Oby base.eth ✱,✱ ⚡️ZugChain

Day 31 — The Invisible Layer of the Internet Most people think the internet is just apps. Websites. Social media. Crypto. But underneath it all is a physical network of fiber cables, routers, and propagation paths moving data across the world. Data doesn’t teleport. It travels. And every millisecond shapes how information spreads across the network. Software runs on physics. @get_optimum To learn more about 𝐎𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐮𝐦: Website : getoptimum.xyz Follow 𝐗 : @get_optimum Join 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝 : discord.gg/getoptimum Docs : docs.getoptimum.xyz youtube : @get_optimum" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@get_optimum

@solsticefi Hap hap

Don’t let the bad bunnies steal your yield. Happy Easter. Take your eggs back.

@nesaorg @billions_ntwk Good combination

Nesa X Billions Network As real-world AI deployment continues to scale, trusted and secure identity verification becomes essential. That’s why Nesa is partnering with @billions_ntwk, to enable secure verification across our infrastructure.

@chrysnthmm_xyz @apyx_fi thanks for telling me about @apyx_fi

I first heard about @apyx_fi through Indonesian web3 community on Telegram and honestly my first reaction was curiosity more than anything else, so I did what I always do which is research everything before touching it. Team backgrounds, product mechanics, what they're actually building and why, all of it was findable because every founding contributor is doxxed and has a clear track record which is not something you see often enough in this space. the more I dug in the more convinced I became, and what really got me was the narrative itself since it felt genuinely fresh rather than another variation of something that already exists. Joined the Discord shortly after and the folks are welcoming and actually helpful rather than just hype though it's kinda quiet over there, and I've tried to stay active since then by helping newcomers who come in with questions and contributing however I can because at the end of the day we all want this to work. I even committed apxUSD from day one after going down the rabbit hole, small amount but it was a deliberate decision and I've been building from there. the pips are not a lot but they're mine and I'm proud of every single one of them. @apyGOAT

@oxdfahmadd @get_optimum @blockchainjeff Thank you

@obyzcrypto @get_optimum @blockchainjeff Nice post

Day 38 — Designing for Reality Networks are chaotic by nature. Loss, delay, inconsistency all normal. Traditional systems try to correct this. RLNC does something different: It accepts it. And builds on top of it. That’s why it scales. @get_optimum @blockchainjeff @CryptoSundayz To learn more about 𝐎𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐮𝐦: Website : getoptimum.xyz Follow 𝐗 : @get_optimum Join 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝 : discord.gg/getoptimum Docs : docs.getoptimum.xyz youtube : @get_optimum" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@get_optimum

@Watt2Trade gm

80% of all rewards in the Watt2Trade program are reserved for traders. ⚡ Read that again. Every trade you make earns you WXP. Even your very first one. And once you cross a certain volume threshold, your rewards per trade double. Same effort, bigger bag. The math is simple: → More trades = more WXP → More volume = higher tier → Higher tier = 2x rewards per trade The rewards portal is live and the trading pool is wide open. The earlier you start, the more you stack. This is the edge most people haven't seen yet.

🤖 Community Question: Do multi-agent systems truly scale healthcare or just scale complexity? Viewpoint A: Scalable Coordination Healthcare workflows are too complex for a single agent. Multi-agent systems split tasks, cross-check outputs, and improve efficiency at scale, especially in areas like care coordination and prior authorization. With the right guardrails, they offer a practical path forward. Viewpoint B: Compounding Risk More agents also mean more risk. Errors can cascade, decisions become harder to explain, and accountability gets blurred. As systems grow, governance becomes more difficult and scaling too early increases exposure. 👇 Drop A or B and share your perspective

@rynelsz @get_optimum @blockchainjeff Always. Because math doesn’t assume - it proves.

@obyzcrypto @get_optimum @blockchainjeff in math we trust

@ekinoks_26 @get_optimum @blockchainjeff Exactly adaptability ,rigidity. Networks evolve, systems should too.

@obyzcrypto @get_optimum @blockchainjeff Traditional systems are too rigid you are pushing boundaries with a more adaptive approach that really intrigues me

@HanumD3e @get_optimum @blockchainjeff Gmum hanum

@obyzcrypto @get_optimum @blockchainjeff gMum shino

@maxi425784 @get_optimum Gmum ! Ema

Battle of the Codes: Why RLNC Beats Reed Solomon for Blockchain Data Propagation. One of the most insightful topics @get_optimum has been sharing lately is their detailed comparison between different erasure coding methods specifically Random Linear Network Coding (RLNC) versus the more commonly used Reed Solomon and Fountain codes. Prof. @MurielMedard and the team call it the Battle of the Codes, and it explains a lot about why blockchains still feel slow even when execution is fast. Traditional gossip (no coding) keeps copying and resending the entire message repeatedly. It works, but it wastes bandwidth and creates delays. Reed Solomon, used by chains like Solana, improves on that by breaking data into fixed coded pieces. It’s better than plain gossip, but it has a big limitation: nodes can only forward the exact pieces they received. If a node misses too many packets, the whole chain of forwarding can stall. The inefficiency grows as the network expands. RLNC works differently and better. It turns data into flexible, randomly mixed shards that nodes can recode on the fly before forwarding. Every transmission stays useful. Receivers only need enough shards to rebuild the original message, even if some are lost or delayed. This eliminates cumulative loss between hops and scales beautifully with network size. The results are striking: - Much lower redundancy - Faster propagation (Optimum’s mump2p already shows 5 to 6× improvement) - Better resilience under real world conditions @get_optimum blog and recent videos dive deep into the math, but the takeaway is clear: RLNC isn’t just a small upgrade it’s the only method that truly scales without trade offs in decentralized networks. While many projects focus on faster execution or more storage, @get_optimum is solving the hidden bottleneck in how data actually moves. That’s why their approach feels fresh and fundamentally different. @blockchainjeff @f1nk1r

@chrysnthmm_xyz Great ram jujur saja aku membaca ini sampai selesai

Weekly Office Hours #5 — RECAP Speakers: Pete Humiston (host), Parker White, Joseph Onorati — all founding contributors at Apyx ───────────────────────── TVL & Growth apxUSD total supply crossed $80M this week, approaching $85M — a significant week-over-week jump. The team had internally been betting on hitting $100M before the weekend. People are hungry for yield in a down market, and Apyx offers double-digit returns in a transparent way — just holding publicly listed preferred shares — compared to alternatives like basis trading, reinsurance, or private credit that either yield less or carry transparency concerns. Private credit liquidity issues in particular have been pushing people toward instruments like apxUSD. On the growth specifics: the USDC Morpho markets are live and seeing traction, Pendle is still the biggest source of new user flow, and this week had some of the highest TVL growth days since launch. Third Eye, a liquid crypto fund, also publicly announced they took a position — they came in on their own without being solicited. The Resolve exploit and the Drift hack on Solana likely froze capital and slowed momentum this week. Neither event is a kill shot for the ecosystem, but Apyx is taking lessons seriously — adding delays on admin contract actions, additional monitoring, and further hardening infrastructure. The Drift attack in particular appeared highly sophisticated, potentially Lazarus-level. ───────────────────────── Base Launch Apyx deployed to Base, making it the second chain after Ethereum. The Base team reached out and expressed interest, they have strong distribution, and bridging to Base is significantly easier than bridging to Solana. The plan was always to be multi-chain from day one — this is the start of the Apyx expansion, not the end of it. Solana is still on the roadmap. ───────────────────────── Morpho Markets There are now 8 active Morpho markets for Apyx-touching assets. The most active is the PT-apyUSD/USDC market, which enables looping: deposit PT-apyUSD as collateral, borrow USDC, buy more PT-apyUSD. As long as the PT yield exceeds the borrow cost, users can lever up. This market is nearly fully utilized right now — Morpho rates will climb until equilibrium is reached. Users can also express a variety of views on the protocol across the different markets combined with Pendle positions. ───────────────────────── Q&A Q (Ram): Any thoughts on current market conditions? Most token launches have been performing poorly. If the Apyx launch window arrives and the market is still slow, do you delay or push through regardless? The plan is to push through on the current timeline. TGE valuations across the board are lower than they've been, but the product is genuinely strong — significant traction already, and a lot of incoming diligence requests from institutions and partners. The TGE and airdrop timeline has already been published, as have the intended tokenomics and fee mechanisms for the APYX governance token. The framing: Apyx is building digital money on top of digital credit — the product doesn't disappear if the TGE doesn't happen at a massive valuation. If it launches at a lower valuation, there's room to climb from there. ───────────────────────── Q (RevengeLong): There are two Curve pools for apyUSD/apxUSD — one has almost 10x the TVL but the smaller one has all the volume. What's the thinking there? The first pool was created with fees too low and amplification too high, which opened up an arbitrage vector. The attack: buy STRC before ex-dividend, collect the dividend, flip into apyUSD to double-dip on yield, then exit and repeat — effectively lowering yield for all passive apyUSD holders. The 30-day withdrawal lock eliminates this for the vault, but the team recognized some users don't want to be locked for 30 days. So the new Curve pool was designed as an instant exit mechanism, with higher fees and lower amplification so the slippage makes the arbitrage uneconomical. The old pool simply hasn't been cleaned up yet — it wasn't a priority since barely anyone committed liquidity there (~$12K committed). Both pools are technically incentivized for points via the commit contract, but almost nobody is using it. The higher fee on the new pool is also expected to attract more LPs over time, potentially making it more liquid even with the higher fee. If Strategy ever increases STRC payment frequency — say to 15 days — that would allow Apyx to meaningfully reduce the lockup period and adjust the pool structure accordingly. ───────────────────────── Q (Elsavadore): How does Apyx prevent getting hacked? We've seen a lot of protocols exploited recently. Attack vectors are extremely varied — in Drift's case the contracts themselves worked as intended, yet it still got hit. Here's what Apyx has in place: • 3 independent security audits completed before launch. All findings remediated, all PRs and audit reports are publicly available on the docs page. • Audits are ongoing for new contracts. The Base team also offered to facilitate an additional audit. • Stablecoin holdings and mint/redeem operations run via offline multi-sig. • Built-in mechanisms specifically around mint/redeem functionality, detailed in the published blog post on apxUSD minting controls. On the overall structure: off-chain it's most similar to USDC or Tether — just holding publicly listed securities. On-chain the contract structure is closer to Ethena. The intentional simplicity means fewer moving parts, a smaller attack surface, and easier auditing. Admin key revocation is being considered as a future step, which would make the contracts immutable. A de-peg is a market-based risk that exists and can't be fully eliminated, but it's something users can model and manage — a different category of risk from a contract exploit.

@nesaorg I tryo model everyday

Same prompt. Different outcomes. With over 100,000 models now available on Nesa, you can find the perfect model for your project. Start experimenting today 👇 beta.nesa.ai

@Autheo_Network Gtheo

▂╱▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔╲ ╲ ▕ ▏ gTheo ▏ ▕ ▕ ╲▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂╱

@nesaorg Gnesa

Consumers care about speed, accessibility, and ease of use. Enterprises care about data privacy, audibility, and risk mitigation. Real adoption requires infrastructure that can satisfy the needs of both. That’s what Nesa is built for.

@Autheo_Network Gtheo

$THEO TGE is coming. Here's what you need to know. 1/ Every transaction, compute, storage and AI task runs on $THEO 2/ Fees are reinvested Strengthens the network and reduces costs over time 3/ Builders stake to build Access tools and scale with $THEO 4/ Secured by staking Validators and delegators keep it running 5/ AI and compute demand More usage drives demand by design 6/ Governance included Holders shape the future Not just a token. But a working economy. Position accordingly 🤝

Locked in. So close it’s visible, still far enough to hurt. The distance isn’t denial it’s preparation.