christians

@AnthonyAji7492 That fear is putten I place to instill discipline

Can we agree that Muslims are religiously disciplined than Christians?

@Haqiqatjou Bro Muslims can lie and misquote people oo😂😂 Without lies and hatred and intimidation Islam is DEAD

@Aashfinn You make someone believe every girl in Hijab always have low IQ

Nigeria Christians what’s up???

@Praise_Ffs Here's how we do it!

How did Chelsea fans do it? 😂😂

@JamesStone909 @Jamallyon001 @TECNOMobileNG Same as me

@Jamallyon001 @TECNOMobileNG I start from 12 after I used H5

Every blurry shot and every missed moment ends today. From a camera that captures clear shots at any distance, to the AI Health Assistant that monitors your health, to the battery that lasts all day, you’re about to enjoy real good with the CAMON 50 Series.

@musing_monica The winner is Maggi

Colgate did branding so well that some people still call every toothpaste- Colgate!

@ayoub_AL6 @Reuters So Senegal have a strong case?

@Reuters Morocco resuming doesn't change anything, because it's the referee that resumes or stops, if morocco refuses, they would have made the same mistake senegal has made, it's not withing the teams' right to refuse play, it's up to the referee's whistle.

Sports lawyer Adedeji-Ajoje Israel says that Senegal has a strong case to appeal CAF’s decision to strip them of the African title, arguing Morocco waived its forfeiture rights by resuming play reut.rs/3PiAlVA

@ciceroofny @AdedotunTaiwo @ayotem4real @woye1 @LouisChidube I don't believe in Shango rubbbish. You're just foœlish to believe a loan is the best options for students. Students who have been frustrated don't want to reapply, some who do believe they're not gonna pay back in a wicked taxmaster regime. A fooœl you are.

@moonesu @AdedotunTaiwo @ayotem4real @woye1 @LouisChidube You’re a fuckin liar and a degenerate sock fuck . May Shango Olukoso kpai you .

See Achievement

@woye1 @AdedotunTaiwo @ayotem4real @LouisChidube Some parents you claim are happy their wards are applying are doing so cos they believe it's a free money. Go around and ask students applying for those 95% will tell you they're not paying back. But we know in Tinubu's anti people tax laws, they will pay with their blood

@woye1 @AdedotunTaiwo @ayotem4real @LouisChidube The application has increased by what? I told you most of those who have applied are not willing to reapply because of the loopholes and frustration in the system. This is fact. Some students have not received their upkeep for over 3 months now.

@LORD_VALAR_ @DanBurmawy @amasad @KhalilJeries That's archaic way of thinking "all religions didn't practice it?" Those religions have left that behind because it's very archaic and against modern way of life, except for Islam who still think we're living in 1400 years ago. And for the actual facts about tech, he is right.

@DanBurmawy @amasad @KhalilJeries Bro what a dumb fuck you are .Arguing first about tech and then bringing endogamy like historically all religions didn't practiced it and even some in middle east like orthodox jews and druze practice way more tougher than muslims and it's US not your sectarian land

This was so controversial to say last year. Now it’s basically a fact—they’re adding to the Python stdlib.

@AdedotunTaiwo @ayotem4real @woye1 @LouisChidube The Nelfund scheme is a failure already. Students are regretting even getting it and some any students have refused to reapply for next session. A loan is not an achievement. Investment in education is. Affordable fees is. Conducive learning environment and facilities is.

@moonesu @ayotem4real @woye1 @LouisChidube Is anyone denying that. This is a no interest loan. You pay back same amount borrowed. Many parents are borrowing at huge interest rate to even pay their children sch fees. This remove pressure on parents and ensure that children are not dropping out of schools

CAF's Appeal Board ruled yesterday that in application of Article 84 of the AFCON Regulations, the Senegal National Team is declared to have forfeited the 2025 AFCON final, with the result recorded as 3-0 in favour of Morocco. But there are at least four serious legal arguments that suggest this ruling is not as clean as CAF wants you to believe. I am an International Sports Lawyer. Let me walk you through all of them. Are you still with me? Good. But first, let us be fair to Morocco because their case deserves to be understood properly before we interrogate it. Articles 82 and 84 of the AFCON Regulations state clearly that if a team refuses to play or leaves the ground before the regular end of the match without the authorisation of the referee, it shall be considered the loser and eliminated from the competition, with the result recorded as 3-0 against them. On January 18, coach Pape Thiaw ordered his players off the pitch after two consecutive decisions went against Senegal in the space of ninety seconds. First, a Senegal goal was disallowed for a foul by Abdoulaye Seck on Achraf Hakimi, despite replays showing minimal contact. Then, immediately after, a VAR review awarded Morocco a penalty. The players left. Only Sadio Mane stayed. The match was suspended for around fifteen minutes. The regulation does not say "unless you come back." It says without the referee's authorisation. Senegal left without permission. Morocco read the rule, applied it, and appealed on that basis. On a textual reading, that case is solid. And here is the extra layer Morocco will lean on heavily. What precedent does it set if a team can walk off a pitch for fifteen minutes in protest over a refereeing decision in an AFCON final, return, and still keep the trophy? Every team in every future tournament now knows that if they disagree with a decision, they can walk off, regroup, come back, and face zero sporting consequence for it. The regulation exists precisely to prevent that kind of leverage over match officials and the integrity of competition. You cannot run a tournament if teams can temporarily abandon matches without consequence. That is the strongest version of their case. Now let us talk about why it is not the full story. The first argument Senegal can make is “qui approbat non reprobat”. It is a Latin principle that means you cannot approbate and reprobate at the same time. You cannot accept the benefit of a situation and then challenge the basis of it. After Senegal returned to the pitch, Morocco participated fully in the resumption. They contested the penalty. They played thirty minutes of extra time. They accepted the sporting outcome of that period without walking off themselves. By continuing to play after Senegal returned, Morocco accepted the resumption as legitimate. They cannot now argue the match should be treated as abandoned when they were active participants in its conclusion. That tension will not be lost on a CAS panel. The second argument is proportionality, and this is arguably the strongest one Senegal has. This ruling is without precedent in the history of AFCON and indeed the highest level of international football. The regulation was designed for teams that abandon matches entirely. Teams that refuse to take the field. Teams that do not return. A fifteen minute protest followed by a full return, a completed penalty, thirty minutes of extra time, and a winner determined through sporting competition is not abandonment in any meaningful sense of the word. Applying a forfeit provision designed for total withdrawal to a completed match, where both teams participated in the full ninety minutes plus extra time, is a disproportionate application of a rule to circumstances it was never designed to cover. CAS has consistently held that sanctions must be proportionate to the actual harm caused. The match was completed. That distinction matters enormously in proportionality analysis. The third is Law 5.2 of the IFAB Laws of the Game, which states that the referee's decisions regarding facts connected with play are final. Referee Jean-Jacques Ndala chose to wait for Senegal's return. He chose to resume the match. He administered the penalty, oversaw extra time, and brought the fixture to its conclusion. In doing so, he made a decision connected with the conduct of play. The question Senegal's lawyers should be asking is whether the referee's decision to resume constitutes a final decision that CAF's administrative bodies cannot retrospectively override. This however is not a settled question in football law. FIFA has never fully resolved the boundary between referee authority under the Laws of the Game and governing body authority under competition regulations. That unresolved tension is exactly the kind of legal crack a well-argued CAS appeal exploits. The fourth argument goes beyond Senegal entirely. The CAF Appeal Board set aside the earlier CAF Disciplinary Board decision, which had opted for light sanctions and allowed the result to stand. Two separate bodies in one governing organisation had the same set of facts and polar opposite rulings. That internal contradiction is not just a procedural embarrassment. It is evidence that the application of Articles 82 and 84 to these specific facts was genuinely contested even within CAF itself. CAF's own rulings confirmed that Morocco's federation was sanctioned for ball boy misconduct involving interference with the towel of Senegal goalkeeper Edouard Mendy, and for laser use by the home crowd, conduct that directly contributed to the environment that caused Senegal to walk off. A competent legal team will and should use all of that. Finally,  here is the consequence that stretches far beyond this one final. Every federation under CAF's jurisdiction, every club in the CAF Champions League, every national team in every AFCON qualifier, now has to reckon with a new reality. A result confirmed on a pitch, validated by a referee, and celebrated by a nation is no longer necessarily final. If a governing body can strip a champion two months after the trophy was lifted, on the basis of conduct that did not prevent the match from reaching its conclusion, then every result in African football is now theoretically contestable in a boardroom long after the final whistle. The losing side in any match where a protest or walkout occurred, however brief, however resolved, now has a legal template to point at. It means one can file a complaint, escalate to the Appeal Board and cite Articles 82 and 84. The CAF Appeal Board has just demonstrated that the outcome is not guaranteed to be what happened on the pitch. That is not a stable foundation for any football competition to operate on. It does not just affect Senegal and Morocco. It affects every federation that competes under CAF's umbrella, because all of them now know that the boardroom is open for business long after the referee has blown the final whistle. FIFA will be watching this CAS appeal very closely. Because if CAS upholds it, the template may not stay in Africa. The Senegalese Football Federation Secretary General Abdoulaye Seydou Sow has already stated they will appeal to CAS, calling the ruling a travesty with no legal foundation. He is not wrong to go there. The internal contradiction between CAF's two bodies alone gives them a genuine platform. CAS operates independently of CAF and has overturned governing body decisions before when the proportionality and procedural arguments are strong enough. Senegal lifted a trophy, celebrated a nation and went home as champions. Two months later, a boardroom took it away. Whether the rule was correctly applied or not, one question African football cannot avoid is this: if two separate bodies within the same organisation cannot agree on what the rule means, on what basis should a nation lose a title they won on the pitch? That is the question CAS will have to answer. And how they answer it will shape the boundaries of what football administrators can do to results that were already decided by sport. My name is Ajoje. I am a FIFA Licensed Agent and International Sports Lawyer. I write on the Law and Business of Football, a lot. Repost and Follow if you want to read more posts like this.

@ayotem4real @woye1 @AdedotunTaiwo @LouisChidube It's a Loan.

@woye1 @AdedotunTaiwo @LouisChidube My Niece Got this without knowing anybody We're relieved.....😂😂 Tinubu is the Best President Ever

@sepril23NG Na why I dey use opay for my transactions be dat. If my app no top up, u go wait o. I will even advice you to transfer u money to opay before u can transfer it to me.

Apparently these boys going viral went a phone dealer to by iPhones for their girlfriends, which amount to 5m They allegedly did fake alert and luckily the phone dealer caught them on time