Nick Wall

@BeckySpooner1 @ZoomalianSlayer @LakotaMan1 @sorchaDe indians migrated from siberia, there is no such thing as natives

@ZoomalianSlayer @LakotaMan1 @sorchaDe Who is talking about Siberians?

Your daily reminder that Native Americans weren’t granted citizenship, of our own land, until the until Indian Citizenship Act was passed in 1924.

@krassenstein we wish you’d leave, sadly this is probably a aprils fool joke

I am officially leaving X. Please follow on Instagram:@krassensteins TikTok: @krassenstein Facebook: @krassensteins The toxicity here is unbearable and MAGA is in shambles with $4.10 gas prices. We’ve done our job.

@PoorWorkHabits @CKDeGods @GeraldoRivera yeah the one guy who wrote the law 🤦‍♂️

@CKDeGods @GeraldoRivera It says that one guy had an opinion about what the amendment ought to do based on a piss-poor understanding of the word "jurisdiction" even under its common meaning in 1868.

The president is right. The 14th Amendment was originally intended to embrace slaves and the children of slaves. Its passage in 1868, made it unconstitutional to deny citizenship to all children born here. Example: Despite odious attempts over the years to deny them, all Native Americans are (the original) citizens. So are all other babies who in Bruce Springsteen’s words were “Born in the USA.”

@BeingJWood and democrats don’t? remind me aren’t POtUS support to protect the border not open it up for people to walk through? Biden also was adjucated for violating the 1A…….

Republicans cherry-pick the Constitution like Christians cherry-pick the Bible.

@HazeyDaisey17 Trumps XO is the reason SCOTUS is hearing the arguement. He wrote it knowing it would be challenged and theyed have to rule on it. same with banning mail in votes

The issue isn't who is a citizen. The issue is whether the President can override the Constitution. And, no he cannot. If you want to change the Constitution, there's a way to do that. And, these assholes know they don't have the support to do it.

@KeithGross @POTUS can’t even pass the save act, how are they going pass one on citizenship…

As everyone is focused on the SCOTUS hearing on @POTUS Executive Order ending Birthright Citizenship, I can’t help but wonder: Why hasn’t Congress passed a LAW ending birthright citizenship? We have a majority.

@conro @kelticboy @clarksonlawson_ strange they did it with roe vs wade

@kelticboy @clarksonlawson_ No. You do not create law via a SCOTUS decision.

The job of SCOTUS is not to subjectively determine whether a law is stupid. Their job is to interpret the Constitution and rule on whether a law violates it. If MAGA wants to end birthright citizenship, they should pursue a constitutional amendment. If you don’t like the separation of powers our Constitution outlines, then leave the country. Your ignorance is anti-American and incompatible with the principles this country was founded on.

@acnewsitics and subject to the jurisdiction…. you left out. key part

The 14th Amendment literally starts with ‘All persons born… are citizens.’ There’s no asterisk. If it was a loophole, it wouldn’t have lasted 150+ years of legal scrutiny.

@ColonyScotland @HQNewsNow come on now with 3 marriages he spent more time in a church….

Trump: On Palm Sunday, Jesus entered Jerusalem as crowds welcomed him with praise honoring him as king. They call me king now. Can you believe it?

@JackPosobiec no, then there’s the issue of wether or not the election was stolen…..

I will ask this again: Was Ketanji Brown Jackson a legally-commissioned Supreme Court Justice if the person who appointed her lacked mental capacity?

@jassonohio @CT_RSTA @RonFilipkowski my ass was in daycare, and my parents payed for it. didn’t rely on the government for handouts or feel entitled enough to demand they pay for it. a majority of parents chose to have kids and they should have to pay for them not me

@CT_RSTA @RonFilipkowski You fucking idiot You say that to try and rub people the wrong way I bet anything your ass was in daycare. Go and sit with Mom (she's upstairs) and have her tell you about how you had to go to daycare while she worked, and that the $ spent could have been spent on you. Bitch

Trump just cut a midterm ad for every Democrat in America.

@NewswirePatriot remove them. there allegiance is to islam not the us

Some Muslims in the US Military are asking to be classified as "Conscientious Objectors," arguing that fighting other Muslims violates their conscience and religious beliefs. ❓️: Should Muslim Service Members be granted this special exemption?

@VerumVulnero1 why? the 2A says shall not be infringed, yet they’d continue to infringed. seen the bill about to be sogned in va

If you really hate birthright citizenship, propose a new amendment to clarify that the 14th amendment applies only to the children of mothers here legally with the intention of long-term residence. I don’t know if that passes, but it absolutely has very real support.

@VinceDaoTV wong kim’s parents were resident aliens, not illegal therefore he was entitled to citizenship as they were subject to the jurisdiction

The internet didn’t exist in 1791, but the First Amendment still applies. Modern guns didn’t exist in 1791, but the Second Amendment still applies. In the same spirit: illegal aliens and birth tourists didn’t exist in 1865, but the spirit and intent of the framers must be applied. The historical evidence is clear that they never intended for anchor babies to be a thing. That’s why they wrote “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” in the text and banned birthright citizenship from Indians, foreign visitors, and invading forces. Even the Wong Kim Ark case, which liberals have used to justify birthright citizenship since 1898, did not give citizenship to Indians or foreign ambassadors. It also doesn’t consider the modern understandings of immigration, illegal aliens, or tourists — because those things didn’t exist. Wong Kim Ark basically tried to say that children of immigrants are citizens (like Wong Kim Ark himself was). But tourists, guest workers, and foreign students aren’t immigrants. Neither are illegal aliens.

@MomAngtrades smartest person who can’t define what a woman is

Ketanji Brown-Jackson is the smartest person to ever serve in the Supreme Court. We are soo blessed to have her excellence and knowledge. Girl power!

@HQNewsNow he’s not wrong and it’s not on tax payers to subsidize daycare

The White House has removed this video from their social media channels. But not before we could post it.

@Rep_Stansbury weird to appreacate a judge who can’t define what a woman is….how could she stand for thier rights if she doesn’t know what one is?

This is a Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson appreciation post. That is all! 💕🙏

@Folon15 @guajar7413 @anyonewantchips @Cathryn12164403 Funny democrats repeats and lies for their gullible devotees. Russian collusion, pre tapes, most safe and secure election i could go on

@guajar7413 @anyonewantchips @Cathryn12164403 Donald is a depraved damaged man. He lies constantly and repeats his lies often to brainwash his gullible devotees. How sad for them, and for our country. Bye troll7413.

Anita Hill warned us about Clarence Thomas. Hillary Clinton warned us about Samuel Alito. Christine Blasey Ford warned us about Brett Kavanaugh. E Jean Carroll warned us about Trump. If only their warnings were taken seriously.

@TokyoTom2020 @ScottThuman your post is whataboutism. Fact is J6 was a protest turned riot. Storming buildings and disrupting services becasue they don’t get what they want is solely on the left. my post referenced a time when people did attack scotus over a ruling.

@nickdanewall @ScottThuman “Whataboutism” supposed to provoke me to a response? Take that one up with a leftists or a registered Dem, not me.

The court sketches of President Trump sitting in at the Supreme Court today as justices weighed his actions to limit 'birthright citizenship'. Trump is the first sitting President to attend proceedings. He stayed just about an hour and left during the defense's arguments. After court adjourned, Trump posted on Truth Social: “We are the only Country in the World STUPID enough to allow ‘Birthright’ Citizenship!” Actually, about three dozen countries, nearly all of them in the Americas, guarantee citizenship to children born on their territory, per Associated Press.

@ForwardCarolina @Orbital_Lexicon it’s not.The minutes from discussing the bill it was very clear alien births weren’t included as they weren’t subject to the jurisdiction.Similar to the indians who wasn’t made citizens when it was ratified. if the 14th meant all people, you wouldn t have needed a new law

@Orbital_Lexicon You're welcome to hold any opinion you like about how the U.S. Constitution should be changed (or not), but the point is that birthright citizenship is very clearly protected under it today.

Here's the thing: if you oppose birthright citizenship, that's an opinion you're allowed to hold. It's a free country. It means you support changing the United States Constitution, which very clearly and explicitly says anyone born on American soil is a citizen. But pretending that the U.S. Constitution doesn't say that, just because you don't like it, is a silly child's game. Birthright citizenship is a foundational principle of what America is all about, and no President, no matter how ignorant or delusional, is able to change that with the stroke of a pen. That's just not how America works. 🇺🇸